The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Who wins? (May select 2 options.)

Simmons
361
38%
Ball
35
4%
Kuzma
39
4%
Tatum
103
11%
Markkanen
78
8%
Smith Jr
7
1%
Fox
5
1%
Mitchell
280
30%
Anunoby
18
2%
Other
14
1%
 
Total votes: 940

User avatar
sixerswillrule
RealGM
Posts: 16,684
And1: 3,628
Joined: Jul 24, 2003
Location: Disappointment

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#501 » by sixerswillrule » Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:44 pm

Knickstape1214 wrote:
LordCovington33 wrote:
WaveTheWheat80 wrote:That's great. He has a lot going for him. He still can't shoot.

51.7% FG is pretty good for somebody who can't shoot, right? One of the highest among rookies, so whatever he is doing it must be working.

Notable Rookies
Lonzo Ball: 35.6%
Donovan Mitchell: 44.2%
Jayson Tatum: 48.6%
Laurie M: 42.7%
Kyle Kuzma: 46.1%
DSJ: 40.6%


FG% isn't indicative of one's ability to shoot, unless you'd like to say that Clint Capella and DeAndre Jordan are the two best shooters in the NBA. :-? I like Simmons, but he can't shoot and wasn't able to at LSU either. I do expect him to expand his range as he progresses over the years, but he has work to do.

PLO wrote:
Didn't you forget to add he's also not a rookie?


He is a rookie.


I think he means for him to have that FG percentage in spite of his lack of outside shooting as a guard is pretty good.
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,193
And1: 5,228
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#502 » by michaelm » Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:48 pm

PLO wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
LordCovington33 wrote:51.7% FG is pretty good for somebody who can't shoot, right? One of the highest among rookies, so whatever he is doing it must be working.

Notable Rookies
Lonzo Ball: 35.6%
Donovan Mitchell: 44.2%
Jayson Tatum: 48.6%
Laurie M: 42.7%
Kyle Kuzma: 46.1%
DSJ: 40.6%


FG% isn't indicative of one's ability to shoot, unless you'd like to say that Clint Capella and DeAndre Jordan are the two best shooters in the NBA. :-? I like Simmons, but he can't shoot and wasn't able to at LSU either. I do expect him to expand his range as he progresses over the years, but he has work to do.

PLO wrote:
Didn't you forget to add he's also not a rookie?


He is a rookie.


Only technically.

Yes, he qualified to be regarded as never having played an NBA game by never playing an NBA game.
LordCovington33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,392
And1: 5,229
Joined: Nov 15, 2016
   

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#503 » by LordCovington33 » Sat Jan 27, 2018 1:57 pm

sixerswillrule wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
LordCovington33 wrote:51.7% FG is pretty good for somebody who can't shoot, right? One of the highest among rookies, so whatever he is doing it must be working.

Notable Rookies
Lonzo Ball: 35.6%
Donovan Mitchell: 44.2%
Jayson Tatum: 48.6%
Laurie M: 42.7%
Kyle Kuzma: 46.1%
DSJ: 40.6%


FG% isn't indicative of one's ability to shoot, unless you'd like to say that Clint Capella and DeAndre Jordan are the two best shooters in the NBA. :-? I like Simmons, but he can't shoot and wasn't able to at LSU either. I do expect him to expand his range as he progresses over the years, but he has work to do.

PLO wrote:
Didn't you forget to add he's also not a rookie?


He is a rookie.


I think he means for him to have that FG percentage in spite of his lack of outside shooting as a guard is pretty good.


Exactly. Since he is significantly more efficient than many other rookies who can shoot, I am not sure why his lack of a jump shot has to be repeatedly pointing out to us.
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#504 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Sat Jan 27, 2018 2:02 pm

LordCovington33 wrote:
sixerswillrule wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
FG% isn't indicative of one's ability to shoot, unless you'd like to say that Clint Capella and DeAndre Jordan are the two best shooters in the NBA. :-? I like Simmons, but he can't shoot and wasn't able to at LSU either. I do expect him to expand his range as he progresses over the years, but he has work to do.



He is a rookie.


I think he means for him to have that FG percentage in spite of his lack of outside shooting as a guard is pretty good.


Exactly. Since he is significantly more efficient than many other rookies who can shoot, I am not sure why his lack of a jump shot has to be repeatedly pointing out to us.


It’s still a weakness that can be / has been exploited. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with pointing out ones deficiencies, but that’s just me.
PLO
Analyst
Posts: 3,062
And1: 1,306
Joined: Aug 04, 2016
     

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#505 » by PLO » Sat Jan 27, 2018 2:15 pm

michaelm wrote:
PLO wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
FG% isn't indicative of one's ability to shoot, unless you'd like to say that Clint Capella and DeAndre Jordan are the two best shooters in the NBA. :-? I like Simmons, but he can't shoot and wasn't able to at LSU either. I do expect him to expand his range as he progresses over the years, but he has work to do.



He is a rookie.


Only technically.

Yes, he qualified to be regarded as never having played an NBA game by never playing an NBA game.


A technical distinction lost on many realgm posters
LakersDynasty14 wrote:Lonzo Ball is literally on a Hall of Fame trajectory at this point. This thread is so full of fail.


shakes0 wrote:I hope they put Simmons on Trae. He'll foul him out by the 3rd quarter. plus Simmons can't stay in front of Trae. No one can.
michaelm
RealGM
Posts: 12,193
And1: 5,228
Joined: Apr 06, 2010
 

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#506 » by michaelm » Sat Jan 27, 2018 2:21 pm

LordCovington33 wrote:
sixerswillrule wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
FG% isn't indicative of one's ability to shoot, unless you'd like to say that Clint Capella and DeAndre Jordan are the two best shooters in the NBA. :-? I like Simmons, but he can't shoot and wasn't able to at LSU either. I do expect him to expand his range as he progresses over the years, but he has work to do.



He is a rookie.


I think he means for him to have that FG percentage in spite of his lack of outside shooting as a guard is pretty good.


Exactly. Since he is significantly more efficient than many other rookies who can shoot, I am not sure why his lack of a jump shot has to be repeatedly pointing out to us.

I think he needs to shoot at least a little eventually, and his seeming lack of a shot has been of concern to me as an Australian NBA fan desirous of seeing him prosper, which for me and I am sure him would mainly involve him maximally helping his team to win, but I am now fairly confident he will get to a satisfactory level.

He strikes me as a perfectionist, who won’t start shooting more until he is confident he won’t shoot poorly, as others have intimated. Perhaps he could have developed more quickly by shooting poorly in actual NBA games from the getgo, but it is what it is, and my impression is that he would himself perceive doing so as selfish.
crazy_me_87
Analyst
Posts: 3,238
And1: 1,877
Joined: Jul 08, 2010
 

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#507 » by crazy_me_87 » Sat Jan 27, 2018 2:36 pm

michaelm wrote:He strikes me as a perfectionist, who won’t start shooting more until he is confident he won’t shoot poorly, as others have intimated. Perhaps he could have developed more quickly by shooting poorly in actual NBA games from the getgo, but it is what it is, and my impression is that he would himself perceive doing so as selfish.


This is exactly the vibe i get from Ben. From watching and reading Interviews you totally get that he really is a Perfectionist. Comes with both his talent and his incredible BBIQ.

Most players dont care that much if shooting ineffecient Jumpers drags down their FG% .. But Ben seems to be the guy that wont start shooting them until he thinks he can make him at a % that he thinks is effective enough. He is just wired like that. He wont shoot a bad shot because he feels it would be as you said selfish and bad for the Team.

To me it is clear he has the work ethic(and then some) needed to become at least an sufficient shooter and his form is not broken at all. He just needs time. I think even by next year we will see Ben take and Make alot of Mid Range Shots.. the year after that maybe he starts taking actual(not last second heaves) Threes.
Sixerscan
Senior Mod - 76ers
Senior Mod - 76ers
Posts: 33,946
And1: 16,327
Joined: Jan 25, 2005

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#508 » by Sixerscan » Sat Jan 27, 2018 2:42 pm

Knickstape1214 wrote:
LordCovington33 wrote:
sixerswillrule wrote:
I think he means for him to have that FG percentage in spite of his lack of outside shooting as a guard is pretty good.


Exactly. Since he is significantly more efficient than many other rookies who can shoot, I am not sure why his lack of a jump shot has to be repeatedly pointing out to us.


It’s still a weakness that can be / has been exploited. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with pointing out ones deficiencies, but that’s just me.


Sure, he is on the whole a very good player at this point though, and seemingly one of his relatively few weaknesses seems to be all people want to talk about.

Meanwhile all the other rookies have to do is not vomit all over themselves and people get super excited without repeatedly pointing out what they have to work out.

I think it's fair to say he is held to a higher standard than the other rookies. Maybe it's because he sat out a year.
NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#509 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Sat Jan 27, 2018 2:45 pm

Sixerscan wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:
LordCovington33 wrote:
Exactly. Since he is significantly more efficient than many other rookies who can shoot, I am not sure why his lack of a jump shot has to be repeatedly pointing out to us.


It’s still a weakness that can be / has been exploited. I don’t think there’s anything wrong with pointing out ones deficiencies, but that’s just me.


Sure, he is on the whole a very good player at this point though, and seemingly one of his relatively few weaknesses seems to be all people want to talk about.

Meanwhile all the other rookies have to do is not vomit all over themselves and people get super excited without repeatedly pointing out what they have to work out.

I think it's fair to say he is held to a higher standard than the other rookies. Maybe it's because he sat out a year.


Expectations were way higher for Simmons than any other rookie playing now, so it only makes sense that the standard is higher as well.

I think the shooting is a non-issue in the long term and I see him developing a jumper in the same way Blake did.

*I'd also like to add that his lack of jumper, inability to stay active (in tune) in games when he wasn't handling the ball, and his defense were major issues in college. He's fixed two of them already.
User avatar
PhilBlackson
RealGM
Posts: 31,875
And1: 46,613
Joined: May 02, 2017
Location: No Wastemans Land
     

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#510 » by PhilBlackson » Sat Jan 27, 2018 5:06 pm

With all the talk about Dame Lillard the player that I do think will have a similar IMPACT (not style of play) is Dennis Smith Jr, not Mitchell.
>>>THENOTORIOUSBI3<<< :guitar: *INGRAM*ALLSTARSEASON* Wemby is HIM
Image
Names of who OG will be better than Shaedon: DelAbbott, ThaCynic, pingpongrac, Los_29, OakleyDokley
GameBredAPBT
Veteran
Posts: 2,814
And1: 1,611
Joined: Dec 09, 2017

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#511 » by GameBredAPBT » Sat Jan 27, 2018 6:40 pm

PhilBlackson wrote:With all the talk about Dame Lillard the player that I do think will have a similar IMPACT (not style of play) is Dennis Smith Jr, not Mitchell.


Mitchell doesn't resemble Lillard at all out there.

His closest comparison is a less athletic, more intelligent, driven Baron.

More brute force than crafty fluidity.

Smith doesn't remind me of Lillard either though. Looks like Francis 2.0, right down to a nearly identical physical build.
WaveTheWheat80
Senior
Posts: 513
And1: 355
Joined: Nov 15, 2016
     

Re: RE: Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#512 » by WaveTheWheat80 » Sat Jan 27, 2018 7:08 pm

GameBredAPBT wrote:
PhilBlackson wrote:With all the talk about Dame Lillard the player that I do think will have a similar IMPACT (not style of play) is Dennis Smith Jr, not Mitchell.


Mitchell doesn't resemble Lillard at all out there.

His closest comparison is a less athletic, more intelligent, driven Baron.

More brute force than crafty fluidity.

Smith doesn't remind me of Lillard either though. Looks like Francis 2.0, right down to a nearly identical physical build.

What? Nothing about Mitchell's game is "brute force". He's a Lillard and Wade hybrid. His flaw is he doesn't get to the line because he gets into the paint clean

Sent from my SM-G930T using RealGM mobile app
ChargerMan
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,351
And1: 465
Joined: Apr 24, 2008

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#513 » by ChargerMan » Sat Jan 27, 2018 7:20 pm

Milos pushing for 10/6/3 soon, needs to finish better as his fg% is only 4% better than his 3p%
User avatar
stitches
RealGM
Posts: 14,462
And1: 6,912
Joined: Jul 14, 2014
 

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#514 » by stitches » Sat Jan 27, 2018 10:22 pm

NBA Fan 1234
RealGM
Posts: 48,653
And1: 28,365
Joined: Jul 16, 2009

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#515 » by NBA Fan 1234 » Sat Jan 27, 2018 10:25 pm

How is Mitchell even remotely similar to Baron Davis...?
User avatar
cksdayoff
RealGM
Posts: 13,331
And1: 3,639
Joined: Jun 21, 2010

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#516 » by cksdayoff » Sat Jan 27, 2018 10:35 pm

Knickstape1214 wrote:How is Mitchell even remotely similar to Baron Davis...?


yup, mitchell's knock coming out of college was that he was more of a combo guard than a lead guard. mitchell does not have the handles of a baron davis.

mitchell reminds me of oladipo
#failforfultz
User avatar
cksdayoff
RealGM
Posts: 13,331
And1: 3,639
Joined: Jun 21, 2010

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#517 » by cksdayoff » Sat Jan 27, 2018 10:36 pm

also, ben simmons can shoot 3s. if he actually starts shooting those in actual games, how are you gonna guard him. he has every move in the book within 15 feet of the rim. if he starts shooting 3s, he's gonna be pretty amazing
#failforfultz
Roy The Natural
RealGM
Posts: 10,302
And1: 5,450
Joined: Nov 07, 2014

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#518 » by Roy The Natural » Sat Jan 27, 2018 10:54 pm

cksdayoff wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:How is Mitchell even remotely similar to Baron Davis...?


yup, mitchell's knock coming out of college was that he was more of a combo guard than a lead guard. mitchell does not have the handles of a baron davis.

mitchell reminds me of oladipo


Oh yea... that's a really good one. Kind of like that young Eric Gordon sort of player. Mitchell's been great, but he definitely hasn't yet proved he can be a real PG and setup teammates consistently.
User avatar
Art Vaandelay
Freshman
Posts: 87
And1: 35
Joined: Mar 22, 2010

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#519 » by Art Vaandelay » Sun Jan 28, 2018 3:40 am

Roy The Natural wrote:
cksdayoff wrote:
Knickstape1214 wrote:How is Mitchell even remotely similar to Baron Davis...?


yup, mitchell's knock coming out of college was that he was more of a combo guard than a lead guard. mitchell does not have the handles of a baron davis.

mitchell reminds me of oladipo


Oh yea... that's a really good one. Kind of like that young Eric Gordon sort of player. Mitchell's been great, but he definitely hasn't yet proved he can be a real PG and setup teammates consistently.


Yep. Clippers Eric Gordon is the best comparison for Mitchell imo.

Baron was a more traditional point who wasn't a good shooter (but that never stopped him). We are yet to see Mitchell facilitate and control an offense like Baron did. He didn't slither through the key like Mitchell does either, relying more on his rare combination of speed, athleticism, and IQ (all of which Mitchell shows to a certain degree).
User avatar
KobeBryant24
Veteran
Posts: 2,514
And1: 2,167
Joined: Aug 06, 2014
Location: Savannah, GA
     

Re: The ROTY/Rookie Discussion Thread, Part III 

Post#520 » by KobeBryant24 » Sun Jan 28, 2018 3:53 am

Tatum really fell off

Return to The General Board