Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade?

Moderators: cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid

User avatar
Chanel Bomber
RealGM
Posts: 23,902
And1: 42,015
Joined: Sep 20, 2018
 

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#81 » by Chanel Bomber » Sat Dec 31, 2022 8:18 pm

Harry Garris wrote:
Geaux_Hawks wrote:
Harry Garris wrote:
The Hawks offense has been absolutely terrible given their talent and how good they were last year. I'm not sure why so many people are assuming the Hawks will be fine and figure it out but the Wolves situation is unrecoverable. For as bad as the Gobert fit is offensively so far this season the fit with Trae Young and Dejounte Murray has arguably been even worse, but it flies under the radar.

The Hawks were the #2 offense in the NBA last year, this year they're bottom 10. And yes there are other players and injuries involved in that drop off it's not just the addition of Dejounte Murray, but it also just looks really bad when Trae and Dejounte share the court together. The offense devolves into stagnant your-turn, my-turn iso ball and Trae's having the least efficient season of his career as a result.

There is a world in which Dejounte Murray walks for nothing and Trae Young demands out. In that world this could totally end up being a worse trade than the Rudy Gobert one, especially if the Hawks end up having to give the Spurs a couple of top 5 picks.


You're forgetting Trae Young is also shooting the same shots he did last year, but missing them this year. Murray isn't impacting that. Also, shooters like Huerter and Gallo are gone; Collins is shooting horfficly; Bogi missed 20+ games; and Clint has been dealing with injuries. That #2 offense is bottom 10 because the same guys that made it so good, are either struggling themselves, or not here. Guys don't shoot 31% and 23% because a new player joined the team. These are legit wide open shots being missed btw. This isn't Murray coming in and taking shots away or anything. Trae's still got around the same usage and FGA's. All Murray did was replaced Huerter/Gallo without the shooting.

Again, our problems come from no bench, lack of shooting, missing Capela, and coaching in general. Even just having Capela back fully healthy would swing more games back into our favor. Teams just kill us on the boards most nights without him.


I haven't watched a ton of Hawks games this year so I'll have to defer to you somewhat but from an outside observer the stagnation, lack of creativity, and ball movement in the Hawks offense this year looks significantly worse than it did last year. It's like night and day. Maybe you're right and Trae Young is just going through the worst shooting slump ever and it will self correct but so far the offense looks like it's doing a terrible job generating high quality shots and everyone on the Hawks is shooting as if that's the case.

You can watch all the games you want, if you're watching them through the wrong lens (e.g. to rationalize a trade that saw 3 first-round picks including 2 unprotected go to another team) then it prevents you from making an accurate analysis of the events.

Not specifically dismissing Geaux_Hawks's take here, just making a more general point.

Like you, I've seen a few Hawks games this year, and it's obvious to me the offense looks worse. Trae - who might also be missing shots to compound to the bigger issue - looks uncomfortable within the offense, which has undoubtedly contributed to his poor percentages. He never gets to get in a flow, or to regress to the mean after a bad stretch within the game, because in this case he just defers to Murray, who then takes his turn.

The Hawks didn't add a secondary playmaker, they added a second primary option, who is now just taking turns running the offense with Trae, while neither one of them helps the other while they are off the ball.

Huerter was a much better fit than Murray. Losing him hurt them.
User avatar
Phish Tank
RealGM
Posts: 19,765
And1: 12,712
Joined: Nov 09, 2004
Location: Your Timepiece
   

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#82 » by Phish Tank » Sat Dec 31, 2022 8:49 pm

Murray's not a bad player, but he's the wrong guy for the Hawks.

What does that mean?

He's not really solving the Hawks issues. The problem you have with the Hawks backcourt is defense, right? However, by acquiring Murray, you're acquiring a player that's being tasked to guard bigger players than what he's normally used to. He's been guarding point guards for the bulk of his time in SA, where his height and length pose real problems for opposing guards. But when you have to guard guys who're more like 6'6 or so compared to 6'3 or so, there's a significant difference.

If you read some articles from people in the summer, they point out that Murray often gambles on defense & is not as strong of an on-ball and off-ball defender as advertised. Steals/game is often a cautionary statistic to use to gauge defensive competency. It proves more so true here.

Conflate all this with the fact you're also asking Murray to anchor a backcourt defense and you're kinda taking some of his strengths away.

I have yet to even get into offense, where neither he nor Trae have any off-ball aspects to their game. Therefore, you see these ugly iso ball possessions between the both of them that surely help them from a PPG perspective, but hamper the team in every other meaningful stat or outcome.
Image
payton2kemp
Starter
Posts: 2,340
And1: 4,362
Joined: Dec 15, 2014
Location: I can't tell you. I'm an investigator.
   

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#83 » by payton2kemp » Sat Dec 31, 2022 9:18 pm

They should bring Murray off the bench, like the Lakers do with Westbrook. But his ego will be shattered.
TheLand13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,289
And1: 4,534
Joined: Aug 31, 2021
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#84 » by TheLand13 » Sat Dec 31, 2022 10:59 pm

SpreeS wrote:
TheLand13 wrote:
SpreeS wrote:
What? I would take easy 4 teams BOS/PHI/BKN/MIL over CLE in PO. After hot start 8W-1L, CLE has 14W-13L record. Also won all 5 OT.

This is a bad trade and why. You don’t invest into 6-1 guard as top guy when yours second best player also is 6-1 guard and you have huge hole at SF. This is stupid.

CLE gave 5 picks with allstar in Markkanen and other 6-1 guard Sexton. Markkanen impact alone is way bigger than Mitchell this season.

This summer CLE will have a lot of money after Love/Lavert contracts expire. But free agents market for big SG or SF is very limited. The best option here Brooks, Barnes, Oubre???, Hart.


Why is getting another 6’1 guard stupid? In what ways has it hindered Cleveland? They’re the number one defensive team in the NBA so it very clearly hasn’t impacted their defense. So what was even the point in bringing that up?

You mentioned only four teams that you think are clear cut favorites over Cleveland. Fine. Ignoring the fact that only one of those teams has a winning record against Cleveland right now, how does that prove that Cleveland is “at best” a first round exit?

Yeah, they’ve been 14-13 since the great start. They’ve had lineup issues, are missing spacing and they’ve run into some teams playing incredible basketball. They’re still one of the top teams in the East as of today and have beaten multiple top teams already.

Lauri was not going to be the type of player he is more in Cleveland. His offense was going to be limited to being a floor spacing wing that would be given opportunities every now and then to score inside, just like the year prior.

I suggest not talking about the cavaliers if you don’t have a single clue about their team. All you contributed was the same brain dead take other people who don’t know any better have made.


Really? We had Utah with top defence and DPOY level player at C year by year. PO is different animal and miss matches become the most important thing. Elite wings or forwards are the most dominant players, not 6-1 guards or standart bigs.

I just want to say. Lavert/Love salaries, Sexton/Lauri and 5 picks could be used differently.


Utah wasn’t a top offensive team when they had a top ranked defense. And then when they became a top offensive team, their defense wasn’t nearly as good. And you always had a offensive liability that you could exploit in Gobert. Cleveland is still hanging around the top ten despite not having a three point shooting wing at the SF spot. That all changes when Wade returns.

Cleveland doesn’t have these same issues. Mobley and Allen are not two people you can just exploit. They’re far too skilled and dynamic at that end.

Right now Cleveland’s biggest problem is that lack of a third floor spreader. Wade solves that problem when he returns. Cleveland is weak at the SF position, but to the point where they’re limited in how far they can go.

6’1 guards aren’t the most dominant in the Postseason? Do you understand how great Mitchell has been in the playoffs? Do I need to give you the numbers?
bronxknicksfan1
Analyst
Posts: 3,507
And1: 2,313
Joined: Feb 01, 2011
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#85 » by bronxknicksfan1 » Sat Dec 31, 2022 11:32 pm

TheLand13 wrote:
SpreeS wrote:All these trades are bad ones

Gobert to MIN
Murray to ATL
Mitchell to CLE
Vucevic to CHI

16 picks were traded or will be swaped in these trades and all these teams are first rnd exit folder at best.


Please do explain how Cleveland is a first round exist team at best. I can't wait to hear this one.

SpreeS wrote:Nah, you won't win with Mitchell as top dog. Mitchell teams looked better w/o him in the last 4 years.


:lol: :lol:


Boston, Philly, Milwaukee and Brooklyn…

Which one of those teams are the Cavs knocking out?
TheLand13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,289
And1: 4,534
Joined: Aug 31, 2021
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#86 » by TheLand13 » Sat Dec 31, 2022 11:44 pm

bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
TheLand13 wrote:
SpreeS wrote:All these trades are bad ones

Gobert to MIN
Murray to ATL
Mitchell to CLE
Vucevic to CHI

16 picks were traded or will be swaped in these trades and all these teams are first rnd exit folder at best.


Please do explain how Cleveland is a first round exist team at best. I can't wait to hear this one.

SpreeS wrote:Nah, you won't win with Mitchell as top dog. Mitchell teams looked better w/o him in the last 4 years.


:lol: :lol:


Boston, Philly, Milwaukee and Brooklyn…

Which one of those teams are the Cavs knocking out?


Philly and Milwaukee are both teams Cleveland can definitely beat.

Until I can see evidence of Embiid and Harden having what it takes to be consistently excellent playoff performers, I will continue to question why everyone seems to forget that their quality of play decreasing significantly in the PO. What, so Miami last season can beat them but you're telling me Cleveland with Mitchell can't simply because they're inexperienced? I'm not buying it.

Milwaukee is a team Cleveland matches up favorably with, and that can be problematic in a seven game series. I don't see Giannis style of play benefiting him as well against a team that is probably the best equipped we've ever seen to form a wall in the paint. In that instance, Milwaukee has to rely more on their three point shooting, and that's easier said than done. Again, it needs to be stressed that for the great majority of this season, Cleveland has been the number one defensive team in the league. I don't see that changing anytime soon.

Boston and Brooklyn I have legitimate concerns about. Even though we're 2-0 against Boston this season, both games went to OT and it could have went either way. And with Brooklyn, due to the Ben Simmons problem, you know at least one of Mitchell or Garlands offensive output is going to be limited. That severely hinders what Cleveland can do at that end.

And by the way, this isn't me saying that Cleveland will for sure make it out of the first round. Saying they're a first round team at BEST implies they'll be lucky if they even make the playoffs in the first place, which (assuming they don't continue to have major health problems) is ludicrous in of itself given the amount of talent they have. And to top it off, they are absolutely capable of knocking out any of the four teams mentioned. That doesn't mean I'm confident enough in it happening to any of those teams to the point where I'm willing to put money on it, but they definitely have the talent to do so. It's not out of the question by any means.
bronxknicksfan1
Analyst
Posts: 3,507
And1: 2,313
Joined: Feb 01, 2011
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#87 » by bronxknicksfan1 » Sun Jan 1, 2023 12:10 am

TheLand13 wrote:
bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
TheLand13 wrote:
Please do explain how Cleveland is a first round exist team at best. I can't wait to hear this one.



:lol: :lol:


Boston, Philly, Milwaukee and Brooklyn…

Which one of those teams are the Cavs knocking out?


Philly and Milwaukee are both teams Cleveland can definitely beat.

Until I can see evidence of Embiid and Harden having what it takes to be consistently excellent playoff performers, I will continue to question why everyone seems to forget that their quality of play decreasing significantly in the PO. What, so Miami last season can beat them but you're telling me Cleveland with Mitchell can't simply because they're inexperienced? I'm not buying it.

Milwaukee is a team Cleveland matches up favorably with, and that can be problematic in a seven game series. I don't see Giannis style of play benefiting him as well against a team that is probably the best equipped we've ever seen to form a wall in the paint. In that instance, Milwaukee has to rely more on their three point shooting, and that's easier said than done. Again, it needs to be stressed that for the great majority of this season, Cleveland has been the number one defensive team in the league. I don't see that changing anytime soon.

Boston and Brooklyn I have legitimate concerns about. Even though we're 2-0 against Boston this season, both games went to OT and it could have went either way. And with Brooklyn, due to the Ben Simmons problem, you know at least one of Mitchell or Garlands offensive output is going to be limited. That severely hinders what Cleveland can do at that end.

And by the way, this isn't me saying that Cleveland will for sure make it out of the first round. Saying they're a first round team at BEST implies they'll be lucky if they even make the playoffs in the first place, which (assuming they don't continue to have major health problems) is ludicrous in of itself given the amount of talent they have. And to top it off, they are absolutely capable of knocking out any of the four teams mentioned. That doesn't mean I'm confident enough in it happening to any of those teams to the point where I'm willing to put money on it, but they definitely have the talent to do so. It's not out of the question by any means.


As we’ve seen for years now, Miami turns it up a notch when it comes to the playoffs. All we’ve seen from this group in Cleveland is a play-in matchup against the Nets and that didn’t end well. So, I have a hard time comparing what Miami has done to teams to a Cleveland team that hasn’t gotten to that stage yet. I’d be more willing to bet that Philly w/ Embiid, Harden and Maxey can take down Cleveland in 5 or 6.

And I wouldn’t say that they have much of a chance of beating a Giannis led Bucks team either if they’re matched up. Boston had the best defense in the league last year and Giannis tore them apart. Not too long ago, he gave the Cavs 45 with both Allen and Mobley playing heavy minutes. Don’t think he’ll be slowed down by any team and have to hope that Middleton doesn’t come back 100% to get past them.

Personally, I don’t see them getting past the first round this year and that Donovan Mitchell doesn’t bring a team to the next level, but we’ll see how it looks in this playoffs.
TheLand13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,289
And1: 4,534
Joined: Aug 31, 2021
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#88 » by TheLand13 » Sun Jan 1, 2023 12:19 am

bronxknicksfan1 wrote:As we’ve seen for years now, Miami turns it up a notch when it comes to the playoffs. All we’ve seen from this group in Cleveland is a play-in matchup against the Nets and that didn’t end well. So, I have a hard time comparing what Miami has done to teams to a Cleveland team that hasn’t gotten to that stage yet. I’d be more willing to bet that Philly w/ Embiid, Harden and Maxey can take down Cleveland in 5 or 6.

And I wouldn’t say that they have much of a chance of beating a Giannis led Bucks team either if they’re matched up. Boston had the best defense in the league last year and Giannis tore them apart. Not too long ago, he gave the Cavs 45 with both Allen and Mobley playing heavy minutes. Don’t think he’ll be slowed down by any team and have to hope that Middleton doesn’t come back 100% to get past them.

Personally, I don’t see them getting past the first round this year and that Donovan Mitchell doesn’t bring a team to the next level, but we’ll see how it looks in this playoffs.


You're confident Philly will take out Cleveland in 5/6 games.

Yeah, not worth wasting my time on you.
bronxknicksfan1
Analyst
Posts: 3,507
And1: 2,313
Joined: Feb 01, 2011
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#89 » by bronxknicksfan1 » Sun Jan 1, 2023 1:25 am

TheLand13 wrote:
bronxknicksfan1 wrote:As we’ve seen for years now, Miami turns it up a notch when it comes to the playoffs. All we’ve seen from this group in Cleveland is a play-in matchup against the Nets and that didn’t end well. So, I have a hard time comparing what Miami has done to teams to a Cleveland team that hasn’t gotten to that stage yet. I’d be more willing to bet that Philly w/ Embiid, Harden and Maxey can take down Cleveland in 5 or 6.

And I wouldn’t say that they have much of a chance of beating a Giannis led Bucks team either if they’re matched up. Boston had the best defense in the league last year and Giannis tore them apart. Not too long ago, he gave the Cavs 45 with both Allen and Mobley playing heavy minutes. Don’t think he’ll be slowed down by any team and have to hope that Middleton doesn’t come back 100% to get past them.

Personally, I don’t see them getting past the first round this year and that Donovan Mitchell doesn’t bring a team to the next level, but we’ll see how it looks in this playoffs.


You're confident Philly will take out Cleveland in 5/6 games.

Yeah, not worth wasting my time on you.


Oh no! How dare I think the better team is better? :lol:
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,908
And1: 9,724
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#90 » by bstein14 » Sun Jan 1, 2023 1:32 am

Murray is a really solid player, he's just not a great value as a MAX player. He's going to get a MAX deal. That's like 4 years $90+ million from another team that Atlanta will have no choice but to match or beat with a 5 year deal.

$42 mil
$46 mil
$50 mil
$54 mil
Total 4 years $192 million is the likely max deal that a different team will be able to offer Murray.
JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 15,144
And1: 9,357
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#91 » by JujitsuFlip » Sun Jan 1, 2023 1:34 am

TheLand13 wrote:
bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
TheLand13 wrote:
Please do explain how Cleveland is a first round exist team at best. I can't wait to hear this one.





Boston, Philly, Milwaukee and Brooklyn…

Which one of those teams are the Cavs knocking out?


Philly and Milwaukee are both teams Cleveland can definitely beat.

Until I can see evidence of Embiid and Harden having what it takes to be consistently excellent playoff performers, I will continue to question why everyone seems to forget that their quality of play decreasing significantly in the PO. What, so Miami last season can beat them but you're telling me Cleveland with Mitchell can't simply because they're inexperienced? I'm not buying it.

Milwaukee is a team Cleveland matches up favorably with, and that can be problematic in a seven game series. I don't see Giannis style of play benefiting him as well against a team that is probably the best equipped we've ever seen to form a wall in the paint. In that instance, Milwaukee has to rely more on their three point shooting, and that's easier said than done. Again, it needs to be stressed that for the great majority of this season, Cleveland has been the number one defensive team in the league. I don't see that changing anytime soon.

Boston and Brooklyn I have legitimate concerns about. Even though we're 2-0 against Boston this season, both games went to OT and it could have went either way. And with Brooklyn, due to the Ben Simmons problem, you know at least one of Mitchell or Garlands offensive output is going to be limited. That severely hinders what Cleveland can do at that end.

And by the way, this isn't me saying that Cleveland will for sure make it out of the first round. Saying they're a first round team at BEST implies they'll be lucky if they even make the playoffs in the first place, which (assuming they don't continue to have major health problems) is ludicrous in of itself given the amount of talent they have. And to top it off, they are absolutely capable of knocking out any of the four teams mentioned. That doesn't mean I'm confident enough in it happening to any of those teams to the point where I'm willing to put money on it, but they definitely have the talent to do so. It's not out of the question by any means.
I just want to chime in and say the Cavs do not match up well with a a healthy Bucks team.
leo7
Junior
Posts: 277
And1: 198
Joined: Aug 29, 2017

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#92 » by leo7 » Sun Jan 1, 2023 1:40 am

I didn't like this trade at all. Hawks really needed to upgrade the PF position first. I wish they could've traded for Markkanen or Porzingis.
bstein14
RealGM
Posts: 32,908
And1: 9,724
Joined: Jun 22, 2001

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#93 » by bstein14 » Sun Jan 1, 2023 1:42 am

leo7 wrote:I didn't like this trade at all. Hawks really needed to upgrade the PF position first. I wish they could've traded for Markkanen or Porzingis.


Look at how little Portland had to give up for Jerami Grant... Grant has been killing it for Portland.
leo7
Junior
Posts: 277
And1: 198
Joined: Aug 29, 2017

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#94 » by leo7 » Sun Jan 1, 2023 1:45 am

bstein14 wrote:
leo7 wrote:I didn't like this trade at all. Hawks really needed to upgrade the PF position first. I wish they could've traded for Markkanen or Porzingis.


Look at how little Portland had to give up for Jerami Grant... Grant has been killing it for Portland.


Yeah and the Hawks had so many opportunities to trade for Grant. He would've been a perfect fit.
TheLand13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,289
And1: 4,534
Joined: Aug 31, 2021
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#95 » by TheLand13 » Sun Jan 1, 2023 2:03 am

bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
TheLand13 wrote:
bronxknicksfan1 wrote:As we’ve seen for years now, Miami turns it up a notch when it comes to the playoffs. All we’ve seen from this group in Cleveland is a play-in matchup against the Nets and that didn’t end well. So, I have a hard time comparing what Miami has done to teams to a Cleveland team that hasn’t gotten to that stage yet. I’d be more willing to bet that Philly w/ Embiid, Harden and Maxey can take down Cleveland in 5 or 6.

And I wouldn’t say that they have much of a chance of beating a Giannis led Bucks team either if they’re matched up. Boston had the best defense in the league last year and Giannis tore them apart. Not too long ago, he gave the Cavs 45 with both Allen and Mobley playing heavy minutes. Don’t think he’ll be slowed down by any team and have to hope that Middleton doesn’t come back 100% to get past them.

Personally, I don’t see them getting past the first round this year and that Donovan Mitchell doesn’t bring a team to the next level, but we’ll see how it looks in this playoffs.


You're confident Philly will take out Cleveland in 5/6 games.

Yeah, not worth wasting my time on you.


Oh no! How dare I think the better team is better? :lol:


And what makes you think they’re the better team right now?
brutalitops
Head Coach
Posts: 6,393
And1: 8,176
Joined: Feb 20, 2014
Location: Perth, Australia
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#96 » by brutalitops » Sun Jan 1, 2023 3:35 am

therealozzykhan wrote:They should bring Murray off the bench, like the Lakers do with Westbrook. But his ego will be shattered.

No, this is a pretty gross suggestion, Murray is probably their best perimeter defender and grossly, one of the guys you want with Young to space the floor because while he's an average to Ok 3p shooter. The rest of the team including Trae currently can't shoot

Makes no sense bringing him off the bench.
فلسطين يجب أن تكون
User avatar
FAH1223
RealGM
Posts: 16,319
And1: 7,427
Joined: Nov 01, 2005
Location: Laurel, MD
       

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#97 » by FAH1223 » Sun Jan 1, 2023 4:01 am

Bornstellar wrote:In the spirt of the Gobert thread, I'd thought it would be interesting to look at the other trade that happened over the summer that nabbed a middling all-star for a lot of picks

Spurs traded Murray to the Hawks for 2 unprotected 1sts in 2025 and 2027, another protected 1st via Charlotte, and unprotected swap rights in 2026

Hawks record after 35 games:

Last season: 16-19
This season: 15-18

Spurs record after 35 games

Last season: 14-21
This season: 12-23


Dejounte Murray this season: 20/6/5/1.7 .528 TS%
Dejounte Murray last season: 21/9/8/2 .533 TS%


Doesn't seem like losing Murray has impacted SA much nor has it boosted ATL much and his numbers are down a bit across the board. With the talk of Trae possibly wanting out, how bad is this trade looking now? Especially considering Murray has no intention of signing an extension and could leave for nothing in a couple of years


Its funny, the Spurs are legit the worst team in the league by the numbers this year.

But in 2021-22, they had the 17th best net rating and had the makings of a 41-41 team.
Image
Roddy B for 3
Analyst
Posts: 3,544
And1: 1,042
Joined: Jan 13, 2012
       

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#98 » by Roddy B for 3 » Sun Jan 1, 2023 5:35 am

If they retain Dejounte and he lives up to his next contract it's an incredible trade. Those draft picks should be middle round picks and 4 middle round picks are very unlikely to produce more value than Dejounte and 3 FA's or UDFAs.

Over the next 4 years Atlanta needs to hit on 1 second or UDFA and that player + Murray should >>> Those middle round picks.
7/1/2019
(I broke a mirror on 7-1-2012)
User avatar
HMFFL
Global Mod
Global Mod
Posts: 54,509
And1: 10,624
Joined: Mar 10, 2004

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#99 » by HMFFL » Sun Jan 1, 2023 6:03 am

LBJKB24MJ23 wrote:not surprised by the Hawks record. Its not Murray's fault tbh.

its always been Trae's lack of defense. and this year, he's also in a shooting slump. if he ever gets around to the rumours of him wanting to be the next star to demand a trade being true ... because his team is sucking - he should take a look in the mirror.

Murray was a good move. Trae needs to be a lot better overall.
Sadly, many Atlanta fans don't agree, and they have no problem with how Trae is playing. They seem to believe everybody else on the team is the problem. I don't believe Trae is able to hold himself accountable yet.

Sent from my SM-N975U using RealGM mobile app
TheLand13
Assistant Coach
Posts: 4,289
And1: 4,534
Joined: Aug 31, 2021
     

Re: Gobert Trade Was Bad, But What About the Dejounte Murray Trade? 

Post#100 » by TheLand13 » Sun Jan 1, 2023 7:27 am

JujitsuFlip wrote:
TheLand13 wrote:
bronxknicksfan1 wrote:
Boston, Philly, Milwaukee and Brooklyn…

Which one of those teams are the Cavs knocking out?


Philly and Milwaukee are both teams Cleveland can definitely beat.

Until I can see evidence of Embiid and Harden having what it takes to be consistently excellent playoff performers, I will continue to question why everyone seems to forget that their quality of play decreasing significantly in the PO. What, so Miami last season can beat them but you're telling me Cleveland with Mitchell can't simply because they're inexperienced? I'm not buying it.

Milwaukee is a team Cleveland matches up favorably with, and that can be problematic in a seven game series. I don't see Giannis style of play benefiting him as well against a team that is probably the best equipped we've ever seen to form a wall in the paint. In that instance, Milwaukee has to rely more on their three point shooting, and that's easier said than done. Again, it needs to be stressed that for the great majority of this season, Cleveland has been the number one defensive team in the league. I don't see that changing anytime soon.

Boston and Brooklyn I have legitimate concerns about. Even though we're 2-0 against Boston this season, both games went to OT and it could have went either way. And with Brooklyn, due to the Ben Simmons problem, you know at least one of Mitchell or Garlands offensive output is going to be limited. That severely hinders what Cleveland can do at that end.

And by the way, this isn't me saying that Cleveland will for sure make it out of the first round. Saying they're a first round team at BEST implies they'll be lucky if they even make the playoffs in the first place, which (assuming they don't continue to have major health problems) is ludicrous in of itself given the amount of talent they have. And to top it off, they are absolutely capable of knocking out any of the four teams mentioned. That doesn't mean I'm confident enough in it happening to any of those teams to the point where I'm willing to put money on it, but they definitely have the talent to do so. It's not out of the question by any means.
I just want to chime in and say the Cavs do not match up well with a a healthy Bucks team.


Yeah, they kind of do.

Cleveland is one of the only teams with the combination of elite perimeter and interior defense that can stifle Milwaukee's offense. Even if Giannis can consistently contribute at a high level, the rest of the team can't. That style of play Giannis likes to deploy doesn't work nearly as much in the post season, and Cleveland has the defense capable of severely limiting him. Someone brought up Boston (and again, I can't stress how much this comparison made me laugh), but that team simply lacks the length and versatility that Cleveland has at its disposal.

The only real advantage that Milwaukee legitimately have is Brook Lopez. Because of his ability to knock down shots from the outside, Cleveland has to use one of their bigs to go out and meet him. But if he's contained and not able to consistently hit his shots, that's a serious problem for the Bucks.

Last season, everything I just described above occurred in the matchups between the two teams. And it was on display in Cleveland's most recent win against them. I know Middleton will at some point be back and I am assuming (and hoping) that he will be able to have a healthy season from that point on. But Cleveland has a variety of very (and I mean VERY) capable one on one defenders that they can throw at him in Stevens, LeVert (you can laugh all you want but he's actually been really great defensively this season) and Okoro. Milwaukee just doesn't have the same amount of defenders to throw back at our most lethal offensive weapons apart from Holiday.

Talking about Cleveland has derailed this thread, so I'm going to leave it at that.

Return to The General Board