VDT wrote:Honestly, as a Sixers fan i dont want Lillard (too much risk involved). If the Sixers dont have any other option i could see them doing a Simmons for Lillard trade straighup. I doubt Morey will add much more given Lillard's current performance, age and contrac
Generally speaking though, it is extremely hard to find a trade between two teams that both want to improve. If the Blazers dont want to rebuild, i dont see a deal between these two teams materializing, unless Portland offers an absurd amount of picks, which however they could have used to get a better player than Simmons probably, henece it doesnt make much sense either.
This is where I'm landing on it too. As of right now, both teams want to improve and stay competitive, so the priorities of what both teams want is in direct conflict. I just don't think a deal will end up happening.
That said, I would be ok with Portland offering an absurd amount of picks. The Blazers under Olshey should have been willing to do that for a couple of players they had a shot at. Harden, for example, was open to playing in Portland. Portland should have just told Houston - whatever you want that isn't Damian Lillard, you got it. But by all accounts, Olshey's overvaluing of CJ wouldn't allow him to offer a ton of picks in a megadeal. So Portland should have done a deal like that a couple times over now to pair another real star with Dame.
Not sure there's another "star" available that attaching a decades worth of 1st round picks to CJ could get something done. Simmons seems to be the only option out there. So yeah, if Morey wants 3 1st and 3 swaps for Simmons along with CJ, at this point, I say Portland should just do it. It's probably a bad gamble, but I want the Blazers to try at least ONE time in the Dame era to get him a player near the caliber of himself. If that means possibly sacrificing some long-term viability should everything go south, at least you can say you tried.