How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players?

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

MoneyMo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,200
And1: 1,880
Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Location: Toronto

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#81 » by MoneyMo » Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:23 am

jfs1000d wrote:
MoneyMo wrote:
Currygoat wrote:
He would be a way better player than prime Lebron lmaooooo


lmao prime Lebron is far greater than Bird man. Get serious

Debate. Bird had him as a scorer, shooter and passer. Lebron so athletic and powerful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bird was a better shooter but since he never took threes, this advantage was pretty negligible. Lebron clearly was a better scorer by nearly every metric, and he was also a superior passer (this is closer), and a MUCH better defender.
Profound23
RealGM
Posts: 20,943
And1: 8,593
Joined: Jun 29, 2005
     

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#82 » by Profound23 » Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:37 am

The comparisons to Luka and Jokic are weird.

If anything he would be the equivalent of KD.
DCasey91
General Manager
Posts: 9,538
And1: 5,777
Joined: Dec 15, 2020
   

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#83 » by DCasey91 » Thu Nov 11, 2021 2:45 am



He’d be fine. This 1991 btw. 53-18 vs 53-20
Final score 132-135

Pippen dropped 35/10/9 and had a better game than each.

Both jacked up a lot of shots (funnily enough MJ got the rare travel violations on one of his favorite moves).

90’s was a weaker era but that’s not the point. The point is yes a player who had a top 5 all time peak would kill today.

He’d play the 3/4, be on ball/off ball, shoot, score whatever. With Bird he covers every aspect of bastketball so you can’t point to one thing, he has way too much quantity of quality relative skill.

There’s guys in the league that’s supposed to be 3+D but can’t do either or lol.
Li WenWen is the GOAT
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#84 » by Big J » Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:14 am

Bird quite possibly had the GOAT peak of anyone. He was that damn good. Dude was ripping opponents nuts off and swigging 6 packs of Budweiser after the game. He would probably average 40 10 and 10 in todays weak ass era.
Marrrcuss
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,245
And1: 2,872
Joined: Oct 23, 2020

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#85 » by Marrrcuss » Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:16 am

The 50/40/90 thing is cute but being that not one top 10 all time NBA player has done it, it seems a bit overrated.

But since Bird and Curry are fan favs, it will be continue to be over valued.
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#86 » by Big J » Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:17 am

MoneyMo wrote:
jfs1000d wrote:
MoneyMo wrote:
lmao prime Lebron is far greater than Bird man. Get serious

Debate. Bird had him as a scorer, shooter and passer. Lebron so athletic and powerful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bird was a better shooter but since he never took threes, this advantage was pretty negligible. Lebron clearly was a better scorer by nearly every metric, and he was also a superior passer (this is closer), and a MUCH better defender.


Bron wasn’t close to bird as a scorer. Look at the shooting percentages. Same with passer, Bird had way more creativity. Bron was more of a bulldozer in his prime like Shaq and Giannis.
Wolfgang630
RealGM
Posts: 21,589
And1: 20,761
Joined: Feb 07, 2016
 

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#87 » by Wolfgang630 » Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:20 am

Bird and Bron raises the floor exponentially on a team. I don’t think there’s many players in nba history that can raise the teams floor like these two.
MoneyMo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,200
And1: 1,880
Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Location: Toronto

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#88 » by MoneyMo » Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:27 am

Big J wrote:
MoneyMo wrote:
jfs1000d wrote:Debate. Bird had him as a scorer, shooter and passer. Lebron so athletic and powerful.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Bird was a better shooter but since he never took threes, this advantage was pretty negligible. Lebron clearly was a better scorer by nearly every metric, and he was also a superior passer (this is closer), and a MUCH better defender.


Bron wasn’t close to bird as a scorer. Look at the shooting percentages. Same with passer, Bird had way more creativity. Bron was more of a bulldozer in his prime like Shaq and Giannis.


You mean Bird wasn't close to Lebron as a scorer. Greater volume and greater efficiency both Raw and advanced. The gap is even wider when you look at per 100 possessions.

Passing is closer but I'll give Lebron the edge due to him being able to make passes that Bird just physically can't. His ability to get by guys, draw doubles and help, create passing lanes is second to none.
Big J
RealGM
Posts: 11,625
And1: 8,757
Joined: May 26, 2020

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#89 » by Big J » Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:46 am

MoneyMo wrote:
Big J wrote:
MoneyMo wrote:Bird was a better shooter but since he never took threes, this advantage was pretty negligible. Lebron clearly was a better scorer by nearly every metric, and he was also a superior passer (this is closer), and a MUCH better defender.


Bron wasn’t close to bird as a scorer. Look at the shooting percentages. Same with passer, Bird had way more creativity. Bron was more of a bulldozer in his prime like Shaq and Giannis.


You mean Bird wasn't close to Lebron as a scorer. Greater volume and greater efficiency both Raw and advanced. The gap is even wider when you look at per 100 possessions.

Passing is closer but I'll give Lebron the edge due to him being able to make passes that Bird just physically can't. His ability to get by guys, draw doubles and help, create passing lanes is second to none.


Greater efficiency? Remind me of when Bron ever shot 50 40 90? Bird didn’t need to draw doubles to get assists, dude was throwing bounce passes backwards behind his head. Bron is a great passer but Birds vision and creativity was on another level.
MoneyMo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,200
And1: 1,880
Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Location: Toronto

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#90 » by MoneyMo » Thu Nov 11, 2021 3:56 am

Big J wrote:
MoneyMo wrote:
Big J wrote:
Bron wasn’t close to bird as a scorer. Look at the shooting percentages. Same with passer, Bird had way more creativity. Bron was more of a bulldozer in his prime like Shaq and Giannis.


You mean Bird wasn't close to Lebron as a scorer. Greater volume and greater efficiency both Raw and advanced. The gap is even wider when you look at per 100 possessions.

Passing is closer but I'll give Lebron the edge due to him being able to make passes that Bird just physically can't. His ability to get by guys, draw doubles and help, create passing lanes is second to none.


Greater efficiency? Remind me of when Bron ever shot 50 40 90? Bird didn’t need to draw doubles to get assists, dude was throwing bounce passes backwards behind his head. Bron is a great passer but Birds vision and creativity was on another level.


Passing is completely subjective so no point in going back and forth. The 50, 40, 90 is a great shooting stat, but his volume of threes was so low it doesn't propel his efficiency higher than LeBron's.

Overall as a scorer Lebron puts up more points per game by a good margin, and his TS percentage is also greater. This holds true in both the regular season and the playoffs.
DaPessimist
Head Coach
Posts: 6,234
And1: 7,991
Joined: Feb 08, 2018
Location: HB, CA
       

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#91 » by DaPessimist » Thu Nov 11, 2021 4:09 am

Perennial MVP candidate.
CIN-C-STAR
General Manager
Posts: 8,440
And1: 18,310
Joined: Dec 17, 2017

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#92 » by CIN-C-STAR » Thu Nov 11, 2021 4:37 am

Rich man's Doug McDermott
All the guys back then were 5' 8" chain smoking plumbers who got drunk at halftime. Hoomans have evolved now.

:lol:
"I'd rather have Kevin Love spacing out to the three point line than anything (Karl) Malone brings"
:lol: :lol: :lol:
User avatar
HomoSapien
Senior Mod - Bulls
Senior Mod - Bulls
Posts: 37,463
And1: 30,536
Joined: Aug 17, 2009
 

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#93 » by HomoSapien » Thu Nov 11, 2021 4:50 am

How’d he compare? He’d be the best player in the NBA.
ThreeYearPlan wrote:Bulls fans defend HomoSapien more than Rose.
User avatar
AKfanatic
RealGM
Posts: 12,210
And1: 10,068
Joined: May 20, 2001
     

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#94 » by AKfanatic » Thu Nov 11, 2021 4:56 am

He’d have so many fans confused as he looked like the least athletic guy on the court while dominating their favorite players.
SNPA
General Manager
Posts: 9,268
And1: 8,623
Joined: Apr 15, 2020

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#95 » by SNPA » Thu Nov 11, 2021 4:59 am

MoneyMo wrote:
Big J wrote:
MoneyMo wrote:
You mean Bird wasn't close to Lebron as a scorer. Greater volume and greater efficiency both Raw and advanced. The gap is even wider when you look at per 100 possessions.

Passing is closer but I'll give Lebron the edge due to him being able to make passes that Bird just physically can't. His ability to get by guys, draw doubles and help, create passing lanes is second to none.


Greater efficiency? Remind me of when Bron ever shot 50 40 90? Bird didn’t need to draw doubles to get assists, dude was throwing bounce passes backwards behind his head. Bron is a great passer but Birds vision and creativity was on another level.


Passing is completely subjective so no point in going back and forth. The 50, 40, 90 is a great shooting stat, but his volume of threes was so low it doesn't propel his efficiency higher than LeBron's.

Overall as a scorer Lebron puts up more points per game by a good margin, and his TS percentage is also greater. This holds true in both the regular season and the playoffs.

While vision isn’t quantifiable it also isn’t totally subjective. If you study the game long enough you can see it and who has more of it. And in this case it’s Bird.

As for points, different eras, different roles. But be clear…Bird is a better shooter by a good margin from everywhere facing or back to the basket and he had the ball in his hands a massive amount less. Points per minute of ball possession and dangerous from anywhere both go to Bird big sizable margins.
LakersLegacy
Head Coach
Posts: 7,487
And1: 4,026
Joined: Apr 27, 2015
   

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#96 » by LakersLegacy » Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:10 am

He is one of the best shooters ever so he would thrive. And he’s a great rebounder.

Most of the great shooters would thrive in 2021-2022
MoneyMo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,200
And1: 1,880
Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Location: Toronto

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#97 » by MoneyMo » Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:11 am

SNPA wrote:
MoneyMo wrote:
Big J wrote:
Greater efficiency? Remind me of when Bron ever shot 50 40 90? Bird didn’t need to draw doubles to get assists, dude was throwing bounce passes backwards behind his head. Bron is a great passer but Birds vision and creativity was on another level.


Passing is completely subjective so no point in going back and forth. The 50, 40, 90 is a great shooting stat, but his volume of threes was so low it doesn't propel his efficiency higher than LeBron's.

Overall as a scorer Lebron puts up more points per game by a good margin, and his TS percentage is also greater. This holds true in both the regular season and the playoffs.

While vision isn’t quantifiable it also isn’t totally subjective. If you study the game long enough you can see it and who has more of it. And in this case it’s Bird.

As for points, different eras, different roles. But be clear…Bird is a better shooter by a good margin from everywhere facing or back to the basket and he had the ball in his hands a massive amount less. Points per minute of ball possession and dangerous from anywhere both go to Bird big sizable margins.


Agree to disagree. A lot of Biases and and nostalgia for Bird on this board. I've seen Lebron make some passes that Bird couldn't even dream about.

Bird was better shooter no doubt. He was nearly automatic at the line and good at the three point shot for his time. However, overall as a scorer, it isn't even really debatable. You can practically look at everything that is measurable and Lebron has the overall edge as a scorer. He was much better at the rim, in transition, at creating his shot, scored more points per poss etc.

Just because you like Bird more, doesn't make him the better scorer or passer if the evidence doesn't support that.
Joshyjess
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,886
And1: 8,748
Joined: Jun 20, 2018
         

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#98 » by Joshyjess » Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:19 am

MoneyMo wrote:
SNPA wrote:
MoneyMo wrote:
Passing is completely subjective so no point in going back and forth. The 50, 40, 90 is a great shooting stat, but his volume of threes was so low it doesn't propel his efficiency higher than LeBron's.

Overall as a scorer Lebron puts up more points per game by a good margin, and his TS percentage is also greater. This holds true in both the regular season and the playoffs.

While vision isn’t quantifiable it also isn’t totally subjective. If you study the game long enough you can see it and who has more of it. And in this case it’s Bird.

As for points, different eras, different roles. But be clear…Bird is a better shooter by a good margin from everywhere facing or back to the basket and he had the ball in his hands a massive amount less. Points per minute of ball possession and dangerous from anywhere both go to Bird big sizable margins.


Agree to disagree. A lot of Biases and and nostalgia for Bird on this board. I've seen Lebron make some passes that Bird couldn't even dream about.

Bird was better shooter no doubt. He was nearly automatic at the line and good at the three point shot for his time. However, overall as a scorer, it isn't even really debatable. You can practically look at everything that is measurable and Lebron has the overall edge as a scorer. He was much better at the rim, in transition, at creating his shot, scored more points per poss etc.

Just because you like Bird more, doesn't make him the better scorer or passer if the evidence doesn't support that.

I'm going to assume that you've never actually watched Bird play. There isn't a single pass that Lebron has made that Bird couldn't easily make. He was so far ahead of Lebron in the passing category that it should never even come up.
User avatar
ImSlower
Head Coach
Posts: 6,353
And1: 7,649
Joined: Jan 06, 2011
Location: STL-ish
   

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#99 » by ImSlower » Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:24 am

If prime Bird were teleported into this age of basketball, I am 100% certain he'd be absolutely merciless. On Twitter. Oh man, the trash talk would be incredible. I imagine Magic's tweets to be clever and supportive with some humble confidence. Jordan would be relentlessly self-aggrandizing. Bird would have like 25 million followers waiting for the next epic takedown of whichever punk-ass he dominated the game before.
MoneyMo
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,200
And1: 1,880
Joined: Jul 04, 2002
Location: Toronto

Re: How Would Larry Bird Rate Against Todays' Players? 

Post#100 » by MoneyMo » Thu Nov 11, 2021 5:24 am

Joshyjess wrote:
MoneyMo wrote:
SNPA wrote:While vision isn’t quantifiable it also isn’t totally subjective. If you study the game long enough you can see it and who has more of it. And in this case it’s Bird.

As for points, different eras, different roles. But be clear…Bird is a better shooter by a good margin from everywhere facing or back to the basket and he had the ball in his hands a massive amount less. Points per minute of ball possession and dangerous from anywhere both go to Bird big sizable margins.


Agree to disagree. A lot of Biases and and nostalgia for Bird on this board. I've seen Lebron make some passes that Bird couldn't even dream about.

Bird was better shooter no doubt. He was nearly automatic at the line and good at the three point shot for his time. However, overall as a scorer, it isn't even really debatable. You can practically look at everything that is measurable and Lebron has the overall edge as a scorer. He was much better at the rim, in transition, at creating his shot, scored more points per poss etc.

Just because you like Bird more, doesn't make him the better scorer or passer if the evidence doesn't support that.

I'm going to assume that you've never actually watched Bird play. There isn't a single pass that Lebron has made that Bird couldn't easily make. He was so far ahead of Lebron in the passing category that it should never even come up.


I've seen plenty of Bird. "He was so far ahead of Lebron in the passing category that it should never even come up" Right.... I see you're a Celtics fan :lol:

Return to The General Board