Bobalob wrote:The Rebel wrote:Bobalob wrote:Something aint adding up...
If hes THIS good then people would be making more noise for a Kyrie trade. Stars need stars. StaRs crave stars. Ask Towns, ask AD.
Kyrie + Milsap (not a star but solid) + depth + "about to be top 5 player" would be a title contender.
If you give Milsap + Kyrie + depth to Lebron, Kwahi, Harden, Curry, Durant, etc it = contender, so why not Jokic?
Answer: Because he's not on that level. Slow down.
Jokic is not on that level? Have you watched him play? Could it be that we realize that Kyrie is overrated and thinks more of himself than the rest of us do?
The Nuggets already had the top offense in the league after they inserted Jokic in at starting Center there was a graph on this board a few days ago showing how much each player improved with and without Jokic and it is eye opening. Irving is a PG but he is also a chucker and wants to be the big star of the team. We do not need a guy like that, we got a great fit this summer in Millsap who is happy to play on or off the ball and does not care about who gets the credit.
Jokic is still young, no need to add a big name that does not fit and does nothing to fix the weaknesses of the team, if we were talking about a guy like Chris Paul than I am good with it, I wanted Paul George badly but the front office did not feel like he would stay due to the LA thing, but Kyrie I am not all that interested in unless it is for very cheap.
Again, something aint adding up
Jokic: omg he makes the Nuggets have the GREATEST OFFENSE EVER. He's a beast!!
Kyrie: All he does is score. He's overrrated
Buuuuut, the Nuggets had the #3 scoring offense in the league and guess who was right behind them at #4...........Cleveland.
Do you know a guy called LeBron James?

























