Post-Mortem: 2021-22 New York Knicks

Moderators: Clav, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Dirk, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285

4 Questions

Poll ended at Sun Apr 3, 2022 2:05 am

Q1: Keep the GM
30
11%
Q1: Fire the GM
32
12%
Q2: Keep the coach
24
9%
Q2: Fire the coach
42
16%
Q3: Performed better than expected
0
No votes
Q3: Performed as expected
19
7%
Q3: Performed worse than expected
51
19%
Q4: Rising Team
10
4%
Q4: Treadmill Team
40
15%
Q4: Waning Team
20
7%
 
Total votes: 268

iBall101
Pro Prospect
Posts: 842
And1: 348
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Post-Mortem: 2021-22 New York Knicks 

Post#81 » by iBall101 » Tue Apr 5, 2022 3:57 am

Lets be honest. If the knicks managed to stay healthy as a team with no major injuries. They would easily crack the play-in. They’re a good team just had a bad fate of injuries this year.
:nod: Masai’s Rebuilt Raptors :nod:

PG: I. Quickley/ J. Shead/ J. Walter
SG: R. Barrett/ G. Dick / A. Lawson
SF: B. Ingram/ O. Agbaji / G. Temple
PF: S. Barnes/ C. Boucher/ J. Battle
C: J. Poeltl /J. Mogbo/ O. Robinson
User avatar
Asian Celtic
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,819
And1: 7,002
Joined: Jun 10, 2016
 

Re: Post-Mortem: 2021-22 New York Knicks 

Post#82 » by Asian Celtic » Tue Apr 5, 2022 7:07 am

iBall101 wrote:Lets be honest. If the knicks managed to stay healthy as a team with no major injuries. They would easily crack the play-in. They’re a good team just had a bad fate of injuries this year.


Let's be fair as well, every team has had their own covid + injuries part of the season. If a healthy Knicks was your scenario vs all other healthy teams then the knicks still suck given the play-in is their ceiling with good health.
Nazrmohamed
Head Coach
Posts: 6,190
And1: 3,138
Joined: May 16, 2013
     

Re: Post-Mortem: 2021-22 New York Knicks 

Post#83 » by Nazrmohamed » Tue Apr 5, 2022 10:48 am

Asian Celtic wrote:
iBall101 wrote:Lets be honest. If the knicks managed to stay healthy as a team with no major injuries. They would easily crack the play-in. They’re a good team just had a bad fate of injuries this year.


Let's be fair as well, every team has had their own covid + injuries part of the season. If a healthy Knicks was your scenario vs all other healthy teams then the knicks still suck given the play-in is their ceiling with good health.



Yeah but the difference is our injuries were to players or positions so integral to how we played as a team that I feel like it mightve been better than just play in. Probably like 8th or 7th seed. Don't sound great either but everyone expected us to slide to some extent.
User avatar
John Murdoch
RealGM
Posts: 10,281
And1: 7,740
Joined: Sep 16, 2013
         

Re: Post-Mortem: 2021-22 New York Knicks 

Post#84 » by John Murdoch » Tue Apr 5, 2022 12:23 pm

Westy for Randle/Fournier makes alot of sense for both parties. Get outta bad deals , and maybe Utah would entertain RJ/1st for Mitchell
Magic#1 wrote:We have won two playoff games in two years. If we decide to keep this team for the next two years, maybe it will feel like we won a series.
User avatar
Johnny Bball
RealGM
Posts: 55,316
And1: 59,807
Joined: Feb 01, 2015
 

Re: Post-Mortem: 2021-22 New York Knicks 

Post#85 » by Johnny Bball » Tue Apr 5, 2022 3:21 pm

Again, how does anyone justify Leon Rose staying when he did this?

https://www.basketball-reference.com/contracts/NYK.html

They don't get off Randle and Fourier until 2026 and that's how long it will be until they might have cap space. They near max Barrett, walk away from Robinson and they are probably at or over the tax? Someone needs to rip it apart and it rarely ends up being the guy that built it.
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,101
And1: 14,461
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: Post-Mortem: 2021-22 New York Knicks 

Post#86 » by cgf » Tue Apr 5, 2022 4:41 pm

Johnny Bball wrote:Again, how does anyone justify Leon Rose staying when he did this?

https://www.basketball-reference.com/contracts/NYK.html

They don't get off Randle and Fourier until 2026 and that's how long it will be until they might have cap space. They near max Barrett, walk away from Robinson and they are probably at or over the tax? Someone needs to rip it apart and it rarely ends up being the guy that built it.

Fournier only has two more years guaranteed, so they can get off him in 2024, not 2026. I thought it was the wrong move for us, but if you look at what guys like that get paid, Fournier's salary is right in line with his peers/comparables & we avoided giving him that guaranteed fourth season that Duncan Robinson got :dontknow:

Randle's only getting 106/4years unless he bounces back in a big way & hits his bonuses, which is an overpay, but not a crippling one. To average ~29.6M on this new deal he would need to make the allstar game for the next 4 years and drag us to the playoffs each of those seasons...at which point, there wouldn't be many knicks fans that had an issue with his salary.

And how much do you expect Robinson to get? We have ~26M under the tax to pay for our pick & Mitch, without dumping anyone. Do you really think that won't be enough to afford Mitch? I'd like to sign him to a deal around 55M over 4 years, but would go up to 65-70M if that's what it took...neither of which would put us at the tax.

Not saying the FO did well last summer, they definitely didn't do what I wanted and made mistakes, but you're painting things more grimly than they really are...if the FO learned from their mistakes...
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,101
And1: 14,461
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: Post-Mortem: 2021-22 New York Knicks 

Post#87 » by cgf » Tue Apr 5, 2022 4:55 pm

John Murdoch wrote:Westy for Randle/Fournier makes alot of sense for both parties. Get outta bad deals , and maybe Utah would entertain RJ/1st for Mitchell


It could make sense if Randle is making keeping him any longer untenable behind closed doors...but if he's not & the only offer is Russ without any picks attached, it makes more sense for us to hold onto him until RJ takes the reins as our #1. Plus, hopefully, Julius' value will have bounced back some by that point...especially if our FO addresses the PG spot.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!

Return to The General Board