LivingLegend wrote:Hello Brooklyn wrote:Winning counts when it comes to MVP, it always has.
The idea that its just an individual stats award is stupid.
Last year was an aberration and should not become the norm.
I disagree a little bit. In this day and age of basketball when everybody just is in an arms race to have 3 + 4 All Stars on each team, I think team success has gotten a little overrated. There has been formed powerhouses since the Celtics, Heat, Cavs, Warriors, Rockets and Thunder that sort of waters down that notion of best player on best team like never before.
I think now more than ever it should revert back more to the 'who is actually the best player' and not 'who is the best player on the best team' since team stats have been skewed in this Superteam era. It gives guys who are really really really good like Anthony Davis and Damian Lillard a chance for recognition they deserve and is not just mostly handed to the best player picked from one of the top 4 superteams.
For example, if you put another All-Star on the Blazers roster right now and they become a 60 win team. Everybody would probably vote Lillard as the MVP just because of team record. He will still be the same Lillard as he currently is, but just because another AllStar came over and helped them win 5-10 more games a year all of a sudden THEN he is allowed to get the recognition for being great??
I agree that team record should be factored in, but weighing heavily on the 'what would this playoff team look like without player X on it' I think needs to be a thing again.
Makes it more impressive that Harden is doing what he is doing with NO ALL STARS on his team besides him.