The Nets won't be a legit contender unless they get Kawhi/KD even with Russell...but that's primarily of a few reasons:mademan wrote:FlatearthZorro wrote:Mr Loggins wrote:
the kick in the nuts is he’s (seemingly) going to Brooklyn, the franchise who’s linked with Boston.
sooo ironic that despite taking all brooklyn’s draft picks, it’s the Nets who could be in a better spot the year after the picks are done
I'm still taking us without AD and with Irving on the Nets. Irving has absolutely proved this year that he sucks as #1 especially in the playoffs where he struggled BIG TIME to make any adjustments. Unless he has a LOT and I mean LOT more to offer, I'd take us over the Nets comfortably with a starting 5 of say Rubio or Rondo/Brown/Tatum/Hayward/Horford(bench Morris/Smart, etc)...
I'm with you on the Nets not getting that much better just by adding Kyrie. Theyre going to still have the same defensive issues unless they get bigger (though they'll still be poor on the wings with Kyrie/Dlo).
That said, this is a guards/wing league and a Rondo/Brown (or Rubio/Rozier whatever bin point guard) hurts my eyes to look at
Giannis and Bucks
Kawhi (and raptors if he stays)
Embiid and Sixers
The size of those three teams gives them an edge over the Nets because they just do not have anyone who can even slow down Giannis/Kawhi/Embiid.
But apart from those teams, I can see the Nets being the 4th with Kyrie paired with Russell.
Sent from my SM-G925T using RealGM mobile app




































