Crackfool wrote:It's pretty clear here that you're grasping for straws and simply regurgitating biased and uninformed NY media reports that serve little more than to damage control the incompetency of the Knicks front office. Praising Stephen A. Smith as someone who "gets the truth" when he is close to a caricature of an opinionated and uninformed Bleacher Report writer is laughable.
The fact of the matter is that the Knicks were hoping to keep Lin, and then failed spectacularly on so many levels. They failed to understand the CBA and how poison pill contracts work. They failed to anticipate a poison pill contract when every analyst and armchair general manager saw it coming a mile away. They failed to understand that in free agency, a free agent is entitled to seek out the best offer for himself, not for his former team. They failed to realize that wasting two max contracts on the modern day iterations of Glenn Robinson and Shawn Kemp is generally not the way to build a winning basketball team, nor is surrounding them with roleplayers with low basketball IQ. They failed to understand that giving away long-term contracts with no foresight will result in future repercussions.
But go ahead and keep believing that a young point guard that saved the Knicks from lottery and pulled them out of a hole created by those "superstar" max contracts will revert back to being a scrub. Go ahead and keep believing that the Knicks won't be stuck in mediocrity with the best case scenario being a first round sweep for the next three years. Go ahead and keep believing that a savvy and competent front office like the Rockets' don't know how to build a team with young talent, draft picks, and cap space (all assets that the Knicks foolishly gave away). Go ahead and keep living in that New York bubble, where the only sports news reports are those feverishly praising the wonderful Knicks.
Here's another rose-colored glasses wearing, soapbox standing ranter who's prays in front of the altar to the god-like Jeremy Lin. You just put together a cockeyed sermon that's wrong on virtually every count. Truly pathetic, yet amusing at the same time.
I have news for you -- I don't think the Knicks wanted Lin all that much. Do you remember that the early free agent talk in NY was for acquiring Steve Nash? Why would the Knicks FO engage in that type of discussion if Lin was the presumed answer at guard? As I've explained over and over in this thread, Lin's skillset doesn't fit in on the Knicks. But this falls on deaf ears for the Linsantiacs, who are all in a pout because their dear little Jeremy was "wronged" by the big, bad Knicks and that mean old James Dolan.
As far as Lin "saving the season", he did provide an initial spark but when the going got tough -- down the stretch -- he was injured. The team went 18-6 (.750) to make it to the playoffs, without so much of a hint of help from Jeremy Lin. You can't go around saying that he "saved the season" without mentioning what the team did without him.
The Knicks will be very good this coming year. They've not "mediocre" at all, but will contend in the East with the Heat and Boston. Melo, from his showing in the Olympics, is primed for a great year.
Houston will be turrible. We'll see how Lin will cope with having a bullseye on his back when dealing nightly with all those quick, elite-level guards out in the West. It will be interesting.
► Old School fan of the best league in the world.