Marty_Budda wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:
Cameroonian Jokic
Not gonna lie, having Vuc in there kind of sours it for me lol
lmao Vuc gets unwarranted hate but he was a good player in his prime
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Marty_Budda wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:
Cameroonian Jokic
Not gonna lie, having Vuc in there kind of sours it for me lol
raf1995 wrote:I just don’t think he has that kind of potential. I think we will regret not trading him for a haul in a few years when he’s a mid-tier starter with nice playmaking and defense and a shaky jumper.

JXL wrote:Who does the Raptors have to throw at Embiid? Khem Birch? Boucher? Young? Don't see anyone stopping him, but their length can bother the rest of them, especially Maxey and Harden. Harden looks washed, and his ISOs go nowhere but brick laying jump shots.
I can see the Raptors pull the upset in 7. VanVleet, OG, Siakim, and GTJ can turn the series if they get hot.
JXL wrote:Who does the Raptors have to throw at Embiid? Khem Birch? Boucher? Young? Don't see anyone stopping him, but their length can bother the rest of them, especially Maxey and Harden. Harden looks washed, and his ISOs go nowhere but brick laying jump shots.
I can see the Raptors pull the upset in 7. VanVleet, OG, Siakim, and GTJ can turn the series if they get hot.
LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:lmao Vuc gets unwarranted hate but he was a good player in his prime
visionquest wrote:aminiaturebuddha wrote:
Don't take this board as indicative of the overall narrative though. The ESPN poll of its writers went 12-5 in favour of the Sixers. However, every voter had it going 6 or 7.
Good news.
Raptors excel when people count them out.

MoMoneyMoProbs wrote:visionquest wrote:aminiaturebuddha wrote:
Don't take this board as indicative of the overall narrative though. The ESPN poll of its writers went 12-5 in favour of the Sixers. However, every voter had it going 6 or 7.
Good news.
Raptors excel when people count them out.
Visionquest is right.
ESPN also projected Raptors to go 35 - 47 this year.
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/32399420/nba-preview-2021-22-power-rankings-projections-breakout-stars-storylines-all-30-teams
The Comedian wrote:/Raps in 4.
Duffman100 wrote:MoMoneyMoProbs wrote:visionquest wrote:
Good news.
Raptors excel when people count them out.
Visionquest is right.
ESPN also projected Raptors to go 35 - 47 this year.
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/32399420/nba-preview-2021-22-power-rankings-projections-breakout-stars-storylines-all-30-teams
Honestly, I had a similar projection. I think I had them at 32 wins.
Duffman100 wrote:MoMoneyMoProbs wrote:visionquest wrote:
Good news.
Raptors excel when people count them out.
Visionquest is right.
ESPN also projected Raptors to go 35 - 47 this year.
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/32399420/nba-preview-2021-22-power-rankings-projections-breakout-stars-storylines-all-30-teams
Honestly, I had a similar projection. I think I had them at 32 wins.
JShuttlesworth wrote:Duffman100 wrote:MoMoneyMoProbs wrote:
Visionquest is right.
ESPN also projected Raptors to go 35 - 47 this year.
https://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/32399420/nba-preview-2021-22-power-rankings-projections-breakout-stars-storylines-all-30-teams
Honestly, I had a similar projection. I think I had them at 32 wins.
I had us at 38 wins, I doubt many had us making it out of the first round before the season started.
Objectively, I'd say Sixers in 6. But the Toronto fan in me still says Raps in 5. I'll go down with my squad every time

everdiso wrote:I find that people have a really hard time accepting the idea that Siakam and VanVleet are really really good and absolutely legit all-stars. Once you get past that hurdle, it's not hard to understand why the raps are good.
Duffman100 wrote:everdiso wrote:I find that people have a really hard time accepting the idea that Siakam and VanVleet are really really good and absolutely legit all-stars. Once you get past that hurdle, it's not hard to understand why the raps are good.
I think it's a few things.
They were on the national stage as role players in a title run (Siakam as an elite roleplayer) and so people remember them in that construct.
Siakam had a terrible year that was highlighted and people don't follow him closely enough this year to realize he's been incredible.
FVV just doesn't fit the mold of a 'star'.
There are a bunch of objective, rational, non-troll fans on the GB that can see they're really good. Because otherwise, how are the Raptors the 5th seed?
It was always my argument with Lowry. Clearly the Raptors are winning for a reason so...
pingpongrac wrote:T_Brandon wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:
only a Raps fan would believe Siakam is on par with Booker, those homer goggles are on a little too tight
They live in their own little world
If you don't want to watch any Raptors games, you can just look at the stats.
Siakam: 22.8 PPG, 8.5 REB, 5.3 AST, .565 TS%, 25.8 USG%, .151 ws/48, 3.5 BPM, 3.6 VORP, 2.3 EPM, 5.11 RPM, 2.26 LEBRON, +7.4 on/off
Booker: 26.8 PPG, 5.0 REB, 4.8 AST, .576 TS%, 32.0 USG%, .156 ws/48, 4.1 BPM, 3.6 VORP, 4.5 EPM, 4.93 RPM, 2.70 LEBRON, +4.8 on/off
Outside of Booker scoring an extra 4 PPG on much higher usage and Siakam grabbing an extra 3.5 REB in a few extra minutes, their numbers are almost identical across the board. I don't know why I'm even responding to people who have no evidence for their claims though lol.
Mik317 wrote:Not sure the stats back it up but it feels like the Sixers have had a big lead in most of the matchups only to blow it thanks to Doc being Doc lol.
Mik317 wrote:
Not sure the stats back it up but it feels like the Sixers have had a big lead in most of the matchups only to blow it thanks to Doc being Doc lol. So maybe the shortened lineups helps prevent that but I doubt it. Nurse seems to prioritize making sure the star player of the other team hates life more than winning at times lol and our second best player has been washed for a bit and/or young and hasn't experienced real playoff hours yet...so that strat might work out.