Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade?

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

turnaroundJ
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,751
And1: 1,522
Joined: Oct 31, 2020

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#61 » by turnaroundJ » Sat Dec 31, 2022 6:19 am

Threezus wrote:
meekrab wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
So you just don’t value the PG position? You want a wing as a PG in the traditional sense to initiate the offense? I’m trying to understand your position

Not sure what's hard to understand, the Hawks traded a bunch of value for a guy who's inefficient at scoring and short. There's pretty much no recorded instance of that working out well.


i dunno it seemed to work out pretty dang well for the Bucks trading for a 6'5 jrue Holiday who is pretty much a older version of Murray. Pretty similar compensation as well. I would 100% trade for both guys again if i were both teams.

Average height might just be a shade under 6’7 now but heights are measured closer to barefoot these days, save for some teams (like Houston). Dejounte is 6’4 and Jrue is only 6’3.
TheLand13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,289
And1: 4,534
Joined: Aug 31, 2021
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#62 » by TheLand13 » Sat Dec 31, 2022 7:16 am

SpreeS wrote:
TheLand13 wrote:
SpreeS wrote:All these trades are bad ones

Gobert to MIN
Murray to ATL
Mitchell to CLE
Vucevic to CHI

16 picks were traded or will be swaped in these trades and all these teams are first rnd exit folder at best.


Please do explain how Cleveland is a first round exist team at best. I can't wait to hear this one.

SpreeS wrote:Nah, you won't win with Mitchell as top dog. Mitchell teams looked better w/o him in the last 4 years.


:lol: :lol:


What? I would take easy 4 teams BOS/PHI/BKN/MIL over CLE in PO. After hot start 8W-1L, CLE has 14W-13L record. Also won all 5 OT.

This is a bad trade and why. You don’t invest into 6-1 guard as top guy when yours second best player also is 6-1 guard and you have huge hole at SF. This is stupid.

CLE gave 5 picks with allstar in Markkanen and other 6-1 guard Sexton. Markkanen impact alone is way bigger than Mitchell this season.

This summer CLE will have a lot of money after Love/Lavert contracts expire. But free agents market for big SG or SF is very limited. The best option here Brooks, Barnes, Oubre???, Hart.


Why is getting another 6’1 guard stupid? In what ways has it hindered Cleveland? They’re the number one defensive team in the NBA so it very clearly hasn’t impacted their defense. So what was even the point in bringing that up?

You mentioned only four teams that you think are clear cut favorites over Cleveland. Fine. Ignoring the fact that only one of those teams has a winning record against Cleveland right now, how does that prove that Cleveland is “at best” a first round exit?

Yeah, they’ve been 14-13 since the great start. They’ve had lineup issues, are missing spacing and they’ve run into some teams playing incredible basketball. They’re still one of the top teams in the East as of today and have beaten multiple top teams already.

Lauri was not going to be the type of player he is more in Cleveland. His offense was going to be limited to being a floor spacing wing that would be given opportunities every now and then to score inside, just like the year prior.

I suggest not talking about the cavaliers if you don’t have a single clue about their team. All you contributed was the same brain dead take other people who don’t know any better have made.
buzzkilloton
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,858
And1: 2,442
Joined: Feb 20, 2017
Location: Bangkok
 

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#63 » by buzzkilloton » Sat Dec 31, 2022 8:45 am

The problem wasnt the Murray trade. The problem was trading Luka for Trae.
LightTheBeam
RealGM
Posts: 18,995
And1: 12,101
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#64 » by LightTheBeam » Sat Dec 31, 2022 8:59 am

Wolveswin wrote:Would this trade fix both teams…

To Hawks: Gobert + Anderson + GTJ

To Raptors: Capela

To Wolves: Murray + Collins + Hawks Filler

New Raptors:
Capela
Siakam
Barnes
OG
FVV

New Hawks:
Gobert
Anderson | OO
Hunter
GTJ | BB
Young

New Wolves:
Towns
Collins
McDaniels
Edwards
Murray
Wolves would need to include about 2-3 1st round picks they don't have

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app
SpreeS
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,790
And1: 4,149
Joined: Jul 26, 2012
 

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#65 » by SpreeS » Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:01 am

TheLand13 wrote:
SpreeS wrote:
TheLand13 wrote:
Please do explain how Cleveland is a first round exist team at best. I can't wait to hear this one.



:lol: :lol:


What? I would take easy 4 teams BOS/PHI/BKN/MIL over CLE in PO. After hot start 8W-1L, CLE has 14W-13L record. Also won all 5 OT.

This is a bad trade and why. You don’t invest into 6-1 guard as top guy when yours second best player also is 6-1 guard and you have huge hole at SF. This is stupid.

CLE gave 5 picks with allstar in Markkanen and other 6-1 guard Sexton. Markkanen impact alone is way bigger than Mitchell this season.

This summer CLE will have a lot of money after Love/Lavert contracts expire. But free agents market for big SG or SF is very limited. The best option here Brooks, Barnes, Oubre???, Hart.


Why is getting another 6’1 guard stupid? In what ways has it hindered Cleveland? They’re the number one defensive team in the NBA so it very clearly hasn’t impacted their defense. So what was even the point in bringing that up?

You mentioned only four teams that you think are clear cut favorites over Cleveland. Fine. Ignoring the fact that only one of those teams has a winning record against Cleveland right now, how does that prove that Cleveland is “at best” a first round exit?

Yeah, they’ve been 14-13 since the great start. They’ve had lineup issues, are missing spacing and they’ve run into some teams playing incredible basketball. They’re still one of the top teams in the East as of today and have beaten multiple top teams already.

Lauri was not going to be the type of player he is more in Cleveland. His offense was going to be limited to being a floor spacing wing that would be given opportunities every now and then to score inside, just like the year prior.

I suggest not talking about the cavaliers if you don’t have a single clue about their team. All you contributed was the same brain dead take other people who don’t know any better have made.


Really? We had Utah with top defence and DPOY level player at C year by year. PO is different animal and miss matches become the most important thing. Elite wings or forwards are the most dominant players, not 6-1 guards or standart bigs.

I just want to say. Lavert/Love salaries, Sexton/Lauri and 5 picks could be used differently.
CP War Hawks
Analyst
Posts: 3,441
And1: 1,575
Joined: Nov 28, 2017
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#66 » by CP War Hawks » Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:55 am

Geaux_Hawks wrote:Hawks problems are't centered around Murray. In fact, he's probably helped us win games we would've lost without him. Our issues revolve around Trae being in a slump, a need for a modernized offense, 3 pt shooting, Capela missing time, and a sub par bench.

We needed a consistent secondary playmaker. Murray is exactly that. We needed a defensive minded backcourt mate for Trae. Murray is that. Murray is doing what we need him to do. We just aren't the same team from last year or the year before.

Gallo and Huerter were bigger losses than anticipated. Especially Gallo because he came off the bench and gave us a more versatile threat in the frontcourt compared to what Collins and Clint are.


I mean Trae is struggling shooting but so is everyone else except Bogi, and then he goes hot/cold for long stretches. The frontcourt are an atrocious shooting quartet, worst in the league. Changes need to be made, they are that bad. It has hampered the spacing needed for the wings and guards to operate properly.

Huerter is in a system that suits him just find, but not so much here. Has allowed Griffin to emerge so it's a NBA cycle of life sort of thing. The wing depth is also close behind the bad shooting of the frontcourt. Hunter can't be counted to guard the best wings and score enough to fuel a winning team right now with absolutely no one there to spell him.

Main issues other than Murray:
1. Coaching
2. Zero versatile play from the 4s and 5s.
3. Wing depth and talent.

I do agree Murray needs to be less ball dominant and move w/o the ball more. He's the most slippery player running off screens and getting open.
CP War Hawks
Analyst
Posts: 3,441
And1: 1,575
Joined: Nov 28, 2017
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#67 » by CP War Hawks » Sat Dec 31, 2022 10:22 am

Bornstellar wrote:
jayu70 wrote:
Bornstellar wrote:And an unprotected swap in 2026. Spurs basically own their draft for 3 straight years. You think that's small potatoes?

You do understand how a swap works though right? Hawks will still have a pick in 2026.

And you understand if your team implodes and end up with a higher draft pick it becomes ours and you get wherever we pick (which may end up as a later first by then)? Along with no picks the year before and after?

I guess man. I didn't say it was the worst trade ever, but it wasn't a very good trade for ATL imo


The 2025 pick is a nothing burger imo. That pick is likely pick 20-25 just like the last few have been. The swap in 2026 seems redundant. The Spurs don't exactly have much talent unless another Duncan is out there waiting to get selected top overall...

Now you got me for 2027. That could go either way that far out. You obviously hate Murray for whatever reason, good luck with the Wemby sweepstakes.
Wolveswin
General Manager
Posts: 8,324
And1: 3,083
Joined: Aug 22, 2020
 

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#68 » by Wolveswin » Sat Dec 31, 2022 10:35 am

RipPizzaGuy wrote:
Wolveswin wrote:Would this trade fix both teams…

To Hawks: Gobert + Anderson + GTJ

To Raptors: Capela

To Wolves: Murray + Collins + Hawks Filler

New Raptors:
Capela
Siakam
Barnes
OG
FVV

New Hawks:
Gobert
Anderson | OO
Hunter
GTJ | BB
Young

New Wolves:
Towns
Collins
McDaniels
Edwards
Murray
Wolves would need to include about 2-3 1st round picks they don't have

Sent from my SM-G988U1 using RealGM mobile app

Can you explain your opinion and try to justify your take?
User avatar
Hoop Hunter
Starter
Posts: 2,290
And1: 3,090
Joined: Feb 19, 2002
   

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#69 » by Hoop Hunter » Sat Dec 31, 2022 11:54 am

Murray and Trae have no chemistry and don't fit together. They don't play basketball together, they just take turns.

Nate has been exposed as the mediocre coach he's always been, just like Pacer fans told you all a few years ago, when everyone was so outraged that we fired him.
“He’s not afraid of the moment, he is The Moment!” — Richard Jefferson on Tyrese Haliburton
Exp0sed
General Manager
Posts: 7,974
And1: 7,407
Joined: Feb 10, 2022

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#70 » by Exp0sed » Sat Dec 31, 2022 12:03 pm

Seeing Murray lose his footing and the ball to WB and continuing to sit on the court and pout tells you all you need to know

He's got some skills but he needs to be motivated and to completly buy in for him to a really impactful players and that's clearly not the case on the Hawks, dude looks checked out
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,155
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#71 » by Geaux_Hawks » Sat Dec 31, 2022 12:47 pm

Exp0sed wrote:Seeing Murray lose his footing and the ball to WB and continuing to sit on the court and pout tells you all you need to know

He's got some skills but he needs to be motivated and to completly buy in for him to a really impactful players and that's clearly not the case on the Hawks, dude looks checked out

He held himself accountable for the loss against the Nets. He's not the crybaby you think he is. If anything, he's frustrated at how things are going. Understandable given the situation.
Exp0sed
General Manager
Posts: 7,974
And1: 7,407
Joined: Feb 10, 2022

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#72 » by Exp0sed » Sat Dec 31, 2022 12:57 pm

Geaux_Hawks wrote:
Exp0sed wrote:Seeing Murray lose his footing and the ball to WB and continuing to sit on the court and pout tells you all you need to know

He's got some skills but he needs to be motivated and to completly buy in for him to a really impactful players and that's clearly not the case on the Hawks, dude looks checked out

He held himself accountable for the loss against the Nets. He's not the crybaby you think he is. If anything, he's frustrated at how things are going. Understandable given the situation.


I don't think he's a crybaby
I think he's not a high level professional and competitor

his demeanor and body language are really bad at times

as we've seen in the past, these low-key divas or headcases can be managed sometimes within a winning culture and system but the Hawks just don't have that

they are scuffling among themselves one way or the other for most of Trae's career
it's not Collins whose to blame ot Trae or whomever is constantly stirring stuff up in that lockeroom- it's the enviornment and cultrue

then u add another ego to the mix in Murray, and guys eventually start pointing fingers at each other

Hawks won't make the playoffs imo
Exp0sed
General Manager
Posts: 7,974
And1: 7,407
Joined: Feb 10, 2022

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#73 » by Exp0sed » Sat Dec 31, 2022 1:05 pm

Collins is a good player (and underutilized due to Trae's ball hoggery and chucking) - but he's not as good as he thinks he is..

Trae is really good, tho his decision making, poor shot selection and complete inability to play even a touch of defense are huge barriers for him as a player

as a result he is WB 2.0. he's good but he thinks he's some kind of superstar (he most def is not)

you got another Guy in Dejounte who thinks he's better than he really is, without actualy achieving anything on a basketball court

this isn't 1980, these guys are paid so well even mid-level guys like Murray are set for life from a young age. less incentive to give a 100% only guys with the mental desire and tenacity keep at it

Murray hasn't done s***, he's just a coddled and entitled like most of his generation

it's a problem when u put 3 guys who all think they are much better than they are together

it's not a recipe for winning team basketball, for guys sacrificing for the team, coach and each other or working together towards a common goal

it's just not a recipe for success
User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,015
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#74 » by Chanel Bomber » Sat Dec 31, 2022 1:38 pm

Maybe the Hawks needed a secondary playmaker, but not this type.

They needed a back-up when Trae hits the bench, and either a wing with some playmaking chops to swing the ball to against a trapping defense or a big who can playmake off the roll.

Murray is not a secondary playmaker. He's just another primary who needs the ball. Him and Trae are just taking turns running the offense, and neither is a threat off the ball.

But at least one of them has proven to be good on the ball, and led the team to the ECF as the primary ball-handler, while the other was leading his team to the lottery in a high-usage role.

The fit is awful. There's not much McMillan can do about it. He's not going to convince Murray to take on a lesser role and embrace more of a 3&D role. There's a reason Pop - who presumably would prefer to win now as he's nearing retirement - traded him for some picks. He's fool's gold.
Charlesareed
Starter
Posts: 2,102
And1: 927
Joined: Jun 14, 2013
         

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#75 » by Charlesareed » Sat Dec 31, 2022 2:12 pm

GrindCityHustle wrote:I think Atlanta were done with drafting players and just wanted a sure bet instead of gambles like reddish with lotto picks.

I also believe it stings as we have seen Huerter made such an impact in a better system and they gave him up for so little and paid so much for Murray.

By the end of the season we should have a surefire answer probably.

Yeah trading huerter was a head scratcher for me all the needed was a coaching change someone with a offensive mindset make mike Dantoni with a defensive staff my coach choice for ATL is kenny atkinson he can get then to play a a high level like in the playoffs a couple years ago
Chicago Raised me
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,155
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#76 » by Geaux_Hawks » Sat Dec 31, 2022 2:21 pm

Bornstellar wrote:
jayu70 wrote:
Bornstellar wrote:And an unprotected swap in 2026. Spurs basically own their draft for 3 straight years. You think that's small potatoes?

You do understand how a swap works though right? Hawks will still have a pick in 2026.

And you understand if your team implodes and end up with a higher draft pick it becomes ours and you get wherever we pick (which may end up as a later first by then)? Along with no picks the year before and after?

I guess man. I didn't say it was the worst trade ever, but it wasn't a very good trade for ATL imo


You're conflating rumors and assuming a pick swap will have a devastating affect. Not to mention, this assumes the Spurs are even good by then. There's just so many variables floating here.

I mean if we implode because Trae Young had a season ending injury, does that justify it being a bad trade? You can't predict something like that.

Did we implode because we had a fire sale? Assuming one of the reason this is even being discussed is because of the BS report that someone is predicting Trae will demand a trade. Let us assume he does and we give him his trade, we will certainly recoup value at that time. So does not having our own pick outweigh what we could possibly get in a Trae Young return? We haven't even discussed other player being traded yet

Does Murray have a big improvement to his game out of nowhere that was unforeseen? He's only 26 right now.

Do the Hawks improve with a different coach? The team has made a run to the ECF after making a coaching change.

Lets be real here. The Hawks traded 2 unprotected first and agreed to swap a pick in years where their core group(including their star player) are all signed for except in '27. So at best for the Spurs, the likeliest outcome is, we're a treadmill team those years, and the picks end up late lotto to late teens. That was for a player going into his age 26 season on a team friendly deal, and currently averaging 20-5-6 with almost 2 SPG and filled major holes we had.

You can assume all 3 picks end up top 3-5, but that's a high end gamble and requires a lot of unlucky breaks from the Hawks. If nothing changes, the Hawks will still have Collins, Hunter, Trae, AJ, JJ, and OO until the summer of '26. All under the age of 28. So the '26-'27 year is the earliest possibility of our pick really mattering for the Spurs as Hunter is the only player guaranteed to still be around by then.

That said, every trade for a young, talented player isn't going to equate to getting a team over the hump at that very moment. We didn't mortgage our entire future on 1 player like the Lakers or in this example, the Wolves. For us, it was a drop in the bucket compared to what Minnesota gave up for a guy over 30 on $200 million deal not even making the impact he was did before. Even without comparing the two trades, it still was a drop in the bucket for what we got so far. We still have our '23 pick, kept all of our young guys, have 2 picks in '24, and are essentially losing only 2 picks from '25-'27.
User avatar
Harry Garris
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,248
And1: 13,971
Joined: Jul 12, 2017
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#77 » by Harry Garris » Sat Dec 31, 2022 3:26 pm

therealozzykhan wrote:Hawks I think with time will still be better, Gobert is just a bad fit with Minny. Hawks have struggled in games without Capela 2-6. That's had a bigger impact on their defense.


The Hawks offense has been absolutely terrible given their talent and how good they were last year. I'm not sure why so many people are assuming the Hawks will be fine and figure it out but the Wolves situation is unrecoverable. For as bad as the Gobert fit is offensively so far this season the fit with Trae Young and Dejounte Murray has arguably been even worse, but it flies under the radar.

The Hawks were the #2 offense in the NBA last year, this year they're bottom 10. And yes there are other players and injuries involved in that drop off it's not just the addition of Dejounte Murray, but it also just looks really bad when Trae and Dejounte share the court together. The offense devolves into stagnant your-turn, my-turn iso ball and Trae's having the least efficient season of his career as a result.

There is a world in which Dejounte Murray walks for nothing and Trae Young demands out. In that world this could totally end up being a worse trade than the Rudy Gobert one, especially if the Hawks end up having to give the Spurs a couple of top 5 picks.
Image
ConSarnit
Head Coach
Posts: 6,266
And1: 5,997
Joined: May 05, 2015
 

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#78 » by ConSarnit » Sat Dec 31, 2022 3:33 pm

Threezus wrote:
meekrab wrote:
azcatz11 wrote:
So you just don’t value the PG position? You want a wing as a PG in the traditional sense to initiate the offense? I’m trying to understand your position

Not sure what's hard to understand, the Hawks traded a bunch of value for a guy who's inefficient at scoring and short. There's pretty much no recorded instance of that working out well.


i dunno it seemed to work out pretty dang well for the Bucks trading for a 6'5 jrue Holiday who is pretty much a older version of Murray. Pretty similar compensation as well. I would 100% trade for both guys again if i were both teams.


The Bucks already had Giannis and Middleton (coming off an all-star season). Adding Jrue as the 3rd/final piece makes more sense than adding Dejounte to be your #2. How is ATL getting their Middleton? I can’t see any way ATL would make the Dejounte trade again if given the option considering how mediocre they look.
User avatar
Geaux_Hawks
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,473
And1: 1,155
Joined: Feb 18, 2011
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#79 » by Geaux_Hawks » Sat Dec 31, 2022 6:05 pm

Harry Garris wrote:
therealozzykhan wrote:Hawks I think with time will still be better, Gobert is just a bad fit with Minny. Hawks have struggled in games without Capela 2-6. That's had a bigger impact on their defense.


The Hawks offense has been absolutely terrible given their talent and how good they were last year. I'm not sure why so many people are assuming the Hawks will be fine and figure it out but the Wolves situation is unrecoverable. For as bad as the Gobert fit is offensively so far this season the fit with Trae Young and Dejounte Murray has arguably been even worse, but it flies under the radar.

The Hawks were the #2 offense in the NBA last year, this year they're bottom 10. And yes there are other players and injuries involved in that drop off it's not just the addition of Dejounte Murray, but it also just looks really bad when Trae and Dejounte share the court together. The offense devolves into stagnant your-turn, my-turn iso ball and Trae's having the least efficient season of his career as a result.

There is a world in which Dejounte Murray walks for nothing and Trae Young demands out. In that world this could totally end up being a worse trade than the Rudy Gobert one, especially if the Hawks end up having to give the Spurs a couple of top 5 picks.


You're forgetting Trae Young is also shooting the same shots he did last year, but missing them this year. Murray isn't impacting that. Also, shooters like Huerter and Gallo are gone; Collins is shooting horfficly; Bogi missed 20+ games; and Clint has been dealing with injuries. That #2 offense is bottom 10 because the same guys that made it so good, are either struggling themselves, or not here. Guys don't shoot 31% and 23% because a new player joined the team. These are legit wide open shots being missed btw. This isn't Murray coming in and taking shots away or anything. Trae's still got around the same usage and FGA's. All Murray did was replaced Huerter/Gallo without the shooting.

Again, our problems come from no bench, lack of shooting, missing Capela, and coaching in general. Even just having Capela back fully healthy would swing more games back into our favor. Teams just kill us on the boards most nights without him.
User avatar
Harry Garris
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 8,248
And1: 13,971
Joined: Jul 12, 2017
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#80 » by Harry Garris » Sat Dec 31, 2022 7:42 pm

Geaux_Hawks wrote:
Harry Garris wrote:
therealozzykhan wrote:Hawks I think with time will still be better, Gobert is just a bad fit with Minny. Hawks have struggled in games without Capela 2-6. That's had a bigger impact on their defense.


The Hawks offense has been absolutely terrible given their talent and how good they were last year. I'm not sure why so many people are assuming the Hawks will be fine and figure it out but the Wolves situation is unrecoverable. For as bad as the Gobert fit is offensively so far this season the fit with Trae Young and Dejounte Murray has arguably been even worse, but it flies under the radar.

The Hawks were the #2 offense in the NBA last year, this year they're bottom 10. And yes there are other players and injuries involved in that drop off it's not just the addition of Dejounte Murray, but it also just looks really bad when Trae and Dejounte share the court together. The offense devolves into stagnant your-turn, my-turn iso ball and Trae's having the least efficient season of his career as a result.

There is a world in which Dejounte Murray walks for nothing and Trae Young demands out. In that world this could totally end up being a worse trade than the Rudy Gobert one, especially if the Hawks end up having to give the Spurs a couple of top 5 picks.


You're forgetting Trae Young is also shooting the same shots he did last year, but missing them this year. Murray isn't impacting that. Also, shooters like Huerter and Gallo are gone; Collins is shooting horfficly; Bogi missed 20+ games; and Clint has been dealing with injuries. That #2 offense is bottom 10 because the same guys that made it so good, are either struggling themselves, or not here. Guys don't shoot 31% and 23% because a new player joined the team. These are legit wide open shots being missed btw. This isn't Murray coming in and taking shots away or anything. Trae's still got around the same usage and FGA's. All Murray did was replaced Huerter/Gallo without the shooting.

Again, our problems come from no bench, lack of shooting, missing Capela, and coaching in general. Even just having Capela back fully healthy would swing more games back into our favor. Teams just kill us on the boards most nights without him.


I haven't watched a ton of Hawks games this year so I'll have to defer to you somewhat but from an outside observer the stagnation, lack of creativity, and ball movement in the Hawks offense this year looks significantly worse than it did last year. It's like night and day. Maybe you're right and Trae Young is just going through the worst shooting slump ever and it will self correct but so far the offense looks like it's doing a terrible job generating high quality shots and everyone on the Hawks is shooting as if that's the case.
Image

Return to The General Board