QingJames wrote:Optms wrote:I never understood the outrage with "no homo", its not anti-gay.
Its basically just hetero males getting it straight that they don't play for the other team after making a remark that could give gay men the wrong message. We don't want them getting the wrong message. Its just proper communication. Keep doing you, Mr Cam Thomas. The NBA should know better. But of course not.
“Homo” is obviously a well-known slur for gay people and it’s just disingenuous to pretend otherwise.
The use of "homo" as a derogatory term for homosexual individuals has roots in prejudice and discrimination against the LGBTQ+ community. In the past, homosexuality was widely stigmatized and homosexuality was classified as a mental disorder by many psychiatric professionals. This led to a negative connotation of the term "homo," which was used to insult and demean homosexual individuals.
Over time, the LGBTQ+ community has fought for their rights and for the recognition of their identity and dignity. They have advocated for the use of language that is respectful and affirming, and have worked to reclaim terms like "gay" and "lesbian" that were previously used as insults. However, the use of "homo" as a slur has persisted in some quarters, and it is still considered offensive by many people.
When/if the term Homo is reclaimed by the LGBTQ+ community, I suppose it will be okay to use again.
IMO it's silly to ban words that have legitimate uses (besides just being derogatory).