xavis wrote:spicy6 wrote:iggymcfrack wrote:
He was awful in Games 1 and 2? WTF?
Game 1: 18/3/10 on .676 TS%, held George Hill scoreless
Game 2: 21/4/8 on .861 TS%
Like you honestly can’t be serious. He played fantastic both of those games. Yeah, he didn’t have a great game in Game 4, but who cares. The series was 1,000,000% over at that point.
Did you watch the game? Look what he did in the fourth. Nothing in both games, he ridiculously was fouling like a maniac had 5 fouls in that second game from what I can remember. This is why I have a trouble with stats, pulling them out without actually watching does nothing they lost by what 20 points in the second game at home as a first seed keep that in mind. The first game he was completly passive in the fourth especially dont get me started with the second. And holding "george hill scoreless" are we really arguing this?
Have trouble with stats because they tell the truth? Part of the reason they lost by so much was because of Derozan. A huge part actually. What you're stating is the definition of a casual fan. Lowry is an elite PG.
The bias is endless. Derozan gets traded hes the blunt of the blame, when hes here "it was caseys fault". And what "elite pg" gets swept by a 4 seed with literally a team helmed by lebron and friends. He was nowhere in those games mainly 4rth quarters, both lowry and derozan. I mean he is a "elite pg" afterall and leader of that team shouldnt he get a blunt of the blame as well?


