BROWN wrote:fahqu2011 wrote:BROWN wrote:
Again what i meant to say was still valid. He ended up playing for the team he competed against in the Eastern conference finals.
Yes it took him 3 years to get that point. So it's all good for Dennis to join up a rival team, but KD can't because why?
It's cool for Wade to join up with LeBron, or it's cool with Wilt to join up with Jerry... it happens all the time. I understand that he was just a "role player". A role player doesn't just get into the hall of fame.
Your point isn't valid at all. Dennis Rodman, HOFer or not, was never a piece you build around. Rather, he was a complimentary piece. In no way shape or form was your example good. Further, Rodman was traded for, he didn't go from a team he lost to and signed as a free agent like Durant. Rodman was traded for Will freaking Perdue. Let that sink in for a moment. Additionally, Wilt Chamberlain was traded to the Lakers and Wade has been with the Heat his whole career.
How old are you? Serious question. You sound like you're in your early 20s and just got done watching some NBA highlight reels.
Again you are missing the point. I am not comparing RODMAN to DURANT.
Rodman ended up playing for the "rival" team. Regardless of how he ended up there, Phil made the call to him and said come and play for us. He agreed.
I'm in my late 20's and I've been watching my Warriors since 2000. You may not understand the point, but I'm not the only one bringing this up. Playing for a "rival" team isn't a new idea. Durant didn't re-invent the wheel. Other "stars" have done it.
Lol @ Wilt was traded to the Lakers, Okay so we'll roll with that, he played no hand in getting himself to L.A to join forces with Jerry West. It's a-okay for Wilt to get a pass, because he was traded. Just like I'm sure you'll say it's okay for LeBron since he was traded to Miami, or Bosh. Yes Wade played for the Heat, but they orchestrated it so their rival opponents played together.
This isn't a new concept, it's been happening FOREVER.
I hear you loud and clear and I'm not missing your point. Your comparisons are poor at best. How asinine of an argument is it to talk about playing for a rival team 3 years and 2 transactions after he left Pistons? This has more to do with a current top 3 player ditching HIS team and to going to a NBA record 73-9 team after they just lost to them. It's about Durant being a ring chaser and taking the easiest, almost guaranteed path to get it. I've already mentioned Lebron was a ring chaser going to Miami in an early post of this KD thread as well; however, in Durant's case it's worse.
This is what GSW fans are missing. No one has any issue that Golden State went out and got the top free agent that's nearly a perfect fit for their team. That's their job.
The problem is that:
A.) Durant left for an NBA regular season record breaking team he lost to solely because it was the easiest way to get a ring. Plain and simple.
B.) Warriors fans try to defend his actions and say he's not a ring chaser. He is.
Every bit of this is on Durant. The Warriors were just doing their job. And in the end, they came out with the prize. I have zero issues with the way the Warriors went about their business.
I can only imagine if Jordan, Bird, Magic, Kareem, Malone, Stockton, Ewing, Olajawon, Robinson etc left their teams the way KD did. It simply just didn't happen outside of trades and even those were rare.