ThatClockWork wrote:shangrila wrote:ThatClockWork wrote:Have you ever played any sport competitively?
Have you?
Are you involved in the conversation? Because you don't seem to have anything to add.
But have you?
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
ThatClockWork wrote:shangrila wrote:ThatClockWork wrote:Have you ever played any sport competitively?
Have you?
Are you involved in the conversation? Because you don't seem to have anything to add.
Disagree highly. It should be 6 minutes+ for 30 points.xAIRNESSx wrote:4 minute mark is where you usually pull your starters when up by 30.
3 minutes when up by 20.
Dame Lizard wrote:Disagree highly. It should be 6 minutes+ for 30 points.xAIRNESSx wrote:4 minute mark is where you usually pull your starters when up by 30.
3 minutes when up by 20.
As eluded to above, you can literally just drain the shot clock + bomb 3s and miss all of them, and still win at that point.
MartyConlonOnTheRun wrote:Dame Lizard wrote:Disagree highly. It should be 6 minutes+ for 30 points.xAIRNESSx wrote:4 minute mark is where you usually pull your starters when up by 30.
3 minutes when up by 20.
As eluded to above, you can literally just drain the shot clock + bomb 3s and miss all of them, and still win at that point.
And that is worst case scenario if you stay the course. They hit 4 3s in a row over a 2 minute stretch. Ok fine call a TO and bring the starters/best defenders back in after a few minutes of rest of you are nervous. Math is on your side as long as you don't panic
Isocleas2 wrote:ThatClockWork wrote:Isocleas2 wrote:
His question was as pointed and thought provoking as yours, as he said if you can't handle public discourse on a public forum perhaps that's on you.
Who asked you? The question was directed at .... who exactly? Not you or him. If you can't understand that, that is on you.
I asked my question for a reason and as you are not him, you are not in any position to answer that question. Says a lot about you honestly.
Might want to consider your engagement strategy going forward.
I think you're confused how a public forum works, you see anyone can quote or respond to you. If you don't like it don't post in public.
Making up imaginary rules of engagement that suits your own personal preferences has no bearing here. Where it does have a place is in "private" messaging, which may be more appealing to your sensibilities.
xAIRNESSx wrote:Just my observations on what most coaches seem to do.
You gotta be up by 40 to pull at the 6 minute mark.
xAIRNESSx wrote:4 minute mark is where you usually pull your starters when up by 30.
3 minutes when up by 20.
Chronz wrote:xAIRNESSx wrote:Just my observations on what most coaches seem to do.
You gotta be up by 40 to pull at the 6 minute mark.
Wouldn't doubt it, coaches don't really understand math. It's why 3s were a secret weapon for as long as they were
Isocleas2 wrote:ThatClockWork wrote:Isocleas2 wrote:
His question was as pointed and thought provoking as yours, as he said if you can't handle public discourse on a public forum perhaps that's on you.
Who asked you? The question was directed at .... who exactly? Not you or him. If you can't understand that, that is on you.
I asked my question for a reason and as you are not him, you are not in any position to answer that question. Says a lot about you honestly.
Might want to consider your engagement strategy going forward.
I think you're confused how a public forum works, you see anyone can quote or respond to you. If you don't like it don't post in public.
Making up imaginary rules of engagement that suits your own personal preferences has no bearing here. Where it does have a place is in "private" messaging, which may be more appealing to your sensibilities.