Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

User avatar
prophet_of_rage
RealGM
Posts: 18,121
And1: 7,356
Joined: Jan 06, 2005

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#61 » by prophet_of_rage » Thu Oct 1, 2015 9:00 pm

ken6199 wrote:
prophet_of_rage wrote:
yoyoboy wrote:I don't understand most NBA fans. You guys want more physicality in the NBA, but then when guys like Dellavedova play hard, you whine about it. You bash today's players for playing too "buddy-buddy," but then the moment a player talks trash (like Draymond or Lawson in this case), you cry about it.

Make up your damn minds...


It's a hierarchy thing. Only superstars who win rings can criticize other superstars with rings. It's like how posters here whine about ballboys as if post count has to do with post quality.


Image

Imagine JR Smith and Josh Smith doing this to Dick Bavetta.


Exactly.
NBAfan3024
RealGM
Posts: 16,567
And1: 7,035
Joined: May 25, 2013
Contact:
 

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#62 » by NBAfan3024 » Thu Oct 1, 2015 9:00 pm

BigFatBob wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:
BigFatBob wrote:Just watch and see. You want put your name on it too? If the Warriors lose you have to retire your RealGM name


Why would anybody even bother doing that? it comes off very childish. It makes me laugh when I see people say stuff like this..like anybody would go through with such a bet. They always end up with just a different name or keep the same name and just not post for a few weeks.

Yeah, so basically your scared to do it because you know the Warriors will lose against the Rockets. I understand


:lol: What are you like 10 years old?
BigFatBob
Banned User
Posts: 721
And1: 341
Joined: May 14, 2014

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#63 » by BigFatBob » Thu Oct 1, 2015 9:06 pm

NBAfan3024 wrote:
BigFatBob wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:
Why would anybody even bother doing that? it comes off very childish. It makes me laugh when I see people say stuff like this..like anybody would go through with such a bet. They always end up with just a different name or keep the same name and just not post for a few weeks.

Yeah, so basically your scared to do it because you know the Warriors will lose against the Rockets. I understand


:lol: What are you like 10 years old?

No, why would you think that? I'm probably your same age. You're not use to trash talk are you?
NBAfan3024
RealGM
Posts: 16,567
And1: 7,035
Joined: May 25, 2013
Contact:
 

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#64 » by NBAfan3024 » Thu Oct 1, 2015 9:08 pm

BigFatBob wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:
BigFatBob wrote:Yeah, so basically your scared to do it because you know the Warriors will lose against the Rockets. I understand


:lol: What are you like 10 years old?

No, why would you think that? I'm probably your same age. You're not use to trash talk are you?


Trash talk is fun but what kind of person makes a bet of leaving a freaking forum if the team they support loses? why would you do that? for one If my team did lose I would want to talk about said series and where it went wrong..not dissappear
User avatar
prophet_of_rage
RealGM
Posts: 18,121
And1: 7,356
Joined: Jan 06, 2005

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#65 » by prophet_of_rage » Thu Oct 1, 2015 9:11 pm

ken6199 wrote:
prophet_of_rage wrote:
yoyoboy wrote:I don't understand most NBA fans. You guys want more physicality in the NBA, but then when guys like Dellavedova play hard, you whine about it. You bash today's players for playing too "buddy-buddy," but then the moment a player talks trash (like Draymond or Lawson in this case), you cry about it.

Make up your damn minds...


It's a hierarchy thing. Only superstars who win rings can criticize other superstars with rings. It's like how posters here whine about ballboys as if post count has to do with post quality.


Image

Imagine JR Smith and Josh Smith doing this to Dick Bavetta.


Exactly.
BigFatBob
Banned User
Posts: 721
And1: 341
Joined: May 14, 2014

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#66 » by BigFatBob » Thu Oct 1, 2015 9:13 pm

NBAfan3024 wrote:
BigFatBob wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:
:lol: What are you like 10 years old?

No, why would you think that? I'm probably your same age. You're not use to trash talk are you?


Trash talk is fun but what kind of person makes a bet of leaving a freaking forum if the team they support loses? why would you do that? for one If my team did lose I would want to talk about said series and where it went wrong..not dissappear

It's just a bet where you lose your name and all your And1's. You can always create another name and continue your conversation. But the principal is to lose all your And1's because your Warriors will take a big LOST!
jpm312
Rookie
Posts: 1,161
And1: 1,966
Joined: Feb 06, 2013
     

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#67 » by jpm312 » Thu Oct 1, 2015 9:18 pm

BigFatBob wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:
BigFatBob wrote:No, why would you think that? I'm probably your same age. You're not use to trash talk are you?


Trash talk is fun but what kind of person makes a bet of leaving a freaking forum if the team they support loses? why would you do that? for one If my team did lose I would want to talk about said series and where it went wrong..not dissappear

It's just a bet where you lose your name and all your And1's. You can always create another name and continue your conversation. But the principal is to lose all your And1's because your Warriors will take a big LOST!


Gawd damn, people don't give a **** about meaningless And 1's. Grow the **** up.
BigFatBob
Banned User
Posts: 721
And1: 341
Joined: May 14, 2014

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#68 » by BigFatBob » Thu Oct 1, 2015 9:34 pm

jpm312 wrote:
BigFatBob wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:
Trash talk is fun but what kind of person makes a bet of leaving a freaking forum if the team they support loses? why would you do that? for one If my team did lose I would want to talk about said series and where it went wrong..not dissappear

It's just a bet where you lose your name and all your And1's. You can always create another name and continue your conversation. But the principal is to lose all your And1's because your Warriors will take a big LOST!


Gawd damn, people don't give a **** about meaningless And 1's. Grow the **** up.

Your just mad cause "Curry was chill'n on defense" :lol:
User avatar
mvpshaq32
Starter
Posts: 2,342
And1: 2,265
Joined: Dec 13, 2008
 

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#69 » by mvpshaq32 » Thu Oct 1, 2015 9:37 pm

BigFatBob wrote:
jpm312 wrote:
BigFatBob wrote:It's just a bet where you lose your name and all your And1's. You can always create another name and continue your conversation. But the principal is to lose all your And1's because your Warriors will take a big LOST!


Gawd damn, people don't give a **** about meaningless And 1's. Grow the **** up.

Your just mad cause "Curry was chill'n on defense" :lol:


i got this.

http://gfycat.com/BarrenFormalGalah
Image
BigFatBob
Banned User
Posts: 721
And1: 341
Joined: May 14, 2014

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#70 » by BigFatBob » Thu Oct 1, 2015 9:50 pm

mvpshaq32 wrote:
BigFatBob wrote:
jpm312 wrote:
Gawd damn, people don't give a **** about meaningless And 1's. Grow the **** up.

Your just mad cause "Curry was chill'n on defense" :lol:


i got this.

http://gfycat.com/BarrenFormalGalah

:lol: Classic
User avatar
Edrees
RealGM
Posts: 17,250
And1: 12,479
Joined: May 12, 2009
Contact:
         

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#71 » by Edrees » Thu Oct 1, 2015 10:39 pm

Didn't the warriors destroy the nuggets last season? Curry wasn't working hard when he defended Lawson either. What on earth do people see in Ty Lawson that makes them think Curry will have to work some absorbent amount to defend him? Yeah I guess Curry will be a little more tired. he'll make 6 three pointers instead of 7.

I do believe defending irving will tire someone at least a little more out, so that's a good point about the Finals vs the Cavs.

I agree that there's nothing wrong with he said, but I think the different in stephen curry's energy will be very small. the main reason curry had so much energy was because he played around 30 minutes a game all season long because the warriors blew opponents out. I consider it a disrespect to curry or any star to think that playing D on non-all star level point guard will be difference in tiring them out after an 82 game season. Tired legs will result from long seasons, not someone defending you for a few games.

It's also possible Curry will have MORE energy because he won't be using any energy to blow by his defender (lawson) when he's on offense.
Soca
Analyst
Posts: 3,012
And1: 892
Joined: Jul 22, 2004

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#72 » by Soca » Thu Oct 1, 2015 10:43 pm

Hector_Reyes_8 wrote:As if Lawson's one to talk about defense. :lol:


No kidding
User avatar
Liver_Pooty
RealGM
Posts: 40,792
And1: 16,762
Joined: Dec 29, 2008
Location: Asheville, NC
   

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#73 » by Liver_Pooty » Thu Oct 1, 2015 10:44 pm

I don't find anything wrong with what he said. Not sure why everyone is so upset. Its basically fact.
Balllin wrote:Zion Williamson is 6-5, with a 6-10 wingspan. I see him as a slightly better Kenneth Faried.
chrismikayla
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,141
And1: 2,989
Joined: Jun 16, 2014

Re: RE: Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#74 » by chrismikayla » Thu Oct 1, 2015 10:51 pm

BigFatBob wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:
BigFatBob wrote:No, why would you think that? I'm probably your same age. You're not use to trash talk are you?


Trash talk is fun but what kind of person makes a bet of leaving a freaking forum if the team they support loses? why would you do that? for one If my team did lose I would want to talk about said series and where it went wrong..not dissappear

It's just a bet where you lose your name and all your And1's. You can always create another name and continue your conversation. But the principal is to lose all your And1's because your Warriors will take a big LOST!


LOSS NOT LOST


Sorry I couldn't resist
[gfycat][/gfycat]
BigFatBob
Banned User
Posts: 721
And1: 341
Joined: May 14, 2014

Re: RE: Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was 

Post#75 » by BigFatBob » Thu Oct 1, 2015 11:44 pm

chrismikayla wrote:
BigFatBob wrote:
NBAfan3024 wrote:
Trash talk is fun but what kind of person makes a bet of leaving a freaking forum if the team they support loses? why would you do that? for one If my team did lose I would want to talk about said series and where it went wrong..not dissappear

It's just a bet where you lose your name and all your And1's. You can always create another name and continue your conversation. But the principal is to lose all your And1's because your Warriors will take a big LOST!


LOSS NOT LOST


Sorry I couldn't resist

Haha! It's cool, that's what happens when your working and posting on RealGM at the SAME DAMN TIME
User avatar
ken6199
Forum Mod - Rockets
Forum Mod - Rockets
Posts: 13,435
And1: 18,740
Joined: Jan 05, 2015
Location: Bill O'Brien is GOAT
     

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#76 » by ken6199 » Thu Oct 1, 2015 11:52 pm

Edrees wrote:Didn't the warriors destroy the nuggets last season? Curry wasn't working hard when he defended Lawson either. What on earth do people see in Ty Lawson that makes them think Curry will have to work some absorbent amount to defend him? Yeah I guess Curry will be a little more tired. he'll make 6 three pointers instead of 7.

I do believe defending irving will tire someone at least a little more out, so that's a good point about the Finals vs the Cavs.

I agree that there's nothing wrong with he said, but I think the different in stephen curry's energy will be very small. the main reason curry had so much energy was because he played around 30 minutes a game all season long because the warriors blew opponents out. I consider it a disrespect to curry or any star to think that playing D on non-all star level point guard will be difference in tiring them out after an 82 game season. Tired legs will result from long seasons, not someone defending you for a few games.

It's also possible Curry will have MORE energy because he won't be using any energy to blow by his defender (lawson) when he's on offense.


Two things.

First I fully agree with your last point, can't agree more actually. Curry might even save more energy blowing pass Lawson, compared to someone say, Conley, or Jrue Holiday. That's what this whole conversation of Beverly vs Lawson who should start is for, because we appreciate his offensive skill but also concerns over his defense, especially paired with Harden.

On the other hand, using Warriors destroying Nuggets (or Curry to Lawson for that matter) is not a good reference. It's not like those two play 1-on-1 the whole game. In offense, Bogut can set solid screens to take Lawson away, GSW's motion offense can end up Nuggets players chasing shadows. In defense, GSW boasting a best defensive unit in the league with flexible rotation is a challenge to everybody. Rather than simply look at the impact of having Lawson go against Curry, it's more for the team to come up with better offensive and defensive schemes to take Curry's impact away, both ends of the floor. Basketball is 5 vs 5.
RealGM loves you, Melissa.
skywalker33
Nuggets Forum Mock Draft Champ
Posts: 14,094
And1: 5,453
Joined: Jun 02, 2014
       

Re: RE: Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was 

Post#77 » by skywalker33 » Thu Oct 1, 2015 11:52 pm

BigFatBob wrote:
chrismikayla wrote:
BigFatBob wrote:It's just a bet where you lose your name and all your And1's. You can always create another name and continue your conversation. But the principal is to lose all your And1's because your Warriors will take a big LOST!


LOSS NOT LOST


Sorry I couldn't resist

Haha! It's cool, that's what happens when your working and posting on RealGM at the SAME DAMN TIME


Yeah, I'll bet McDonald's really looks down on that ! :lol:
Texas Chuck wrote:I'd like to see Utah, and Denver lose


Exactly as I've been saying all along !!
User avatar
miltk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,766
And1: 751
Joined: Oct 09, 2008

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#78 » by miltk » Fri Oct 2, 2015 12:05 am

some dense players should understand they have to just stfu.

i guess unc DID cover for their players.
User avatar
WesleyExChiFan
Starter
Posts: 2,483
And1: 1,014
Joined: Jul 05, 2013
       

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#79 » by WesleyExChiFan » Fri Oct 2, 2015 12:19 am

He's got a good point. Every opposing starting point guard was injured. That's not even debatable.
User avatar
RSCD3_
RealGM
Posts: 13,932
And1: 7,342
Joined: Oct 05, 2013
 

Re: Ty Lawson: Curry Was "Chillin on Defense" In The Playoffs 

Post#80 » by RSCD3_ » Fri Oct 2, 2015 12:26 am

Lot of alcohol jokes so far.
I came here to do two things: get lost and slice **** up & I'm all out of directions.

Butler removing rearview mirror in his car as a symbol to never look back

Peja Stojakovic wrote:Jimmy butler, with no regard for human life

Return to The General Board