cupcakesnake wrote:Tacoma wrote:tsherkin wrote:He will get in, which is sad to me in the sense of it being more a longevity award than a quality award. Dude was a massive playoff choker and took forever to become more than empty stats. Nice guy, hard worker but a slow learner on the court.
I tend to wish we had an NBA HoF that had more stringent criteria so we could celebrate greatness. If you acknowledge that the HoF is more of a career achievement award, then it's pretty clear that Demar should get in based on counting stats.
From a Toronto perspective, I think it's sad that you're sad. He was a strong advocate of the city and the Raptors and didn't want to leave. I don't think he's a slow learner, rather he is limited by his talent level and everything he gained was due to his very high work ethic, which if it weren't for hard work, he would not be sniffing 26,000 career points.
As for his choking in the playoffs, while that may be true, so did his friend Lowry who is considered one of the GOAT Raptors player. Lowry's reputation improved drastically after winning the Championship, which has much to do with playing with Kawhi. My 2 cents is if Lowry goes into the HOF, then so should DeRozan.
Don't call someone "sad" because they have a different opinion about a basketball player than you do.
I don't get the hard work low talent narrative. Not that I doubt Demar is a crazy hard worker, but we're talking about someone with a really high athleticism level. While he's not an all-time great athlete, he's in that next tier of extremely good athlete. Probably in the 99.99th percentile of basketball athletes. While he mastered an interesting skill set over time, his strange failure to extend his shooting range is pretty strange considering how many middling NBA players have successfully added 3s to their arsenal.
To your other point: while Lowry and Demar share the reputation of being playoff chokers, any closer scrutiny reveals it's true for Demar and false for Lowry. A lot of Lowry's choker reputation comes from 2 playoff series. 2015 when they got swept by Washington (Lowry had an elbow injury and probably shouldn't have played) and 2016 against Indiana (Raps won in 7 against a vastly inferior Pacers team). Lowry has had a few other series where he didn't shoot the ball well, but even when Lowry struggled to score, he's a super versatile player who can chip in with defense, playmaking, and hustle. Overall Lowry's playoff resume is fine with a couple of ugly duds. Lowry's massive on/off numbers hold up in the playoffs just fine (He's +9.5 for his career and was +25 in 2016). Demar on the other hand...it's kind of the opposite. It's hard to find a Demar Derozan playoff series where he wasn't dramatically bad. He's a pure scorer who never scored well in the playoffs. He's -11 in on/off for his playoff career and some years it was much worse. Basically Demar struggles to consistently score against bigger defenders in the playoffs, and every playoff opponent has found a way to turn Demar into a low-efficiency chucker.
I agree with your points on Lowry actually being a very effective playoff player. Lowry actually played very well against Brooklyn in 2014, Miami in 2016, Cleveland in 2016, Cleveland in 2016, in 2018 and the 2019 playoffs (particularly against the Bucks and Warriors). In 2020 he was awesome in that Celtics series that went 7 games. And as you pointed out, regardless of his shooting, Lowry is a positive impact whenever he's on the floor similar to a CP3.
However, I don't agree with you that Derozan is as elite of an athlete as you think. While he's a very good athlete, has very good hops/explosiveness, and very good balance, he was always a bit slow footed and never had the lateral quickness/agility/burst that other similar type of players like Jordan, Kobe, Wade etc. had to really get himself to the next level. As you pointed out, bigger longer defenders give Derozan issues and I think it's his lack of quickness and slow lateral movement that hurts him because he can't just blow by these guys like Jordan, Kobe or Wade. This is also why Derozan isn't a very good defender, he just doesn't have the lateral speed to really assert himself on that end.
I do agree with the other poster that Derozan has an insane work-ethic and has made significant improvements throughout his career and has maximized his potential. He's managed to improve most facets of his game and in recent years he's become extremely efficient and an above average facilitator, which is not the guy he was on Toronto.
As far as his 3 point shooting, definitely an issue, but guys like Wade and Butler were pretty similar excellent mid-range guys who could never be consistently good from the outside.