Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Series Prediction for 76ers vs. Raptors?

76ers in 4
22
4%
76ers in 5
48
9%
76ers in 6
97
18%
76ers in 7
54
10%
Raps in 4
40
8%
Raptors in 5
14
3%
Raptors in 6
190
36%
Raptors in 7
64
12%
 
Total votes: 529

User avatar
TheBoi10
General Manager
Posts: 9,553
And1: 11,891
Joined: Apr 13, 2018
 

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#461 » by TheBoi10 » Tue Apr 12, 2022 9:44 pm

everdiso wrote:Siakam has steadily improved over the course of the season after recovering from shoulder surgery and in his last 20gms averaged 27.0pts (52.4/36.6/7/.9), 8.8rb, 5.6ast/2.6to.

I think we can all agree that those are legit stud #1 numbers, so the question is whether that stretch was just a long hot streak or if this is the level of player he's finally actually developed into.


More specifically in the Philly matchup Siakam averaged 30.3/8.7/8.3 (50.7 FG%,14.3 3P%, 86.4 FT%, 57.8 TS%). Looked like the best player in the series, really optimal matchup.
User avatar
Lunartic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,087
And1: 9,755
Joined: Nov 28, 2015

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#462 » by Lunartic » Tue Apr 12, 2022 9:45 pm

Playoff experience really isn't that important, talent wins playoffs games, not experience.

Unfortunately, Sixers probably win in 7 just because Embiid is going to have Siakam and anyone else that tries to guard him in foul trouble. He gets the friendliest whistle in the entire league. FVV is going to need to average 25+ for the Raps.

I'm rooting for the Raps
User avatar
everdiso
General Manager
Posts: 7,832
And1: 10,207
Joined: Nov 18, 2008

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#463 » by everdiso » Tue Apr 12, 2022 10:01 pm

TheBoi10 wrote:
everdiso wrote:Siakam has steadily improved over the course of the season after recovering from shoulder surgery and in his last 20gms averaged 27.0pts (52.4/36.6/7/.9), 8.8rb, 5.6ast/2.6to.

I think we can all agree that those are legit stud #1 numbers, so the question is whether that stretch was just a long hot streak or if this is the level of player he's finally actually developed into.


More specifically in the Philly matchup Siakam averaged 30.3/8.7/8.3 (50.7 FG%,14.3 3P%, 86.4 FT%, 57.8 TS%). Looked like the best player in the series, really optimal matchup.


Head to Head is small sample of course but still at least a bit interesting to look at.

Vs PHI/TOR

Siakam 3gms, 38.3mpg, 30.3pts (50.7/14.3/86.4), 8.7rb, 8.3ast/2.7to
Embiid 3gms, 36.2mpg, 29.0pts (46.6/20.0/83.8), 11.3rb, 2.7ast/2.7to

VanVleet 1gms, 40.2mpg, 32.0pts (50.0/54.5/100.0), 6.0rb, 7.0ast/1 0to
Harden 3gms, 38.6mpg, 19.3pts (40.9/22.2/81.8), 7.7rb, 10.3ast/3.7to


Philly really can't afford to have this happen again during this series.
"I wasn't gonna act surprised - cuz I wasn't surprised."
User avatar
cupcakesnake
Senior Mod- WNBA
Senior Mod- WNBA
Posts: 15,693
And1: 32,281
Joined: Jul 21, 2016
 

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#464 » by cupcakesnake » Tue Apr 12, 2022 10:03 pm

skones wrote:
jamaalstar21 wrote:
This is a weird argument. Neither of these rosters are particularly inexperienced. The Raps have a decent group of vets that are in the rotation: Thaddeus Young, Siakam, and FVV have all played around 50 playoff games apiece. Embiid has played 34. Harden has played over 130 but how have the playoffs general gone for Harden? I think your point would be worth making if one of these 2 teams were young and inexperienced, but both of them are kind of mixed groups. I'd probably overall give Toronto the edge here because so many of their core players (and coach) have played together for so much longer.

Also: Siakam was better than Harden this year. Full stop. Even if you want to make an argument for Harden's offense, you're comparing a guy who will get all-defense votes to one of the crappiest defenders in the league.


Put me in the camp that thinks it's a "weird" to call an argument a "weird argument" while discounting playoff experience because "how have they gone for Harden" and neglecting to look objectively and the performance of FVV and Siakam in roles relevant to their current standing on the team.

Also: Harden is superior to Siakam in BPM, VORP, WS/48, EPM, LEBRON, and RAPTOR. That's a lot of smoke.


Sorry to call your argument weird.
I should say it's atypical to point out playoff experience discrepancies when the discrepancies aren't huge. I get it when it's a young team vs. a very experienced team, but Phili and Toronto are neither. I'm sure the total playoff minutes of each teams top 9 rotation would tilt Phili, but that's mostly due to Danny Green and Harden being older players still in rotations (if you want to make an argument for how Paul Millsap or Deandre Jordan's playoff experience is going to be a big factor in this series, go for it.) We're looking at 2 teams with good playoff experience. Since the value of playoff experience is hard to qualify, I just don't see a reason to think Phili has some great advantage here. But fair enough if you think it does.

I'm out on Harden, man. I don't care that there's still a statistical case for him. I've been a Harden defender basically every year until this one. His hamstring isn't right, his scoring is broken, and he refuses to play defense in most situations. I get that there are plenty of advanced stats that like Harden. He gets boatloads of assists and free throws, and those free throws rescue his bad 2-point and 3-point FG% for all the efficiency parts of any of those stats. There's also some value baked into him carrying an injured Brooklyn team that helps the on-off components of what those stats tell us. I love me some stats but I also don't look at them as proof that one player is better than the other without understanding how the players play and what those numbers are telling us. I don't think those numbers properly capture Siakam's defensive value or Harden's lack on that end. Some of those numbers (WS/48, VORP, PER) say they're the same. I fully expect Siakam to bring it on both ends in this series and for Harden to struggle. You can dunk on me later if I end up being wrong.
"Being in my home. I was watching pokemon for 5 hours."

Co-hosting with Harry Garris at The Underhand Freethrow Podcast
User avatar
Kurtz
RealGM
Posts: 15,581
And1: 16,521
Joined: Aug 07, 2002
Location: Toronto

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#465 » by Kurtz » Tue Apr 12, 2022 10:12 pm

Lunartic wrote:Playoff experience really isn't that important, talent wins playoffs games, not experience.

Unfortunately, Sixers probably win in 7 just because Embiid is going to have Siakam and anyone else that tries to guard him in foul trouble. He gets the friendliest whistle in the entire league. FVV is going to need to average 25+ for the Raps.

I'm rooting for the Raps


I think experience matters. When I look at the list of champions, pretty much every team was filled with experienced stars and role-players. Phoenix would have been a bit of an outlier had they won last year.
Image
User avatar
Son Goku 25
RealGM
Posts: 26,034
And1: 41,145
Joined: Jan 18, 2010
 

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#466 » by Son Goku 25 » Tue Apr 12, 2022 10:12 pm

Sixers are all in trying to win a ship this year and this is a development year for the Raptors yet some sixer fans are shook.. damn.
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,238
And1: 13,852
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#467 » by Los_29 » Tue Apr 12, 2022 10:28 pm

One team is playing with house money and the other team has all their chips down on the table and are all in.

Guess which team has more to lose?
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#468 » by skones » Tue Apr 12, 2022 10:53 pm

pingpongrac wrote:
Imagine saying offence and defence aren't equal then throwing out names like Holiday, Bam, Gobert and Davis (lol, the guy has missed almost half of the Lakers games the last 3 seasons and isn't near as good as he used to be?) as players that are clearly better than Siakam presumably because of their defence. Not to mention guys like Mitchell, Booker and Towns aren't clearly better than Siakam. Middleton and Beal absolutely do not have any case over Siakam at this point while DeRozan is so bad defensively that he doesn't have much of a case either. Again, Siakam has absolutely been a top 20 player THIS SEASON. Give me a list of players that can put up 30+ points or dish out ~10 assists depending on how teams defend him while being solid on the boards and a very good defender.

The bubble is absolutely not a lot to go off of. As I said in my other post, the Celtics/Raptors series was the most defensive series of the playoffs by far and stars from both teams struggled mightily. It was a 7-game sample against one team whereas Toronto's Championship run was 24 games against 4 very different teams. It is mindboggling that you think the Championship run doesn't mean significantly more than a single series under unusual circumstances.

Sent from my Pixel 4 using RealGM mobile app


First of all, saying offense and defense aren't equal and then saying certain players are better than Siakam? You're treating that as a contradiction when it's very clearly not. As I said earlier, there are levels to these things, and point blank, full stop, dead ass, whichever term you want to use, Pascal Siakam doesn't live in the same realm aas guys like Holiday, Bam, and Gobert on the defensive end. (PS. Holiday finished this season shooting over 50% from the field, over 40% from three, and 7 assists. I was a Holiday hater when we dealt for him, he's exceeded all of my expectations this season and has had a season that rises above all of his others) These players are better because A) They're tip top when it comes to defense in this league and/or B) Also have offensive games to boot. Like i said, going down a list of random checkboxes and then tallying up the totals is a bad way to evaluate a player.

As for this "give me a list" stuff again. You're not looking at skillset, how it translates to the floor, and how it fits into a winning team. It's why you're running around in circles lauding counting numbers as the basic case. Guy isn't a superstar, he's not top tier talent, and everyone knows it outside of Toronto.

You just casually doubled assist output for Siakam, added a bunch of points, and ended up throwing out other qualifiers to narrow the field when Siakam doesn't even fit the qualifiers you put into place. Then you're talking about single seasons and just throwing out a guy like Derozan without objectively looking at what he's done this season. Siakam scored 23 a night in 38 minutes a contest. There are guys ACTUALLY dropping almost 30 a night in this league. They're the ones who are actually top tier, elite, superstars etc.
User avatar
WuTang_CMB
RealGM
Posts: 41,421
And1: 51,837
Joined: Sep 26, 2017
   

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#469 » by WuTang_CMB » Tue Apr 12, 2022 11:12 pm

coaching in a playoff series doesnt get talked about enough

Toronto has a massive advantage
User avatar
pingpongrac
RealGM
Posts: 11,722
And1: 16,877
Joined: Mar 18, 2015
   

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#470 » by pingpongrac » Tue Apr 12, 2022 11:33 pm

skones wrote:
pingpongrac wrote:
Imagine saying offence and defence aren't equal then throwing out names like Holiday, Bam, Gobert and Davis (lol, the guy has missed almost half of the Lakers games the last 3 seasons and isn't near as good as he used to be?) as players that are clearly better than Siakam presumably because of their defence. Not to mention guys like Mitchell, Booker and Towns aren't clearly better than Siakam. Middleton and Beal absolutely do not have any case over Siakam at this point while DeRozan is so bad defensively that he doesn't have much of a case either. Again, Siakam has absolutely been a top 20 player THIS SEASON. Give me a list of players that can put up 30+ points or dish out ~10 assists depending on how teams defend him while being solid on the boards and a very good defender.

The bubble is absolutely not a lot to go off of. As I said in my other post, the Celtics/Raptors series was the most defensive series of the playoffs by far and stars from both teams struggled mightily. It was a 7-game sample against one team whereas Toronto's Championship run was 24 games against 4 very different teams. It is mindboggling that you think the Championship run doesn't mean significantly more than a single series under unusual circumstances.

Sent from my Pixel 4 using RealGM mobile app


First of all, saying offense and defense aren't equal and then saying certain players are better than Siakam? You're treating that as a contradiction when it's very clearly not. As I said earlier, there are levels to these things, and point blank, full stop, dead ass, whichever term you want to use, Pascal Siakam doesn't live in the same realm aas guys like Holiday, Bam, and Gobert on the defensive end. (PS. Holiday finished this season shooting over 50% from the field, over 40% from three, and 7 assists. I was a Holiday hater when we dealt for him, he's exceeded all of my expectations this season and has had a season that rises above all of his others)

As for this "give me a list" stuff again. You're not looking at skillset, how it translates to the floor, and how it fits into a winning team. It's why you're running around in circles lauding counting numbers as the basic case. Guy isn't a superstar, he's not top tier talent, and everyone knows it outside of Toronto.

You just casually doubled assist output for Siakam, added a bunch of points, and ended up throwing out other qualifiers to narrow the field when Siakam doesn't even fit the qualifiers you put into place. Siakam scored 23 a night in 38 minutes a contest. There are guys ACTUALLY dropping almost 30 a night in this league. You're talking about single seasons and just throwing out a guy like Derozan without objectively looking at what he's done this season.


I have no clue what stance you're trying to take in regards to offence vs. defence. I know Siakam isn't as impactful of a defender as Gobert or Bam, but he is a significantly better offensive player than both of them...and in previous posts you keep harping on the fact that being a great offensive player is more important. As MANY people have also said, Siakam's impact numbers – especially on the defensive end – don't truly capture how incredible he has been this season. In the first 10 games that Siakam missed, Toronto got off to hot start then they were pretty terrible throughout the next ~20 games because Siakam was noticeably slow and OG/Achiuwa/Birch all missed significant time with injuries. As soon as Siakam started to get back into shape and Toronto was regaining their health, he went on a tear and was a very impactful player on both ends of the floor for the last ~60 games.

I said Siakam is capable of scoring 30+ points or dishing out ~10 assists depending on how teams are defending him on a given night. I didn't say he is averaging 30 points and 10 assists night in, night out lol. Just look at what he did in the last 15 games against mostly playoff competition; 25 PTS and 10 AST vs Suns, 33 PTS and 7 AST vs Nuggets, 31 PTS and 3 AST vs Clippers, 26 PTS and 5 AST vs Sixers, 22 PTS and 4 AST vs Bulls (Raptors blown out on B2B), 35 PTS and 6 AST vs Cavs, 40 PTS and 1 AST vs Celtics, 12 PTS and 13 AST vs Wolves, 29 PTS and 5 AST vs Heat, 31 PTS and 6 AST vs Hawks, 37 PTS and 12 AST vs Sixers. Those are star numbers and he has consistently been having those type of performances against the best teams in the league all season long while leading Toronto to numerous big wins.

I think you're of the illusion that Siakam is the same player he was in 19/20 (when he was already 2nd team All-NBA and clearly a top 15-20 player before COVID/the bubble) or 20/21 (when he, and the Raptors as a whole, played every game away from home and most of which without fans). Siakam has dramatically improved his midrange game and playmaking abilities as well as his overall feel for the game which has turned him into a legit offensive force. He's basically guaranteed to score 20+ points and dish out ~5 assists while being the focal point of the offence that constantly draws double teams – or even triple teams. In fact, Siakam is just outside the top 10 in double teams drawn (11th, .01 possessions per game behind DeRozan and Garland, but he sports a higher % of double team possessions than both) and he is tied with Luka and Trae for 2nd in PPP. He makes teams pay regardless of how they are defending him because he has more counters than a spin move now (a little push shot/floater, much better with his left hand, etc.) and his three-ball is back up to a respectable level (34% after a down year last season) while he can get the ball to open shooters/cutters due to his combination of height, vision and passing abilities.

Siakam averaged 22.8/8.5/5.3 for the season after coming off shoulder surgery. The league as a whole only had 10 other players average at least 20 PTS, 7 REB, 4 AST (all categories which Siakam was comfortably above the threshold) and Siakam turned the ball over the 2nd least among those players (0.1 more than Murray and 0.2 less than Tatum) while also being arguably being a top 3 defender among them (behind Embiid and Giannis, on the same level as Tatum and Murray). All of the players that hit those thresholds are considered elite aside from Randle and Murray (who at this stage of his career is making the leap) and Siakam was right there with them while leading a young team to a 34-16 record over his last 50 games played. If you want to point to Siakam's MPG as the reason for his high box score stats, I think it's just as important to look at USG% too. Luka (37%), Embiid (37%), Giannis (35%), LeBron (32%), Jokic (32%), Tatum (32%) and Durant (31%) did more on a per-minute basis, but they also had a significantly higher USG% than Siakam (26%) while Randle (29%), Harden (27%) and Murray (27%) were also above Siakam in usage rate.

At this point, it is clear that you either have no clue what you are talking about (probably because you haven't seen many Raptors games outside of the few that Siakam dominated the Bucks down the stretch) or you're just trolling.
Image
User avatar
Lunartic
Head Coach
Posts: 6,087
And1: 9,755
Joined: Nov 28, 2015

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#471 » by Lunartic » Tue Apr 12, 2022 11:37 pm

Kurtz wrote:
Lunartic wrote:Playoff experience really isn't that important, talent wins playoffs games, not experience.

Unfortunately, Sixers probably win in 7 just because Embiid is going to have Siakam and anyone else that tries to guard him in foul trouble. He gets the friendliest whistle in the entire league. FVV is going to need to average 25+ for the Raps.

I'm rooting for the Raps


I think experience matters. When I look at the list of champions, pretty much every team was filled with experienced stars and role-players. Phoenix would have been a bit of an outlier had they won last year.



Other than OKC v Heat, are there any obvious examples of a more talented - less experienced team losing?
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#472 » by skones » Tue Apr 12, 2022 11:43 pm

pingpongrac wrote:
At this point, it is clear that you either have no clue what you are talking about (probably because you haven't seen many Raptors games outside of the few that Siakam dominated the Bucks down the stretch) or you're just trolling.


Ah, the tried and true if you don't agree yOu DoNt WaTcH aNd ArE a TrOlL. Fun stuff. Nah, I said he wasn't a top tier talent. And he's not. That's not trolling, that's correct. You're literally arguing top 20, and while I don't think he's a top 20 player, there are fewer than 20 players in the top tier so you're STILL not refuting the initial point.
User avatar
Meeksology
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,404
And1: 5,082
Joined: Nov 25, 2013

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#473 » by Meeksology » Wed Apr 13, 2022 12:18 am

JShuttlesworth wrote:It's funny seeing posters that sometimes don't get along in the Raptors forum joining forces in the GB
It's a surreal feeling that won't last long, welcome it with open arms lol

Sent from my SM-N950W using RealGM mobile app
Image
User avatar
pingpongrac
RealGM
Posts: 11,722
And1: 16,877
Joined: Mar 18, 2015
   

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#474 » by pingpongrac » Wed Apr 13, 2022 1:02 am

skones wrote:
pingpongrac wrote:
At this point, it is clear that you either have no clue what you are talking about (probably because you haven't seen many Raptors games outside of the few that Siakam dominated the Bucks down the stretch) or you're just trolling.


Ah, the tried and true if you don't agree yOu DoNt WaTcH aNd ArE a TrOlL. Fun stuff. Nah, I said he wasn't a top tier talent. And he's not. That's not trolling, that's correct. You're literally arguing top 20, and while I don't think he's a top 20 player, there are fewer than 20 players in the top tier so you're STILL not refuting the initial point.


No bias is being shown. If anything, you are being ignorant of another team's player that has improved quite a bit over the past 12 months and even more so as the season progressed. Siakam performed at an elite level this season. There is absolutely no denying that fact. If you want to point to impact numbers painting Siakam as the ~40th best player, that is your prerogative. The fact of the matter is that every one of those stats has a significant amount of players that weren't better than Siakam this season. Do you really think Irving (29 GP), Lillard (29 GP), George (31 GP), Klay (32 GP), Ball (35 GP) and Davis (40 GP) were better and/or more valuable than Siakam despite missing at least half of the season because they had a higher EPM for example? What about bench/role players like Muscala, Brooks, Payton, Bane, Hartenstein, Green (who missed 36 games), Harrell, Robinson, Carter Jr., Capela, Clarke, Turner and Quickley? There are a bunch of other good players that have a higher EPM than Siakam (like Allen, Garland, Bam, Conley, Harden, Porzingis, Poeltl, Ayton, White, Horford, Ball, SGA, LaVine, Lowry and Middleton), but they haven't had better seasons. The same kind of thing can be said about RPM (where he is 21st behind players like Conley, JJJ, Horford, Porzingis, Bane and Capela) and RAPTOR (where Siakam is 48th behind a slew of role players or 4th/5th options).

The question is whether or not Siakam can continue to put up elite numbers in the playoffs like he did against good teams while he was healthy during the season. Since late November – which was two weeks after Siakam's first game of the season and around the time when he started to get into NBA-game shape against players that were 10-15 games into their season – he averaged 23.5/9.5/4.5 in 18 games against lottery teams (11-7 record) and 23.5/8.5/6.0 in 42 games against playoff/play-in teams (27-15 record). Also, a small note, Siakam averaged 12/6/4 on 30% shooting over a 4-game stretch against playoff teams (which is included in the previous stats) when he was sick coming out of the ASB. Overall though, there was absolutely no drop-off in play against good teams – which is something people pointed to in past seasons in regards to Siakam – and the Raptors as a team actually played better against good teams. 

Also, I love how you didn't quote or respond to any part of my post that was combating your conclusion that Siakam wasn't at least a top 20 player this season. If you ignore evidence that proves otherwise and you can't have a legitimate conversation without responding with a mocking Spongebob type sentence, that is indeed trolling.
Image
canada_dry
General Manager
Posts: 9,030
And1: 7,072
Joined: Aug 22, 2017

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#475 » by canada_dry » Wed Apr 13, 2022 1:04 am

skones wrote:
Tripod wrote:
If only Siakam was top end talent this year.
Read on Twitter

Read on Twitter


I always get a kick out of stuff like this. Every local broadcast of games throws some bogus graphic up like this where a less than player is put up with legitimate superstars with an arbitrary counting stat line to make them seem like their immediate company is far better than they actually are. You can put me in the camp that thinks you mostly discredit yourself when you're trying to make a case for "top end talent" and throw him in a graphic with two MVP candidates which are a number of tiers above Siakam.

As for the only player with x, y, and z in a season! It's happening all the time. Look across the league, there are a number of players that have statlines that look like bloated video game numbers from 2004. Pace and Space is doing that all on it's own.
Points rebounds and assists are pretty basic stats my guy...lol

Sent from my SM-G960W using RealGM mobile app
sixers4real
Analyst
Posts: 3,071
And1: 2,025
Joined: Nov 27, 2015
Location: Russia
 

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#476 » by sixers4real » Wed Apr 13, 2022 1:13 am

Los_29 wrote:
skones wrote:Toronto just doesn't have the collective experience or the top end talent. Think Philly makes work of this in 6.

Millsap, Embiid, Harris, Harden, Niang, Green, Jordan, Millsap. That's a lot of vet experience to ignore here.


Only Embiid, Harris and Harden will be key contributors. None of them have NBA championships and not sure if any of them have even been past the 2nd round aside from Harden.

Millsap and Jordan won’t likely play and if they do then that’s excellent news for the Raptors. Green and Niang will come off the bench and I’m sure the Raptors hope they play a lot as well. Lol.

We have guys that have actually won championships. Even the idea that the Raptors lack top end talent is highly debatable. Pascal has been a top end talent all year. He will need to carry that into the playoffs but the talent and ability are there. Sixers have the best player in the series. Harden will need to play like the 2nd best player for them to win.

Should be a great series.

Danny Green has been an NBA champion as a starter 2014, 2019, 2020.

Danny Green injured last year in the semis and Sixers lost that series.

He is still an excellent role player. And he’ll start with Harden Maxey Harris Embiid. He did finish the season as a starter.
Sixers fan since 2001. From Russia.
sixers4real
Analyst
Posts: 3,071
And1: 2,025
Joined: Nov 27, 2015
Location: Russia
 

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#477 » by sixers4real » Wed Apr 13, 2022 1:43 am

pingpongrac wrote:
skones wrote:
pingpongrac wrote:
Who are the 15-20 players that are "flat-out better" than Siakam? If you're strictly talking about offence, maybe I can see that case, but there are a handful of one-way players that aren't clearly better than Siakam (Trae and DeRozan stick out, maybe Kyrie and Mitchell) because he is very good on both ends of the floor. I don't know of ~20 players in the league that can put up 22/8/5 on decent efficiency while being very good defenders. Siakam has absolutely been a top 20 player this season. If he didn't miss the first month and take a few weeks to get up to speed after shoulder surgery, his numbers – especially impact numbers like VORP, EPM, LEBRON and RAPTOR which were tanked by that start – his numbers would have looked a lot better too. He averaged 24/9/6 on 57 TS% with a +9 on/off rating in his last ~50 games.

Yes, Harden and Embiid have the "playoff choker" label because they have flamed out early multiple times as #1 options and they have never actually WON a Championship. Siakam and FVV had a really bad offensive series against the Celtics in which they were both kind of #2 type options along with Lowry (all three attempted 16-19 FGA). That's not a whole lot to go off of, especially considering it was a single series in the bubble – the same bubble in which your Bucks were badly outplayed by Miami because their role players went off and Butler outplayed Giannis.

It's ridiculous to discredit what Siakam and FVV contributed to Toronto's title. Siakam averaged 19/7/3 throughout the playoffs – and 20/8/4 in the Finals – while being the clear #2 option. FVV struggled at times (mostly in the Philly series due to their length), but he averaged 25 MPG throughout the playoffs and came to life in the most important games (12 PPG on 62 TS% in the ECF+Finals) while making life difficult for Curry – who did a lot of his damage against Green, which forced Nurse to make adjustments throughout the game/series.



First of all Trae is ABSOLUTELY a better player than Siakam. As for 15 off the top of my head?

Giannis, Tatum, Doncic, Embiid, Jokic, Lebron, Curry, Butler, Gobert, Durant, Harden, Booker, Paul, Young, Mitchell, Ja, Holiday, Bam, Davis, Towns. Then you've got the Beal, Miiddleton's, Derozans, etc. that also have cases.

This is the thing about rating players. Offense and Defense are not created equal in this league. Great offensive players are plentiful and impactful. Truly great defenders are few and far between and unless you're a big, your overall impact on the defensive end is mitigated by role. We're not saying, good offense is one point, good defense is another point here and making them equal. A player, Trae for example, is a better player because he's special on offense and that outweighs the negative contributions on the other end. Siakam's contributions on both ends don't add up to the one for Trae.


Harden has made the 2nd round 3 times and conference finals twice. In the three times he lost in the 1st round, he was an 8 seed twice, and 4 seed once. I hardly qualify those as "early flameouts." In fact, use of the term is click baity and hot take as hell, but I guess that's what the sports media likes so people are following suit. Like I said earlier whether it was in response to you or someone else, there's a lot of area to cover in between a championship and the lottery. There can only be one championship team each year, that does NOT mean everyone else is terrible, an utter failure, trash, choker, blah blah blah.

You can't sit there and tell me the bubble isn't a lot to go off of when FVV and Siakam have one playoff run to offset it. A playoff run in which no Toronto fan wanted to see FVV touch the court until he pulled a rando rabbit out of the hat against Milwaukee. To be frank, I think two playoff series in which they have relevant and increased offensive roles is more applicable than feeding as 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th options whatever during a championship run. You're free to disagree with that part, but that's how I'd weigh them.

I didn't discredit anyone's contribution to the Toronto championship run. That paragraph comes off as someone complaining to complain.


Imagine saying offence and defence aren't equal then throwing out names like Holiday, Bam, Gobert and Davis (lol, the guy has missed almost half of the Lakers games the last 3 seasons and isn't near as good as he used to be?) as players that are clearly better than Siakam presumably because of their defence. Not to mention guys like Mitchell, Booker and Towns aren't clearly better than Siakam. Middleton and Beal absolutely do not have any case over Siakam at this point while DeRozan is so bad defensively that he doesn't have much of a case either. Again, Siakam has absolutely been a top 20 player THIS SEASON. Give me a list of players that can put up 30+ points or dish out ~10 assists depending on how teams defend him while being solid on the boards and a very good defender.

The bubble is absolutely not a lot to go off of. As I said in my other post, the Celtics/Raptors series was the most defensive series of the playoffs by far and stars from both teams struggled mightily. It was a 7-game sample against one team whereas Toronto's Championship run was 24 games against 4 very different teams. It is mindboggling that you think the Championship run doesn't mean significantly more than a single series under unusual circumstances.

Sent from my Pixel 4 using RealGM mobile app

What? Booker is not better then Siakam?
Sixers fan since 2001. From Russia.
User avatar
pingpongrac
RealGM
Posts: 11,722
And1: 16,877
Joined: Mar 18, 2015
   

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#478 » by pingpongrac » Wed Apr 13, 2022 2:02 am

sixers4real wrote:
pingpongrac wrote:
skones wrote:
First of all Trae is ABSOLUTELY a better player than Siakam. As for 15 off the top of my head?

Giannis, Tatum, Doncic, Embiid, Jokic, Lebron, Curry, Butler, Gobert, Durant, Harden, Booker, Paul, Young, Mitchell, Ja, Holiday, Bam, Davis, Towns. Then you've got the Beal, Miiddleton's, Derozans, etc. that also have cases.

This is the thing about rating players. Offense and Defense are not created equal in this league. Great offensive players are plentiful and impactful. Truly great defenders are few and far between and unless you're a big, your overall impact on the defensive end is mitigated by role. We're not saying, good offense is one point, good defense is another point here and making them equal. A player, Trae for example, is a better player because he's special on offense and that outweighs the negative contributions on the other end. Siakam's contributions on both ends don't add up to the one for Trae.


Harden has made the 2nd round 3 times and conference finals twice. In the three times he lost in the 1st round, he was an 8 seed twice, and 4 seed once. I hardly qualify those as "early flameouts." In fact, use of the term is click baity and hot take as hell, but I guess that's what the sports media likes so people are following suit. Like I said earlier whether it was in response to you or someone else, there's a lot of area to cover in between a championship and the lottery. There can only be one championship team each year, that does NOT mean everyone else is terrible, an utter failure, trash, choker, blah blah blah.

You can't sit there and tell me the bubble isn't a lot to go off of when FVV and Siakam have one playoff run to offset it. A playoff run in which no Toronto fan wanted to see FVV touch the court until he pulled a rando rabbit out of the hat against Milwaukee. To be frank, I think two playoff series in which they have relevant and increased offensive roles is more applicable than feeding as 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th options whatever during a championship run. You're free to disagree with that part, but that's how I'd weigh them.

I didn't discredit anyone's contribution to the Toronto championship run. That paragraph comes off as someone complaining to complain.


Imagine saying offence and defence aren't equal then throwing out names like Holiday, Bam, Gobert and Davis (lol, the guy has missed almost half of the Lakers games the last 3 seasons and isn't near as good as he used to be?) as players that are clearly better than Siakam presumably because of their defence. Not to mention guys like Mitchell, Booker and Towns aren't clearly better than Siakam. Middleton and Beal absolutely do not have any case over Siakam at this point while DeRozan is so bad defensively that he doesn't have much of a case either. Again, Siakam has absolutely been a top 20 player THIS SEASON. Give me a list of players that can put up 30+ points or dish out ~10 assists depending on how teams defend him while being solid on the boards and a very good defender.

The bubble is absolutely not a lot to go off of. As I said in my other post, the Celtics/Raptors series was the most defensive series of the playoffs by far and stars from both teams struggled mightily. It was a 7-game sample against one team whereas Toronto's Championship run was 24 games against 4 very different teams. It is mindboggling that you think the Championship run doesn't mean significantly more than a single series under unusual circumstances.

Sent from my Pixel 4 using RealGM mobile app

What? Booker is not better then Siakam?
Booker isn't clearly better than Siakam, which is what I said. Booker is the better scorer, but Siakam has the edge in most other areas and is the more complete player. I think they have both been incredible this season though and should be 3rd team All-NBA. Same kind of tier.

Sent from my Pixel 4 using RealGM mobile app
Image
Raps1103
Veteran
Posts: 2,574
And1: 3,235
Joined: Jan 30, 2018

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#479 » by Raps1103 » Wed Apr 13, 2022 2:30 am

John Murdoch wrote:Marc Gasol aint gonna save yall this time. 6'ers in 6


Was Marc Gasol on the Hawks last year ?
User avatar
Yuri Vaultin
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 21,172
And1: 14,520
Joined: Jun 24, 2006
Location: In a tree by your window.
     

Re: Eastern Conference | Round 1 | (4) Philadelphia 76ers vs. (5) Toronto Raptors 

Post#480 » by Yuri Vaultin » Wed Apr 13, 2022 3:16 am

John Murdoch wrote:Marc Gasol aint gonna save yall this time. 6'ers in 6

It's okay. Doc's incredible ineptitude will!

Raps in 6.
Image
Props to Turbo_Zone for the sig.

Return to The General Board