eyeatoma wrote:Duke4life831 wrote:I know it can be annoying because of how often people bring it up. But it is pretty hard to overstate just how much harder it is for guys like Jokic/Luka who dont have that legit #2 option that defenses have to worry about. Defenses cant just 100% sell out on guys like KD, Tatum, and Embiid.
Kyrie: Since coming back from his suspension, hasnt missed a game and is averaging 26/5/4 on 52/42/90 shooting (64 TS%).
Brown: 27/7/3 on 59 TS%
Harden: 22/6/11 on 60 TS%
Having a 2nd option like these guys prevent teams from being able to just 100% sell out on KD/Tatum/Embiid. Compare that to Luka or Jokic. Its either Murray or Gordon for Jokic, or its Wood or Dinwiddie for Luka. Defenses will happily say, lets 100% focus on taking Jokic/Luka out and force those 2nd options to beat us.
I also want to be clear, I dont think having a legit #2 option should be some disqualifier for MVP either. I think the majority of MVP winners have a legit 2nd option. Its just when guys dont have a legit 2nd option and are still able to put up crazy efficiency numbers and lead their teams to good records, thats just a bonus for them.
Prior to Harden, Embiid had a 2nd year Maxey and Tobias Harris for much of the season last year. Better than Jokic's team and Luka's, but really not great. Maxey has taken a leap this year, and Harden is here. Tobias has bought in. But if you make that argument, why is Tatum a candidate? KD?
I never made the claim that Embiid had an elite 2nd option last year, Im talking about this year. And again I made it clear that having a legit 2nd option is in anyway a disqualifier for the MVP. Its just a positive for those that can put up a MVP season without having one. That is why Ive stated multiple times I think that Embiid, Tatum and KD are having legit MVP worthy seasons this year.



















