Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,598
And1: 14,992
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#61 » by basketballRob » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:01 am

AussieBuck wrote:
Frank Dux wrote:That Monroe/Parker front court pairing is a disaster.

Monroe won't be on the team and Parker is the SF.


Are they waiving Monroe? Looks like he's untradeable.
OrangeBlueSkies
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,965
And1: 3,144
Joined: Jul 22, 2013

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#62 » by OrangeBlueSkies » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:04 am

basketballRob wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
Frank Dux wrote:That Monroe/Parker front court pairing is a disaster.

Monroe won't be on the team and Parker is the SF.


Are they waiving Monroe? Looks like he's untradeable.



Monroe for Gay ?? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,367
And1: 20,886
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#63 » by AussieBuck » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:33 am

basketballRob wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
Frank Dux wrote:That Monroe/Parker front court pairing is a disaster.

Monroe won't be on the team and Parker is the SF.


Are they waiving Monroe? Looks like he's untradeable.

There's no reason why he'd be untradable. The Bucks will be looking for more he's worth right now but they'll relent and offload him for nothing in the end. It will be the same as what happened with Magloire at the Bucks a decade ago.
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
King Close
Pro Prospect
Posts: 787
And1: 747
Joined: Oct 20, 2015
Location: Lake Eola Championship parade
   

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#64 » by King Close » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:36 am

AussieBuck wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:Monroe won't be on the team and Parker is the SF.


Are they waiving Monroe? Looks like he's untradeable.

There's no reason why he'd be untradable. The Bucks will be looking for more he's worth right now but they'll relent and offload him for nothing in the end. It will be the same as what happened with Magloire at the Bucks a decade ago.


The rumor is that Monroe is easily available but there's no market for him, he's a young big man with a good offensive game, kinda sad to see him not have a market seeing as if this was a few years ago he'd be a highly sought after player.
ILOVEIT
RealGM
Posts: 15,055
And1: 3,615
Joined: May 28, 2004

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#65 » by ILOVEIT » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:59 am

Of all the borderline teams...I think the Bucks are the closest to breaking through
IF
....they don't screw it up. They could add one very good player/vet and be a Eastern Conference Finalist, IMO. You put Westbook on THAT team with that talent....bam....
2021/22 - The return of the Ring.
ILOVEIT
RealGM
Posts: 15,055
And1: 3,615
Joined: May 28, 2004

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#66 » by ILOVEIT » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:01 am

AussieBuck wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:Monroe won't be on the team and Parker is the SF.


Are they waiving Monroe? Looks like he's untradeable.

There's no reason why he'd be untradable. The Bucks will be looking for more he's worth right now but they'll relent and offload him for nothing in the end. It will be the same as what happened with Magloire at the Bucks a decade ago.


I think the other reason is .... he's not a two way player or a dominant one way player. AND...I don't think he fits the NEW style of ball....with a though quick PF/center with 3 point range.

Monroe is frankly just too soft.....sort of falls into the David Lee, Kevin Love category.
2021/22 - The return of the Ring.
Cosmic_Backlash
Junior
Posts: 495
And1: 272
Joined: Jul 02, 2007

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#67 » by Cosmic_Backlash » Thu Jul 21, 2016 1:30 am

Magic Giannison wrote:
Cosmic_Backlash wrote:I feel like bucks are a really polarizing team because a lot of people like to circlejerk about how great Giannis is and how bad Monroe is.

Facts are Monroe led the bucks in Win Shares, PER, and was 2nd in On/Off Performance. He has his flaws - he's not an elite defensive center, but holy hell it's ridiculous how much centers with an offensive game are hated on because they aren't an elite 2-way player.

Everyone loves Giannis, but nobody ever looks at how he hurts the bucks. He's a terrible outside threat shooting an abysmal 25% from 3. He also didn't shoot above 35% from any range past 5 feet. Let me say that again. He shot 35% or less for every range past 5 feet.

On the other end of the floor while defending past 15 feet opponents shot 2.4% better when defended by him. When guarding the 3 point shot, opponents shot 3.8% better. However, he is an elite interior defender with his long arms, opponents shoot 8% worse in the paint when defended by him.

With this being said, Bucks have a chance to be great - but they need to figure out their outside shooting if they want to succeed. It's just so disappointing seeing so many people say "omg, Giannis is going to be the best" and "Monroe is dragging the whole team down". Open your eyes, look at the good and bad of both players and how the team is constructed. Yeah, the team is long - too bad most of their players have critical flaws while their strengths, at this point time, don't compliment each other. I will say they're lucky they got MIddleton locked up - he's a huge key to their success when they do have it.

Holy cow how wrong you're about this.
Not only Giannis had an FG% of 51 but you totally ignore that the reason why his defensive stats dropped are mainly because he was the only one actually running from a position to another trying to cover everything.
A guard that stays still and lets a guy shoot is not better than another that tries to stop but fails in doing so, the stats are extremely unreliable when it comes to that.
Giannis not being able to shoot doesnt make him responsible for the whole bench sucking balls and being injured. Giannis played in most positions both on defense and offense, he got the most minutes played on the team.
Giannis shot a respectful 36% from 16 feet and 69 from close. Guess what, his most FGs are from 0-3 feet and 16 feet and he did well on both these.

Its nice and all jumping in the wagon of calling him overrated but at least make it more credible for people that watch him all year long.


Giannis was the best player of the team and there is no denying about it.


I never said Giannis was the problem - I said ignoring his flaws is a problem. He clearly is their best player. Overall he knows he can't shoot, so he makes smart decisions taking the majority of his shots inside the paint. That doesn't mean his inability to score from the perimiter isn't a weakness.

My point was that because Monroe doesn't compliment the team doesn't mean he deserves all the blame. By blaming him and ignoring what even the best players problems are is just picking favorites. You're just looking at things with a blind eye. I expect that though coming from someone's whose username is Magic Giannison.
User avatar
MiltownHawkeye
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,727
And1: 4,457
Joined: Jan 04, 2012
     

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#68 » by MiltownHawkeye » Thu Jul 21, 2016 2:10 am

Cosmic_Backlash wrote:My point was that because Monroe doesn't compliment the team doesn't mean he deserves all the blame. By blaming him and ignoring what even the best players problems are is just picking favorites. You're just looking at things with a blind eye. I expect that though coming from someone's whose username is Magic Giannison.


Did anyone in this thread actually blame all of the team's problems on Monroe? Sounds like a strawman.
Free Chuck Diesel

Fire Steve Novak
Cosmic_Backlash
Junior
Posts: 495
And1: 272
Joined: Jul 02, 2007

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#69 » by Cosmic_Backlash » Thu Jul 21, 2016 2:26 am

MiltownHawkeye wrote:
Cosmic_Backlash wrote:My point was that because Monroe doesn't compliment the team doesn't mean he deserves all the blame. By blaming him and ignoring what even the best players problems are is just picking favorites. You're just looking at things with a blind eye. I expect that though coming from someone's whose username is Magic Giannison.


Did anyone in this thread actually blame all of the team's problems on Monroe? Sounds like a strawman.


Here are some quotes from this thread

Jaballa Parkay wrote:Still need to trade Monroe and improve the bench. As of now, my answer is no, even with improvements from Giannis and Jabari. I think they're 9 seed.

BloodNinja wrote:They have decent talent but the fit isn't there. I don't like either Monroe or MCW on this roster.

YogurtProducer wrote:I said from the beginning they were overrated. They got rid of good defenders and brought in poor ones. They have length but no shooters and no real defense stoppers. Monroe needs to be traded asap

GimmeDat wrote:They have to do something about Monroe and the C position, otherwise I like they're roster.

Frank Dux wrote:That Monroe/Parker front court pairing is a disaster.

ZeppelinPage wrote:Losing the slow turd that is Monroe would be a great start.

TheDavinciCHODE wrote:They need a legit defensive center that can protect the rim and get rebounds, not a post scorer.
Then they need to give Giannis the ball and the keys to the offense. Surround him with capable shooters and let Jabari be a scorer.
The potential for the team is sky-high with Giannis, Jabari, and Middleton being a young and talented trio. Maker is a wildcard..

TheDavinciCHODE wrote:think there is any chance that the Bucks would want to trade for Robin Lopez? They'd have to pay Chicago to dump Monroe on them...
Maybe a deal centered around Monroe and a future first?
Would that be enough for you?


Some of these are right in identifying that Monroe is a bad fit, but don't think it's a strawman to saw that people actually blame Monroe...

In addition to that there is a thread on the front page asking how to dump Monroe. It's pretty clear people justify the bucks poor season by blaming Monroe.
User avatar
MiltownHawkeye
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,727
And1: 4,457
Joined: Jan 04, 2012
     

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#70 » by MiltownHawkeye » Thu Jul 21, 2016 2:41 am

Cosmic_Backlash wrote:Here are some quotes from this thread


Monroe isn't a long-term piece and he's obviously not a fit, so people are correctly pointing out that he should be traded. Not one of your quotes depict anyone saying that he deserved all the blame for all the Bucks problems including Jabari and Giannis still being young and flawed players.
Free Chuck Diesel

Fire Steve Novak
User avatar
Magic Giannison
RealGM
Posts: 27,848
And1: 27,302
Joined: Aug 08, 2014
   

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#71 » by Magic Giannison » Thu Jul 21, 2016 5:03 am

Cosmic_Backlash wrote:
Magic Giannison wrote:
Cosmic_Backlash wrote:I feel like bucks are a really polarizing team because a lot of people like to circlejerk about how great Giannis is and how bad Monroe is.

Facts are Monroe led the bucks in Win Shares, PER, and was 2nd in On/Off Performance. He has his flaws - he's not an elite defensive center, but holy hell it's ridiculous how much centers with an offensive game are hated on because they aren't an elite 2-way player.

Everyone loves Giannis, but nobody ever looks at how he hurts the bucks. He's a terrible outside threat shooting an abysmal 25% from 3. He also didn't shoot above 35% from any range past 5 feet. Let me say that again. He shot 35% or less for every range past 5 feet.

On the other end of the floor while defending past 15 feet opponents shot 2.4% better when defended by him. When guarding the 3 point shot, opponents shot 3.8% better. However, he is an elite interior defender with his long arms, opponents shoot 8% worse in the paint when defended by him.

With this being said, Bucks have a chance to be great - but they need to figure out their outside shooting if they want to succeed. It's just so disappointing seeing so many people say "omg, Giannis is going to be the best" and "Monroe is dragging the whole team down". Open your eyes, look at the good and bad of both players and how the team is constructed. Yeah, the team is long - too bad most of their players have critical flaws while their strengths, at this point time, don't compliment each other. I will say they're lucky they got MIddleton locked up - he's a huge key to their success when they do have it.

Holy cow how wrong you're about this.
Not only Giannis had an FG% of 51 but you totally ignore that the reason why his defensive stats dropped are mainly because he was the only one actually running from a position to another trying to cover everything.
A guard that stays still and lets a guy shoot is not better than another that tries to stop but fails in doing so, the stats are extremely unreliable when it comes to that.
Giannis not being able to shoot doesnt make him responsible for the whole bench sucking balls and being injured. Giannis played in most positions both on defense and offense, he got the most minutes played on the team.
Giannis shot a respectful 36% from 16 feet and 69 from close. Guess what, his most FGs are from 0-3 feet and 16 feet and he did well on both these.

Its nice and all jumping in the wagon of calling him overrated but at least make it more credible for people that watch him all year long.


Giannis was the best player of the team and there is no denying about it.


I never said Giannis was the problem - I said ignoring his flaws is a problem. He clearly is their best player. Overall he knows he can't shoot, so he makes smart decisions taking the majority of his shots inside the paint. That doesn't mean his inability to score from the perimiter isn't a weakness.

My point was that because Monroe doesn't compliment the team doesn't mean he deserves all the blame. By blaming him and ignoring what even the best players problems are is just picking favorites. You're just looking at things with a blind eye. I expect that though coming from someone's whose username is Magic Giannison.

Why do you assume we are ignoring his problems,we the Bucks fans are the ones that know his weaknesses better than anyone and we point it out . Just because we praise Giannis like he deserves doesn't mean we ignore his flaws,far from it.
If anything are expecting him way too much to do despise his tremendous improvement rate.

As for Monroe, im agreeing with you, many are dissing him but mainly not because he is responsible for our bad defense but because he is really a bad fit. Sure it may work if Jabari magically because a stud in defense and we play him with a better defender next to him but that would involve not really using his talent like we all know he got.
Our defensive scheme overall was bad and the bench was not helping at all .

Didn't want to come as aggressive its just im getting tired of people calling out Giannis ( not you) and call him overrated over and over when they havent watched him.
beantownski
Bench Warmer
Posts: 1,310
And1: 598
Joined: Sep 30, 2009
       

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#72 » by beantownski » Thu Jul 21, 2016 7:15 am

Bucks showed their potential after the all star break in the 14-15 season. that was after they acquired Jared Dudley. His 3 point shooting and veteran leadership is what got the ball rolling for them. they missed that a lot last season. still haven't replaced the 3 point shooting since. maybe g henderson's vet leadership will help though. along with their young players continuing to develop.
Before you criticize someone, walk a mile in their
shoes. That way, you'll be a mile from them, and
you'll have their shoes.
toussaud
Junior
Posts: 354
And1: 238
Joined: Apr 26, 2014

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#73 » by toussaud » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:07 pm

i don't think jason kidd is the coach to get them where they want to go. They need a college coach that will emphisis using the full court to play defense, half court traps, etc make it a 90 foot game. you can't stop the bucks out in transition. too athlete, too long.

not necessarily 48 mins of hell but they need to get up and go. have the freak out on the point half court trapping pg's and speeding the game up. htis is not a team built to play traditional half court basketball
User avatar
Dark Faze
Head Coach
Posts: 6,488
And1: 2,140
Joined: Dec 27, 2008

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#74 » by Dark Faze » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:08 pm

they really needed parker to become a Melo type --kyrie at the PF position, the way he looked at duke

I can't help but to feel he's been horribly developed. A guy like him not shooting threes given what he was doing in college is insane
User avatar
AussieBuck
RealGM
Posts: 42,367
And1: 20,886
Joined: May 10, 2006
Location: Bucks in 7?
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#75 » by AussieBuck » Thu Jul 21, 2016 12:50 pm

Imafoo1 wrote:
AussieBuck wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
Are they waiving Monroe? Looks like he's untradeable.

There's no reason why he'd be untradable. The Bucks will be looking for more he's worth right now but they'll relent and offload him for nothing in the end. It will be the same as what happened with Magloire at the Bucks a decade ago.


The rumor is that Monroe is easily available but there's no market for him, he's a young big man with a good offensive game, kinda sad to see him not have a market seeing as if this was a few years ago he'd be a highly sought after player.

No market can mean no market at the Bucks' price tag or more pessimistically no market at the point of giving anything of value for him. He's still easily dumpable IMO. Failing that tie MCW to him. :)
emunney wrote:
We need a man shaped like a chicken nugget with the shot selection of a 21st birthday party.


GHOSTofSIKMA wrote:
if you combined jabari parker, royal ivey, a shrimp and a ball sack youd have javon carter
skones
RealGM
Posts: 37,108
And1: 17,267
Joined: Jul 20, 2004

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#76 » by skones » Thu Jul 21, 2016 4:47 pm

Dark Faze wrote:they really needed parker to become a Melo type --kyrie at the PF position, the way he looked at duke

I can't help but to feel he's been horribly developed. A guy like him not shooting threes given what he was doing in college is insane


You'll see him shooting this season.

I disagree with it, but I don't think the logic behind it was terrible. The primary reason is that they wanted the kids to work on getting looks near the rim before they fell in love with the three ball. Use the three ball to compliment their skill set rather than rely upon it. We've seen a lot of guys come through this league, fall in love with the three, and leave their in between game underdeveloped.
User avatar
M-C-G
RealGM
Posts: 23,527
And1: 9,854
Joined: Jan 13, 2013
     

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#77 » by M-C-G » Thu Jul 21, 2016 5:31 pm

Cosmic_Backlash wrote:I feel like bucks are a really polarizing team because a lot of people like to circlejerk about how great Giannis is and how bad Monroe is.

Facts are Monroe led the bucks in Win Shares, PER, and was 2nd in On/Off Performance. He has his flaws - he's not an elite defensive center, but holy hell it's ridiculous how much centers with an offensive game are hated on because they aren't an elite 2-way player.

Everyone loves Giannis, but nobody ever looks at how he hurts the bucks. He's a terrible outside threat shooting an abysmal 25% from 3. He also didn't shoot above 35% from any range past 5 feet. Let me say that again. He shot 35% or less for every range past 5 feet.

On the other end of the floor while defending past 15 feet opponents shot 2.4% better when defended by him. When guarding the 3 point shot, opponents shot 3.8% better. However, he is an elite interior defender with his long arms, opponents shoot 8% worse in the paint when defended by him.

With this being said, Bucks have a chance to be great - but they need to figure out their outside shooting if they want to succeed. It's just so disappointing seeing so many people say "omg, Giannis is going to be the best" and "Monroe is dragging the whole team down". Open your eyes, look at the good and bad of both players and how the team is constructed. Yeah, the team is long - too bad most of their players have critical flaws while their strengths, at this point time, don't compliment each other. I will say they're lucky they got MIddleton locked up - he's a huge key to their success when they do have it.


I agree with a lot of what you said, but would caution you about the underlined. Our scheme basically allows for the most wide open threes in the league, and almost always forces a guy like Giannis to challenge the three coming from inside the paint. I know this doesn't even sound possible, but I assure you it is.
rasta_marley
Starter
Posts: 2,357
And1: 510
Joined: Jul 10, 2009
Location: The city of broken knees...
     

Re: Re: Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#78 » by rasta_marley » Thu Jul 21, 2016 5:47 pm

Spens1 wrote:
Milbuck wrote:
kvash37 wrote:Can anyone speak on why Jabari barely takes any 3's? He seems like a better shooter than someone who took 35 all of last year.

He was literally instructed by Kidd not to shoot 3s, much like Giannis was in his 2nd year. Something about developing their inside games. He said he's done with that and will let them loose next year.

I think people are going to be surprised at good a shooter Jabari ends up being. Not only was he a 20 year old coming off an ACL injury but he was told by his coach not to shoot from range. But he has great form and touch on his shot and shooting was never really a problem in high school or college for him, he'll be good going forward.


then jason kidd is clearly not fit to be an nba coach in the modern game since you need to be able to shoot the 3 (even if he couldn't for most of his career)

However he sure taught himself how to shoot the three when he needed it for those last few years. As a blazer fan I'll attest to that. Really impressed me that he could just go out and do that. Most players either can or can't.
Heej wrote:And tbh I'm not entirely convinced MJ wasn't just the 90s version of KD.

:lol:
GreatWhiteStiff
RealGM
Posts: 15,265
And1: 12,684
Joined: Oct 17, 2011
Location: Overusing finna
 

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#79 » by GreatWhiteStiff » Thu Jul 21, 2016 10:11 pm

If they keep drafting 23 year olds masquerading as 19 year olds probably not..
Image

Let's playin for 9th!

"OG puts the clamps on point guards like Trae Young." -DelAbbot
Spens1
RealGM
Posts: 13,865
And1: 3,879
Joined: Jun 16, 2015
     

Re: Can The Bucks Get "IT" Back? 

Post#80 » by Spens1 » Sat Jul 23, 2016 11:38 pm

Scalabrine wrote:
Spens1 wrote:
Milbuck wrote:He was literally instructed by Kidd not to shoot 3s, much like Giannis was in his 2nd year. Something about developing their inside games. He said he's done with that and will let them loose next year.

I think people are going to be surprised at good a shooter Jabari ends up being. Not only was he a 20 year old coming off an ACL injury but he was told by his coach not to shoot from range. But he has great form and touch on his shot and shooting was never really a problem in high school or college for him, he'll be good going forward.


then jason kidd is clearly not fit to be an nba coach in the modern game since you need to be able to shoot the 3 (even if he couldn't for most of his career)


So Doc Rivers telling DeAndre Jordan not to shoot 3's must be a fireable offense too?

If the guy isn't an efficient 3 point shooter than the team is better off with him taking shots the he is more likely to make, or else go with someone who is a more efficient 3 point shooter. Don't take a shot that you are more likely to miss.


there is a huge difference between Jabari (who is closer to a Melo type player than anyone else really in terms of playing style) and DeAndre Jordon who is relatively offensively inept

Return to The General Board