QPR wrote:One thing he can't do is draft in the second round.
Aaron Wiggins and Jaylen Williams are both pretty solid 2nd rounders.
Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid
QPR wrote:One thing he can't do is draft in the second round.
JMAC3 wrote:Thunder have existed for 15.5 years now. Have had 7 All-NBA talents in KD, Westbrook, Harden, Paul George, Chris Paul, Dom Sabonis and SGA. Have 1 Finals appearance and zero titles. Does he deserve more love for acquiring those guys or more hate for never winning with them?
timO wrote:if presti is overrated, how you rate the nets hornets pistons mavs cuban etc GMs?
HotelVitale wrote:ShootersShoot wrote:Truly one of the best talent evaluators in the league. All GMs have their weaknesses, but as far as strengths go, evaluating talent especially through the draft is imo one of the most important for a GM.
Presti has done two rebuilds into contender level teams in a span of 15 years..not bad, considering OKC should be a top team for the next 5+ years at least.
I agree but I honestly think, after years of thinking and studying this, that 'talent evaluation' in the draft is mostly just educated guessing. There are some GMs/FOs that make pretty bad gambles, and there are some who are able to select guys that can develop well in their culture, but everyone else is just taking the same info and saying 'none of us know how this guy will translate exactly, and we have zero idea how he'll develop (besides a couple of unreliable indicators), but X and Y make me think he's a better guess than these other guys in his range.'
I won't go into the whole argument here, but I think Presti has been a top GM even if you chalk up a lot of his draft success to good luck on good gambles. The stuff that you can actually do a direct evaluation of--asset valuation, timing on his assets, making use of all possible avenues, etc--he's done really well.
Johnny Bball wrote:He had two years of cheap competing teams. He Danny Ainged this year cheaping out on Hayward at the deadline with his tradeable salary and keeping what is really far too many picks. If he does the same in the summer, I don't even know what to say. He can keep picking and building but there's a salary cap that's eventually going to restrict what he can do. Now was the time to use some of those picks.
And he could have traded some picks and still be in a position of not just being competetive, but actually really competing.
Building and getting wacked by the cap was the mistake he made last decade and I'm not sure its going to be any different this time.
MoneyTalks41890 wrote:Johnny Bball wrote:He had two years of cheap competing teams. He Danny Ainged this year cheaping out on Hayward at the deadline with his tradeable salary and keeping what is really far too many picks. If he does the same in the summer, I don't even know what to say. He can keep picking and building but there's a salary cap that's eventually going to restrict what he can do. Now was the time to use some of those picks.
And he could have traded some picks and still be in a position of not just being competetive, but actually really competing.
Building and getting wacked by the cap was the mistake he made last decade and I'm not sure its going to be any different this time.
The Thunder cleared 17.7m in cap for next year in the Hayward trade and will have about 30m in cap space this summer.
JMAC3 wrote:So how many people have Presti as a top 3 GM in the league?
QPR wrote:OfficialRef wrote:He has had blemishes people conveniently leave out: trading Harden, anchoring the teams financial flexibility with the Perkin's contract, not going in on the Durant/Westbrook years, Trading for Melo, keeping bad coaches on the team, so forth.
So, like every GM in history then.
JMAC3 wrote:So he gets the credit when the players he drafts turn into good players, but when the players lose in the playoffs that is not on him, it is the players fault. Feels like it can't be completely both ways on this.
Capn'O wrote:JMAC3 wrote:So how many people have Presti as a top 3 GM in the league?
You should add a poll...
But in the event you don't, I consider him as such.
LaLover11 wrote:I bet you $100 Mavs beat the Celtics
OGSactownballer wrote:When it comes to GM team builders in the NBA and guys who are the sharpest dealers in the league, there are Presti and Ainge and then everyone else.
JMAC3 wrote:sikma42 wrote:JMAC3 wrote:So how many years does he get a pass on for the current team not making the Finals? If they don't get to the finals in the next 4 years does that change anything to you?
It’s his job to put together a team capable of competing. If they don’t pull through in the next 4 years, doesn’t mean he is a failure. Everyone can’t win a title or make it out of the conference.
NBA success is largely predicated on having one of those GOAT level players.
Sent from my iPhone using RealGM mobile app
I mean KD was MVP, Westbrook won MVP, PG was in MVP convo, SGA is in MVP convo.
He has 50 future picks, is it not his job to maximize the team and give them best title chances?
Or is it better to just play the long game, stay competitive, keep compiling assets and eventually hope to get lucky?
George Oscar wrote:OKC loses Durant for nothing and here they are again, right back on the cusp. I doubt we’re talking about Toronto in a few years.