People were interested in these podcasts

The $270 million dollar question

Moderators: bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake

User avatar
PhilBlackson
RealGM
Posts: 31,776
And1: 46,519
Joined: May 02, 2017
Location: No Wastemans Land
     

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#61 » by PhilBlackson » Sat Feb 3, 2018 11:49 pm

ClipsFanSince98 wrote:
PhilBlackson wrote:
ClipsFanSince98 wrote:Paul George will be a Clipper. Grew up a fan of the Clips, now his dream will come true


Really?! He grew up a Clipper fan???


Yes. Grew up watching both teams but liked the Clippers more. Has said so in interviews. He was really mad Clippers didn't draft him.


Huh...I'm just shocked because every time I read any discussions about him wanting to play LA they never mention the Clippers n I would have just thought they'd at least speculate him going there especially when you previously had a couple of pieces there and Jerry West but it's always about the Lakers.

I'd rather see him become a Clipper because of how spoiled the Lakers' franchise has been but was just genuinely surprised he was one because he would have grown up during the Shaq/Kobe era.
>>>THENOTORIOUSBI3<<< :guitar: *INGRAM*ALLSTARSEASON*
Image
Names of who OG will be better than Shaedon: DelAbbott, ThaCynic, pingpongrac, Los_29, OakleyDokley
Illmatic12
RealGM
Posts: 10,161
And1: 8,459
Joined: Dec 20, 2013
 

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#62 » by Illmatic12 » Sun Feb 4, 2018 12:07 am

LakersLegacy wrote:
THE J0KER wrote:Salaries of most productive TOP4 team's players of 2017-18 season:

OKLAHOMA CITY THUNDER:
$28,530,608 Russell Westbrook
$26,243,760 Carmelo Anthony
$22,471,910 Steven Adams
$19,508,958 Paul George___
$96,755,236 OVERALL

DENVER NUGGETS:
$3,355,320 Jamal Murray
$2,550,055 Gary Harris
$2,441,400 Trey Lyles
$1,471,382 Nikola Jokic___
$9,818,157 OVERALL

:o :o :o :o
:eek2: :eek2: :eek2: :eek2:


:o
Jokic is the best value in the NBA!

Looks good now but the Nuggets cap sheet is about to balloon pretty fast . Jokic is unrestricted FA this summer (bc he was a 2nd round pick) and will command the max. Harris’ number jumps up to ~$17 mil and then they have to pay Murray, Lyles soon. They’re gonna have some decisions to make if they wanna stay competitive out West
User avatar
PhilBlackson
RealGM
Posts: 31,776
And1: 46,519
Joined: May 02, 2017
Location: No Wastemans Land
     

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#63 » by PhilBlackson » Sun Feb 4, 2018 12:10 am

Illmatic12 wrote:
LakersLegacy wrote:
THE J0KER wrote:Salaries of most productive TOP4 team's players of 2017-18 season:

OKLAHOMA CITY THUNDER:
$28,530,608 Russell Westbrook
$26,243,760 Carmelo Anthony
$22,471,910 Steven Adams
$19,508,958 Paul George___
$96,755,236 OVERALL

DENVER NUGGETS:
$3,355,320 Jamal Murray
$2,550,055 Gary Harris
$2,441,400 Trey Lyles
$1,471,382 Nikola Jokic___
$9,818,157 OVERALL

:o :o :o :o
:eek2: :eek2: :eek2: :eek2:


:o
Jokic is the best value in the NBA!

Looks good now but the Nuggets cap sheet is about to balloon pretty fast . Jokic is unrestricted FA this summer (bc he was a 2nd round pick) and will command the max. Harris’ number jumps up to ~$17 mil and then they have to pay Murray, Lyles soon. They’re gonna have some decisions to make if they wanna stay competitive out West


They're going to pay Jokic & Murray....Lyles is obviously the odd man out.
>>>THENOTORIOUSBI3<<< :guitar: *INGRAM*ALLSTARSEASON*
Image
Names of who OG will be better than Shaedon: DelAbbott, ThaCynic, pingpongrac, Los_29, OakleyDokley
lvckv
Starter
Posts: 2,396
And1: 2,031
Joined: Jan 24, 2017
Location: Europe
     

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#64 » by lvckv » Sun Feb 4, 2018 12:45 am

I can't find the article now but a few days ago I read someone suggest that the Thunder could suggest to Carmelo that instead of a one-year player option, they do something like 3 years, $45 million. More security for him and he stays on a winning team (potentially contending given they were second in the league since Dec 1st) instead of going someplace else and who knows what $ offer.

That would take them pretty close to the luxury tax line. Then they offload those Patterson, Abrines, Singler contracts before re-signing PG. They wouldn't get under the line but they could end up within $5-15m of it.

So that would be about $12-40m extra money, which adds up to a lot less than this crazy $270m.



On the other hand, if Melo takes the player option then they can sign PG anyway and try to deal Melo as an expiring at the deadline. Bit of an ask at $24m but still... Because tax payments are based on what the team's payroll on the final day of the regular season.

Or they could deal some of their mid-level guys at this deadline - Patterson, Abrines, Singler. That would make it 2 years in a row under the tax, and it would put off worrying about a repeater tax until 2020-21.
Warriorfan
RealGM
Posts: 15,357
And1: 2,801
Joined: Jun 24, 2001
         

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#65 » by Warriorfan » Sun Feb 4, 2018 1:08 am

Not paying the luxury tax 2 yrs in a row is a huge deal to avoid the repeater.

Losing about 9 million is big ask but not impossible. If you can trade Roberson who is not on a bad deal to a tanking team insurance would pay the salary
dautjazz
RealGM
Posts: 15,276
And1: 10,041
Joined: Aug 01, 2001
Location: Miami, FL
 

Re: RE: Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#66 » by dautjazz » Sun Feb 4, 2018 1:15 am

LAKESHOW wrote:They shoulda kept harden. KD. Westbrook. That's money well spent. 270 for this current collection, is not worth it.

If that 3 worked out, could of become the GOAT team, but who knows, Harden and Westbrook may not have worked out that well together.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
NickAnderson wrote:
How old are you, just curious.

by gomeziee on 21 Jul 2013 00:53

im 20, and i did grow up watching MJ play in the 90's.
dautjazz
RealGM
Posts: 15,276
And1: 10,041
Joined: Aug 01, 2001
Location: Miami, FL
 

Re: RE: Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#67 » by dautjazz » Sun Feb 4, 2018 1:17 am

Dupp wrote:This just makes not wanting to pay harden a little bit more all that much worse. Cheap at the wrong time. They had 3 mvps* and dpoy all at once.















*Hardens mvp not yet finalised.

Power of foresight. I felt the max was overpaying at the time, remember, he was playing Manu role, nothing wrong with that but throwing max money at a guy coming off your bench is tough.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app
NickAnderson wrote:
How old are you, just curious.

by gomeziee on 21 Jul 2013 00:53

im 20, and i did grow up watching MJ play in the 90's.
jbk1234
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 58,808
And1: 35,896
Joined: Dec 22, 2010
 

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#68 » by jbk1234 » Sun Feb 4, 2018 1:27 am

I think people are overreacting. It's a one year loss. A big loss but just a one off. Once Melo comes off that contract, he's officially in ring chaser territory and the Thunder are out of the tax. I'm not buying the notion that they watch PG walk out the door because of a one year loss.
cbosh4mvp wrote:
Jarret Allen isn’t winning you anything. Garland won’t show up in the playoffs. Mobley is a glorified dunk man. Mitchell has some experience but is a liability on defense. To me, the Cavs are a treadmill team.
LakersLegacy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,449
And1: 4,013
Joined: Apr 27, 2015
   

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#69 » by LakersLegacy » Sun Feb 4, 2018 1:56 am

jbk1234 wrote:I think people are overreacting. It's a one year loss. A big loss but just a one off. Once Melo comes off that contract, he's officially in ring chaser territory and the Thunder are out of the tax. I'm not buying the notion that they watch PG walk out the door because of a one year loss.


Of course they have to resign PG13.

WB amd PG are worth the money. Adams and Melo are overpaid. Roberson is the easiest guy to move and may be expendable due the luxury tax and hefty repeater tax penalties.

The solution is the Thunder need cheap rookie contracts and cheap role players. The challenge is how do the Thunder get there without a draft pick in 2018 and a draft pick in 2020.

Any ideas. Maybe the Thunder could move Roberson or Adams to a team that doesn’t realize the Thunder are so strapped.
MelosSoreWrist
Analyst
Posts: 3,534
And1: 1,565
Joined: Mar 25, 2012

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#70 » by MelosSoreWrist » Sun Feb 4, 2018 2:02 am

RipPizzaGuy wrote:
ClipsFanSince98 wrote:
RipPizzaGuy wrote:
Jerry West.


Not to mention despite all the big names on the Lakers their core is still inferior.


People sleeping on the ability of what the Clippers can do. If I am them, I'd only look to trade Lou Will and Deandre (preferably keep Deandre since I cant see any team give a 1st and expirings for him) if they can get 1st round picks attached to expiring contracts. Fire Doc, maybe his son opts out for long term security after a nice year.

Go into next year with Tobias/Beverly and enough cap to sign Paul George.

For assets Detroit 1st (14-18), Clippers 1st (12-16), Dekker, whatever they get from moving Lou Will.

Option 1. Lebron tells Cleveland hes going to LA, he opts in and does a CP3 style trade with Gallo, Dekker, Clippers 1st going to the Cavs. Otherwise they find another taker for that same package for cap space. Sign Lebron.

Option 2. John Wall moves. They trade Gallo, Beverly, Boban, Lac or Det 1st for Wall. Possibly routing Gallo and some compensation to a 3rd team with something else coming back to Wizards.

Resign Jordan.

Jordan
Tobias
George
Wall

4 core pieces between 25-29 years old.

Or

Jordan
Tobias
Lebron
George/Wade
Beverly/Milos

With Boban, Johnson, Det or Clippers 1st to move for another addition.

This team is better than the current Cavs and the closest thing we have to beating the Warriors.

Not saying either of these will definitely happen, just saying the Clippers have a multi billion dollar owner, A brilliant mind in Jerry West, space to work, assets to deal and are in LA.

Gallinari is a bad contract. He makes $21.6 and $22.6 the next two seasons. So essentially you are asking to trade a bad contract, a mid 1st rounder, and possibly some expirings for LeBron or Wall.

Cavs wont do that. Lose LeBron while capping themselves out for mid st rounder. Ugh.

Wizards might do it if they change their mind about Wall and think he is grossly overpaid (like LAC and Blake).
NYK 455 wrote:
greenhughes wrote:I hope Melo leaves and wins a championship and rubs it all in our face.

How does that make you better than the Lin, Gallo, and Wil fans who root for them over NY?
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 112,355
And1: 67,104
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Lifelong Nuggets Fan
 

Re: RE: Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#71 » by Dupp » Sun Feb 4, 2018 3:25 am

dautjazz wrote:
Dupp wrote:This just makes not wanting to pay harden a little bit more all that much worse. Cheap at the wrong time. They had 3 mvps* and dpoy all at once.















*Hardens mvp not yet finalised.

Power of foresight. I felt the max was overpaying at the time, remember, he was playing Manu role, nothing wrong with that but throwing max money at a guy coming off your bench is tough.

Sent from my SM-G950U using RealGM mobile app



Was it the max though? And iirc in the end the parting was over only around 200k per in the end
User avatar
brewbucks
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,950
And1: 861
Joined: May 11, 2012
Location: Milwaukee
     

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#72 » by brewbucks » Sun Feb 4, 2018 4:00 am

LAKESHOW wrote:They shoulda kept harden. KD. Westbrook. That's money well spent. 270 for this current collection, is not worth it.



They had the superteam before the superteam.
TyCobb
Forum Mod - Lakers
Forum Mod - Lakers
Posts: 38,252
And1: 9,956
Joined: Apr 17, 2005
Location: Pitcher's Mound
     

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#73 » by TyCobb » Sun Feb 4, 2018 4:09 am

OP give credit where it's due... this wasn't your own work. Shout out to Eric Pincus.
Read more, learn more, change your posts.
User avatar
Bertrob
RealGM
Posts: 27,394
And1: 8,823
Joined: Sep 08, 2011
Location: Boognish

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#74 » by Bertrob » Sun Feb 4, 2018 4:17 am

Well Melo is definitely not in their future plans
LakersSoul
Head Coach
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,967
Joined: Jul 03, 2016

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#75 » by LakersSoul » Sun Feb 4, 2018 4:19 am

Bertrob wrote:Well Melo is definitely not in their future plans


Yeah but no team is taking on Melo and his $28million. Melo is not opting out either.

Not Yo Ham Lakers!

The Don and The King!
Alonzo_Morning
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,941
And1: 5,624
Joined: Jan 19, 2014
Location: Perth, Western Australia
 

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#76 » by Alonzo_Morning » Sun Feb 4, 2018 5:16 am

LakersSoul wrote:
Bertrob wrote:Well Melo is definitely not in their future plans


Yeah but no team is taking on Melo and his $28million. Melo is not opting out either.


Maybe if Presti asks super nicely
DanTown8587
RealGM
Posts: 37,583
And1: 9,333
Joined: Jan 06, 2008
Location: Chicago
     

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#77 » by DanTown8587 » Sun Feb 4, 2018 5:27 am

There is a far more interesting question and it's what Golden State does to field a team in say two years.
...
User avatar
heatwillbeback
RealGM
Posts: 18,800
And1: 13,853
Joined: Jul 26, 2003
     

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#78 » by heatwillbeback » Sun Feb 4, 2018 6:15 am

The supermax is going to really mess teams up. When you are looking at 35 million (40 for Harden?) you have absolutely no room for error.

And OKC made errors- Melo is declining and not worth his money and Adams is a very good (but overpaid) player.
LakersSoul
Head Coach
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,967
Joined: Jul 03, 2016

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#79 » by LakersSoul » Sun Feb 4, 2018 6:31 am

Alonzo_Morning wrote:
LakersSoul wrote:
Bertrob wrote:Well Melo is definitely not in their future plans


Yeah but no team is taking on Melo and his $28million. Melo is not opting out either.


Maybe if Presti asks super nicely


What is Presti and OKC doing?

Is the injury to Andre really disrupting OKC? They were on a roll winning 8 in a row. Now, they have lost 3 in a row to Washington, Denver, and NO. They sit in 5th spot in the playoff picture and their future prospects do not look great. They look like a top 4-7 team in the west and possibly win their opening playoff series only at best.

I dont know how OKC can handle a top 4-7 team coupled with luxury tax and possibly the repeat offender tax in a small market. In hindsight, the PG and Melo trades are looking a bit confusing. They traded younger player for two older and more offensive minded players that need the ball in their hands. This is not what Presti and OKC had envisioned. Right now in 5th place, I just dont see them continuing this path by re-signing PG to $30 million dollar even if they get the chance. Will they continue to pay luxury tax and repeat offender tax for 5th place? Can they afford it?

Like the Clippers, they might make a quick turnaround move, unloading some vets. First let PG go for 1-2 assets. Then the year after, they remove/buyout Melo. Then they can start building again with Westbrook and Adams as their top 2 guys which sucks but they will avoid a big chunk of the luxury and repeat taxes after one year. It will piss Westbrook off but its the right move for OKC as they just dont have the horses to fight Houston or GSW or the taxes.

Not Yo Ham Lakers!

The Don and The King!
Alonzo_Morning
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,941
And1: 5,624
Joined: Jan 19, 2014
Location: Perth, Western Australia
 

Re: The $270 million dollar question 

Post#80 » by Alonzo_Morning » Sun Feb 4, 2018 6:56 am

LakersSoul wrote:
Alonzo_Morning wrote:
LakersSoul wrote:
Yeah but no team is taking on Melo and his $28million. Melo is not opting out either.


Maybe if Presti asks super nicely


What is Presti and OKC doing?

Is the injury to Andre really disrupting OKC? They were on a roll winning 8 in a row. Now, they have lost 3 in a row to Washington, Denver, and NO. They sit in 5th spot in the playoff picture and their future prospects do not look great. They look like a top 4-7 team in the west and possibly win their opening playoff series only at best.

I dont know how OKC can handle a top 4-7 team coupled with luxury tax and possibly the repeat offender tax in a small market. In hindsight, the PG and Melo trades are looking a bit confusing. They traded younger player for two older and more offensive minded players that need the ball in their hands. This is not what Presti and OKC had envisioned. Right now in 5th place, I just dont see them continuing this path by re-signing PG to $30 million dollar even if they get the chance. Will they continue to pay luxury tax and repeat offender tax for 5th place? Can they afford it?

Like the Clippers, they might make a quick turnaround move, unloading some vets. First let PG go for 1-2 assets. Then the year after, they remove/buyout Melo. Then they can start building again with Westbrook and Adams as their top 2 guys which sucks but they will avoid a big chunk of the luxury and repeat taxes after one year. It will piss Westbrook off but its the right move for OKC as they just dont have the horses to fight Houston or GSW or the taxes.


Well they have a week to deal PG. Gonna have to work quickly.

Trading for a non-expiring Melo really was pretty stinky move then and it smells much worse every day that goes by

Return to The General Board