ellobo wrote:Sedale Threatt wrote:ellobo wrote:Overall, it took the US a long time to get over the attitude that we're the best at basketball and no one else is really a threat to beat us under any circumstances, so all we have to do is show up and we'll still win even if we don't play hard, smart, or cohesively.
I actually think we attacked the problem pretty quickly. We had back-to-back catastrophes in 02 and 04 and pretty immediately instituted a more structured program. Even though it didn't bear immediate fruits in 06, it had nothing to do with cohesion or effort or still thinking we could just roll out the ball and win by 20; Greece just played the game of its collective lives and beat us straight up, which is going to happen in single-elimination competition. (We could have easily lost to Spain or France in multiple tournaments since then as well.)
I think our record since the 04 debacle is something like 71-4 with six titles in seven major tournaments, and it would be even better if we didn't have the maddening tradition of treating the Olympics as our only main objective. So it's hard to criticize the response.
Well, waiting until you have "back-to-back catastrophes" two years apart doesn't seem like a very fast response. It seems more like we didn't learn our lesson the first time and had to get spanked again before reality set in.
And you can excuse 2006, but that was another disappointment, and hard to look at as righting the ship. I don't recall the game against Greece specifically, but looking at the box score it's hard to imagine that a US team that is organized and playing hard defensively would give up 63.5% field goals. That's not just the opponent getting hot. That's the opponent consistently getting high quality shots due to some combination of bad strategy, bad execution, bad effort, or the opponent having a lot more talent than you (which was not the case). Greece even missed 10 free throws, although the US shot even worse from the line.
First one you can just chalk up to a bad tournament. Second was proof of systemic failure, at which point USA Basketball responded. Perhaps if 02 had been the Olympics it would have prompted a super immediate reaction. But it barely registered given that it was the Worlds and I don't think that was an irrational chain of events that prompted the overhaul. Two tournaments in two years isn't exactly being asleep at the wheel.
And yes, of course 06 was a disappointment. Massively so, in fact, and easily our biggest since we revamped. Talent was off the charts, everybody was all in, etc etc. We should have won that tournament and would have 98 out of 100 times. Because I do remember that game, very vividly because of how agonizing it was to watch, and Greece will not play like that at that stage in a major tournament against an opponent of that caliber in another 100 years.
Regardless, the details of the game don't really matter. Unless you think never, ever losing under any circumstance is a realistic goal, perfection is simply impossible even with the massive edge in talent we will have in almost all of these games.
The 04 Olympics sucked because of all the circumstances leading up to it. It was embarrassing. But I'm 100 pct satisfied that we gave it our best effort in 06 and just got beat. Not best performance -- that would have precluded getting totally dismantled by pick-and-rolls -- but, for the most part, best effort. At the very least we got full by-in from the players, and when that happens we're almost unbeatable. As our ridiculous record since we started using pros will attest.