2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Which 3 players will lead the ROY race this season? (listed in order of post-draft betting odds)

Cooper Flagg, Mavericks
159
30%
Tre Johnson, Wizards
59
11%
Ace Bailey, Jazz
54
10%
Dylan Harper, Spurs
56
10%
V.J. Edgecombe, 76ers
94
18%
Kon Knueppel, Hornets
32
6%
Derik Queen, Pelicans
11
2%
Jeremiah Fears, Pelicans
14
3%
Cedric Coward, Grizzlies
13
2%
Other (Clifford, Demin, Bryant, Richardson, Newell, Clayton Jr., Gonzalez, etc. - poll is limited to 10 options)
45
8%
 
Total votes: 537

basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,289
And1: 14,943
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#61 » by basketballRob » Tue Jul 22, 2025 10:12 am

76ciology wrote:Not often mentioned, but Dylan Harper has been underwhelming. His jumper looks flat, his handle with the off hand is shaky, and he lacks the burst to consistently beat defenders in the halfcourt.

I also think he needs to play his high usage style, which he likely won’t get with the Spurs given their “developmental runway” approach. That said, he clearly has the combination of size and skill to be a special talent at the guard position, but he’ll need the right opportunity, roster set-up and continued development to reach that ceiling.
He's like a year younger than Edgecombe


Sent from my SM-G998U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
God Squad
RealGM
Posts: 13,356
And1: 11,604
Joined: Feb 22, 2010
Location: Toronto
 

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#62 » by God Squad » Tue Jul 22, 2025 12:32 pm

basketballRob wrote:
76ciology wrote:Not often mentioned, but Dylan Harper has been underwhelming. His jumper looks flat, his handle with the off hand is shaky, and he lacks the burst to consistently beat defenders in the halfcourt.

I also think he needs to play his high usage style, which he likely won’t get with the Spurs given their “developmental runway” approach. That said, he clearly has the combination of size and skill to be a special talent at the guard position, but he’ll need the right opportunity, roster set-up and continued development to reach that ceiling.
He's like a year younger than Edgecombe


Sent from my SM-G998U1 using RealGM mobile app

What does Edgecombe have to do with his post? I'm confused. Was something edited?

:lol:
Image
basketballRob
RealGM
Posts: 37,289
And1: 14,943
Joined: May 05, 2014
     

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#63 » by basketballRob » Tue Jul 22, 2025 5:54 pm

God Squad wrote:
basketballRob wrote:
76ciology wrote:Not often mentioned, but Dylan Harper has been underwhelming. His jumper looks flat, his handle with the off hand is shaky, and he lacks the burst to consistently beat defenders in the halfcourt.

I also think he needs to play his high usage style, which he likely won’t get with the Spurs given their “developmental runway” approach. That said, he clearly has the combination of size and skill to be a special talent at the guard position, but he’ll need the right opportunity, roster set-up and continued development to reach that ceiling.
He's like a year younger than Edgecombe


Sent from my SM-G998U1 using RealGM mobile app

What does Edgecombe have to do with his post? I'm confused. Was something edited?

A 76ers fan was saying the pick ahead of his guy was underwhelming.

Sent from my SM-G998U1 using RealGM mobile app
User avatar
76ciology
RealGM
Posts: 66,019
And1: 26,986
Joined: Jun 06, 2002

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#64 » by 76ciology » Wed Jul 23, 2025 2:25 am

Jase Richardson has looked far more impressive than Fears and Egor Demin, both of whom were drafted ahead of him but have underperformed.
There’s never been a time in history when we look back and say that the people who were censoring free speech were the good guys.
Los_29
RealGM
Posts: 15,244
And1: 13,859
Joined: Apr 10, 2021

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#65 » by Los_29 » Wed Jul 23, 2025 4:57 am

Flagg, Johnson and then the field. Edgecombe is a great prospect but I think his offense isn’t there yet. Harper is behind Wemby, Fox and you also have Castle. Plus Harper won’t be the best off-ball player for that team. Fears will likely put up numbers but on dreadful efficiency.
peZt
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,809
And1: 1,980
Joined: Aug 15, 2010
Location: Braunschweig
   

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#66 » by peZt » Wed Jul 23, 2025 9:00 am

Seems like none of the Euro PG's seems worth the hype right now. Feels bad for the Nets who drafted 3 of them lol
pepe1991
RealGM
Posts: 23,251
And1: 19,332
Joined: Jan 10, 2016
   

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#67 » by pepe1991 » Wed Jul 23, 2025 9:15 am

peZt wrote:Seems like none of the Euro PG's seems worth the hype right now. Feels bad for the Nets who drafted 3 of them lol


Based on what? Summer league? :lol:

Feel free to see Franz Wagner summer league stats.
Life is what happens when you're busy making other plans. -John Lennon
Ruma85
Analyst
Posts: 3,484
And1: 1,936
Joined: Sep 09, 2021
   

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#68 » by Ruma85 » Fri Jul 25, 2025 10:08 am

Even though I don't put much stock into summer league, Edgecombo is exciting to watch reminds me of a more athletic Jimmy.
Life is beautiful...
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,867
And1: 12,000
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#69 » by HotelVitale » Thu Aug 7, 2025 3:56 pm

basketballRob wrote:
God Squad wrote:
basketballRob wrote:He's like a year younger than Edgecombe
Sent from my SM-G998U1 using RealGM mobile app

What does Edgecombe have to do with his post? I'm confused. Was something edited?

A 76ers fan was saying the pick ahead of his guy was underwhelming. ]


That ish's always lame, fans bashing some rookie who was drafted right before or after their pick. Ship has sailed and not coming back into harbor, and these guys will have long complicated careers. Get over your team not quite getting some dude, it doens't matter at all once it's done. Half the rookie board posts end up being that type thing and it makes me want to stay away from the thread every year.

On the other hand, this line is also kinda weak. Lots of dudes are older than lots of other dudes, Jalen Williams is a lot older than like Jeremy Sochan or Ousmane Dieng. And no one expected Harper to be raw or a late bloomer or whatever. Age of prospects is a useful thing to keep in mind but not use as a standing excuse or reason never to register concern.
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,867
And1: 12,000
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#70 » by HotelVitale » Thu Aug 7, 2025 4:02 pm

Ruma85 wrote:Even though I don't put much stock into summer league, Edgecombo is exciting to watch reminds me of a more athletic Jimmy.

Sixers fans are pretty hyped up about him, but there are still a lot of question marks. He looked really good with the extra NBA spacing and I think everyone sees he'll be able to make things happen in NBA games (people doubted that at draft time), but he's got a ton of things that could go either way. He can get to the rim but tends to finish weirdly rn (both his timing and his moves), he looked awesome at pull-ups in SL but didn't do that in college really, he shot badly from 3 in SL (even on catch-shoot) but shot pretty well in college, etc. I also think he’s a sweet athlete but don't think he's a crazy freak, especially given that he doesn't have great size for the position.

But he should be fun to watch and should be a nice role player even if he doesn't become great at those swing skills on offense. Most players who become really good I think tend to come in more advanced at those things in one area or another, so we'll see. High ceiling and solid floor, but could definitely just be a guy in the worst outcome.
TheChaser
Analyst
Posts: 3,337
And1: 585
Joined: Feb 09, 2009
Location: Obviously not hanging out with John Hollinger.
       

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#71 » by TheChaser » Sat Aug 9, 2025 3:12 am

Black Jack wrote:Topic Thunder can be an atg nickname if he pans out


This is funny.
maginno wrote:There is nothing wrong with this team that putting a few unloaded guns in Carter's gym bag will not solve.
jeeph
Senior
Posts: 662
And1: 573
Joined: Jun 06, 2012

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#72 » by jeeph » Fri Aug 22, 2025 10:14 am

UcanUwill wrote:
XTC wrote:
This post literally needs to br stickied. This explains so much.

Can you explain a name like Nowitzki? Or instances where a name would have a Z, for example "Brzustewicz"


Hey thanks. Nowitzki is Polish name obviously, I am not expert there at all, but why does is has to be explained? I think everyone knows how to pronounce Nowitzki and it sounds the way it is spelled, doesn't in? Polish names are hard, I think they are harder to spell than to pronounce, I have no idea why they need so many Zs, Cs and Ss, we have poles here, I bet they can explain. In some languages, 2 or 3 letters combined create another letter entirely, I think it is that way in France for example, ''eau'' in France is a ''letter'', thats why their words are very hard to figure out at least for me, cause it sounds like nothing else, but when I learned that it is not e a u, eau is just different letter entirely, starts to make sense then. Maybe Polish is the same, because many of their names have cz or zs, where from foreigner perspective, it does not seem to have major need for it.

I think I know how to pronounce Brzustewicz, but I do not know for certain. At least I would split sounds into Brzus- te- wicz and it would sound like broosh-teh-wits or something close to it I imagine (for me, the hardest part is to explain how it is pronounced in English, because English does not use some sounds that are basic letter sounds of these other languages. like letter u for example, I have hard time trying to explain how it sounds), but I can't explain the spelling.


A Polish guy went to the eye doctor, the eye doctor took him to the eye chart, told him to cover his left eye and read line 5. The Polish guy looked at the chart and it read EXZUTWKI. The Polish guy said "What do you mean read those letters, I know that guy?"
Godymas
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,739
And1: 4,489
Joined: Feb 27, 2016

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#73 » by Godymas » Mon Sep 1, 2025 12:09 pm

the best rookies to contribute imo will be Flagg, Tre Johnson and Kon

I expect Kon to average like 12 ppg on really good efficiency and good D and the Hornets will be remarkably improved which will get him ROTY love

As for Johnson, he’s obviously slotting into the shots Jordan Poole used to take. I don’t expect CJ nor Khris to be shouldering a big offensive load. Tre is gonna be the best rookie 3 point shooter and will average a solid 16 ppg on decent rookie efficiency

Flagg will be a good defender and will probably average like 15 ppg on barely good efficiency, but the Mavs will be a solid team overall and he will get credit.

A sleeper pick is Ace Bailey because who else is going to be taking shots on that terrible Jazz roster.
Daddy 801
General Manager
Posts: 8,609
And1: 3,056
Joined: May 14, 2013
 

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#74 » by Daddy 801 » Thu Sep 4, 2025 6:43 am

It has to be a three way combination of the four players Cooper, Ace, Trey, and VJ. Dylan could be the next Jordan (or some other player) but those guys are on crap teams who will get a ton of mins and ball out from a rookie numbers standpoint. A player drafted in the teens could end up being the best and I still think ROY would go to one of those guys given a ton of minutes.
MMyhre
Starter
Posts: 2,196
And1: 922
Joined: Jun 29, 2010

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#75 » by MMyhre » Sat Sep 6, 2025 6:00 am

Thomas Sorber the Thunder rookie out for the season with an ACL tear... got to say, Thunder does not seem to do the best job in the gym or with injury prevention stuff. Seen some awful exercises done with Chet who still has sticks for legs, and now they let a rehabbing center injure himself in preseason.

I will be a bit more hesitant to call them a potential dynasty since I am increasingly skeptical about the competence of their physical staff for now.
wemby
Sixth Man
Posts: 1,931
And1: 1,265
Joined: Jun 13, 2023
 

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#76 » by wemby » Sat Sep 6, 2025 6:10 am

MMyhre wrote:Thomas Sorber the Thunder rookie out for the season with an ACL tear... got to say, Thunder does not seem to do the best job in the gym or with injury prevention stuff. Seen some awful exercises done with Chet who still has sticks for legs, and now they let a rehabbing center injure himself in preseason.

I will be a bit more hesitant to call them a potential dynasty since I am increasingly skeptical about the competence of their physical staff for now.

I'm far from an expert in medical issues, but Chet's injuries were mostly due to his physical nature and reckless playing style (dude won't hesitate to get in front of a freight train, or throw himself up in the air to challenge players much stronger than him), not due to team mismanagement. Freak injuries happen to every team, I'm much more inclined to assign blame with recurring injuries or rushing players back, for instance the routine "knee cleanup" procedures, meniscus removals and the like, that are nothing but a euphemism for long term pain for a short term gain. I don't think this describes the Thunder.
MMyhre
Starter
Posts: 2,196
And1: 922
Joined: Jun 29, 2010

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#77 » by MMyhre » Sat Sep 6, 2025 1:46 pm

wemby wrote:
MMyhre wrote:Thomas Sorber the Thunder rookie out for the season with an ACL tear... got to say, Thunder does not seem to do the best job in the gym or with injury prevention stuff. Seen some awful exercises done with Chet who still has sticks for legs, and now they let a rehabbing center injure himself in preseason.

I will be a bit more hesitant to call them a potential dynasty since I am increasingly skeptical about the competence of their physical staff for now.

I'm far from an expert in medical issues, but Chet's injuries were mostly due to his physical nature and reckless playing style (dude won't hesitate to get in front of a freight train, or throw himself up in the air to challenge players much stronger than him), not due to team mismanagement. Freak injuries happen to every team, I'm much more inclined to assign blame with recurring injuries or rushing players back, for instance the routine "knee cleanup" procedures, meniscus removals and the like, that are nothing but a euphemism for long term pain for a short term gain. I don't think this describes the Thunder.

Zzz. He has had tons of time to build his legs, they prioritize bosu ball stuff. They are not good. Sorber had a left side foot injury, now a right side knee injury. Why is that? Because he has been playing at too high intensity, too soon, so the right side has to absorb more force and overcompensate for the weaker left side = tons of force absorbed from a big man jumping up and down - acl tear in training. Not good enough.
jayu70
RealGM
Posts: 20,578
And1: 13,082
Joined: Mar 11, 2014
   

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#78 » by jayu70 » Sat Sep 6, 2025 3:21 pm

Read on Twitter
HotelVitale
RealGM
Posts: 16,867
And1: 12,000
Joined: Sep 14, 2007
Location: West Philly, PA

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#79 » by HotelVitale » Sat Sep 6, 2025 10:25 pm

wemby wrote:
MMyhre wrote:Thomas Sorber the Thunder rookie out for the season with an ACL tear... got to say, Thunder does not seem to do the best job in the gym or with injury prevention stuff. Seen some awful exercises done with Chet who still has sticks for legs, and now they let a rehabbing center injure himself in preseason.

I will be a bit more hesitant to call them a potential dynasty since I am increasingly skeptical about the competence of their physical staff for now.

I'm far from an expert in medical issues, but Chet's injuries were mostly due to his physical nature and reckless playing style (dude won't hesitate to get in front of a freight train, or throw himself up in the air to challenge players much stronger than him), not due to team mismanagement. Freak injuries happen to every team, I'm much more inclined to assign blame with recurring injuries or rushing players back, for instance the routine "knee cleanup" procedures, meniscus removals and the like, that are nothing but a euphemism for long term pain for a short term gain. I don't think this describes the Thunder.


Sports fan special--see a very low data point pattern, conclude that it's because team is doing something obviously wrong. It's really one of the more annoying sports talk habits IMO, almost never based on any info about what teams/staff are doing and almost always assumes we're smarter for noticing something obvious than the guys who've dedicated their lives to this stuff. (Not to say we should assume they never make mistakes, just that you have to actually know what criticism you're making and get the context for it.)
MMyhre
Starter
Posts: 2,196
And1: 922
Joined: Jun 29, 2010

Re: 2025-26 NBA Rookie Discussion Thread 

Post#80 » by MMyhre » Sun Sep 7, 2025 8:24 am

HotelVitale wrote:
wemby wrote:
MMyhre wrote:Thomas Sorber the Thunder rookie out for the season with an ACL tear... got to say, Thunder does not seem to do the best job in the gym or with injury prevention stuff. Seen some awful exercises done with Chet who still has sticks for legs, and now they let a rehabbing center injure himself in preseason.

I will be a bit more hesitant to call them a potential dynasty since I am increasingly skeptical about the competence of their physical staff for now.

I'm far from an expert in medical issues, but Chet's injuries were mostly due to his physical nature and reckless playing style (dude won't hesitate to get in front of a freight train, or throw himself up in the air to challenge players much stronger than him), not due to team mismanagement. Freak injuries happen to every team, I'm much more inclined to assign blame with recurring injuries or rushing players back, for instance the routine "knee cleanup" procedures, meniscus removals and the like, that are nothing but a euphemism for long term pain for a short term gain. I don't think this describes the Thunder.


Sports fan special--see a very low data point pattern, conclude that it's because team is doing something obviously wrong. It's really one of the more annoying sports talk habits IMO, almost never based on any info about what teams/staff are doing and almost always assumes we're smarter for noticing something obvious than the guys who've dedicated their lives to this stuff. (Not to say we should assume they never make mistakes, just that you have to actually know what criticism you're making and get the context for it.)

Zzz. Sports fan special - know nothing yourself and assume everyone else knows nothing, while spewing up some random stuff and not actually addressing a single thing that was written because you don't comprehend it.

If you can't actually disprove anything I said, why are you even adding something to it? I have worked with this stuff and gained more knowledge because I am curious and interested. I also never give condescending comments on other peoples statements if I know oh so little on the subject myself.

I will give you some of my research into it from another post in my mother language, not going to make a new one for lazy ones like you - but for people who like to learn.

"So they had Chet on this hopeless bosuball routine with some hopeless exercises. When the guy has sticks for legs, the last thing he needs is exercises where the muscle can't work 100% because it's not in balance/can't contract properly when you have to adjust to try to get balance/gets a much lower quality of movement pattern/you compensate/gets less force produced/less resistance and a much lower quality of technical execution for the movement pattern for strength and muscle growth."

Here are some quotes from studies going through strength work in a stable setting vs instability/bosu ball junk. "The primary basis for traditional ground-based free weights over IRT for athletes is the significant force reduction that occurs when one performs force or power exercises under unstable conditions.55 With IRT exercises performed under unstable conditions,7 the mean force and power decreased 29.3%, with an effect size18 of 2.1." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3806173/

What instability can do is reduce the load on joints and provide a gentle way to train for elderly, untrained or help athletes with weak cores activate the core and stabilizing muscles with less force overall. It does not make you a more powerful athlete by itself, or increase muscle mass and strength for a trained athlete.

For beginners one study did show similar results between normal training and bosu work, but the quality of work for the beginners were iffy - and expert work on beginners with more advanced training like nordics/reverse nordics/overcoming ISO's and certain plyometrics with some (SOME, not a lot) bosu ball work for increased core / muscle stabilizer activation is useful. Nothing has ever shown bosu ball work being better than strength training on maximum muscle force production or growth + other factors for athletes or well trained people.

So thats why Chet STILL has skinny legs. They arent giving him actually useful exercises to grow his leg muscles, but doing bosu ball stuff limiting 1 his ability to contract 2 force output and more force is more adaptation and 3 you cant get into deep muscle ranges/advanced eccentric work which is a big factor for muscle growth - "Studies and systematic reviews indicate that eccentric training can be more effective than concentric training for increasing muscle mass." https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18981046/

Now lets dissect why Sorber got injured, here is some of my take on it :
"Foot injuries change the way you receive power, since the foot you have injured will receive less power = the other foot and then the entire structure of the other leg overcompensates and receives more power = high chance of injury if you do not let the injured side get to 100% before resuming competition and higher intensity/load."

"So I hadn't read which side he was injured on before I wrote this - and voila = there was an injury to the structure of his left foot/toe in February, and now an anterior cruciate ligament injury in his right knee. Just as I mentioned, he has had to start jumping and competing way too early = the left side of the foot doesn't take the load as it should, your right side then takes more force and gets overloaded in every single movement. Then you think about how much force must be taken every time a 113+ kilo guy jumps and sprints, and how much a basketball player jumps, sprints, starts and stops in all directions in training - and the knee is the part that takes the most beating in jumping which is the most common action in basketball..."

Some sources of this info I am talking of:
"This complex anatomy of the foot and ankle together with the remainder of the lower limb functions to efficiently support the body weight and provide for locomotion. The foot specifically acts as a platform for stance, a shock absorber for impact during gait, and a lever to propel the body forward during stepping." https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK546698/#:~:text=This%20complex%20anatomy%20of%20the,the%20body%20forward%20during%20stepping.

More on the importance of the foot in terms of how capable your body is of handling and producing force in something like a jump :
"We all know that the ankle muscles, especially the plantar flexors, are key contributors to sport performance and play a critical role in accelerating the body rapidly during sprinting [1,2], cutting [3] or jumping [4]. However, these assumptions are based on an oversimplified rigid foot model, i.e., no deformation of the foot. This leads to overestimating ankle power while simultaneously underestimating the power generated by the structures within the foot [5]." https://www.sportsmith.co/articles/training-the-foot-to-improve-performance/#:~:text=The%20medial%20longitudinal%20arch%20(MLA)%20is%20a,generates%20power%20during%20the%20stance%20phase%20%5B8%2C9%5D.

"Inter-limb asymmetry may potentially place both legs at an increased risk of injury in sports; the strong leg may sustain excessive stress due to high dependence and loading, whereas the weak leg may be compromised to sustain even average load [5]. In addition, inter-limb asymmetries have been associated with increased risk of sport injury because the asymmetries may result in unequal force absorption or a loss of frontal plane stability, which are important to sustain the impacting forces [6]." https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8779786/

So the foot injury is a big problem for Sorber in terms of injury risk, IF, he is rushed back to high intensity too soon. In february he has his left foot injury and already in september he gets an ACL injury. It was only 200 days between the injuries - and he had a turf toe surgery =
"Turf toe surgery recovery time varies but typically involves an initial period of immobilization, gradually progressing to weight-bearing and activity, with return to full activity often taking 4-6 months or longer."

And he injures himself barely over 6 months later. He rushed back like a young fool eager to prove himself, and the incompetence of the Thunder physical staff did not see the warning signs and correlation between all the factors I have mentioned + this :
"For TT injuries managed operatively, rehabilitation protocols consist of 4 phases and may last up 20 weeks. Without prompt treatment of TT injuries, players can have permanent MTP joint pain and stiffness, loss of push-off strength, degenerative changes and osteoarthritis, and diminished athletic performance. Athletes with low-grader injuries can expect to resume play and achieve their prior level of performance. However, among athletes with higher grade injuries, both treated non-operatively and operatively, about 70% are expected to maintain their level of performance."
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10587038/

So in severe cases like his, where you need surgery you arent even guaranteed to maintain performance in up to 30 % of cases and you let him do enough damage in just 20-25 days after just the initial rehab procedure to TEAR HIS ACL?
It's incompetence. There is absolutely ZERO need for Thomas Sorber to rush into intensities than can **** tear his ACL less than 7 months away from a serious injury that increases risk of tons of other injuries.

You dont **** tear your ACL unless you are putting a ton of pressure on it in some way or another when its clearly not ready/probably been overloaded for some time due to him forcing things. Why is he allowed to do this? He is a eager kid. You as the physical staff need to take control and push back and assess his movement mechanics, inflammation/pain levels and functional status +++.

Sorber had all the time in the world, the Thunder just needed him to slowly progress his physical capacity and intensity, so he could have way less injury risk and reaquire proper non-injury risk biomechanics and force absorption with more.

Its just **** work. Stop covering for incompetence if you know nothing.

TLDR = The Thunder staff is responsible for Chet not being put through proper stress for growth and power production of his lower body, and Sorber was rushed back from a serious injury that put him at a serious risk of new injuries when all they had to do was not let him rush into high intensity situations that can cause an ACL tear so shortly after a serious injury.

Return to The General Board