gorz wrote:Porzingis has the higher ceiling but randle is the better player.
It better be a very high ceiling because if KP bumps his head, he'll be out 6-8 months.
Moderators: zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77
gorz wrote:Porzingis has the higher ceiling but randle is the better player.

Zenzibar wrote:gorz wrote:Porzingis has the higher ceiling but randle is the better player.
It better be a very high ceiling because if KP bumps his head, he'll be out 6-8 months.
RoxSteady wrote:Most people would rather have Porzingis on their team, and that's a fair take. But I think it's worth pointing out that Randle (who came to NY through cap space freed up by the Porzingis trade, I believe) is only 9 months older than KP; has played in every game at an average of 37 mpg; and is averaging almost 23, 11, and 7. Probably playing better D than earlier in his career too.
The Knicks didn't sign KD and Kyrie; DSJ hasn't been good so far; the Mavs' picks the Knicks will receive likely will not be lottery picks; but think I think Randle's play makes the KP trade look a little better in retrospect and once again proves my theory that Frank Isola is always wrong:
AthensBucks wrote:Lowry is done.
Nurse is below average at best.
Masai is overrated.
I dont get how so many people believe in the raptors,they have zero to chance to win it all.
urgal wrote:Zenzibar wrote:gorz wrote:Porzingis has the higher ceiling but randle is the better player.
It better be a very high ceiling because if KP bumps his head, he'll be out 6-8 months.
Anyway he'll be back before the Knicks are relevant again
urgal wrote:Zenzibar wrote:gorz wrote:Porzingis has the higher ceiling but randle is the better player.
It better be a very high ceiling because if KP bumps his head, he'll be out 6-8 months.
Anyway he'll be back before the Knicks are relevant again
Zenzibar wrote:Question.
Are the Mavs relevant due to KP or Luka? What would the Mavs look like without him (Luka)?
You know what they'll look like without Luka? Like the Knicks with Randle.
The_Hater wrote:RoxSteady wrote:Most people would rather have Porzingis on their team, and that's a fair take. But I think it's worth pointing out that Randle (who came to NY through cap space freed up by the Porzingis trade, I believe) is only 9 months older than KP; has played in every game at an average of 37 mpg; and is averaging almost 23, 11, and 7. Probably playing better D than earlier in his career too.
The Knicks didn't sign KD and Kyrie; DSJ hasn't been good so far; the Mavs' picks the Knicks will receive likely will not be lottery picks; but think I think Randle's play makes the KP trade look a little better in retrospect and once again proves my theory that Frank Isola is always wrong:
Trading Porzingis might have been the only thing that could be done at that point as things had grown sour, but I doubt it. But the 2 things missing in this equation is that Durant himself mentioned that KP was a player that he’d like to play with, so the Knicks did things ass backwards if one of the goals trading him was to help their free agency prospects. Plus they also negotiated a hilariously bad trade package which only looks 5 times worse in hindsight with the value of high level players continuing to rise.
The Knicks screwed up here, and that’s the sort of stuff that happens when you have a dysfunctional front office with an interim GM pulling the strings.


The_Hater wrote:RoxSteady wrote:Most people would rather have Porzingis on their team, and that's a fair take. But I think it's worth pointing out that Randle (who came to NY through cap space freed up by the Porzingis trade, I believe) is only 9 months older than KP; has played in every game at an average of 37 mpg; and is averaging almost 23, 11, and 7. Probably playing better D than earlier in his career too.
The Knicks didn't sign KD and Kyrie; DSJ hasn't been good so far; the Mavs' picks the Knicks will receive likely will not be lottery picks; but think I think Randle's play makes the KP trade look a little better in retrospect and once again proves my theory that Frank Isola is always wrong:
Trading Porzingis might have been the only thing that could be done at that point as things had grown sour, but I doubt it. But the 2 things missing in this equation is that Durant himself mentioned that KP was a player that he’d like to play with, so the Knicks did things ass backwards if one of the goals trading him was to help their free agency prospects. Plus they also negotiated a hilariously bad trade package which only looks 5 times worse in hindsight with the value of high level players continuing to rise.
The Knicks screwed up here, and that’s the sort of stuff that happens when you have a dysfunctional front office with an interim GM pulling the strings.

3toheadmelo wrote:
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
3toheadmelo wrote:
Texas Chuck wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:
How in the world are you following this local Dallas hack?
Spoiler:


3toheadmelo wrote:I saw a Knicks fan retweet it lol not following him
ThunderBolt wrote:I’m going to let some of you in on a little secret I learned on realgm. If you don’t like a thread, not only do you not have to comment but you don’t even have to open it and read it. You’re welcome.
Clincher wrote:KP is better talent wise but his attitude is terrible and him enabling his big brother to be some hot shot sports agent who thinks he's Scott Boras brings him down to Randle's level who by all accounts isn't a locker room problem and doesn't make it about him all the time. KP on a good team is fine but on a rebuilding team is the first guy to tuck his tail and leave when the going get's tough, not someone I want. He would see draft picks and prospects on the team go if it gave him a better shot to compete even if it isn't the correct way to build a roster.
iLLmatic860 wrote:Clincher wrote:KP is better talent wise but his attitude is terrible and him enabling his big brother to be some hot shot sports agent who thinks he's Scott Boras brings him down to Randle's level who by all accounts isn't a locker room problem and doesn't make it about him all the time. KP on a good team is fine but on a rebuilding team is the first guy to tuck his tail and leave when the going get's tough, not someone I want. He would see draft picks and prospects on the team go if it gave him a better shot to compete even if it isn't the correct way to build a roster.
How do Mavs fans feel about KPs brother?
Has he done anything in Dallas like he did on knicks
The_Hater wrote:RoxSteady wrote:Most people would rather have Porzingis on their team, and that's a fair take. But I think it's worth pointing out that Randle (who came to NY through cap space freed up by the Porzingis trade, I believe) is only 9 months older than KP; has played in every game at an average of 37 mpg; and is averaging almost 23, 11, and 7. Probably playing better D than earlier in his career too.
The Knicks didn't sign KD and Kyrie; DSJ hasn't been good so far; the Mavs' picks the Knicks will receive likely will not be lottery picks; but think I think Randle's play makes the KP trade look a little better in retrospect and once again proves my theory that Frank Isola is always wrong:
Trading Porzingis might have been the only thing that could be done at that point as things had grown sour, but I doubt it. But the 2 things missing in this equation is that Durant himself mentioned that KP was a player that he’d like to play with, so the Knicks did things ass backwards if one of the goals trading him was to help their free agency prospects. Plus they also negotiated a hilariously bad trade package which only looks 5 times worse in hindsight with the value of high level players continuing to rise.
The Knicks screwed up here, and that’s the sort of stuff that happens when you have a dysfunctional front office with an interim GM pulling the strings.