Do you rate losing?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

og15
Forum Mod - Clippers
Forum Mod - Clippers
Posts: 50,926
And1: 33,735
Joined: Jun 23, 2004
Location: NBA Fan
 

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#61 » by og15 » Fri May 15, 2015 1:33 am

Mr Puddles wrote:A bunch of born losers in this thread apparently don't understand that if you don't win you lose. Winning a conference finals is no better than having the worst record in the league. Scoring 99 points in a game only places you second on the all-time list, ergo LOSER. Sure you had sex with Jessica Alba, but were you the first to do so? Does she even think you're the best D she ever had, or are you only second on that list? .....Started a business that recently went IPO? Apple is still richer you loser...

True winners don't settle for second best. Like the OP said, If you haven't won you haven´t accomplished anything.

Lol, yea, people can be quite ridiculous.
andremcosta
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,446
And1: 454
Joined: May 08, 2011

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#62 » by andremcosta » Fri May 15, 2015 2:44 am

Pan Jia Yuan wrote:
KayDee35 wrote:Jerry West was 1-8 in NBA finals. He's always talked about as a perennial loser who accomplished nothing. He gets no respect around the league and will never be remembered. /s

Image

Sometimes I wonder if it's summer already when I see threads like these. :banghead:

Well, he's the logo because of a PR agency/NBA decision. But I've literally never seen him ranked among the Top 10.
That's what 1-8 does to you.
Make it 4-5 and people would say he's Top 10, and the 2nd best SG, and better than Bird, and what not.

Making the finals matters, no doubt.
But when it comes GOAT discussions, Top 10 debates etc. - then it's about winning everything.

People will remember Malone, Ewing, Barkley, Nash etc. as Top 5-10 on their positions, but nobody would ever say they're better than Duncan, Kareem, Hakeem, Magic. First and foremost because of - the ring thing.


But OP AND some guys are suggesting that making it to the Finals is worst than not making, because people may look at your Finals score. That's ridiculous.

If someone ends his career as a 6/12 in Finals, he is more acomplished than a 6/6, because he went deep way more. People are suggesting here that Lebron would be better as a 2/2 than a 2/6 because making the Finals And Losing is worst than Losing in the first round.
The Realist
Starter
Posts: 2,091
And1: 1,496
Joined: Jun 12, 2014

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#63 » by The Realist » Fri May 15, 2015 2:49 am

Pan Jia Yuan wrote:
KayDee35 wrote:Jerry West was 1-8 in NBA finals. He's always talked about as a perennial loser who accomplished nothing. He gets no respect around the league and will never be remembered. /s

Image

Sometimes I wonder if it's summer already when I see threads like these. :banghead:

Well, he's the logo because of a PR agency/NBA decision. But I've literally never seen him ranked among the Top 10.
That's what 1-8 does to you.
Make it 4-5 and people would say he's Top 10, and the 2nd best SG, and better than Bird, and what not.


Making the finals matters, no doubt.
But when it comes GOAT discussions, Top 10 debates etc. - then it's about winning everything.

People will remember Malone, Ewing, Barkley, Nash etc. as Top 5-10 on their positions, but nobody would ever say they're better than Duncan, Kareem, Hakeem, Magic. First and foremost because of - the ring thing.


Image

You see anyone arguing different?
meh
mastermixer
Analyst
Posts: 3,094
And1: 3,803
Joined: Oct 29, 2012
   

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#64 » by mastermixer » Fri May 15, 2015 12:31 pm

Mr Puddles wrote:A bunch of born losers in this thread apparently don't understand that if you don't win you lose. Winning a conference finals is no better than having the worst record in the league. Scoring 99 points in a game only places you second on the all-time list, ergo LOSER. Sure you had sex with Jessica Alba, but were you the first to do so? Does she even think you're the best D she ever had, or are you only second on that list? .....Started a business that recently went IPO? Apple is still richer you loser...

True winners don't settle for second best. Like the OP said, If you haven't won you haven´t accomplished anything.


This guy sees me point.
"Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." -Martin Luther King Jr
Ugly0598
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,811
And1: 3,198
Joined: Mar 21, 2011
     

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#65 » by Ugly0598 » Fri May 15, 2015 12:44 pm

mastermixer wrote:Making it to the finals is like "kissing" your cousin.

Winning the finals is like "kissing" your sister


Hahahahaha +1 for the laugh
jmomcc
Junior
Posts: 306
And1: 220
Joined: Jun 25, 2012

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#66 » by jmomcc » Fri May 15, 2015 12:46 pm

I wonder how OP lives with himself because I'm pretty sure he is not number 1 in the world at..anything.

Making the finals is better than losing in the conference finals, which is better than losing in the second round and so on. Obviously.
User avatar
KayDee35
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,438
And1: 1,765
Joined: Sep 05, 2009
Location: Cupcakery
   

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#67 » by KayDee35 » Fri May 15, 2015 1:57 pm

Pan Jia Yuan wrote:
KayDee35 wrote:Jerry West was 1-8 in NBA finals. He's always talked about as a perennial loser who accomplished nothing. He gets no respect around the league and will never be remembered. /s

Image

Sometimes I wonder if it's summer already when I see threads like these. :banghead:

Well, he's the logo because of a PR agency/NBA decision. But I've literally never seen him ranked among the Top 10.
That's what 1-8 does to you.
Make it 4-5 and people would say he's Top 10, and the 2nd best SG, and better than Bird, and what not.

Making the finals matters, no doubt.
But when it comes GOAT discussions, Top 10 debates etc. - then it's about winning everything.

People will remember Malone, Ewing, Barkley, Nash etc. as Top 5-10 on their positions, but nobody would ever say they're better than Duncan, Kareem, Hakeem, Magic. First and foremost because of - the ring thing.


Narratives change with time because the pseudo-metrics and the players involved have changed. West was widely regarded as the best SG ever prior to Jordan. He had the highest career playoff PPG (prior to MJ). He is the only player to have won finals MVP despite his team losing the series.

And he's still referred to as 'Mr. Clutch.' Not Mr. Choke Artist, not Mr. Fail, and not one of the other numerous negative nicknames the the idiots at ESPN (who drive much of the sports narratives in this country) would have given him.

West ran into the Celtic dynasty and was the underdog in all but one Finals. He was respected more by those Celtics than he is today because narratives change and memories fade.
User avatar
Smash3
RealGM
Posts: 12,783
And1: 9,982
Joined: Apr 17, 2009

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#68 » by Smash3 » Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:05 am

Just in case we get all those: "at least they made the finals" comments after the game :lol:
8
G: James Harden | Kris Dunn
G: Bradley Beal | Josh Richardson
F: Paul George | Svi Mykhailiuk
F: Neemias Queta| Daniel Theis
C: Nikola Vucevic | Bismack Biyombo
User avatar
Cavs0623
Pro Prospect
Posts: 811
And1: 519
Joined: Nov 12, 2012
       

Do you rate losing? 

Post#69 » by Cavs0623 » Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:32 am

I care less about losing and more so about how x players performs moreso than anything. Like it's not really a negative to me that Kobe lost to the Celtics or Dwight to the Lakers they were the better team but LeBron losing in '10 or Kobe in '04 are negatives because they played under their standards and lost while favored.


Sent from my iPad using RealGM Forums
User avatar
MiltownHawkeye
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,727
And1: 4,457
Joined: Jan 04, 2012
     

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#70 » by MiltownHawkeye » Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:42 am

Mr Puddles wrote:A bunch of born losers in this thread apparently don't understand that if you don't win you lose. Winning a conference finals is no better than having the worst record in the league. Scoring 99 points in a game only places you second on the all-time list, ergo LOSER. Sure you had sex with Jessica Alba, but were you the first to do so? Does she even think you're the best D she ever had, or are you only second on that list? .....Started a business that recently went IPO? Apple is still richer you loser...

True winners don't settle for second best. Like the OP said, If you haven't won you haven´t accomplished anything.


:roll:
Free Chuck Diesel

Fire Steve Novak
User avatar
ATTL
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 16,624
And1: 8,483
Joined: Aug 24, 2003
Location: Moms basement
   

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#71 » by ATTL » Wed Jun 17, 2015 1:50 am

mastermixer wrote:Making it to the finals is like "kissing" your cousin.

Winning the finals is like "kissing" your sister


Personally, I enjoy kissing my cousin over my sister.
User avatar
RayBan-Sematra
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,236
And1: 911
Joined: Oct 03, 2012

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#72 » by RayBan-Sematra » Wed Jun 17, 2015 2:00 am

Basketball is a team sport and there are many, many factors outside of the play of an individual star that can effect the outcome of games and series.

•Coaching
•Supporting cast quality & performance level
•Opposing talent (how good they are, how they are performing in the moment and how they matchup against you)
•Reffing
•100x + other things
So if you can't accept the fact that a star player can dominate and still lose (or even get swept) then you have a very poor mindset for being a basketball analyst.

Consider the 95 Finals for example.
•Shaq outplays Hakeem in G1 regulation but Anderson has a GOAT choke which costs them the game.
•Shaq arguably outplays Hakeem in G2 but his roleplayers stunk and certain Houston roleplayers got super hot (Cassell scores 31pts on 92%TS).
•Shaq plays on-par with Hakeem in G3 and the game ends up close but Robert Horry hits a huge shot for Houston down the stretch and they narrowly escape with victory.
•Shaq in that series averaged 28 / 13 / 6-apg / 3-bpg on 61%TS and outplayed Hakeem in multiple games but many people (casual fans) think Hakeem outplayed him badly.
However in reality Shaq had a GOAT title run and a GOAT Finals series but he won't get the credit he deserves from most fans.

Basketball is a team game.
Obviously judging the play of an individual player is never easy (numbers never tell the whole story) but the assumption that a player cannot dominate or be the best player in a series and still lose or get swept is false.
Another good example would be the 69 Finals. Jerry West dominated but Wilt & Baylor were so putrid offensively in that series that they ended up losing to an old Boston dynasty on the verge of collapse.
Should West (with his FMVP) not be given credit for that series? Of course not.

Lebron (efficiency aside) has been great in the Finals and should be given credit for the production he has given his team and the impact he has had.
The fact that he is not on a team good enough (or performing well enough) to beat GS should not be held against him unless you think he is doing a poor job of running the offense or is playing in a way that isn't ideal for the maximization of his teams success.
I don't believe that is the case.
User avatar
Mr Puddles
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,410
And1: 14,179
Joined: Jan 17, 2015
Location: Under your bed
 

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#73 » by Mr Puddles » Wed Jun 17, 2015 2:16 pm

MiltownHawkeye wrote:
Mr Puddles wrote:A bunch of born losers in this thread apparently don't understand that if you don't win you lose. Winning a conference finals is no better than having the worst record in the league. Scoring 99 points in a game only places you second on the all-time list, ergo LOSER. Sure you had sex with Jessica Alba, but were you the first to do so? Does she even think you're the best D she ever had, or are you only second on that list? .....Started a business that recently went IPO? Apple is still richer you loser...

True winners don't settle for second best. Like the OP said, If you haven't won you haven´t accomplished anything.


:roll:


It continues to amaze me how many people don't seem to comprehend that I was poking fun at the OP when I wrote this... I've not been a member of this forum for too long and at first using a green font for posts that are obviously sarcastic seemed a bit redundant but I'm starting to see the value of it now.
User avatar
MiltownHawkeye
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,727
And1: 4,457
Joined: Jan 04, 2012
     

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#74 » by MiltownHawkeye » Wed Jun 17, 2015 10:44 pm

Mr Puddles wrote:
MiltownHawkeye wrote:
Mr Puddles wrote:A bunch of born losers in this thread apparently don't understand that if you don't win you lose. Winning a conference finals is no better than having the worst record in the league. Scoring 99 points in a game only places you second on the all-time list, ergo LOSER. Sure you had sex with Jessica Alba, but were you the first to do so? Does she even think you're the best D she ever had, or are you only second on that list? .....Started a business that recently went IPO? Apple is still richer you loser...

True winners don't settle for second best. Like the OP said, If you haven't won you haven´t accomplished anything.


:roll:


It continues to amaze me how many people don't seem to comprehend that I was poking fun at the OP when I wrote this... I've not been a member of this forum for too long and at first using a green font for posts that are obviously sarcastic seemed a bit redundant but I'm starting to see the value of it now.

What you said wasn't so ridiculous that someone on this board wouldn't actually say it. I'm pretty sure you got people unironically agreeing in this very thread.
Free Chuck Diesel

Fire Steve Novak
User avatar
Smash3
RealGM
Posts: 12,783
And1: 9,982
Joined: Apr 17, 2009

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#75 » by Smash3 » Wed Jun 17, 2015 10:52 pm

MiltownHawkeye wrote:
Mr Puddles wrote:
MiltownHawkeye wrote:
:roll:


It continues to amaze me how many people don't seem to comprehend that I was poking fun at the OP when I wrote this... I've not been a member of this forum for too long and at first using a green font for posts that are obviously sarcastic seemed a bit redundant but I'm starting to see the value of it now.

What you said wasn't so ridiculous that someone on this board wouldn't actually say it. I'm pretty sure you got people unironically agreeing in this very thread.


But how do you tell which is which?
8
G: James Harden | Kris Dunn
G: Bradley Beal | Josh Richardson
F: Paul George | Svi Mykhailiuk
F: Neemias Queta| Daniel Theis
C: Nikola Vucevic | Bismack Biyombo
User avatar
Smash3
RealGM
Posts: 12,783
And1: 9,982
Joined: Apr 17, 2009

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#76 » by Smash3 » Wed Jun 17, 2015 10:55 pm

The real irony is the fact that the op paraphrased someone who had intercourse (yes I used that word) with Alba, one and1 to the person who guesses the person I am alluding to.
8
G: James Harden | Kris Dunn
G: Bradley Beal | Josh Richardson
F: Paul George | Svi Mykhailiuk
F: Neemias Queta| Daniel Theis
C: Nikola Vucevic | Bismack Biyombo
83SixersRocked
Head Coach
Posts: 6,783
And1: 609
Joined: Jun 24, 2006

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#77 » by 83SixersRocked » Wed Jun 17, 2015 11:10 pm

Smash3 wrote:I see a lot of posters are saying if Cleveland were to make the finals that would be a huge achievement which makes no sense to me. How are you happy getting to the finals? Especially for LeBron it would be 2 out of 6, and than people are saying yeah but he made the finals 6 times... The goal is to win the championship and how do you rate losing? Why would it feel better to make the finals? You still haven´t accomplished anything... Seems like a really bad argument: his teams finished second 4 times... So what? What do you guys think about it?


God forbid any of us apply that logic to our own lives.
User avatar
Flip Murray
Hornets Forum Spelling Bee
Posts: 4,365
And1: 1,987
Joined: Jul 05, 2012
 

Re: Do you rate losing? 

Post#78 » by Flip Murray » Wed Jun 17, 2015 11:24 pm

Pan Jia Yuan wrote:
KayDee35 wrote:Jerry West was 1-8 in NBA finals. He's always talked about as a perennial loser who accomplished nothing. He gets no respect around the league and will never be remembered. /s

Image

Sometimes I wonder if it's summer already when I see threads like these. :banghead:

Well, he's the logo because of a PR agency/NBA decision. But I've literally never seen him ranked among the Top 10.
That's what 1-8 does to you.
Make it 4-5 and people would say he's Top 10, and the 2nd best SG, and better than Bird, and what not.

Making the finals matters, no doubt.
But when it comes GOAT discussions, Top 10 debates etc. - then it's about winning everything.

People will remember Malone, Ewing, Barkley, Nash etc. as Top 5-10 on their positions, but nobody would ever say they're better than Duncan, Kareem, Hakeem, Magic. First and foremost because of - the ring thing.


bill simmons ranked jerry west 9th all time in his basketball pyramid. so yeah i've literally seen him ranked in the top ten.
Image

Return to The General Board