2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1)

Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27

Who is the MVP so far? (Poll Re-set 1/14/22)

Stephen Curry
14
5%
Nikola Jokic
111
39%
Giannis Antetokounmpo
75
26%
Kevin Durant
6
2%
Joel Embiid
39
14%
Chris Paul
15
5%
Ja Morant
8
3%
Rudy Gobert
3
1%
DeMar Derozan
7
2%
LeBron James
10
3%
 
Total votes: 288

Packbuckman
Veteran
Posts: 2,730
And1: 1,364
Joined: Oct 02, 2019
     

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#481 » by Packbuckman » Sun Dec 26, 2021 9:28 pm

WarriorGM wrote:
BoatsNZones wrote:Curry is the MVP. They have no business as the NBA 1 seed, and everybody knows it.


I look at it differently. The Warriors have every business being the NBA 1 seed—because they have Curry. Curry has been the best player in the league the past 7 years.


Not if you count offense and defense he’s hasn’t been he’s the best shooter. Giannis impact on both sides of the ball is the best in the league and before him it was LeBron. This bucks team is just getting healthy only Lopez now is out I expect them to go on a nice run they will be right there for best record in the end.
mediocrityrules
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,854
And1: 5,691
Joined: Nov 27, 2013
 

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#482 » by mediocrityrules » Sun Dec 26, 2021 9:40 pm

It's really interesting when you look at team line-ups, and how settled some teams have actually been able to be compared to others, and you realize the advantage that a bunch of teams have had in terms of consistency. It certainly makes it a bit harder to read into overall team records at this stage of the season, and potentially props up a few players higher than they might be considered due to team record/team play etc.

In terms of the number of different five-man line-ups on the floor this season to date: -
Utah - 106 different five-man line-ups
Phoenix - 145
Bulls - 236
Denver - 247
BKN - 275
GSW - 307
Bucks - 445
Circling calendars since 2021
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,882
And1: 22,820
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#483 » by Doctor MJ » Sun Dec 26, 2021 9:53 pm

So, post-Christmas is a good time to discuss where we're at, so I'll share my thoughts at the moment.

I'm going to start by looking at raw +/-. Not saying anyone else needs to care about this, and also certainly not saying it's the end-all be-all, but to me it provides a certain clarity.

First, the NBA leaders:

1. Steph Curry +372
2. Rudy Gobert +255
3. Donovan Mitchell +237
4. Jrue Holiday +236
(tie) Mikal Bridges +236

The numbers here for Curry are astonishing even before you start looking specifically team by team. Curry's managed to be 100 points higher than anyone else in the league. I'll tell you flat out that whenever I see something like this, that guy is a serious MVP candidate for me. Gobert last year was something close to this, and while much of the basketball world is dismissive of him as an MVP kind of guy, I ranked him 2nd in my MVP vote and don't regret it. We can talk about Gobert's concerns in the playoffs and I'm okay with factoring that in to your MVP process, but for the regular season award, when you see one guy really stand out in this way who is also at the focal point of how opponents' strategize against his team, that deserves a ton of respect.

Now we look at the Warriors' leaderboard:

1. Steph Curry +372
2. Draymond Green +189
3. Andrew Wiggins +185
4. Otto Porter Jr. +161
5. Gary Payton II +160

That's about as clear cut of a case as you'll ever see of a star having vastly more impact than any of his teammates. Not an obvious thing given that the Warriors' D is so amazing and Curry's not driving it directly, but the correlation here is so strong that we don't even need regression data to see what appears to be going on here. Curry is the on-court keystone of the Warriors. When he's out there, the Warriors can make it work really well, and when he's not, it's really not the same.

So yeah, this along with what we already know about Curry skills and his role as fulcrum of the Warriors make him an incredibly strong candidate for me.

As we move down the list we first see the pair from the Jazz. Team's doing great led by its stars, but it presents as more of an elite core than a standout MVP guy:

1. Rudy Gobert +255
2. Donovan Mitchell +237
3. Mike Conley +227
4. Jordan Clarkson +208
5. Bojan Bogdanovic +196

Not saying this prevents Gobert from being considered by me, but it is really something the way that we see 5 Jazz players topping the 2nd highest Warrior.

Jrue Holiday now shows up and that's very interesting, both because he's not the star of his own team, and because he's missed time. He's been making up ground in a hurry. Bucks leaders:

1. Jrue Holiday +236
2. George Hill +223
3. Giannis Antetokounmpo +197
4. Khris Middleton +131
5. Grayson Allen +106

Now, I'm not comfortable making Jrue MVP arguments for a variety of reasons, but it has to be noted that Jrue & Giannis actually tied for highest all-season +/- on the Bucks last year (+539), and Holiday has a strong track record in this stat along with a massive defensive reputation that we know is not well measured by the box score. Hence, it's important not to dismiss how Holiday shows up here lightly.

I gave Giannis my #1 vote for Player of the Year (regular & post season combined) last year so I'm not a skeptic about him. He's a worthy MVP candidate, he's an outstanding franchise player, he is absolutely the guy the opponents are all focused on, and he is the one who has to withstand the barrage of attention through playoff series.

However, in these past couple years after his 2 MVPs, we haven't seen the same type of huge +/- impact indicators we did before and I think we have to recognize that this might be an accurate gauge of his regular season impact now.

I know how easy it is to focus on the theory of how good a player is. Giannis is an outstanding talent on both sides of the ball, so it makes sense to think that he simply must be more valuable than someone like Curry, but at present, I can't say I struggle to decide who is being more impactful.

Last guy on the NBA Top 5 leaderboard to discuss is Bridges. Leaders for the Suns:

1. Mikal Bridges +236
2. Devin Booker +171
3. Jae Crowder +168
4. Chris Paul +161
5. Javale McGee +120

Something I was screaming last year was that the Suns needed to be looked at as a great ensemble rather than a group with a clear MVP candidate. I'd say the same is true this year, but I'd also say that I think the world is sleeping on Bridges 2-way impact right now. He's not one of your offensive stars, but he'd the essence of 3 & D and I think we shouldn't be surprised when guys like this end up potentially looking more valuable than your stars.

As with Holiday, I'm not comfortable anointing Bridges to too high a stature. Unlike Holiday, there is no Giannis on this team. People seem to think it's Paul, but it really isn't. I don't think anyone's crazy for ranking Paul & Booker ahead of Bridges, but I do think Bridges deserves to be named all-star this year.

Okay, two other guys talked about a lot in MVP circles. Looking at their teams the same way:

Brooklyn:
1. Patty Mills +204
2. Kevin Durant +132
3. James Harden +75
4. James Johnson +70
5. LaMarcus Aldridge +64

Another case where the guy on top is not someone I'm willing to say is the MVP of his team, but man, it's amazing how people continue to perceive Durant as someone lifting his teams immensely when that's just not what we ever really see from him. Durant continues to have a case as THE scorer you want on your team when trying to win playoff series, and because of that I really don't object to people arguing that he is the best player in the world in theory...but when they imagine his impact during the regular season they lose a lot of credibility.

The reality with Durant is that he's a guy who's played his whole career with an individualistic mindset. He'd turned himself into someone who has a set of skills that seem optimal when you're scouting him, but he's never had amazing feel on the court, and we've now seen him really chafe when pushed to blend in with a team-coordinated style of play (GS) choosing instead to make the ultimate "We superstars know best, just let us do our thing" team with the Nets.

He could have won the title last year this way, and he may still this or in another year, so I'm not even seeing this as destined to fail, but there is a difference between the kind of day-in day-out impact we've seen from the top tier of guys and where Durant sits, and this is absolutely why he tends to be lower on my MVP ballot.

I did want to give a specific shout out to Mills though. I want to see it last longer before I seriously consider him for any accolades, but I'm happy for a guy whose spent his career coming off the bench.

Okay, now Jokic in Denver, making a cutoff of >100 MP or >0 +/-:

1. Nikola Jokic +193
2. Monte Morris +111
3. Aaron Gordon +102
4. Michael Porter Jr. +58

Here we see something similar to the Curry-type impact. For me my MVP vote is between the two of them at the moment.

In terms of comparing Jokic & Curry's raw numbers here, this is obviously missing too much context. What I'd be inclined to say is that Curry's essentially proven higher team highs than Jokic, but that there's no particular reason to think we know where Jokic's team ceiling is.

In terms of me siding between the two, I will end up picking someone here, but I am also really looking to see how things play out over the entire sample of the season. If the Warriors' end up regressing to the mean, that'll be telling. If Jokic's on/off numbers regress toward what they've been in previous seasons, that'll be telling.

Now questing for other names to discuss:

DeMar DeRozan is having a hell of a year. I kinda can't believe it. I've been a skeptic of his ability to actually impact the NBA for forever, but in Chicago it's working. As with names above, I'm eager to see how the season sample plays out, and I think DeRozan if he keeps this up has a strong case for being on the ballot.

On the other hand, do I really believe that DeRozan has "figured out" what was holding him back before? Not really. Not in a way that makes me think he has some team savviness that justifies him actually better than KD, for example. KD's clearly the fulcrum of the #1 team in the East, and if he and DeRozan switched teams, my money would be on Durant once again. This puts a bit of a hard ceiling on what I see as reasonable for DeRozan here.

Joel Embiid absolutely played like an MVP last year and I have no skepticism about his ability to do so again. At this point though his missed time makes him rather easy to dismiss, and there's also the matter that for all the statements that Embiid is more impactful than Jokic, this hasn't looked the case this year.

Paul George is probably in my Top 10 right now, but with his injury it doesn't really feel worth talking about him.

Alright, now committing to a list for the moment:

1. Steph Curry - It's just jawdropping seeing the way teammates around him are thriving regardless of who is on the court with him. This needs to be seen as historically noteworthy.

2. Nikola Jokic - Starting to feel like he's the smartest basketball player I've ever seen, and as something of a BBIQ fetishist, I don't say that lightly.

3. Giannis Antetokounmpo - I'll still give him the benefit of the doubt given what all we know he can do, how much opponents focus on him, and how well the team has done with him.

4. Kevin Durant - Not the same type of value-adder as the guys above, but can't put him that low seeing what he's actually doing out there and seeing his team in the #1 seed.

5. DeMar DeRozan - Career peak right here. Didn't see it coming, feel like I'm unlikely to keep him this high, but deserving right now.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
mediocrityrules
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,854
And1: 5,691
Joined: Nov 27, 2013
 

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#484 » by mediocrityrules » Sun Dec 26, 2021 10:00 pm

If you're going to use +/- as a leading indicator, I'd be interested in other teams that are not contenders. Does another player on one of these teams have the same/more of an impact than some MVP candidates? I ask as i question the relevance of this stat to Jokic, considering team record. When you have a really bad/mediocre team, then a top player is going to have a much bigger impact (you would think), although not necessarily contribute to an actual winning record.
Circling calendars since 2021
Doctor MJ
Senior Mod
Senior Mod
Posts: 53,882
And1: 22,820
Joined: Mar 10, 2005
Location: Cali
     

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#485 » by Doctor MJ » Sun Dec 26, 2021 10:25 pm

mediocrityrules wrote:If you're going to use +/- as a leading indicator, I'd be interested in other teams that are not contenders. Does another player on one of these teams have the same/more of an impact than some MVP candidates? I ask as i question the relevance of this stat to Jokic, considering team record. When you have a really bad/mediocre team, then a top player is going to have a much bigger impact (you would think), although not necessarily contribute to an actual winning record.


So, I really want to emphasize that I'm not going just by +/- here and that if you want to get sophisticated with +/- statistically you've got to do regression analyses. I emphasize the raw because a) I think it makes more sense in conversation generally speaking and b) because I don't believe the regression data represents a holy grail either. (As an example, bball-index right now has Gary Payton II ahead of Steph Curry by LA-RAPM, but given that Payton plays very small minutes disproportionately with Curry, along with the fact that Curry is the focal point of the opponent, it's not reasonable to actually think that Payton is more valuable than Curry.) (Also, Jokic tops that metric.)

To your question, here's how I'd phrase it:

Is it easier to provide team lift when you are lifting the team from a lower place?

General answer: Yes on average, I believe this is true, and this is one good reason to tread carefully when elevating a guy having less actual team on-court success above others with more.

How that's relevant to Jokic here though, is more limited than I think people would think. The Nuggets have been playing better with Jokic than the Nets have with Durant and about as good as the Bucks have with Giannis. As such, it's hard for me to use that as a reason to keep Jokic behind those guys given the apparent +/- impact and the god-level box score stats.

One other relevant point that's important to me:

In theory, what I care about is how a guy has his impact and whether I believe it will scale. Hence, I should be fine with giving the MVP to someone on, say, as 25 win team so long there's clear signs of impact and he isn't mining fool's gold that won't add value against serious competition.

Hence, when I look at guys leading more mediocre teams, I never want to assume that what they are doing is less of a true achievement than guys on elite teams...but in terms of "proof in the pudding", in practice, I may struggle to elevate guys on lesser teams all the way to the top.
Getting ready for the RealGM 100 on the PC Board

Come join the WNBA Board if you're a fan!
User avatar
Impuniti
General Manager
Posts: 9,885
And1: 7,809
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#486 » by Impuniti » Sun Dec 26, 2021 11:16 pm

Packbuckman wrote:
WarriorGM wrote:
BoatsNZones wrote:Curry is the MVP. They have no business as the NBA 1 seed, and everybody knows it.


I look at it differently. The Warriors have every business being the NBA 1 seed—because they have Curry. Curry has been the best player in the league the past 7 years.


Not if you count offense and defense he’s hasn’t been he’s the best shooter. Giannis impact on both sides of the ball is the best in the league and before him it was LeBron. This bucks team is just getting healthy only Lopez now is out I expect them to go on a nice run they will be right there for best record in the end.

Steph has better impact that Giannis does, which is why he's led 3 teams to 67 wins which Giannis will never do unless he gets one of the best playmakers in the league in his team. You can yell about two way as much as you want, and Lebron also could never reach 67 in his entire career despite creating multiple elite level teams.
Packbuckman
Veteran
Posts: 2,730
And1: 1,364
Joined: Oct 02, 2019
     

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#487 » by Packbuckman » Mon Dec 27, 2021 1:20 am

Impuniti wrote:
Packbuckman wrote:
WarriorGM wrote:
I look at it differently. The Warriors have every business being the NBA 1 seed—because they have Curry. Curry has been the best player in the league the past 7 years.


Not if you count offense and defense he’s hasn’t been he’s the best shooter. Giannis impact on both sides of the ball is the best in the league and before him it was LeBron. This bucks team is just getting healthy only Lopez now is out I expect them to go on a nice run they will be right there for best record in the end.

Steph has better impact that Giannis does, which is why he's led 3 teams to 67 wins which Giannis will never do unless he gets one of the best playmakers in the league in his team. You can yell about two way as much as you want, and Lebron also could never reach 67 in his entire career despite creating multiple elite level teams.


The bucks were on a 70 gm pace when Giannis got hurt and then the season was halted with a worse cast then Steph had. And Giannis just turned 27 he’s got a lot more time to get to that magical 67 wins. And he has a different impact not more than Giannis.
BoatsNZones
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,972
And1: 5,296
Joined: Sep 23, 2020

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#488 » by BoatsNZones » Mon Dec 27, 2021 1:49 am

Packbuckman wrote:
WarriorGM wrote:
BoatsNZones wrote:Curry is the MVP. They have no business as the NBA 1 seed, and everybody knows it.


I look at it differently. The Warriors have every business being the NBA 1 seed—because they have Curry. Curry has been the best player in the league the past 7 years.


Not if you count offense and defense he’s hasn’t been he’s the best shooter. Giannis impact on both sides of the ball is the best in the league and before him it was LeBron. This bucks team is just getting healthy only Lopez now is out I expect them to go on a nice run they will be right there for best record in the end.

Yes, when you account for both sides he indeed does. Giannis is great, but Curry has a greater overall impact. Most stats back that up. And this is him him in a shooting slump. Gravity is real whether he’s hitting or not, and the team thrives on it. Giannis is nowhere near his DPOY level D currently, and their defensive efficiency shows that much.
WarriorGM
General Manager
Posts: 8,933
And1: 4,225
Joined: Aug 19, 2017

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#489 » by WarriorGM » Mon Dec 27, 2021 3:19 am

Packbuckman wrote:
WarriorGM wrote:
BoatsNZones wrote:Curry is the MVP. They have no business as the NBA 1 seed, and everybody knows it.


I look at it differently. The Warriors have every business being the NBA 1 seed—because they have Curry. Curry has been the best player in the league the past 7 years.


Not if you count offense and defense he’s hasn’t been he’s the best shooter. Giannis impact on both sides of the ball is the best in the league and before him it was LeBron. This bucks team is just getting healthy only Lopez now is out I expect them to go on a nice run they will be right there for best record in the end.


But defense is factored into that assessment. Did you see TwoStarz's post of NilInvestment's analysis from Reddit earlier in this thread?

Here's an excerpt:

TwoStarz wrote:
[...]

Now, if I need to mention this again, I will. This is insane. That's the only way I can describe it. Looking at the individual ratings, Steph without Wiggins is leading an elite offense AND an elite defense. Without Steph, the defense drastically drops. "But that's because Dray and Steph play together, he's carrying that!" Oh buddy do I have a surprise for you....

And finally, the reason I made this post.

Let me ask you a question. Who is GSW's best defender? Why, it's Draymond of course! The DPOY favourite! Well, who's the 2nd best defender on GSW? I'd say, Andrew Wiggins. How about third? I'd solidly say GP2.

Now, the 2nd example proved that the defense improves with just Steph and no Dray, but let's exaggerate this and take it to the fullest, and push the stats to their limits. What happens when you put out a lineup with Steph and without all 3 of GSWs best defenders?

I present:

[Steph On, Draymond, Wiggins and GP2 Off Net Rating](http://www.pbpstats.com/wowy-combos/nba?TeamId=1610612744&Season=2021-22&SeasonType=Regular%2BSeason&PlayerIds=201939,203110,203952,1627780&Leverage=Medium,High,VeryHigh)

Now, ignore the lineups with a tiny sample size. I want you to focus on the Steph ONLY lineups. It has a solid sample size.

Steph On Draymond, Wiggins and GP2 Off: +24.15

**119 ORTG,** ***95 DRTG***

The greatest defense ever since 1977, the 2004 Spurs, had a rDRTG of -8.8. This Steph only lineup missing GSW's 3 best defenders has a rDRTG of -12.9


I added Kevon Looney, the Warriors next best defender, because why not.

[Steph On, Draymond, Wiggins, GP2 and Looney Off Net Rating](http://www.pbpstats.com/wowy-combos/nba?TeamId=1610612744&Season=2021-22&SeasonType=Regular%2BSeason&PlayerIds=201939,203110,203952,1627780,1626172&Leverage=Medium,High,VeryHigh)

\+26.11

**119.75 ORTG and 93.64 DRTG.**

Insanity.


This is not a one-off either. Last year with Curry back the Warriors' defensive rating went from 26th the previous year to 5th. Curry's effect on his team's defense is dramatic. It doesn't seem to show up on the box score but one notices it in the wins column—and that supercedes other metrics.

Curry has been on strong defensive teams multiple times as much as or more than most other stars. That criticism of him doesn't really hold up on the team level. There is a reason Curry has led teams that can be considered amongst the greatest of all-time even when playing with players who hadn't established themselves as stars independently and when he was partnered with such a star had a team considered possibly the greatest of all-time.
User avatar
Impuniti
General Manager
Posts: 9,885
And1: 7,809
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#490 » by Impuniti » Mon Dec 27, 2021 3:34 am

Packbuckman wrote:
Impuniti wrote:
Packbuckman wrote:
Not if you count offense and defense he’s hasn’t been he’s the best shooter. Giannis impact on both sides of the ball is the best in the league and before him it was LeBron. This bucks team is just getting healthy only Lopez now is out I expect them to go on a nice run they will be right there for best record in the end.

Steph has better impact that Giannis does, which is why he's led 3 teams to 67 wins which Giannis will never do unless he gets one of the best playmakers in the league in his team. You can yell about two way as much as you want, and Lebron also could never reach 67 in his entire career despite creating multiple elite level teams.


The bucks were on a 70 gm pace when Giannis got hurt and then the season was halted with a worse cast then Steph had. And Giannis just turned 27 he’s got a lot more time to get to that magical 67 wins. And he has a different impact not more than Giannis.

Until it happens, it means **** all. It's different to do up until a certain point and to do it for an entire season. When it comes to the impact Steph does, Giannis isn't in the same universe. Which is why he has 2 67 seasons and the goat season under his belt. Giannis so far has 1 60 win season, which you know, it's cute. :lol:
mediocrityrules
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,854
And1: 5,691
Joined: Nov 27, 2013
 

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#491 » by mediocrityrules » Mon Dec 27, 2021 4:26 am

Impuniti wrote:
Packbuckman wrote:
Impuniti wrote:Steph has better impact that Giannis does, which is why he's led 3 teams to 67 wins which Giannis will never do unless he gets one of the best playmakers in the league in his team. You can yell about two way as much as you want, and Lebron also could never reach 67 in his entire career despite creating multiple elite level teams.


The bucks were on a 70 gm pace when Giannis got hurt and then the season was halted with a worse cast then Steph had. And Giannis just turned 27 he’s got a lot more time to get to that magical 67 wins. And he has a different impact not more than Giannis.

Until it happens, it means **** all. It's different to do up until a certain point and to do it for an entire season. When it comes to the impact Steph does, Giannis isn't in the same universe. Which is why he has 2 67 seasons and the goat season under his belt. Giannis so far has 1 60 win season, which you know, it's cute. :lol:


And if Giannis added KD he'd probably get 67 wins as well. I'm happy for people to keep sh**ting on Giannis all they want, because year on year he keeps proving everyone wrong, and will continue to do so as he continues to improve his game.
Circling calendars since 2021
MindState
Veteran
Posts: 2,919
And1: 3,547
Joined: Jul 05, 2018

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#492 » by MindState » Mon Dec 27, 2021 4:31 am

mediocrityrules wrote:
Impuniti wrote:
Packbuckman wrote:
The bucks were on a 70 gm pace when Giannis got hurt and then the season was halted with a worse cast then Steph had. And Giannis just turned 27 he’s got a lot more time to get to that magical 67 wins. And he has a different impact not more than Giannis.

Until it happens, it means **** all. It's different to do up until a certain point and to do it for an entire season. When it comes to the impact Steph does, Giannis isn't in the same universe. Which is why he has 2 67 seasons and the goat season under his belt. Giannis so far has 1 60 win season, which you know, it's cute. :lol:


And if Giannis added KD he'd probably get 67 wins as well. I'm happy for people to keep sh**ting on Giannis all they want, because year on year he keeps proving everyone wrong, and will continue to do so as he continues to improve his game.


I mean. Curry won 73 games without KD. Giannis needs to top that or at least come close if he wants to prove he can impact winning as much as Curry can.

Bucks best season he topped out at only 60 wins, in the weak east. That isnt good enough. Needs 3+ consecutive years with 60+ wins if he wants to be in the same stratosphere as Curry as far as regular season impact.

He ALSO needs to repeat this year or at least take the west finalist to 7 games.

If he does both of those things, I can consider him having a Curry-like regular season impact.
User avatar
Jcool0
RealGM
Posts: 15,496
And1: 9,393
Joined: Jul 12, 2014
Location: Illinois
         

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#493 » by Jcool0 » Mon Dec 27, 2021 4:49 am

He will keep DeRozan from the MVP

Read on Twitter
User avatar
giannis and 1
Starter
Posts: 2,402
And1: 1,200
Joined: Jan 06, 2019
Location: Vancouver, BC
       

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#494 » by giannis and 1 » Mon Dec 27, 2021 4:57 am

Curry
KD

Giannis
Jokic
Lavine
still learning the game

Matches Malone wrote:How did NBA fandom get to the point that it's more fun to thirst over players on other teams than to care more about your own team and players...
Cubbies2120
Head Coach
Posts: 6,421
And1: 9,397
Joined: Apr 20, 2012
Location: MD
 

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#495 » by Cubbies2120 » Mon Dec 27, 2021 5:19 am

MindState wrote:
mediocrityrules wrote:
Impuniti wrote:Until it happens, it means **** all. It's different to do up until a certain point and to do it for an entire season. When it comes to the impact Steph does, Giannis isn't in the same universe. Which is why he has 2 67 seasons and the goat season under his belt. Giannis so far has 1 60 win season, which you know, it's cute. :lol:


And if Giannis added KD he'd probably get 67 wins as well. I'm happy for people to keep sh**ting on Giannis all they want, because year on year he keeps proving everyone wrong, and will continue to do so as he continues to improve his game.


I mean. Curry won 73 games without KD. Giannis needs to top that or at least come close if he wants to prove he can impact winning as much as Curry can.

Bucks best season he topped out at only 60 wins, in the weak east. That isnt good enough. Needs 3+ consecutive years with 60+ wins if he wants to be in the same stratosphere as Curry as far as regular season impact.

He ALSO needs to repeat this year or at least take the west finalist to 7 games.

If he does both of those things, I can consider him having a Curry-like regular season impact.


Wait a second, just to make sure I am following your logic...

Giannis needs playoff achievements for you to consider him having Curry-like regular season impact?

In that case, I think Curry needs FMVP before we can say he's having Giannis-like playoff impact...
Jokic 5x MVP train
mediocrityrules
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,854
And1: 5,691
Joined: Nov 27, 2013
 

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#496 » by mediocrityrules » Mon Dec 27, 2021 5:41 am

Cubbies2120 wrote:
MindState wrote:
mediocrityrules wrote:
And if Giannis added KD he'd probably get 67 wins as well. I'm happy for people to keep sh**ting on Giannis all they want, because year on year he keeps proving everyone wrong, and will continue to do so as he continues to improve his game.


I mean. Curry won 73 games without KD. Giannis needs to top that or at least come close if he wants to prove he can impact winning as much as Curry can.

Bucks best season he topped out at only 60 wins, in the weak east. That isnt good enough. Needs 3+ consecutive years with 60+ wins if he wants to be in the same stratosphere as Curry as far as regular season impact.

He ALSO needs to repeat this year or at least take the west finalist to 7 games.

If he does both of those things, I can consider him having a Curry-like regular season impact.


Wait a second, just to make sure I am following your logic...

Giannis needs playoff achievements for you to consider him having Curry-like regular season impact?

In that case, I think Curry needs FMVP before we can say he's having Giannis-like playoff impact...


Yeah he lost me with that one. Giannis has to repeat this year to be considered a great RS player?!?
Circling calendars since 2021
MindState
Veteran
Posts: 2,919
And1: 3,547
Joined: Jul 05, 2018

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#497 » by MindState » Mon Dec 27, 2021 6:11 am

Cubbies2120 wrote:
MindState wrote:
mediocrityrules wrote:
And if Giannis added KD he'd probably get 67 wins as well. I'm happy for people to keep sh**ting on Giannis all they want, because year on year he keeps proving everyone wrong, and will continue to do so as he continues to improve his game.


I mean. Curry won 73 games without KD. Giannis needs to top that or at least come close if he wants to prove he can impact winning as much as Curry can.

Bucks best season he topped out at only 60 wins, in the weak east. That isnt good enough. Needs 3+ consecutive years with 60+ wins if he wants to be in the same stratosphere as Curry as far as regular season impact.

He ALSO needs to repeat this year or at least take the west finalist to 7 games.

If he does both of those things, I can consider him having a Curry-like regular season impact.


Wait a second, just to make sure I am following your logic...

Giannis needs playoff achievements for you to consider him having Curry-like regular season impact?

In that case, I think Curry needs FMVP before we can say he's having Giannis-like playoff impact...


Sorry, I meant to say impact in winning in general.
User avatar
Impuniti
General Manager
Posts: 9,885
And1: 7,809
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#498 » by Impuniti » Mon Dec 27, 2021 6:12 am

mediocrityrules wrote:
Impuniti wrote:
Packbuckman wrote:
The bucks were on a 70 gm pace when Giannis got hurt and then the season was halted with a worse cast then Steph had. And Giannis just turned 27 he’s got a lot more time to get to that magical 67 wins. And he has a different impact not more than Giannis.

Until it happens, it means **** all. It's different to do up until a certain point and to do it for an entire season. When it comes to the impact Steph does, Giannis isn't in the same universe. Which is why he has 2 67 seasons and the goat season under his belt. Giannis so far has 1 60 win season, which you know, it's cute. :lol:


And if Giannis added KD he'd probably get 67 wins as well. I'm happy for people to keep sh**ting on Giannis all they want, because year on year he keeps proving everyone wrong, and will continue to do so as he continues to improve his game.

That happened once out of 3 times. I'm not **** on Giannis, but saying dumb **** like the last dominant RS player was Lebron and now it's Giannis during RS when Steph has been the clear top end guy since MJ in that regard considering his 3 ATG super-seasons, it's worth mentioning. Noone is remotely close to Steph's impact during RS. That's why we have a fringe 13th player on a team, a guy who couldn't make a single team and stayed in the G league for years and an ok injury prone player coming to the Warriors and people on realGM complaining that the Warriors are too damn stacked. Steph changes the game in a way that nobody else comes close to. And he has the resume to back it.

Giannis can get his due, just know your place. :oops: If Giannis starts leading his team to legendary seasons, I and others will rightfully give him his props.
User avatar
Impuniti
General Manager
Posts: 9,885
And1: 7,809
Joined: Jan 18, 2016

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#499 » by Impuniti » Mon Dec 27, 2021 6:14 am

mediocrityrules wrote:
Cubbies2120 wrote:
MindState wrote:
I mean. Curry won 73 games without KD. Giannis needs to top that or at least come close if he wants to prove he can impact winning as much as Curry can.

Bucks best season he topped out at only 60 wins, in the weak east. That isnt good enough. Needs 3+ consecutive years with 60+ wins if he wants to be in the same stratosphere as Curry as far as regular season impact.

He ALSO needs to repeat this year or at least take the west finalist to 7 games.

If he does both of those things, I can consider him having a Curry-like regular season impact.


Wait a second, just to make sure I am following your logic...

Giannis needs playoff achievements for you to consider him having Curry-like regular season impact?

In that case, I think Curry needs FMVP before we can say he's having Giannis-like playoff impact...


Yeah he lost me with that one. Giannis has to repeat this year to be considered a great RS player?!?

Who has said on here that Giannis is not a great RS player?
User avatar
JDR720
Forum Mod - Hornets
Forum Mod - Hornets
Posts: 44,357
And1: 46,024
Joined: Jul 09, 2013
     

Re: 2021-22 NBA MVP Discussion (Pt. 1) 

Post#500 » by JDR720 » Mon Dec 27, 2021 6:21 am

My rankings:

Jokic #1. He is the only star (or close to star) on his team and without him, Denver is a bottom 5 team IMO.
Steph #2. Great record, but his stats aren't Jokic level. He also has more help.
Giannis #3. Great stats, but again not Jokic level. He also has more help.
KD #4. The Nets roster isn't great, but he does have Harden who is arguably the best MVP candidate running-mate.

#5 could be several different players, but the drop-off is high so I'm not going to bother with them.

Return to The General Board