JayMKE wrote:Nobody was saying that about Luka Doncic tho, he literally would have been the #1 pick had Sarver didn't prefer the guy from his alma mater so saying people argued against drafting him because he is European is nonsense.
But people WERE saying that about Luka Doncic before the draft. Let's not try and rewrite history here. This is the kind of stuff that we heard before the draft:
Ayton was the consensus #1 pick during that draft process. He was the one that most people expected to go number #1. Let's not pretend that this only happened because "he was from Sarver's alma mater". Ayton was the pick that most people expected at #1.
And, yes, Luka playing in the EuroLeague, a league that nobody in the American media respects, absolutely played a role in him being underestimated during the drafting process. This is just a fact. And the American media did learn from that, by the way. It is why Wemby was treated a lot different than Luka was.
JayMKE wrote:How was I wrong, did those guys have successful stints in the NBA under different aliases or something?
2 of the 4 players you called EuroLeague MVPs were not EuroLeague MVPs prior to their NBA stint. So, yeah, that's getting half of your sample size wrong.
JayMKE wrote:You guys have an insane persecution complex and just running with your favorite narrative even tho its not what I said at all.
The post you are quoting was 28th post of this thread. Here's post #26, literally two posts before mine:
Godymas wrote:no and Euroleague is a joke and the awards winners are not actually indicative of anything.
Tell me about this persecution complex again
Look, man, I get it. Mirotic12 has said a lot of crap on this board and has inflamed you all. I understand that. But let's not pretend that there isn't a vitriolic sentiment by a number of GB posters against the EuroLeague. It's a similar sentiment with the one that people have every time the WNBA is mentioned. Some GB posters just react strongly to any mention of a non-NBA professional league. There's no point denying it.
JayMKE wrote:You don't think there is a different type of athleticism especially at the guard position needed in the NBA? Mayyyyybeee that's why these 6'3" unathletic short armed guys tend to struggle, IDK that's speculation you tell me.

Absolutely. Just like there is a major difference between the type of athleticism that NCAA ball requires. What's your point here? It doesn't change the fact that every player should be judged individually, based on their individual strengths and weaknesses.
Want me to get more detailed on each of these players? Fine.
Navarro didn't really flame out. He played a single season in the NBA, had pretty good numbers for a rookie, made the All-Rookie Second Team and the Grizzlies extended him a qualifying offer to keep him. He just rejected it and went back to Barcelona. One thing that people have to understand about Navarro is that he freaking lives and breathes for Barcelona. Other than this one year he spent with the Grizzlies, he has spent his whole life in Barcelona. He never played with any other team. What was the first thing he did after he retired? He started working in Barcelona's front office. That guy's love and loyalty to his team cannot really be questioned. He annoyed me to death every time my NT faced Spain but neither I nor anyone else can deny his love for his club and his city.
Sarunas did flame out. Based on what my fellow Pacer fans who watched him when he was over (I started following the league after the 2011 lockout) it was primarily due to his lack of athleticism, especially on the defensive end. It was also a much different NBA back in 2005-2006. The game was slower, the 3-point shot wasn't as prominent as it is now, teams were allowed to be more physical on the perimeter than they are now. I am fairly certain that if Sarunas (or someone like Sarunas) was to come over now, he'd be a lot more successful. That's why I think that Micic will do better now. The current NBA's focus on team play, passing and 3-point shooting is much more suitable for pass-first PGs with a good 3-point stroke like Micic and Jasikevicius than the iso-ball era of the mid-00s was.
As for Spanoulis and De Colo, their stint to the NBA predated their great years in the EuroLeague.
Nando De Colo came over to the NBA when he was 25 years old. He played for the Spurs, a contending team with a lot of depth. He was a 25 year old rookie playing behind Kawhi Leonard, Manu Ginobili, Danny Green and a veteran Stephen Jackson. So, yeah, he was never really able to carve out a role for himself. He got traded to the Raptors in the trade deadline of his sophomore year and then decided to return to Europe after he received a contract offer by CSKA Moscow. That proved to be the right move for his career, as he was finally able to have the ball in his hands in CSKA and showcase his offensive talent. At the NBA level he never really got the chance to have the ball in his hands a lot and that's fully understandable given how stacked the Spurs team he played for was. Oh and just to showcase how deep this Spurs team was. That team's 14th player was a 24 year-old Patty Mills. Its 15th player? A rookie Aron Baynes. Both of them elected to remain in the NBA and ended up carving long careers for themselves as dependable rotation players. De Colo could have carved out a similar career for himself as well if he remained in the NBA but he preferred to return to Europe and became a star over here after his NBA stint. All 3 of them managed to make a lot of money playing basketball so I'd say that all 3 of them had successful careers.
Now, Spanoulis. He is the one that played the least games and least minutes out of those 4 players. He clashed with his coach in Houston, Jeff van Gundy, and couldn't adapt to an off-ball role. The Rockets team that he played for was led by Tracy McGrady and Yao Ming and, naturally, this meant that the 24 year old rookie wouldn't really have the ball in his hands. And that was simply never the player that Spanoulis was. Spanoulis always needed to have the ball in his hands to thrive and that wasn't really going to happen in Houston. So, he returned to Greece in 2007 and 6 years after that, in 2013, he won the EuroLeague MVP. That last part is pretty important, by the way, and it's why I said that you were wrong earlier. The fact is that the Spanoulis of 2012-2013 that won the EuroLeague MVP was a much, much better player than the Spanoulis of 2006-2007 who fought with his coach and couldn't adapt to the NBA.
So, as you can see, there can be a number of reasons why some players worked out whereas others didn't.
Navarro played well in the NBA but didn't like living in the States, he wanted to return to his beloved Barcelona (who can blame him, right?).
Sarunas Jasikevicius lacked the athleticism to play in the mid-00s iso-ball era of the NBA but would probably be fine in this current era.
Nando De Colo was in the NBA at early stages of his career and never really got the opportunity to establish himself in what was an extremely stacked team that went on to make the NBA Finals.
Spanoulis clashed with his coach and couldn't adapt to an off-ball role.
This simply isn't a one-size-fits-all issue. We always have to actually apply our critical thinking skills to analyze why something happened. Throwing out a silly stereotype isn't really an answer. It's just lazy and a horrible way of judging talent.