Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team?

Moderators: bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285, Domejandro, ken6199

Iwasawitness
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,838
And1: 6,965
Joined: Sep 05, 2023
     

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#81 » by Iwasawitness » Wed Jun 11, 2025 11:08 am

The4thHorseman wrote:
Liam_Gallagher wrote:I'm gonna say no. Rodman was in his mid-30s and past his prime when he joined Chicago. And dude was a shell of his former self in 1998.

He still won the rebounding title that year, his 7th consecutive. Either he wasn't a shell of his former self or it just shows how bad the league really was at the time.


He also still made first team all defense and even managed to get FMVP votes.
ImmortalD24 wrote:Swap 2008 Mo Williams with Garland this post season and Cavs would be up right now on the verge of sweeping the Pacers.
bledredwine
RealGM
Posts: 14,425
And1: 5,616
Joined: Sep 17, 2010
   

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#82 » by bledredwine » Wed Jun 11, 2025 11:16 am

LePeekaboo wrote:No.

I believe super teams must have 3+ All Stars or All NBA players. Jordan only had Pippen (and Rodman for a bit).


Bingo.

Calling them superteams is a coverup coming straight from lebron fans, plain and simple.
LeBron has a 17.8% field goal percentage and a 12.5% 3-point percentage in clutch situations, and also made 20 of 116 game winning/tying shots in 4th/OT during his career :wink:
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,332
And1: 3,934
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#83 » by DimesandKnicks » Wed Jun 11, 2025 11:17 am

LakerLegend wrote:I don’t think I consider the first 3 peat Bulls a super team, but the second definitely. That’s not to say Jordan didn’t have a talent advantage in the first 3 peat. What if Ewing had Drexler or Dominique instead of Starks in 92 and 93? Jordan probably has two less titles.


The first three peat team without Jordan took the eventual conference champs to seven games without Jordan. They also technically had three all-stars that year. That was definitely a super team
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,332
And1: 3,934
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#84 » by DimesandKnicks » Wed Jun 11, 2025 11:25 am

Chuck Everett wrote:Freaking HOF Kukoc came off the bench. That team was something else.


And Ron Harper a year after being a first option scoring 20 ppg with the Clippers
Wingy
RealGM
Posts: 15,871
And1: 6,713
Joined: Feb 15, 2007

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#85 » by Wingy » Wed Jun 11, 2025 11:27 am

This is all retrofitting the Wade/Lebron/Bosh Heatles “super team” term on to the past in order to uplift and soften the shortcomings of a certain ghost chaser who still couldn’t catch the ghost.

No one regularly called the past teams, not just the Bulls, a super team during their actual active reign.

The Heat’s player empowerment move was what made the term ubiquitous and part of the common basketball fan vernacular.
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,332
And1: 3,934
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#86 » by DimesandKnicks » Wed Jun 11, 2025 11:37 am

sashaturiaf wrote:No. They're not even close to Lebrons superteams in terms of superteamness. MJ simply isn't a good enough a GM to create a superteam, just look at his work with the Hornets.

However. MJ was just that good on court that he overcame his crap GMing by still delivering superteam results.


MJ overcame his crap gming :lol:. They drafted Jordan Pippen and pulled Kukoc at a time when euro's weren't really a thing. C'mon man. He's a HOF GM
Wingy
RealGM
Posts: 15,871
And1: 6,713
Joined: Feb 15, 2007

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#87 » by Wingy » Wed Jun 11, 2025 11:48 am

DimesandKnicks wrote:
Chuck Everett wrote:Freaking HOF Kukoc came off the bench. That team was something else.


And Ron Harper a year after being a first option scoring 20 ppg with the Clippers


Ron shot under 43% from the field, had a .496 TS% and played 38mpg to get those 20 points on a 27 win team. :lol:
User avatar
NoStatsGuy
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,911
And1: 2,145
Joined: Feb 14, 2010
Location: Germany
 

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#88 » by NoStatsGuy » Wed Jun 11, 2025 11:59 am

Not in the sense we understand it.

for me a superteam is assembling a team of well established (super)stars. like Miami, Boston, GSW+KD, etc.

Outside of MJ and Pippen i dont see how any of those Bulls teams were THAT topheavy. Yea, Rodman and Kukoc were solid teammates. Grant was solid, but was he Chris Bosh level?.

They were very good teams but talentwise i dont think they are close to any of the three prime examples for a super team from the modern era (heatles, KG+Allen Celtics, KD Warriors). The Bulls were comparable to the Pau-Lakers imo
im bout dat action boss
MavsDirk41
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,311
And1: 4,117
Joined: Dec 07, 2022
     

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#89 » by MavsDirk41 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 12:13 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
LakerLegend wrote:I don’t think I consider the first 3 peat Bulls a super team, but the second definitely. That’s not to say Jordan didn’t have a talent advantage in the first 3 peat. What if Ewing had Drexler or Dominique instead of Starks in 92 and 93? Jordan probably has two less titles.


The first three peat team without Jordan took the eventual conference champs to seven games without Jordan. They also technically had three all-stars that year. That was definitely a super team


Who was the 3rd all star? Technically an all star lol? Either you are or your not lol
Ice Man
Forum Mod - Bulls
Forum Mod - Bulls
Posts: 26,748
And1: 15,771
Joined: Apr 19, 2011

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#90 » by Ice Man » Wed Jun 11, 2025 12:13 pm

Wingy wrote:This is all retrofitting the Wade/Lebron/Bosh Heatles “super team” term on to the past in order to uplift and soften the shortcomings of a certain ghost chaser who still couldn’t catch the ghost.

No one regularly called the past teams, not just the Bulls, a super team during their actual active reign.

The Heat’s player empowerment move was what made the term ubiquitous and part of the common basketball fan vernacular.


Exactly. The term "super team" was invented for the 2011 Miami Heat, to describe a superstar team that was artificially constructed, by signing superstar FAs and/or acquiring them because they demanded a trade. That term could accurately be retrofitted for the Kobe/Shaq Lakers, but it doesn't apply to any team before then (except maybe the late Nineties Rockets, but they sucked). The Magic/Kareem or Bird/McHale/Parish squads weren't super teams; they were teams that were assembled naturally, without major FA signings or trade requests. Ditto for the Bulls.

Now, if somebody wants to invent another term besides "super team" to describe a great team that was put together organically, be my guest. The '96 through '98 Bulls would then qualify. (Not the '91 through '93 Bulls, though.)( But a super team they were not.
MavsDirk41
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,311
And1: 4,117
Joined: Dec 07, 2022
     

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#91 » by MavsDirk41 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 12:15 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
Chuck Everett wrote:Freaking HOF Kukoc came off the bench. That team was something else.


And Ron Harper a year after being a first option scoring 20 ppg with the Clippers



Season before the Bulls Ron Harper averaged 20 points per game on 18 field goal attempts per game on 42/30/71 shooting splits with a 49%TS and averaged over 3 turnovers per game. So that dude makes a team a superteam?
Ugly0598
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,792
And1: 3,188
Joined: Mar 21, 2011
     

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#92 » by Ugly0598 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 12:35 pm

Not really a superteam, no.
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,332
And1: 3,934
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#93 » by DimesandKnicks » Wed Jun 11, 2025 1:03 pm

Wingy wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
Chuck Everett wrote:Freaking HOF Kukoc came off the bench. That team was something else.


And Ron Harper a year after being a first option scoring 20 ppg with the Clippers


Ron shot under 43% from the field, had a .496 TS% and played 38mpg to get those 20 points on a 27 win team. :lol:


Sir; he was the Bulls seventh leading scorer and third best perimeter defender
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,332
And1: 3,934
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#94 » by DimesandKnicks » Wed Jun 11, 2025 1:04 pm

MavsDirk41 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
LakerLegend wrote:I don’t think I consider the first 3 peat Bulls a super team, but the second definitely. That’s not to say Jordan didn’t have a talent advantage in the first 3 peat. What if Ewing had Drexler or Dominique instead of Starks in 92 and 93? Jordan probably has two less titles.


The first three peat team without Jordan took the eventual conference champs to seven games without Jordan. They also technically had three all-stars that year. That was definitely a super team


Who was the 3rd all star? Technically an all star lol? Either you are or your not lol


BJ Armstrong
DimesandKnicks
Head Coach
Posts: 6,332
And1: 3,934
Joined: Jun 11, 2009

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#95 » by DimesandKnicks » Wed Jun 11, 2025 1:10 pm

MavsDirk41 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
Chuck Everett wrote:Freaking HOF Kukoc came off the bench. That team was something else.


And Ron Harper a year after being a first option scoring 20 ppg with the Clippers



Season before the Bulls Ron Harper averaged 20 points per game on 18 field goal attempts per game on 42/30/71 shooting splits with a 49%TS and averaged over 3 turnovers per game. So that dude makes a team a superteam?


Same response to the other poster:

Sir; he was the Bulls seventh leading scorer and their third best perimeter defender.

Idk what you guys get from undermining that Bulls organization, outside of it makes Lebron vs Jordan arguments more fragile.
MavsDirk41
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,311
And1: 4,117
Joined: Dec 07, 2022
     

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#96 » by MavsDirk41 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 1:18 pm

:lol:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
MavsDirk41 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
The first three peat team without Jordan took the eventual conference champs to seven games without Jordan. They also technically had three all-stars that year. That was definitely a super team


Who was the 3rd all star? Technically an all star lol? Either you are or your not lol


BJ Armstrong



What????? So BJ Armstrong made the Bulls a superteam? Are you old enough to have watched those Bulls teams?
User avatar
JoseRizal
General Manager
Posts: 7,949
And1: 2,257
Joined: Oct 21, 2010
 

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#97 » by JoseRizal » Wed Jun 11, 2025 1:20 pm

No, they're not.

They were well-managed and well-coached. The chemistry is off the charts.

The first 3-peat was built organically, and the next, while adding a troubled, unconventional Rodman to replace Grant, is still primarily composed of drafted players and some smart offseason signings.

With how competitive Jordan was, I don't think he's the type who would team-up with his rival superstars to form his own version of super friends.
MavsDirk41
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,311
And1: 4,117
Joined: Dec 07, 2022
     

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#98 » by MavsDirk41 » Wed Jun 11, 2025 1:23 pm

DimesandKnicks wrote:
MavsDirk41 wrote:
DimesandKnicks wrote:
And Ron Harper a year after being a first option scoring 20 ppg with the Clippers



Season before the Bulls Ron Harper averaged 20 points per game on 18 field goal attempts per game on 42/30/71 shooting splits with a 49%TS and averaged over 3 turnovers per game. So that dude makes a team a superteam?


Same response to the other poster:

Sir; he was the Bulls seventh leading scorer and their third best perimeter defender.

Idk what you guys get from undermining that Bulls organization, outside of it makes Lebron vs Jordan arguments more fragile.



Ron Harper was still a very good defender at that point in his career but that is all he brought to the table. With him, Jordan, Pippen, and Rodman they could switch and cover ground. Defensive nightmare. But he was a poor 3 point shooter, wasnt a good passer and he was their 4th or 5th option offensively. Trying to say the Bulls were a superteam because of Ron Harper is embarrassing. Im not undermining the Bulls im speaking facts. The entire premises of this thread is “Well James had superteams but so did Jordan” from guys like you.
jkvonny
Head Coach
Posts: 7,193
And1: 7,052
Joined: Jun 04, 2021
       

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#99 » by jkvonny » Wed Jun 11, 2025 1:32 pm

Somebody said BJ Armstrong :lol:
User avatar
durden_tyler
RealGM
Posts: 21,283
And1: 10,549
Joined: Jun 04, 2003
Location: 537 Paper Street, Bradford
   

Re: Do you consider Jordans Bulls a Super Team? 

Post#100 » by durden_tyler » Wed Jun 11, 2025 1:35 pm

Ice Man wrote:
Wingy wrote:This is all retrofitting the Wade/Lebron/Bosh Heatles “super team” term on to the past in order to uplift and soften the shortcomings of a certain ghost chaser who still couldn’t catch the ghost.

No one regularly called the past teams, not just the Bulls, a super team during their actual active reign.

The Heat’s player empowerment move was what made the term ubiquitous and part of the common basketball fan vernacular.


Exactly. The term "super team" was invented for the 2011 Miami Heat, to describe a superstar team that was artificially constructed, by signing superstar FAs and/or acquiring them because they demanded a trade. That term could accurately be retrofitted for the Kobe/Shaq Lakers, but it doesn't apply to any team before then (except maybe the late Nineties Rockets, but they sucked). The Magic/Kareem or Bird/McHale/Parish squads weren't super teams; they were teams that were assembled naturally, without major FA signings or trade requests. Ditto for the Bulls.

Now, if somebody wants to invent another term besides "super team" to describe a great team that was put together organically, be my guest. The '96 through '98 Bulls would then qualify. (Not the '91 through '93 Bulls, though.)( But a super team they were not.

LeBron’s legacy has to be protected at all costs. Unfortunately for him, NBA historians has the receipts— mainly written in Miami Heat blood red and co-signed by best buds and superstars Chris Bosh and Dwyane Wade.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
If there is no basketball in heaven, i am not going.

Return to The General Board