SK21209 wrote:madmaxmedia wrote:iggymcfrack wrote:
What makes you say that? You think they wanna extend him? You think they’re excited to pay him $90MM the next 2 years and have him walk in free agency? I don’t know who else would want him if the clippers try to move on.
Trading George for Harden makes the team even older than it already was. Harden is going to need a new contract at the same time as PG. Trading one for the other solves absolutely nothing.
They are literally the same age right now lol. Harden is 8 months older, not really a meaningful difference.
I think you guys could use more primary ballhandling ability out of your second star next to Kawhi. I think the Sixers would be well-served giving Maxey more ballhandling responsibility and having a bigger wing that can work off-ball. I think you guys could use a solid forward in Harris as opposed to piecing that other forward spot together with Morris / Covington / Batum. I think the Sixers could use another scoring guard off the bench in Powell. Most of all, I think you guys could using the $75 million in expiring salary that Harden/Harris represents. Give it one more year with Kawhi, if it still doesn't work out you get a bunch of salary relief and have more flexibility to pivot.
Idk, Harden/Harris for PG/Powell makes a lot of sense to me.
Thanks for the clarification on that, I thought Harden had him by a couple of years. TBH honest Harden looks older out there, but I don't mean that to say he's still not a good player.
Your trade is not horrible (it's better than any package where we include Terance Mann). And I guess it's for debate whether you prefer George or Harden, but I'm not pulling that specific trade as-is. I do understand you points about fit though.
If the Clippers just got bought out by an owner whose first (hidden) priority was to cut payroll, that's a great trade to shed Powell's contract while claiming you're trying to improve the team.