LouisLitt wrote:AussieCeltic wrote:I don’t get the Curry hate. The man was the only player doing anything for the Warriors.
Also, let’s not forget KD series against this Celtics team in round 1. 38% for the series!
It's not hate, but when you put him up there with the greatest players of all-time, you have to critique him like he's one.
After the first, where was he for 3 quarters?
How many all-time greats get a pass for playing bad for the last 3 quarters?
How many all-time greats get a pass for your team losing the 4th quarter 40-16?
So he's either not up there and shouldn't be critiqued harshly or he is and gets critiqued appropriately.You really can't have it both ways.
I agree with the emboldened part, but I also think you’ve kind of erected a strawman.
If Steph is an all time great, should he be criticized for not playing well in the last 3 quarters of a Finals game?
Absolutely.
Does the fact that he played poorly in the last 3 quarters “prove” that he is overrated, a fraud, sux in the playoffs, <insert standard Curry hater point here>? Does it mean the stellar 1st quarter never happened, and it was like he had an 8 point game or something?
No.
You’re arguing the first part, while the vast majority of people taking umbrage at the Curry criticisms are arguing the second.