Dan Z wrote:The Raptors wouldn't have been able to sign Brandon Ingram as a free agent.
Ingram has had major health issues and constant injuries. Not sure why you think this was a good decision.
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Dan Z wrote:The Raptors wouldn't have been able to sign Brandon Ingram as a free agent.
TeamTragic wrote:Dan Z wrote:The Raptors wouldn't have been able to sign Brandon Ingram as a free agent.
Ingram has had major health issues and constant injuries. Not sure why you think this was a good decision.
baller16 wrote:dkb964 wrote:PaulKellerman wrote:Ujiri is way past his expiry as a top executive. That Ingram play will not work out as intended and Pascal is a much better player. They should have gotten a better return for him
It is easy to say that in hindsight, but at the time teams were not lining up to give away great assets for the privilegeof of paying a 31 year old Siakam almost 50M anunally over the following 4 years. The Pacers did because they can not attract free agents. I am happy that it has worked out for the Pacers and Siakam but don't act like there was some bidding war or they let some great offer pass them by.
And who's fault is that? Majority of the fanbase wanted Siakam & OG traded a season earlier but Masai refused to because he didn't want to tank. No team is going to waste assets on a half season rental.
dkb964 wrote:baller16 wrote:dkb964 wrote:
It is easy to say that in hindsight, but at the time teams were not lining up to give away great assets for the privilegeof of paying a 31 year old Siakam almost 50M anunally over the following 4 years. The Pacers did because they can not attract free agents. I am happy that it has worked out for the Pacers and Siakam but don't act like there was some bidding war or they let some great offer pass them by.
And who's fault is that? Majority of the fanbase wanted Siakam & OG traded a season earlier but Masai refused to because he didn't want to tank. No team is going to waste assets on a half season rental.
I was in the majority, with that being said ending up with Ingram/Agbaji/Walter for a pending free agent in Siakam was a positive outcome I believe.
Tor_Raps wrote:TeamTragic wrote:Dan Z wrote:The Raptors wouldn't have been able to sign Brandon Ingram as a free agent.
Ingram has had major health issues and constant injuries. Not sure why you think this was a good decision.
Buy low, sell high. Ingram wouldn't be the first player who was had at a lower value only to make the rest of the league and it's fan look stupid when they remain on the court.
Raptors are betting on this and we'll see soon enough if betting on Ingram was smart/stupid. Worst case, the raptors won't out much from rolling the dice on him.
Snakebites wrote:Childs wrote:It’s way too early to say the Jakobe is nothing special. Ingram hasn’t even played a game….
The fact that Ingram hasn't even played a game is a strike against the trade, not in favor of it.

Troubadour wrote:It's complete cope from Raptors fans that it's actually a Pascal for Ingram trade. The Raptors got lucky that Ingram had a five-month ankle sprain that tanked his value and there's still no sign that he is capable of leading a winning team.
TeamTragic wrote:Dan Z wrote:The Raptors wouldn't have been able to sign Brandon Ingram as a free agent.
Ingram has had major health issues and constant injuries. Not sure why you think this was a good decision.
dkb964 wrote:TorontoBarneys wrote:dkb964 wrote:
Paul George is unmoveable. Quickley is an asset. He struggled with injuries all year. I imagine you only watched the Raptors when they played the 76ers. I would rather have IQ at 30M then Maxey at whatever stupid money he is making. They are similar players. The 76ers just let him jack bad shots all game to the tune of 33% from three on the season.
Quickley is absolutely not an asset. His value is neutral at best. My god the cope.
This is fair. He is coming off of a season where he only played 33 games. A better way to have worded it would have been that he has the ability to make himself an asset if he is able to stay healthy next season and play to his capabilities.
Dan Z wrote:Troubadour wrote:It's complete cope from Raptors fans that it's actually a Pascal for Ingram trade. The Raptors got lucky that Ingram had a five-month ankle sprain that tanked his value and there's still no sign that he is capable of leading a winning team.
I was surprised that the Raptors traded for Ingram, but I know they did it because they got him at a "discount" (trade wise..not his contract).
I can't help but wonder what the Raptors long term plans are. They have a group of talented players that don't seem to fit well together. Maybe next season is the year that it works out?
NoBias wrote:Recency bias on realgm is always hilarious.
It went from Masai is overvaluing Pascal and OG!!! The Raptors overrate all their assets!!!
To:
Is the pascal trade the most lopsided trade of all time? LOL.
Raps in 4 wrote:Dan Z wrote:Troubadour wrote:It's complete cope from Raptors fans that it's actually a Pascal for Ingram trade. The Raptors got lucky that Ingram had a five-month ankle sprain that tanked his value and there's still no sign that he is capable of leading a winning team.
I was surprised that the Raptors traded for Ingram, but I know they did it because they got him at a "discount" (trade wise..not his contract).
I can't help but wonder what the Raptors long term plans are. They have a group of talented players that don't seem to fit well together. Maybe next season is the year that it works out?
Masai hates rebuilding. He loves treadmilling. He wants us to be"ready" to compete when another Kawhi trade materializes.
Dan Z wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:Dan Z wrote:
I was surprised that the Raptors traded for Ingram, but I know they did it because they got him at a "discount" (trade wise..not his contract).
I can't help but wonder what the Raptors long term plans are. They have a group of talented players that don't seem to fit well together. Maybe next season is the year that it works out?
Masai hates rebuilding. He loves treadmilling. He wants us to be"ready" to compete when another Kawhi trade materializes.
The Raptors might be waiting for a long time or might not have enough assets to make that trade.
For example, Giannis might be available this off season and the Raptors don't have enough to outbid other teams.
Raps in 4 wrote:Dan Z wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:
Masai hates rebuilding. He loves treadmilling. He wants us to be"ready" to compete when another Kawhi trade materializes.
The Raptors might be waiting for a long time or might not have enough assets to make that trade.
For example, Giannis might be available this off season and the Raptors don't have enough to outbid other teams.
I agree. Masai doesn't see it that way though, which is a problem.
I'm torn on moving on from him though. He's one of the best drafting executives in the league, which is such a rare but important skill to have (I'd argue it's the most important skill for an executive).
We also have one of the dumbest owners in pro sports who would be hiring his replacement, and that does not instill me with any amount of confidence.
HotelVitale wrote:Raps in 4 wrote:Dan Z wrote:
The Raptors might be waiting for a long time or might not have enough assets to make that trade.
For example, Giannis might be available this off season and the Raptors don't have enough to outbid other teams.
I agree. Masai doesn't see it that way though, which is a problem.
I'm torn on moving on from him though. He's one of the best drafting executives in the league, which is such a rare but important skill to have (I'd argue it's the most important skill for an executive).
We also have one of the dumbest owners in pro sports who would be hiring his replacement, and that does not instill me with any amount of confidence.
This is probably not the place to get into this but I really really don’t think basketball fans should think that ‘draft skill’ is a real thing. Or at least not that there’s anything remotely close to a special intuition that some GMs have that allows them to squint and which prospects will translate and develop and which won’t. GMs all see pretty similar things in most prospects and then just take guesses about translation and development, and those who are having nice runs like Masai are just having nice runs that will even out over time. Even if we admit that some depts/FOs are better than others (they are) the advantages gained are much smaller than the full ability to actually predict draft successes and failures.
There’s a lot to this argument and I don’t want to derail this But I’ll just say that this is how GMs and scouts talk about the draft and prospect eval, and that if you follow through the thought about what this draft ‘skill’ might entail—and you’re not assuming that most FOs are incompetent (they aren’t)—you’ll end up talking about quasi-magical abilities at some pt.
Anyway, just saying that if you’re only behind Masai because his picks have generally turned out well, I’d be comfortable backing off that some and not seeing that as irreplaceable.
