ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible

Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Dirk, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27

User avatar
Asif16
RealGM
Posts: 19,473
And1: 27,704
Joined: Feb 03, 2013
     

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#61 » by Asif16 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:07 pm

GiannisAnte34 wrote:
Asif16 wrote:
GiannisAnte34 wrote:
LOL at LeBron ahead of Giannis in 2019-20. Maybe 2 years ago


Giannis is easier to stop with a good game plan.

LeBron on the other hand can still expose you, doesnt matter how much you game plan due to his IQ and better shooting (than giannis).


Oh so it's easy for a team to have a carousel of multiple lengthy, athletic, and high IQ DPOY veterans? My mistake


Not sure where you're getting at. You can make the same case for Lebron. Are you denying that Lebron has a higher IQ and better shooting than Giannis?

In a playoff game (espcially in the last 5 inutes), I guarantee you 99% of players and fans are gonna be more scared of Lebron than Giannis.
GiannisAnte34
Analyst
Posts: 3,622
And1: 2,914
Joined: Jun 19, 2019
 

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#62 » by GiannisAnte34 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:10 pm

Asif16 wrote:
GiannisAnte34 wrote:
Asif16 wrote:
Giannis is easier to stop with a good game plan.

LeBron on the other hand can still expose you, doesnt matter how much you game plan due to his IQ and better shooting (than giannis).


Oh so it's easy for a team to have a carousel of multiple lengthy, athletic, and high IQ DPOY veterans? My mistake


Not sure where you're getting at. You can make the same case for Lebron. Are you denying that Lebron has a higher IQ and better shooting than Giannis?

In a playoff game (espcially in the last 5 inutes), I guarantee you 99% of players and fans are gonna be more scared of Lebron than Giannis.


I guarantee that you are delusional and living in the past. Giannis is a better player than LeBron and it really isn't even an argument at this point
User avatar
Asif16
RealGM
Posts: 19,473
And1: 27,704
Joined: Feb 03, 2013
     

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#63 » by Asif16 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:17 pm

GiannisAnte34 wrote:
Asif16 wrote:
GiannisAnte34 wrote:
Oh so it's easy for a team to have a carousel of multiple lengthy, athletic, and high IQ DPOY veterans? My mistake


Not sure where you're getting at. You can make the same case for Lebron. Are you denying that Lebron has a higher IQ and better shooting than Giannis?

In a playoff game (espcially in the last 5 inutes), I guarantee you 99% of players and fans are gonna be more scared of Lebron than Giannis.


I guarantee that you are delusional and living in the past. Giannis is a better player than LeBron and it really isn't even an argument at this point


Stats wise in the regular season, yes...Giannis is the better player.

But in the playoffs, LeBron is much more intimidating than Giannis, yes even now
User avatar
BallerTalk
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,712
And1: 6,816
Joined: Jul 01, 2013

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#64 » by BallerTalk » Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:19 pm

RoxSteady wrote:...LeBron's probably ranked too high.


:nod:
You checkin' for the sound of the beast
I'm the hound, I'ma creep, I get down, I'ma eat
I'ma keep somethin' to lay a naysayer to sleep
-
GiannisAnte34
Analyst
Posts: 3,622
And1: 2,914
Joined: Jun 19, 2019
 

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#65 » by GiannisAnte34 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:22 pm

Asif16 wrote:
GiannisAnte34 wrote:
Asif16 wrote:
Not sure where you're getting at. You can make the same case for Lebron. Are you denying that Lebron has a higher IQ and better shooting than Giannis?

In a playoff game (espcially in the last 5 inutes), I guarantee you 99% of players and fans are gonna be more scared of Lebron than Giannis.


I guarantee that you are delusional and living in the past. Giannis is a better player than LeBron and it really isn't even an argument at this point


Stats wise in the regular season, yes...Giannis is the better player.

But in the playoffs, LeBron is much more intimidating than Giannis, yes even now


Yes LeBron sure was a menace when he activated playoff mode and.... oh wait he sat on the couch and made tacos

LeBron is a matador on defense, ball hawks rebounds from his teammates, and has actually increased his drives to the basket (relying more on athleticism with age rather than adapting to refine his game like other All Time greats have done)
User avatar
GeorgeMarcus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,124
And1: 24,346
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
     

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#66 » by GeorgeMarcus » Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:23 pm

E-Balla wrote:
GeorgeMarcus wrote:“Battling illness last spring and having illness questioned, Embiid saw his production on both ends of the court decrease in the playoffs”
:rofl:

Unreal display of ignorance. This trumps the Winslow PG debacle in my book

Not at all Winslow played PG for half a season. Embiid saw his numbers decrease so boxscore watchers would think he played worse on both ends if they don't watch games. Even in the boxscore Winslow was the PG though. The best part was them having to report that the comments confused Miami because he was ALREADY the PG a day after roasting him for saying he wanted to be the PG.


Not watching the Heat during the regular season is different than not watching a big stage playoff series like the Raps/Sixers
The Legend of George Marcus

"Where I'm from, bullies get bullied." - Zach Randolph
Adam Stern
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,642
And1: 1,772
Joined: Jun 21, 2017

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#67 » by Adam Stern » Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:27 pm

WarriorGM wrote:
levon wrote:Harden is better than Curry. And I'm one of Harden's biggest detractors.


Then the Rockets better finish well ahead of the Warriors this year.


Didn't they already do that even when KD was on the Warriors?
Adam Stern
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,642
And1: 1,772
Joined: Jun 21, 2017

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#68 » by Adam Stern » Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:32 pm

gh123 wrote:How the hell does AD still get ranked so high when all he does is miss the PO year after year?


I know he's talented as hell but he's done so very little I don't get why he's ranked so high either.
gorz
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,934
And1: 1,604
Joined: Apr 03, 2018

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#69 » by gorz » Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:33 pm

The only thing espn got right is AD is a top 5 player. Hes not better than curry yet. Curry might have a mvp season.


As of now

1. Kawhi
2. Curry
3. Giannis
4. Harden
5. LeBron
6. AD


With projection

1. Curry
2. Kawhi
3. AD
4. Giannis
5. Harden
6. LeBron
User avatar
babyjax13
RealGM
Posts: 36,251
And1: 18,704
Joined: Jul 02, 2006
Location: Fresno, eating Birria
     

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#70 » by babyjax13 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:34 pm

ESPN really needs to hire experts in their given sports, rather than hoping people can specialize in all of it. A lot of this reads like if I were to make a ranking of the top 25 football players - some of them might be right - but it would mostly be a mess. Per the top 25 players or so, I'd go with a ranking like this (but understand that there would be some disagreement):

Possible MVP tier:
1. James Harden
2. Kawhi Leonard
3. Kevin Durant (if healthy)
4. LeBron James
5. Steph Curry
6. Giannis (although I expect him to rise as he develops some more skill)
7. Anthony Davis
8. Nikola Jokic

Possible 1st team all-NBA tier
9. Joel Embiid
10. Rudy Gobert
11. Paul George
12. Victor Oladipo (if healthy)
13. Damien Lillard
14. Karl Anthony-Towns
15. Jimmy Butler
16. Russell Westbrook

Possible 2nd team all-NBA tier
17. Jrue Holiday
18. Kyrie Irving
19. Kemba Walker
20. Blake Griffin
21. Luka Doncic
22. Ben Simmons
23. Pascal Siakam
24. Chris Paul
25. Draymond Green
Image

JazzMatt13 wrote:just because I think aliens probably have to do with JFK, doesn't mean my theory that Jazz will never get Wiggins, isn't true.

JColl
CS707
General Manager
Posts: 8,647
And1: 7,132
Joined: Dec 23, 2003

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#71 » by CS707 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 5:38 pm

Adam Stern wrote:
WarriorGM wrote:
levon wrote:Harden is better than Curry. And I'm one of Harden's biggest detractors.


Then the Rockets better finish well ahead of the Warriors this year.


Didn't they already do that even when KD was on the Warriors?


Nope
Dacost
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,872
And1: 1,582
Joined: Feb 21, 2017

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#72 » by Dacost » Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:14 pm

I don't like Steph his Defense is awful and has other issues but he has to be top 3 on all list period even the biggest Curry hater on the world would have to admit that.
User avatar
stoo
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,552
And1: 1,411
Joined: Jun 11, 2018
 

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#73 » by stoo » Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:26 pm

Spoiler:
babyjax13 wrote:ESPN really needs to hire experts in their given sports, rather than hoping people can specialize in all of it. A lot of this reads like if I were to make a ranking of the top 25 football players - some of them might be right - but it would mostly be a mess. Per the top 25 players or so, I'd go with a ranking like this (but understand that there would be some disagreement):

Possible MVP tier:
1. James Harden
2. Kawhi Leonard
3. Kevin Durant (if healthy)
4. LeBron James
5. Steph Curry
6. Giannis (although I expect him to rise as he develops some more skill)
7. Anthony Davis
8. Nikola Jokic

Possible 1st team all-NBA tier
9. Joel Embiid
10. Rudy Gobert
11. Paul George
12. Victor Oladipo (if healthy)
13. Damien Lillard
14. Karl Anthony-Towns
15. Jimmy Butler
16. Russell Westbrook

Possible 2nd team all-NBA tier
17. Jrue Holiday
18. Kyrie Irving
19. Kemba Walker
20. Blake Griffin
21. Luka Doncic
22. Ben Simmons
23. Pascal Siakam
24. Chris Paul
25. Draymond Green



Tiers are so much better way to classify players
NotSinceWilt
User avatar
E-Balla
RealGM
Posts: 35,891
And1: 25,221
Joined: Dec 19, 2012
Location: The Poster Formerly Known As The Gotham City Pantalones
   

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#74 » by E-Balla » Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:27 pm

GeorgeMarcus wrote:
E-Balla wrote:
GeorgeMarcus wrote:“Battling illness last spring and having illness questioned, Embiid saw his production on both ends of the court decrease in the playoffs”
:rofl:

Unreal display of ignorance. This trumps the Winslow PG debacle in my book

Not at all Winslow played PG for half a season. Embiid saw his numbers decrease so boxscore watchers would think he played worse on both ends if they don't watch games. Even in the boxscore Winslow was the PG though. The best part was them having to report that the comments confused Miami because he was ALREADY the PG a day after roasting him for saying he wanted to be the PG.


Not watching the Heat during the regular season is different than not watching a big stage playoff series like the Raps/Sixers

Tons of people watch the games half paying attention and don't notice defense outside of if a player is really bad or getting a lot of steals and blocks.

Meanwhile Winslow was the starting PG in Miami half of last season. She reported on it when he was named starting PG! There's no excuse for that.
Adam Stern
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,642
And1: 1,772
Joined: Jun 21, 2017

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#75 » by Adam Stern » Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:47 pm

gst8 wrote:
Adam Stern wrote:
WarriorGM wrote:
Then the Rockets better finish well ahead of the Warriors this year.


Didn't they already do that even when KD was on the Warriors?


Nope


I'm pretty sure Houston had the best record in the NBA season before last and were like 5 or 6 whole games ahead of the Warriors.
User avatar
cpower
RealGM
Posts: 21,329
And1: 8,953
Joined: Mar 03, 2011
   

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#76 » by cpower » Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:48 pm

Harden over Curry :lol: :lol: :lol: does losing count for more
User avatar
GeorgeMarcus
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 19,124
And1: 24,346
Joined: Jun 17, 2006
     

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#77 » by GeorgeMarcus » Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:51 pm

E-Balla wrote:
GeorgeMarcus wrote:
E-Balla wrote:Not at all Winslow played PG for half a season. Embiid saw his numbers decrease so boxscore watchers would think he played worse on both ends if they don't watch games. Even in the boxscore Winslow was the PG though. The best part was them having to report that the comments confused Miami because he was ALREADY the PG a day after roasting him for saying he wanted to be the PG.


Not watching the Heat during the regular season is different than not watching a big stage playoff series like the Raps/Sixers

Tons of people watch the games half paying attention and don't notice defense outside of if a player is really bad or getting a lot of steals and blocks.

Meanwhile Winslow was the starting PG in Miami half of last season. She reported on it when he was named starting PG! There's no excuse for that.


Lol alright that’s fair. Both are pretty bad
The Legend of George Marcus

"Where I'm from, bullies get bullied." - Zach Randolph
User avatar
Harry Garris
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,248
And1: 13,971
Joined: Jul 12, 2017
     

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 

Post#78 » by Harry Garris » Fri Sep 27, 2019 6:58 pm

Asif16 wrote:Dame at 9 and Mccolum at 13.

You would think they could have at least put some sort of a fight against the Warriors with such a loaded back court.

Essentially, what I'm trying to say is that Dame probably should be 13 while Mccolum shoudl've been way lower


They did put up a fight, they played 3 very close and competitive games that came down to the wire against a significantly more talented Warriors team. Even with KD out the Warriors had the first, third, and fourth best players in that series.

I love CJ but he isn't a top 20 player.
Image
User avatar
ReasonablySober
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 109,561
And1: 43,505
Joined: Dec 02, 2001
Location: Cheap dinner. Watch basketball. Bone down.
Contact:

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#79 » by ReasonablySober » Fri Sep 27, 2019 7:44 pm

illuminati666 wrote:Nope no way you can have AD over Curry.

Not a GSW fan but Curry is still in his prime and the 2nd best PG of all time. He's number 3 for me.

1. LBJ (until proven otherwise)
2. Kawhi
3. Curry
4. Harden
5. Giannis
6. AD
and then Jokic - Embiid - Dame - PG13 I agree with


What would constitute proof for you? Like, missing the playoffs kind of proof? Losing in the finals again kind of proof?
Mickey8
Head Coach
Posts: 6,376
And1: 5,233
Joined: Jan 21, 2017

Re: ESPN Rankings 3-10 Are Surprisingly Not Horrible 

Post#80 » by Mickey8 » Fri Sep 27, 2019 8:13 pm

Mauro Pedrosa wrote:Lillard >> Jokic

Yeah right, Mccolum bailed him out big time in the play offs last season.

Return to The General Board