Im Coming Home wrote:Thats a typical 'he missed the layup so it must've been a foul' call
Make up call for taking away Haliburton's and-1
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Im Coming Home wrote:Thats a typical 'he missed the layup so it must've been a foul' call
Im Coming Home wrote:Thats a typical 'he missed the layup so it must've been a foul' call
Im Coming Home wrote:Thats a typical 'he missed the layup so it must've been a foul' call





Im Coming Home wrote:Pathetic defense by Haliburton there.. lol


___Rand___ wrote:lol why is Thibs challenging that?

xBulletproof wrote:Capn'O wrote:These Pacers are hard to hate. They play the right way.Hoop Hunter wrote:Honestly I think we miss Mathurin more than the Knicks miss Randle.
No.
Very much agree on the Randle/Mathurin thing. The ball sticks with Mathurin. Hurts the ball movement and player movement game that we are excelling at.
The Knicks are in need of another scorer big time. Randle would be that. Anything happens to Brunson and I'm not sure where the scoring would come from.

___Rand___ wrote:Reeko wrote:___Rand___ wrote:
Not on good volume. His form was just so ugly and worse than robotic.
It was almost 3 attempts per game, that's pretty decent volume.
To add to my point he shot 63% from free throw rookie year. next year he was 33% from 3, FT% was 58%. 2nd year was more indicative of his ability to shoot at that point. He got better in third year when his shooting form improved. FT% started going north of 70%.
Clay Davis wrote:COMPOSED ONLY OF THE COOLEST WOMEN AND THE HOTTEST GUYS, THE TORONTO RAPTORS REALGM BOARD HAS LONG BEEN KNOWN FOR ITS HIGH-QUALITY DISCUSSION, PASSIONATE LOYALTY, TEMPERATE CELEBRATIONS OF VICTORY, AND GRACE IN DEFEAT.