jokeboy86 wrote:In 10 years the media is slowly going to have more top 10 lists w/o Duncan. They're trying to diminish his greatness and erase him as we speak. Any top 10 without Duncan imo is absurd.
I have Duncan at 11.
Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Domejandro, ken6199
jokeboy86 wrote:In 10 years the media is slowly going to have more top 10 lists w/o Duncan. They're trying to diminish his greatness and erase him as we speak. Any top 10 without Duncan imo is absurd.
Effigy wrote:The 'peak' list is dissapointingly boring. Looks like nobody really had imagination with it. I would put Peak Bill Walton on the list for instance. He was so freaking insane in a couple of those Portland years. And he dragged a team with no other hall of famers to the title. Something very few other people have done.
SinceGatlingWasARookie wrote:jokeboy86 wrote:In 10 years the media is slowly going to have more top 10 lists w/o Duncan. They're trying to diminish his greatness and erase him as we speak. Any top 10 without Duncan imo is absurd.
I have Duncan at 11.
JN61 wrote:CIN-C-STAR wrote:Durant over Duncan, Steph & Hakeem is a joke.
How does riding Steph's coattails to two Finals and winning one MVP = top-10 all time?
All 3 of the other guys have more titles and more MVPs
It's not even a reach to state Durant had higher peak than Duncan. Duncan isn't really considered a player who peaked high. This list shouldn't be about career achievements. But it partly clearly is. Which is sad.