NBA = dead league

LApwnd · Post #61 » by **LApwnd** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 6:45 pm

LAC roster more loaded then Chi, you dont see their fans crying

FrieAaron · Post #62 » by **FrieAaron** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 6:52 pm

KEGster wrote:
FrieAaron wrote:
KEGster wrote:They are the new Utah Jazz

Consistently very competitive?

With 0 chance of winning a ring

It can't be a 0.0% chance. They must have a greater chance than the Bulls.

crosswalkryan · Post #63 » by **crosswalkryan** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 6:52 pm

ginobiliflops wrote:
KEGster wrote:Because Bosh is gonna be THAT much more productive than Beasley and O'Neal combo were?

Yes, yes Bosh is significantly better than supercoolbeas and JO.

Second this. JO is an old man with wonky knees who you're lucky to get 60 games a year and 14/10 from. Beas, for whatever reason (lack of immaturity, playing time etc) is barely hitting the 20 mpg mark. But looks like he's staying anyways.

LApwnd · Post #64 » by **LApwnd** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 6:53 pm

your GM sucks, deal with it

bullsnewdynasty · Post #65 » by **bullsnewdynasty** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 6:54 pm

KEGster wrote:Because Bosh is gonna be THAT much more productive than Beasley and O'Neal combo were?
They are the new Utah Jazz

Don't worry man, these **** don't have a clue. Anyone who doen't recongnize that the Bulls have the best roster to compete is in denial and delusional.

LApwnd · Post #66 » by **LApwnd** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 6:57 pm

BULLSFAN_1 wrote:
KEGster wrote:Because Bosh is gonna be THAT much more productive than Beasley and O'Neal combo were?
They are the new Utah Jazz

Don't worry man, these **** don't have a clue. Anyone who doen't recongnize that the Bulls have the best roster to compete is in denial and delusional.

Bosh and James certainly didn't :lol:

kookie_819 · Post #67 » by **kookie_819** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 6:58 pm

LApwnd wrote:
BULLSFAN_1 wrote:
KEGster wrote:Because Bosh is gonna be THAT much more productive than Beasley and O'Neal combo were?
They are the new Utah Jazz

Don't worry man, these **** don't have a clue. Anyone who doen't recongnize that the Bulls have the best roster to compete is in denial and delusional.

Bosh and James certainly didn't

Post #68 » by **Luv those Knicks** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:01 pm

KEGster wrote:Are you NBA "fans" really gonna sit around and jerk off to the next 5 Laker titles?

ROTFL @ this "competitive" sport

I'll bet you money this doesn't happen.

Post #69 » by **Luv those Knicks** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:02 pm

The Boss of Bosses wrote:Miami will always draw FA interest because of the following..

1.No state income tax!
2.No state income tax!
3.No state income tax!!!

..99. Good weather n place to live year round.

Year round?

Have you been to Miami in July & August?

bullsnewdynasty · Post #70 » by **bullsnewdynasty** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:02 pm

LApwnd wrote:
BULLSFAN_1 wrote:
KEGster wrote:Because Bosh is gonna be THAT much more productive than Beasley and O'Neal combo were?
They are the new Utah Jazz

Don't worry man, these **** don't have a clue. Anyone who doen't recongnize that the Bulls have the best roster to compete is in denial and delusional.

Bosh and James certainly didn't

Bosh isn't interested in winning championships. He wants to get laid and 'live the life' in Miami.

I'll wait until LeBron makes his decision to make a judgement on him.

phx#7 · Post #71 » by **phx#7** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:02 pm

BULLSFAN_1 wrote:
Don't worry man, these **** don't have a clue. Anyone who doen't recongnize that the Bulls have the best roster to compete is in denial and delusional.

What difference does the roster make when ownership showed no hesitation in blowing up a team that won 6 titles and has been rebuilding for over a decade despite having a slew of top 3 picks. Obviously big time FAs don't think too highly of the upper management of the team.

This wouldn't be the first time the Bulls came up empty in a big time FA class. At least this year there are enough quality FA that they can still get good players.

Post #72 » by **Luv those Knicks** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:05 pm

KEGster wrote:Maybe you guys are too in drenched in it already but take it from fans of the other major American sports - they are laughing at how the hip hop image as completely gutted this league.

Off the court and selling "my product" is all that matters to 99% of the Elite players in this league. The greatest player the league has had in a decade is more concerned about being the next Jay-Z than winning titles....which I thought was the goal at the end of the day

For the record, I hate it when guys want to join the "best team" - so I disagree with your argument.

If Bosh, Bron and wade had all joined a team together - I think THAT would have been bad for the NBA.

bullsnewdynasty · Post #73 » by **bullsnewdynasty** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:08 pm

phx#7 wrote:
BULLSFAN_1 wrote:
Don't worry man, these **** don't have a clue. Anyone who doen't recongnize that the Bulls have the best roster to compete is in denial and delusional.

What difference does the roster make when ownership showed no hesitation in blowing up a team that won 6 titles and has been rebuilding for over a decade despite having a slew of top 3 picks. Obviously big time FAs don't think too highly of the upper management of the team.

This wouldn't be the first time the Bulls came up empty in a big time FA class. At least this year there are enough quality FA that they can still get good players.

Get a clue. The guy that did that's name is Jerry Krause and he is no longer associated with the Bulls.

BubbaTee · Post #74 » by **BubbaTee** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:13 pm

Phil XI wrote:
KEGster wrote:Maybe you guys are too in drenched in it already but take it from fans of the other major American sports - they are laughing at how the hip hop image as completely gutted this league.

Elite players teaming up seems more to me like they actually want to win championships. This entire thread is a contradiction.

Off the court and selling "my product" is all that matters to 99% of the Elite players in this league. The greatest player the league has had in a decade is more concerned about being the next Jay-Z than winning titles....which I thought was the goal at the end of the day

Hey.. Republicans buy shoes too...

owned

Jordan was the guy who started the "hip-hop" movement in the NBA too. Shaved head, baggy shorts, sneaker culture, etc.

And the guy who started the "my product" movement. Air Jordans, Jumpman, etc. Heck, he wouldn't even let his likeness be used in NBA-licensed video games because he wanted his own game.

wilhelmthe1st · Post #75 » by **wilhelmthe1st** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:15 pm

LOL at the angry crying Bulls fan.

phx#7 · Post #76 » by **phx#7** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:18 pm

BULLSFAN_1 wrote:
Get a clue. The guy that did that's name is Jerry Krause and he is no longer associated with the Bulls.

The owner that let him do it is still there and unless James signs with the Bulls tomorrow they will have struck out on every marquee FA since it happened despite always seemingly having young talent and playing in a big market with strong basketball tradition.

Master Shake · Post #77 » by **Master Shake** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:19 pm

Honestly one of the best cry baby threads of all time.

basketba11 · Post #78 » by **basketba11** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:21 pm

Some bulls fans have been insufferable throughout free agency and it seems like they will continue to be so, post free agency.

You struck out on the big 4. Sign boozer or Lee and get over it.
Your team is still good enough to make the playoffs.

TrueRain · Post #79 » by **TrueRain** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:21 pm

Lol @ butthurt Bulls fans.

mikeyrocks · Post #80 » by **mikeyrocks** » Wed Jul 7, 2010 7:28 pm

Reading this thread, I picture this guy

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0-6Tn0Ie-AQ