Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves?

Moderators: zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77

wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,741
And1: 11,430
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#61 » by wco81 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 8:33 pm

Wow he got to the line 22 times?

Was it skills or being a Laker?
1993Playoffs
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,146
And1: 4,330
Joined: Apr 25, 2017

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#62 » by 1993Playoffs » Mon Oct 27, 2025 8:44 pm

I’d still trade him for someone that fits better with Luka.
JHFVF07
Rookie
Posts: 1,247
And1: 1,014
Joined: Apr 24, 2017
   

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#63 » by JHFVF07 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:22 pm

1993Playoffs wrote:I’d still trade him for someone that fits better with Luka.


Luka had more succes playing alongside a second ballhandler(Dragic, Brunson, Irving, even Lebron), it would be great if we find a ballhandler that also is great defender, but I dont think Reaves will net us Shai.

Reaves can follow Doncic, we only need to find elite 3-D guys to fill the roster. It obviously is hard, but easier than find an efficient 20 ppg+ scorer that also is a good playmaker and is young enough to play with Doncic the next 5 years.
liquidswords
Rookie
Posts: 1,249
And1: 1,249
Joined: May 19, 2021
 

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#64 » by liquidswords » Mon Oct 27, 2025 9:40 pm

Good for him but the calls he got in the 4th quarter were atrocious. Having said that, its cute how people react to guys like Reeves scoring 50 when we had Corey Brewer and Tony Delk dropping 50 in yesteryears. Its the NBA - everyone has talent.
User avatar
Dr Aki
RealGM
Posts: 35,807
And1: 32,211
Joined: Mar 03, 2008
Location: Sydney, Australia
   

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#65 » by Dr Aki » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:00 pm

Image

MagicGPT at it again
Image
JRoy
RealGM
Posts: 16,891
And1: 14,247
Joined: Feb 27, 2019
 

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#66 » by JRoy » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:04 pm

LAL should keep him.
Edrees wrote:
JRoy wrote:Monta Ellis have it all


I was hoping and expecting this to be one of the first replies. You did not disappoint. Jroy have it all.
User avatar
infinite11285
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 22,150
And1: 27,024
Joined: Aug 12, 2008

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#67 » by infinite11285 » Mon Oct 27, 2025 10:53 pm

Image
1993Playoffs
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,146
And1: 4,330
Joined: Apr 25, 2017

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#68 » by 1993Playoffs » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:02 pm

JHFVF07 wrote:
1993Playoffs wrote:I’d still trade him for someone that fits better with Luka.


Luka had more succes playing alongside a second ballhandler(Dragic, Brunson, Irving, even Lebron), it would be great if we find a ballhandler that also is great defender, but I dont think Reaves will net us Shai.

Reaves can follow Doncic, we only need to find elite 3-D guys to fill the roster. It obviously is hard, but easier than find an efficient 20 ppg+ scorer that also is a good playmaker and is young enough to play with Doncic the next 5 years.



I feel that backcourt will be attacked relentlessly in the playoffs.
Memories
Analyst
Posts: 3,474
And1: 6,047
Joined: Feb 18, 2016

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#69 » by Memories » Mon Oct 27, 2025 11:53 pm

Vae Victus wrote:If Austin keeps his play up, i'd definitely try to flip him for assets that fit better around Luka. My dream trade is Austin + spare parts for Tari Eason + DFS. HOU gets a ballhandler who can score and help facilitate while FVV is out for the season, basically keeping it afloat with one of KD's last post prime seasons, while still having enough athletic defenders to help cover for AR15's poor D. Tari and DFS are both elite defenders who can shoot (Tari is developing), that'll greatly help cover up for Luka's defensive deficiencies. Now losing a future secondary ball handler sucks, but the boost in defense is worth it, and it'll make this season's team with Lebron very interesting.


...what?

A 34/8/10 player for a guy that barely 3 points a game and an old declining DFS?

Lakers don't have Nico Harrison as the GM buddy.
User avatar
Liam_Gallagher
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,649
And1: 6,883
Joined: Nov 05, 2019

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#70 » by Liam_Gallagher » Tue Oct 28, 2025 12:36 am

Chokic wrote:Austin Reaves is proof many many players in the league can put up star numbers on any given night if given the green light. 22fg attempt and high on ball usage. The reason hes not consistent is bc he shares the ball with lebron and luka. Theres a pecking order in the league.


I disagree, I think his ability to pass makes it harder for people to guard him. I don't think many players can put up 51/12/9 on good efficiency because as the game goes on teams will hone in on them and force them to make an awkward pass. Reaves has no problem passing to the open man and this forces teams to pick their poison with him. He has a bit of Steve Nash in his game.
G - James | Rondo
G - Bradley | Caruso
F - Green | Caldwell-Pope
F - Davis | Kuzma | Morris
C - McGee | Howard
wco81
RealGM
Posts: 26,741
And1: 11,430
Joined: Jul 04, 2013
       

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#71 » by wco81 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 1:20 am

The issue is fit next to Luka. Can the Lakers have two great offensive players in the lineup who are both suspect on defense?

They can win a lot of games in the regular season but how about in the playoffs?

After this season, if the Lakers do part ways with Lebron as expected and they pay AR big money, their top 2 players may be hunted in the playoffs.

Lakers can see what this roster does in the regular season and playoffs. If they have another poor playoffs run, will they still go all-in on making Luka and AR the two-highest paid players on their team?

Plenty of very good offensive but average or worse on defense players have gotten huge contracts. But have they done well in the playoffs? Trae led his team to the ECF once, can't think of other examples right off the top of my head. Could say Curry is at best average on defense but he was able to play with very good defensive players. Luka led his team to the Finals once and the WCF another time. Again that team had a lot of good defenders.

But can Luka do it again if his second-best player is also hunted on defense.
User avatar
HardenGoat
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,640
And1: 3,348
Joined: Jan 18, 2021
       

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#72 » by HardenGoat » Tue Oct 28, 2025 3:59 am

Reaves could average 30 ppg with 8 assists and still be hated.
PistolPeteJR
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 10,407
Joined: Jun 14, 2017
 

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reeves? 

Post#73 » by PistolPeteJR » Tue Oct 28, 2025 4:07 am

BigGargamel wrote:The rest of the league knows how mediocre Reaves really is. Is he that much better than an Aaron Wiggins? Sure, he gets a lot of minutes and thus counting stats, but the Lakers are woefully thin.

Considering what the Lakers front office used to say about bums like Talen Horton Tucker, they probably want an All Star in return, and that' just not going to happen. Reaves is nothing special.


:lol:
DaddyCool19
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,383
And1: 6,678
Joined: Jul 28, 2013

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#74 » by DaddyCool19 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:10 am

So any guesses how much he could command per year in FA?
User avatar
Lalouie
RealGM
Posts: 23,431
And1: 12,488
Joined: May 12, 2017

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#75 » by Lalouie » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:37 am

because they had a feeling he would score 50,,and one simply cannot have that kind of egg on one's face, over easy, scrambled, hard boiled, poached, benedicted,,,,,OR RAW
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,712
And1: 43,980
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#76 » by zimpy27 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 6:50 am

HardenGoat wrote:Reaves could average 30 ppg with 8 assists and still be hated.


Hate is a bit strong. I think he's finding it hard to shake the undrafted tag in some people's eyes.
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
doogie_hauser
Head Coach
Posts: 6,177
And1: 7,362
Joined: Feb 04, 2024
         

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#77 » by doogie_hauser » Tue Oct 28, 2025 7:09 am

zimpy27 wrote:
HardenGoat wrote:Reaves could average 30 ppg with 8 assists and still be hated.


Hate is a bit strong. I think he's finding it hard to shake the undrafted tag in some people's eyes.


Its definitely not that, it's A He often plays for and gets awarded for foul baiting/three throws and B He plays for The Lakers and many LAL fans often talk him up as a legit 3rd potential star option for Luka and Lebron.

The kid had a great game tonight, props to him, yet the Lakers still lost to a team projected to be less talented then them (even without Luka and Lebron)

For me (and i haven't seen the Lakers this season) it's how many calls he gets from the refs and the lack of defensive effort which annoys me about Reaves, which ties into the preferential treatment Lakers get from the refs. (Which isn't AR's fault i should add)
User avatar
durden_tyler
RealGM
Posts: 21,535
And1: 10,796
Joined: Jun 04, 2003
Location: 537 Paper Street, Bradford
   

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#78 » by durden_tyler » Tue Oct 28, 2025 7:15 am

The redundancy assure the Lakers they are going to be a mediocre team again-- they can settle for that since that means profit for the franchise while waiting for their real rebuild (when LeBron is gone).
If there is no basketball in heaven, i am not going.
User avatar
zimpy27
Forum Mod
Forum Mod
Posts: 45,712
And1: 43,980
Joined: Jul 13, 2014

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#79 » by zimpy27 » Tue Oct 28, 2025 7:24 am

doogie_hauser wrote:
zimpy27 wrote:
HardenGoat wrote:Reaves could average 30 ppg with 8 assists and still be hated.


Hate is a bit strong. I think he's finding it hard to shake the undrafted tag in some people's eyes.


Its definitely not that, it's A He often plays for and gets awarded for foul baiting/three throws and B He plays for The Lakers and many LAL fans often talk him up as a legit 3rd potential star option for Luka and Lebron.

The kid had a great game tonight, props to him, yet the Lakers still lost to a team projected to be less talented then them (even without Luka and Lebron)

For me (and i haven't seen the Lakers this season) it's how many calls he gets from the refs and the lack of defensive effort which annoys me about Reaves, which ties into the preferential treatment Lakers get from the refs. (Which isn't AR's fault i should add)



Blazers are not less talented than Lakers without Luka and LeBron...


I'd order the players on talent like this:

Reaves
Deni
Jrue
Clingan
Sharpe
Camara
Grant
Rui
Ayton
Vando
LaRavia
Knecht
Yang
Wesley
Murray

Blazers have 6 players better than Rui, who is Lakers 2nd best player out there
"Let's play some basketball!" - Fergie
User avatar
lonzo_pelota
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,488
And1: 6,679
Joined: Jul 28, 2017
   

Re: Why the Lakers didn't trade Reaves? 

Post#80 » by lonzo_pelota » Tue Oct 28, 2025 7:59 am

DaddyCool19 wrote:So any guesses how much he could command per year in FA?




All i know is he's a bit better than alligator arm desmond bane imo and we see how much he makes, Lakers fans enjoy the Reaves Train while it lasts the brinks truck is a coming from us or someone else.

Return to The General Board