DonaldSanders wrote:dc wrote:As I mentioned above, Klay's defense in his prime on opposing PGs was a key part of their scheme. But with his age, mileage and injuries, it's obviously no longer an option and they don't have the luxury of that go to strategy anymore.
Poole and Kuminga can definitely get better, but I don't know if it's enough to make a difference in their defense.
Yeah Klay's defense has been a noted issue. Last playoffs we were actually better with him off the court (on/off -11.7), hard to say that but it's true -- we needed GPII's defense more than Klay's offense.
What's weird is that our defense at home has actually been great, really highly rated. I can't quite put together why this is vs. away.DoctorX wrote:I felt during their first title run they were likable outside of Draymond but after they won the first title they morphed into a bunch of douchebags. It went to their heads, and they also took on Draymond's persona.
Just like the Spurs loved Bruce Bowen's dirty plays and took on his persona. Kicking people in the face, intentionally injuring people, you know you loved it Doc!
https://youtu.be/FAMnMFTeCdg?t=204
I have always said what Bruce did was dirty it's a pathetic card Warriors fans like you hold on to desperately whenever I criticize Draymond. However, I don't recall Duncan, Parker, Manu and the rest of the team trying to be like Bowen and imitate his personality much like the Warriors have with Draymond. I don't recall any of those guys acting like douchebags, showboating, and taunting others as your Warrior do regularly. I can't imagine Duncan acting like Klay or Curry after scoring a bucket lol. Duncan Spurs were a humble group overall while the Warriors title teams are a complete 180 of them personality wise.









































