celtxman wrote:GiannisAnte34 wrote:celtxman wrote:Let me understand this. You're admitting the Bucks "forced" the Celtics to play a legit team, while the Bucks, as you say chose to skate. The defending champs make a conscious decision to avoid playing someone may be a strategy but a bad look.
In the end if it helps the Bucks win a Championship, nobody is going to remember or care that they sat players for the final game. They did earn the ability to choose that destiny by beating Boston, Brooklyn, and Philly to end the season
Well, they won't be up there with Rudy Tomjonovich's "never underestimate the heart of a champion" LOL, but sure if they repeat........not many will remember. There was at least a little chatter to allow the team that earned the tiebreaker the choice in the future. That would be wild and fun.
There is also absolutely a scenario where people will remember the Bucks decision for a long time. Celtics are fortunate enough to beat the Nets. They then get to set the tone with first two games in Boston against the Bucks. Game 7 in Boston. 100% people will remember if Celts beat the Bucks in round 2.
If
Celtics had a lot of familiar names and faces on that team that got spanked 4-1. Regular season switching defensive scheme is very effective if you have the personnel to run it. The problem with the Celtics is their coach never experimented with other things, if they get punched in the mouth with their plan A they could easily flail out.
















