LivingLegend wrote:LAL1947 wrote:LivingLegend wrote:
......in terms of difficulty to coach? Which is the entire topic of conversation? My point is prime Bosh/Wade/Bron were much tougher to coach than old LeBron/Westbrook and Davis. Spolstra handed it to the tune of 4 straight Finals and 2 rings and Ty Lue handled it the same way in MUCH higher stakes than Vogel did.
Point being, Vogel didnt have that hard of a coaching situation comparatively. Maybe hes just not a good coach. Spo/Lue got it done 4 years a piece in harder situations. Vogel failed in 4 years in a easier situation.
Ty Lue and Eric Spoelstra are both great coaches. So is Frank Vogel. I don't get this comparison you're trying to make though. Miami were supposed to win not 1, not 2, not 3, not 4, not 5, not 6, not 7... and only ended up with 2. Also, Vogel has only been coach of the Lakers for 3 seasons... and AD got injured in the playoffs last season, missed a whole bunch of games this season... and none of Lebron, Wade, Bosh or AD are as boneheaded as Westbrick.
The comparison I was trying to make was the OP saying "Imagine trying to deal with headcases like Westbrook/LeBron"
and thats why I cited Lue/Spo as examples of coaches that have coached multiple 'headcases' in harder situations and ended up still looking a lot better than Vogel has.
so you're saying ty lue or spoelstra would've coached this team to success? i'm not sure that would be the case. I seem to recall spoelstra was always in the news/hot seat as well in the big 3era, riley was the stabilizing force. even though spoelstra was coaching well his name was the first that came up whenever something went wrong. it's just the nature of of the gig. i also think winning has alot of stabilizing effect and minimizes dysfunction. it just so happens this team is poorly constructed and dealt w/ significant injuries to their stars and if you're implying spoelstra or lue would've done significantly better under the same circumstances, i dont think so.