Braggins wrote:Mr Puddles wrote:Floody100 wrote: it’s hard for me to give someone the ‘GOAT’ status when they’ve lost more finals than they’ve won, especially when the guy he’s trying to pass has never lost a final.
It puzzles me how people continue to use the "losing in the finals" argument.
Using that same logic, let's say Jordan had led his team to the finals 4 more times but failed to beat the western conference opponent - would he be considered a worse player now? You'd basically be arguing that if he had lead his team to more wins and greater playoff success, he'd be a worse player.
Why is losing to the finals a blemish on your resume, but not making it to the finals isn't?
Its always been obviously silly, but it just hit me that these people literally think that conference championships have negative value for a players legacy...
Jimmy Butler really hurt his legacy this year by winning an Eastern Conference championship.
Right, that finals loss really hurts Jimmy Butler's career resume according to the logic here.

















