bisme37 wrote:lakerz12 wrote:bisme37 wrote:
I became ineloquent as I made successive comments. It wasn't right for me to say he's had a better career so far. I was just pointing out he's appeared in multiple postseasons at age 22 and been good each time, because a lot of folks seem to have a very short memory. (He's like Nerlens Noel? Seriously?)
Pascal is the better player now but he's 3 years older and Jaylen has been more consistent in the postseason over his 3 year career. So while I wouldn't give Jaylen the max Pascal is getting, he's worth something more than 4/80.
Pascal is 2.5 years older but they each just finished their 3rd NBA season.
If you look at Brown's regular season numbers, he actually regressed a little from the year before. I know you can argue it was Kyrie, etc. but that doesn't comfort me if I am shelling out $80+ million.
Siakam on the other hand clearly went to another level with his game and his production.
I think these contracts are based on proven production + potential over the next 4-6 years or whatever the length of the contract is.
Jaylen Brown does not have proven production to warrant a big contract. 1 good post season does not count. They didn't even advance to the Finals.
He still seems more like "potential" than production. Whereas Siakam and Hield are already producing at a near All Star level.
I also think Hield and Siakam have higher ceilings. Hield will potentially be one of the best 3 point shooters in the league for the foreseeable future. Siakam with his size and versatility has potential to become a top 10 player in the league.
What's Brown going to do to become an All Star? Be a defensive stopper? Become an elite 3 point shooter? Seems more like he will be a solid starter but not an All Star level guy.
Pascal is getting a max based on scoring 19 ppg last playoffs at age 25. Jaylen averaged 18 ppg at age 20 when the C's went to the ECFs.
Again I'm not saying Jaylen should get a max but why is Pascal "production" in your mind while Jaylen is just "potential"? Pascal's resume is that he averaged one more point per game than Jaylen in their respective best postseason showings.
It's not just about a month in the postseason. It's about last season as a whole. Its about who they are as players. Jaylen has room to improve, sure. Maybe he will pass him at some point. It wasn't really close last year though.
Siakam averaged 17 a game on all nba level efficiency (62.8 TS). The trajectory is still up. He has better touch. He has become a decent shooter and has continued to improve ever year. He shot 37% from 3 last year, and 78% from the free throw line. They are probably comparable shooters from the outside right now. Jaylen is probably even better from 3, considering he has a much quicker release and can get off. BUT, Jaylen hasn't show improvement at the line. Siakam has a better feel for the game. He has better touch in the paint. He is more in control. He is a better playmaker. He is a better rebounder. He is a better overall defender.
It based on more than a postseason. The peak Siakam hit last year was far beyond any Jaylen season.