Patsfan1081 wrote:cgf wrote:Celts17Pride wrote:Knicks lack depth. Thibs is going to play the starters 42-44 mpg and run them into the ground. Everyone will be hurt for the playoffs.
Where have we seen this movie before?
How is the Knicks depth worse than Boston, Milwaukee, or Philly’s? The team has 3 bench guys capable of starting without the team falling off…McBride, Hart, & Achiuwa.
Plus Payne who did well for Philly last season and Sims who stepped in during injuries and looked solid. Yes our depth could use work but I don’t see a significant disadvantage until we get to the younger teams (Indy / Orlando).
Posting and toasting pointed it out, Knick’s lack shooting off the bench. Boston has a few guys coming off the bench that will shoot 40% on 5/6 attempts a game. Seems like a decent gap. Isn’t Hart more of a starter now also? He started tonight, half the games last season with Mitchell’s concerns.
That's certainly true, Deuce is a great shooter and Payne/Kolek can drain their 3s, but our bench forwards/bigs aren't shooters unless Dadiet shocks everyone by being a rotation player this season despite still being a baby. And that's probably a big part of why your bench guys have such good metrics against other bench units.
But the flipside of that shooting focus on the Celtics bench is that Pritchard / Hauser aren't as good defensively as McBride / Hart, so if they had to start in case of injuries, they'd be a bigger liability/target for opposing teams. Which may not be as much of a concern for Boston, since KP is their only fragile starter.
...but is much more important to a team that has Mitch, KAT, and OG, as its likely starting frontcourt when at full health. We're currently missing 1 likely starter (Robinson) and I would worry about our bench unit if we lost another...but I wouldn't worry about our starting 5 if McBride had to step in for OG/Mikal/Hart.
I'm not sure what our healthy starting lineup will be, that's likely tbd based on how these next couple months go. I'm assuming that when Robinson is fit again we'll start him next to KAT in the Gobert role...despite all of the changes Thibs has made since his failure in Minnesota, he still puts more emphasis on rim-protection & offensive rebounding than many coaches, and I feel like Hart's energy makes more of an impact coming off the bench.
I'm also assuming that our defense won't be as effective against the top teams with KAT as our main rim protector...but if I'm wrong about that and Thibs can teach KAT to protect the rim against top teams without fouling, then we could see Hart stay in the starting lineup even at full strength.
Making our best bench players; Robinson, McBride, Achiuwa, Payne, and the kids/future-trade. Boston's shooting advantage off the bench would be even pronounced with Hart starting instead of Mitch, but our defensive advantage off the bench would also get bigger.