are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?!

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
3toheadmelo
RealGM
Posts: 94,931
And1: 136,023
Joined: Feb 15, 2015
 

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#581 » by 3toheadmelo » Sat Oct 5, 2024 9:25 pm

cgf wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:
cgf wrote:
Which Knick other than Brunson is a bad defender? Anunoby's awesome. Robinson is awesome. McBride is awesome. Bridges is pretty awesome. Achiuwa is pretty awesome. Hart is really damn good. Payne is good. And KAT has been a positive (neutral at worst) over the past few years.

KAT has been pretty terrible at the 5. He's ok at the 4 though.


He's been solid the past 2-3 years that they've stopped asking him to protect the rim. Mitch, Precious, OG, and Jericho should be able to protect the rim for us, which means we should be able to use KAT the way Minny has the past 2-3 years.

I been posting the numbers on the Knicks board, but the numbers show when he plays the 5, they were a terrible defensive team.

We need a true C next to KAT. Hopefully it's Mitch or someone we trade for.
Image
It’s like when lil bitches make subliminal records, if it ain’t directed directly at me, I don’t respect it
Quattro
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,022
And1: 9,599
Joined: Jan 29, 2016
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#582 » by Quattro » Sat Oct 5, 2024 9:38 pm

Worried about their depth when the inevitable injuries hit. Love their starting 5 though.
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,089
And1: 14,457
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#583 » by cgf » Sat Oct 5, 2024 9:52 pm

3toheadmelo wrote:
cgf wrote:
3toheadmelo wrote:KAT has been pretty terrible at the 5. He's ok at the 4 though.


He's been solid the past 2-3 years that they've stopped asking him to protect the rim. Mitch, Precious, OG, and Jericho should be able to protect the rim for us, which means we should be able to use KAT the way Minny has the past 2-3 years.

I been posting the numbers on the Knicks board, but the numbers show when he plays the 5, they were a terrible defensive team.

We need a true C next to KAT. Hopefully it's Mitch or someone we trade for.


Yeah, but that's because he needs someone else to protect the rim for him and be the last line of defense. Which is exactly what we asked Precious to do last season and exactly what he had success doing. So even if Towns was the "5" & Achiuwa the "4" on paper, it should still work well until Mitch is back because functionally Precious would be doing the 5 things that KAT needs someone else to do.

OG can do it too...but I like that option less because OG is just a lot more dynamic defensively when he's free to disrupt or smothering a team's #1, and doesn't have to cover for everyone. Plus that would mean we had to put Mikal on the #1 option instead of OG...and Precious is crazy switchable & a really good offensive rebounder.

I'm also optimistic Jericho will take another step like he did last summer. He has the tools to be a good rim protector and has made a lot of progress since getting drafted. If Sims doesn't cut it, then I'd like to see something like Dadiet+Sims+WSH pick for Kessler. Robinson, Achiuwa, & Kessler would make me feel really good about our depth at the 5.

...even if I'd still have my concerns about the non-Brunson creation...
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
User avatar
iLLmatic860
General Manager
Posts: 9,896
And1: 16,387
Joined: Jan 23, 2013
Location: Tampa
     

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#584 » by iLLmatic860 » Sat Oct 5, 2024 9:57 pm

HMFFL wrote:
iLLmatic860 wrote:
JJtheBricklayer wrote:
what Rivalry? lol

New York hates boston
Boston hates new york

that one
Just because the media sold you doesn't mean the rest of us are.

Sent from my SM-S928U1 using RealGM mobile app

Media? Lmao i dont even watch tv. I actually know tons of Boston fans and we talk **** regularly.

Are you really pretending that Boston fans dont hate Ny fans, vice versa or u being deadass?
JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 14,860
And1: 9,196
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#585 » by JujitsuFlip » Sun Oct 6, 2024 2:00 am

cgf wrote:
iLLmatic860 wrote:
RoyceDa59 wrote:Brunson / McBride
Bridges / Payne
Anunoby / Morris Sr
Hart / Achiuwa
Towns / Mitchell

A little thin on the bench but their starting unit now rivals Boston.

Knicks really needed playmaking last season so don't forget about Kolek.

I expect Shamet to get some mins too


Kolek won't get PT from Thibs until he learns to play even bad NBA defense...especially given the depth in front of him at PG. And we can only keep 1 vet minimum guy on top of Payne, that final roster spot needs to go to a rookie-min guy. So it's either Shamet, Okeke, Morris, or somebody they haven't yet tried out, but just 1 of them.

Kids can obviously, improve...I think Jericho could become a full-time rotation guy and maybe Kolek will figure things out enough for Thibs to trust his defense in the NBA...and guys can prove surprisingly useful...I thought Payne was pretty good for the 6ers, I was intrigued by Okeke during Orlando's run, and Shamet can shoot if he's healthy...but as things stand we're looking at:

Starters
Brunson - Bridges - Anunoby - Towns - Robinson*

Big minute bench guys; can step in without looking out of place playing against starters
McBride* - Hart* - Achiuwa*

Deeper bench options; can give us minutes against bench units
Payne - Shamet/Okeke/Morris/FA - Sims

Redshirts; barring massive progress in the GL
Kolek - McCullar
Pretty sure TJ Warren replaced Morris once Morris refused to come back on a camp deal, once waived.
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,089
And1: 14,457
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#586 » by cgf » Sun Oct 6, 2024 2:01 am

JujitsuFlip wrote:
cgf wrote:
iLLmatic860 wrote:Knicks really needed playmaking last season so don't forget about Kolek.

I expect Shamet to get some mins too


Kolek won't get PT from Thibs until he learns to play even bad NBA defense...especially given the depth in front of him at PG. And we can only keep 1 vet minimum guy on top of Payne, that final roster spot needs to go to a rookie-min guy. So it's either Shamet, Okeke, Morris, or somebody they haven't yet tried out, but just 1 of them.

Kids can obviously, improve...I think Jericho could become a full-time rotation guy and maybe Kolek will figure things out enough for Thibs to trust his defense in the NBA...and guys can prove surprisingly useful...I thought Payne was pretty good for the 6ers, I was intrigued by Okeke during Orlando's run, and Shamet can shoot if he's healthy...but as things stand we're looking at:

Starters
Brunson - Bridges - Anunoby - Towns - Robinson*

Big minute bench guys; can step in without looking out of place playing against starters
McBride* - Hart* - Achiuwa*

Deeper bench options; can give us minutes against bench units
Payne - Shamet/Okeke/Morris/FA - Sims

Redshirts; barring massive progress in the GL
Kolek - McCullar
Pretty sure TJ Warren replaced Morris once Morris refused to come back on a camp deal, once waived.


True, but I can't say I think either one was likely to make it over Shamet or Okeke.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
User avatar
iLLmatic860
General Manager
Posts: 9,896
And1: 16,387
Joined: Jan 23, 2013
Location: Tampa
     

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#587 » by iLLmatic860 » Sun Oct 6, 2024 2:04 am

cgf wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:
cgf wrote:
Kolek won't get PT from Thibs until he learns to play even bad NBA defense...especially given the depth in front of him at PG. And we can only keep 1 vet minimum guy on top of Payne, that final roster spot needs to go to a rookie-min guy. So it's either Shamet, Okeke, Morris, or somebody they haven't yet tried out, but just 1 of them.

Kids can obviously, improve...I think Jericho could become a full-time rotation guy and maybe Kolek will figure things out enough for Thibs to trust his defense in the NBA...and guys can prove surprisingly useful...I thought Payne was pretty good for the 6ers, I was intrigued by Okeke during Orlando's run, and Shamet can shoot if he's healthy...but as things stand we're looking at:

Starters
Brunson - Bridges - Anunoby - Towns - Robinson*

Big minute bench guys; can step in without looking out of place playing against starters
McBride* - Hart* - Achiuwa*

Deeper bench options; can give us minutes against bench units
Payne - Shamet/Okeke/Morris/FA - Sims

Redshirts; barring massive progress in the GL
Kolek - McCullar
Pretty sure TJ Warren replaced Morris once Morris refused to come back on a camp deal, once waived.


True, but I can't say I think either one was likely to make it over Shamet or Okeke.

I think Warren gonna be at the end of the bench sorta like Burks was. So situational. But he do have some goon in him. I hope we play Heat in playoffs lol
Read on Twitter
OrangeBlueSkies
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,964
And1: 3,144
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#588 » by OrangeBlueSkies » Sun Oct 6, 2024 3:55 am

cgf wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:
cgf wrote:
Kolek won't get PT from Thibs until he learns to play even bad NBA defense...especially given the depth in front of him at PG. And we can only keep 1 vet minimum guy on top of Payne, that final roster spot needs to go to a rookie-min guy. So it's either Shamet, Okeke, Morris, or somebody they haven't yet tried out, but just 1 of them.

Kids can obviously, improve...I think Jericho could become a full-time rotation guy and maybe Kolek will figure things out enough for Thibs to trust his defense in the NBA...and guys can prove surprisingly useful...I thought Payne was pretty good for the 6ers, I was intrigued by Okeke during Orlando's run, and Shamet can shoot if he's healthy...but as things stand we're looking at:

Starters
Brunson - Bridges - Anunoby - Towns - Robinson*

Big minute bench guys; can step in without looking out of place playing against starters
McBride* - Hart* - Achiuwa*

Deeper bench options; can give us minutes against bench units
Payne - Shamet/Okeke/Morris/FA - Sims

Redshirts; barring massive progress in the GL
Kolek - McCullar
Pretty sure TJ Warren replaced Morris once Morris refused to come back on a camp deal, once waived.


True, but I can't say I think either one was likely to make it over Shamet or Okeke.



Due to the new cba, we can only sign one veteran. It seems that shamet will be signed and ariel hukporti the center at rookie.
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,089
And1: 14,457
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#589 » by cgf » Sun Oct 6, 2024 1:18 pm

OrangeBlueSkies wrote:
cgf wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:Pretty sure TJ Warren replaced Morris once Morris refused to come back on a camp deal, once waived.


True, but I can't say I think either one was likely to make it over Shamet or Okeke.



Due to the new cba, we can only sign one veteran. It seems that shamet will be signed and ariel hukporti the center at rookie.


Yeah, it was in the middle of that first paragraph but I mentioned that we can only sign one of Shamet / Okeke / Morris / Warren / vet min FA:

we can only keep 1 vet minimum guy on top of Payne, that final roster spot needs to go to a rookie-min guy. So it's either Shamet, Okeke, Morris, or somebody they haven't yet tried out, but just 1 of them


But I'm not sure why you are assuming that Shamet & Hukporti will get those final two spots. Did I miss some reporting from Katz or one of the good Knicks beat guys?

If you're just speculating then I'm skeptical about Huk getting the contract over McCullar. With Achiuwa, Sims and Towns capable of filling in while Mitch is out, we're not so desperate for a center that we'll take just anybody & from what I've read McCullar seems much closer to actually giving us NBA minutes.

Shamet v Okeke is more unclear to me. I see the argument for giving that job to a quality shooter...if Shamet is fit...but I like Okeke's defensive versatility and he just feels more like a Thibsy kinda player than Landry.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,063
And1: 14,901
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#590 » by basketballRob » Sun Oct 6, 2024 5:31 pm

RHODEY wrote:
Ballerhogger wrote:I don’t think OG true second star . So not contender for championship . They will make ECF and be beat by Boston or 76ers in 6

He's like our 4th option and the best defensive wing in the league...
If you consider Isaac a big, that's true.

Sent from my SM-G781U using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
Lalouie
RealGM
Posts: 23,349
And1: 12,453
Joined: May 12, 2017

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#591 » by Lalouie » Sun Oct 6, 2024 5:45 pm

no. they are not a top4
nzahir
RealGM
Posts: 11,564
And1: 5,083
Joined: Nov 04, 2017
 

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#592 » by nzahir » Sun Oct 6, 2024 8:20 pm

Sealab2024 wrote:Just so you guys know. KAT is literally the worst defensive center you can have. Very good on the perimeter or bodying 1 on 1, but literally no feel, no rim protection, no help D. There's a reason the Wolves got Gobert. There's a reason suddenly KAT looked decent on D after they did.

Well they still have Mitchell Robinson coming back don't they...

They should really consider a move for a C who isn't hurt now though

OG is the best defender out of OG, Bridges, ANT, and Mcdaniels

They still have Hart and Precious to help out on D. And I think McBride plays decent defense iirc

NY is gona be legit
User avatar
KamikazeK
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,564
And1: 7,223
Joined: Nov 17, 2012
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#593 » by KamikazeK » Sun Oct 6, 2024 9:46 pm

Wargreymon wrote:Absolutely on the same level of the Celtics. They got their Porzingis in Towns. They have the starters. Now they just need some bench pieces but they can always get that at the trade deadline or...who knows maybe a player or two breaks out and develops to solidify their bench situation.

Porzingis is way better than Towns :rofl2:
Image
Quentin
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,596
And1: 1,317
Joined: Dec 18, 2006
 

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#594 » by Quentin » Sun Oct 6, 2024 11:25 pm

I've been following the Wolves since inception. I was very happy to hear about the Towns trade. He has a ten cent head, as Knicks fans will soon find out. Really dumb fouls. Very soft defender and gets lost a lot. Tries to make highlight reel passes that don't work. I may be in the minority from a Wolves fan perspective but I always thought he was overrated. Guess we'll see how the season goes.
Sweet Serenity
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,725
And1: 2,640
Joined: Dec 01, 2023

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#595 » by Sweet Serenity » Mon Oct 7, 2024 1:56 am

Wargreymon wrote:Absolutely on the same level of the Celtics. They got their Porzingis in Towns. They have the starters. Now they just need some bench pieces but they can always get that at the trade deadline or...who knows maybe a player or two breaks out and develops to solidify their bench situation.


While they have closed the talent gap it’s yet to be determined if the pieces fit together.
The reason the Celtics are so good right now is because the whole team is playing like a well oiled machine.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,371
And1: 70,080
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#596 » by Celts17Pride » Mon Oct 7, 2024 11:31 am

Knicks lack depth. Thibs is going to play the starters 42-44 mpg and run them into the ground. Everyone will be hurt for the playoffs.

Where have we seen this movie before?
Moose
Analyst
Posts: 3,732
And1: 1,676
Joined: Feb 20, 2002

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#597 » by Moose » Mon Oct 7, 2024 12:29 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:Knicks lack depth. Thibs is going to play the starters 42-44 mpg and run them into the ground. Everyone will be hurt for the playoffs.

Where have we seen this movie before?


People really just make things up. Even with all the injuries, brunson averaged 35 mpg during the season. Thibs runs a 9-man rotation.

They may still get hurt, but it isn't because they are playing 44 mpg.
User avatar
Celts17Pride
RealGM
Posts: 68,371
And1: 70,080
Joined: Nov 27, 2005

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#598 » by Celts17Pride » Mon Oct 7, 2024 3:07 pm

Moose wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:Knicks lack depth. Thibs is going to play the starters 42-44 mpg and run them into the ground. Everyone will be hurt for the playoffs.

Where have we seen this movie before?


People really just make things up. Even with all the injuries, brunson averaged 35 mpg during the season. Thibs runs a 9-man rotation.

They may still get hurt, but it isn't because they are playing 44 mpg.

The point is still the same. Thibs because of a lack of bench depth, is going to run the starters into the ground. It's what he has always done.
Moose
Analyst
Posts: 3,732
And1: 1,676
Joined: Feb 20, 2002

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#599 » by Moose » Mon Oct 7, 2024 3:47 pm

Celts17Pride wrote:
Moose wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:Knicks lack depth. Thibs is going to play the starters 42-44 mpg and run them into the ground. Everyone will be hurt for the playoffs.

Where have we seen this movie before?


People really just make things up. Even with all the injuries, brunson averaged 35 mpg during the season. Thibs runs a 9-man rotation.

They may still get hurt, but it isn't because they are playing 44 mpg.

The point is still the same. Thibs because of a lack of bench depth, is going to run the starters into the ground. It's what he has always done.


The regular season data says otherwise.
Slimjimzv
Senior
Posts: 739
And1: 959
Joined: Dec 20, 2011
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#600 » by Slimjimzv » Mon Oct 7, 2024 3:50 pm

I'm clearly in the minority, but I actually liked them better before the trade. KAT is a proven loser, and they lost depth. If they were determined to trade Randle, I think they could have gotten more. That being said, they're clearly contenders. They have one of the best starting 5's in the league.

Return to The General Board