Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
-
balla4lyf23
- Sophomore
- Posts: 192
- And1: 97
- Joined: Aug 14, 2014
-
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
this didnt age well...
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
-
Bolivar
- Starter
- Posts: 2,361
- And1: 4,597
- Joined: Aug 28, 2014
- Location: Helsinki, Finland
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
Backcountry wrote:Homer38 wrote:
That's a cool stat, no question. But who is the guy in the graphic? Looks more like Gobert than Steph...
I'd say Gordon Hayward...
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
-
ShootersShoot
- Veteran
- Posts: 2,751
- And1: 1,897
- Joined: Aug 30, 2021
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
How does this thread have three parts? 
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
- Jamaaliver
- Forum Mod - Hawks

- Posts: 45,613
- And1: 17,337
- Joined: Sep 22, 2005
- Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
- Contact:
-
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
-
JN61
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,743
- And1: 9,255
- Joined: Jan 07, 2018
-
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
They lost.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
- Jamaaliver
- Forum Mod - Hawks

- Posts: 45,613
- And1: 17,337
- Joined: Sep 22, 2005
- Location: Officially a citizen of the World...
- Contact:
-
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
JN61 wrote:They lost.
Yes. They did.
But Steph is playing exceptionally well in the NBA Finals, averaging a series high 31 ppg on 48% shooting from 3-pt range.
Teammate Draymond Green is averaging 5 ppg. There's a chance the Celtics are simply a better constructed team overall.
I do wonder: if Steph can continue playing at such a high level, might he garner any Finals MVP votes even if his team loses.
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 44,176
- And1: 20,231
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
Steph has a combined 6 points in all 3 4th quarters. One of those is clearly for a good reason, but there's no way he's winning finals MVP on a losing team when he's been a complete non factor in every 4th. I'm not even a "4th quarter>>>" but that's glaring
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
-
rand
- Analyst
- Posts: 3,073
- And1: 4,027
- Joined: Jun 28, 2013
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
JN61 wrote:
They lost.
Yeah but if they won while Steph played badly you folks would be in here talking about it
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
- WHITE_HOT_HEAT
- Sixth Man
- Posts: 1,632
- And1: 2,210
- Joined: Sep 28, 2019
- Location: Brussels, Belgium
-
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
rand wrote:JN61 wrote:
They lost.
Yeah but if they won while Steph played badly you folks would be in here talking about it
Warranted from previous years... But not to the extent that RGM goes
"And a Man?... A Man provides... And he does it even when he's not appreciated, or respected, or even loved. He simply bears up and he does it.... Because he's a Man...."
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
- Impuniti
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,885
- And1: 7,809
- Joined: Jan 18, 2016
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
NO-KG-AI wrote:Steph has a combined 6 points in all 3 4th quarters. One of those is clearly for a good reason, but there's no way he's winning finals MVP on a losing team when he's been a complete non factor in every 4th. I'm not even a "4th quarter>>>" but that's glaring
The guy losing should never win FMVP, that would be ridiculous.
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
- NO-KG-AI
- Retired Mod

- Posts: 44,176
- And1: 20,231
- Joined: Jul 19, 2005
- Location: The city of witch doctors, and good ol' pickpockets
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
Impuniti wrote:NO-KG-AI wrote:Steph has a combined 6 points in all 3 4th quarters. One of those is clearly for a good reason, but there's no way he's winning finals MVP on a losing team when he's been a complete non factor in every 4th. I'm not even a "4th quarter>>>" but that's glaring
The guy losing should never win FMVP, that would be ridiculous.
I wouldn't be against it if it was a truly groundbreaking effort and the other team didn't have a standout excellent player. I don't believe this is that at all though. Jaylen Brown for me if the series continued this way to a Celtics win.
Doctor MJ wrote:I don't understand why people jump in a thread and say basically, "This thing you're all talking about. I'm too ignorant to know anything about it. Lollerskates!"
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
-
JN61
- RealGM
- Posts: 11,743
- And1: 9,255
- Joined: Jan 07, 2018
-
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
Jamaaliver wrote:JN61 wrote:They lost.
Yes. They did.
But Steph is playing exceptionally well in the NBA Finals, averaging a series high 31 ppg on 48% shooting from 3-pt range.
Teammate Draymond Green is averaging 5 ppg. There's a chance the Celtics are simply a better constructed team overall.
I do wonder: if Steph can continue playing at such a high level, might he garner any Finals MVP votes even if his team loses.
3.7 assists per game for a point guard. That is not exceptionally well when your teammates are struggling. You as leader of a team must create for others and not just shrug your shoulders about your teammates shooting poorly. Curry and his impact on this serie has been pretty mediocre, especially by his standards. Is he putting up points? Yes. Has he impacted on the game on the manner his scoring would suggest? Absolutely not.
I take 20 ppg and 10 assists per game over this chucking where he just shoots 3 pointer every time he has the ball. And everyone else are baffled why his teammates struggle. Curry is career wise really good rebounding guard as well and he is just not doing that either in this serie. Combined with the fact that he is not defending. You have recipe for what it has been so far. If others somehow manage to get hot Warriors are pretty good but if not there is nobody else to elevate their game or create easy offense for them and Celtics dominate.
Pennebaker wrote:And Bird did it while being a defensive liability. But he also made All-Defensive teams, which was another controversial issue regarding Bird and votes.
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
-
Darren
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,116
- And1: 915
- Joined: Nov 06, 2003
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
Curry is never a great defender. But two problems :
1. GSW can't demonstrate the best defense. Smart, White and so on are really not unguardable. But GSW fails the defensive assignment a lot the whole series.
2. Klay, Wiggins, Draymond are all streaky for three balls the whole series. But when the team trails, they're forced to put either Curry or Poole on court.
This makes it difficult to defend and come back.
I think GSW is capable to defending the playmakers and generate turnovers but is underachieving so far.
1. GSW can't demonstrate the best defense. Smart, White and so on are really not unguardable. But GSW fails the defensive assignment a lot the whole series.
2. Klay, Wiggins, Draymond are all streaky for three balls the whole series. But when the team trails, they're forced to put either Curry or Poole on court.
This makes it difficult to defend and come back.
I think GSW is capable to defending the playmakers and generate turnovers but is underachieving so far.
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
-
lambchop
- RealGM
- Posts: 10,015
- And1: 10,072
- Joined: May 14, 2014
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
rand wrote:JN61 wrote:
They lost.
Yeah but if they won while Steph played badly you folks would be in here talking about it
That's a compliment and shows that he has solidified himself as an all time great. His performance gets compared to LBJ, sometimes even MJ, he gets put ahead of guys like Magic Johnson or Thomas in the all time PG rankings. That means people are going to scrutinize his game and performance.
So many people who attain the heights of power in this culture—celebrities, for instance—have to make a show of false humility and modesty, as if they got as far as they did by accident and not by ego or ambition.
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
-
sikma42
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,854
- And1: 6,081
- Joined: Nov 23, 2011
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
Jamaaliver wrote:JN61 wrote:They lost.
Yes. They did.
But Steph is playing exceptionally well in the NBA Finals, averaging a series high 31 ppg on 48% shooting from 3-pt range.
Teammate Draymond Green is averaging 5 ppg. There's a chance the Celtics are simply a better constructed team overall.
I do wonder: if Steph can continue playing at such a high level, might he garner any Finals MVP votes even if his team loses.
He isn't really playing exceptionally well. He is struggling to create for his team and isn't doing enough as a playmaker + being exploited on defense.
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
- Clutch0z24
- General Manager
- Posts: 9,814
- And1: 9,889
- Joined: May 08, 2014
-
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
Curry as fun as he is to watch with how crazy hot he can get....He just does not put fear in your heart like some other players do...Could be his size or his lack of defensive ability....Or might be the fact when his Jumpshot or he isn't hitting 5 threes in the span of 3 mins he just does not do anything else on the court that you fear....You can expose him on the defensive end by getting switches like they did with Tatum, And you can somewhat contain him if you have good enough defenders to bother his shot enough times...
Guys like Kawhi, LeBron, Giannis, Kobe, Jordan, KD Types are scary to play cause they can effect the game in so many ways then just Shooting a jumpshot...Thats the difference and puts him a tier below them guys.
Guys like Kawhi, LeBron, Giannis, Kobe, Jordan, KD Types are scary to play cause they can effect the game in so many ways then just Shooting a jumpshot...Thats the difference and puts him a tier below them guys.

Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
-
dautjazz
- RealGM
- Posts: 15,288
- And1: 10,057
- Joined: Aug 01, 2001
- Location: Miami, FL
-
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
Someone in the gamethread yesterday said that Curry is better than Lebron, just because he was heating up in the third. People live so much in the now. Lebron was in his 19th season, had AD for half a season, and basically nothing else. Are we going to act like Curry would do any better in Lebron's place, much less at 37 (Curry is currently 34), or in year 19 (this is year 13 for Curry). Not to mention Lebron destroyed Curry and his 73 win Warriors when Curry had a 3-1 advantage.Clutch0z24 wrote:Curry as fun as he is to watch with how crazy hot he can get....He just does not put fear in your heart like some other players do...Could be his size or his lack of defensive ability....Or might be the fact when his Jumpshot or he isn't hitting 5 threes in the span of 3 mins he just does not do anything else on the court that you fear....You can expose him on the defensive end by getting switches like they did with Tatum, And you can somewhat contain him if you have good enough defenders to bother his shot enough times...
Guys like Kawhi, LeBron, Giannis, Kobe, Jordan, KD Types are scary to play cause they can effect the game in so many ways then just Shooting a jumpshot...Thats the difference and puts him a tier below them guys.
Curry is a great player, and honestly he's been the best player in the series, but a prime Lebron would have had a handful of rebounds and assists more, and far superior defense. Curry is great, but Lebron is in tier with guys like MJ.
NickAnderson wrote:
How old are you, just curious.
by gomeziee on 21 Jul 2013 00:53
im 20, and i did grow up watching MJ play in the 90's.
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
-
art_tatum
- Lead Assistant
- Posts: 4,738
- And1: 4,385
- Joined: Jun 01, 2018
-
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
Kerrs been exposed more like it.
And draymond slack of offense. At least smart is making a couple 3s a game
And draymond slack of offense. At least smart is making a couple 3s a game
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
- Lunartic
- Head Coach
- Posts: 6,087
- And1: 9,755
- Joined: Nov 28, 2015
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
2022 playoff averages of 26/5/5 on .600 with average defense is pretty good but it's not something that hasn't been done before
Leonard
Lebron
Durant
Giannis
have all played as well or better in the playoffs.
I don't think it's true that Curry has been better than Jaylen Brown this series, JB is getting it done on both ends while Curry is just shooting absolutely insane from 3.
Leonard
Lebron
Durant
Giannis
have all played as well or better in the playoffs.
I don't think it's true that Curry has been better than Jaylen Brown this series, JB is getting it done on both ends while Curry is just shooting absolutely insane from 3.
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
-
DarkXaero
- RealGM
- Posts: 14,220
- And1: 5,763
- Joined: Mar 25, 2011
-
Re: Stephen Curry has been totally exposed (Part II)
The 6 pts are also on 3/10 FG so far. Game 2 was a blow out so he didn't play the 4th but the other two games where they had a chance of winning, he has sucked in the 4th.NO-KG-AI wrote:Steph has a combined 6 points in all 3 4th quarters. One of those is clearly for a good reason, but there's no way he's winning finals MVP on a losing team when he's been a complete non factor in every 4th. I'm not even a "4th quarter>>>" but that's glaring





