Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony

Moderators: KingDavid, cupcakesnake, Domejandro, ken6199, infinite11285, Clav, Dirk, bwgood77, bisme37, zimpy27

Blackmun
Banned User
Posts: 1,368
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 23, 2010
Location: New York, NY

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#841 » by Blackmun » Tue Jan 11, 2011 2:47 pm

Jmonty580 wrote:Denver is going to try and make it look like the Knicks are the best trading partner. They dont want to look like they are getting screwed over. Why else make a threat? If they chose the Knicks over the Nets, its because they think the Knicks have a better package (Well at least thats what they would sell to the media and their fans).


It seems like you guys all forget that Melo has the power of "NO!"

If "they" choose the Knicks over the Nets, it is because Melo forces them to. Everyone, including Donnie Walsh and every single Knicks fan knows that the package Nets are trying to put together blows any offer the Knicks can make out of the water. And Denver knows this too.

Trust me, if Melo ends up in New York, that is simply because he says that is his only option, not because the Nuggets would rather have what the Knicks are offering.

ClarenceDerozan wrote:Or they could threaten to not trade him at all, not take on your garbage, and make him realize how much money he will actually lose, forcing him to go to the Nets. Sorry, you don't win here.


Well, he wouldn't actually lose all that much money by waiting until FA. Mind you, we don't know how the new CBA is going to end up, but with people seeing through David Stern's bull, I wouldn't expect it to be horribly much better.

But you gotta keep in mind, when media keeps talking about how someone will "make $20million less!!!!111oneone!" they are actually calculating the "extra" year in an extension and comparing it to a $0 year if he doesn't extend. The idea that a player will not get a new extension at a later point and make up that money seems to not occur to anyone.
User avatar
Jmonty580
General Manager
Posts: 8,749
And1: 407
Joined: Jun 08, 2004

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#842 » by Jmonty580 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:05 pm

Blackmun wrote:
Jmonty580 wrote:Denver is going to try and make it look like the Knicks are the best trading partner. They dont want to look like they are getting screwed over. Why else make a threat? If they chose the Knicks over the Nets, its because they think the Knicks have a better package (Well at least thats what they would sell to the media and their fans).


It seems like you guys all forget that Melo has the power of "NO!"

If "they" choose the Knicks over the Nets, it is because Melo forces them to. Everyone, including Donnie Walsh and every single Knicks fan knows that the package Nets are trying to put together blows any offer the Knicks can make out of the water. And Denver knows this too.

Trust me, if Melo ends up in New York, that is simply because he says that is his only option, not because the Nuggets would rather have what the Knicks are offering.

ClarenceDerozan wrote:Or they could threaten to not trade him at all, not take on your garbage, and make him realize how much money he will actually lose, forcing him to go to the Nets. Sorry, you don't win here.


Well, he wouldn't actually lose all that much money by waiting until FA. Mind you, we don't know how the new CBA is going to end up, but with people seeing through David Stern's bull, I wouldn't expect it to be horribly much better.

But you gotta keep in mind, when media keeps talking about how someone will "make $20million less!!!!111oneone!" they are actually calculating the "extra" year in an extension and comparing it to a $0 year if he doesn't extend. The idea that a player will not get a new extension at a later point and make up that money seems to not occur to anyone.



Exactly, i'm agreeing with you. But they dont want to make it look like they were forced into anything. If they are forced into a Knick trade because Melo doesnt want to play anywhere else, then expect them to spin the story to make it look like they actually perfer the knicks package to the nets because of x, y, z.... It sounds stupid because I'm a Knicks fan and I can say that the nets package is better, but at the end of the day its about where melo wants to play. i'm on the same page as you, i understand Melo has all of the power.
Blackmun
Banned User
Posts: 1,368
And1: 0
Joined: Aug 23, 2010
Location: New York, NY

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#843 » by Blackmun » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:09 pm

Oh for sure, if Melo actually did tell them the Knicks is his only destination (not saying that he is, but something is definitely going on here since this deal never gets made) the worst case scenario would be that coming out. They would have almost no leverage at all.

That being said, let's just wait and see. I was watching NBA TV last night, and this fat dude from New Jersey (NBA.com writer) sitting in his bedroom talked about how "the deal is taking a long time because it is so complicated". The deal is so un-complicated that even 15 year old RealGM posters managed to figure out how to do it in 10 minutes using ESPN's trade checker. Trying to say this is taking a lot of time because it's difficult to figure out salaries is f'ing (Please Use More Appropriate Word), unless NBA teams have never heard of Microsoft Excel.
User avatar
Calvin Klein
RealGM
Posts: 15,678
And1: 10,703
Joined: May 20, 2008
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Contact:
   

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#844 » by Calvin Klein » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:29 pm

I wouldn't trade Fields or Chandler if I was the Knicks. Gallo yes. But not the others. I would worry about getting a solid Center instead.
User avatar
cb1115
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,014
And1: 405
Joined: Mar 04, 2010
 

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#845 » by cb1115 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:29 pm

Melo update: Underground talks could lead to deal


http://ken-berger.blogs.cbssports.com/mcc/blogs/entry/11838893/26994199
User avatar
corona
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,940
And1: 234
Joined: Apr 29, 2006

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#846 » by corona » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:32 pm

Blackmun wrote:It seems like you guys all forget that Melo has the power of "NO!"

If "they" choose the Knicks over the Nets, it is because Melo forces them to. Everyone, including Donnie Walsh and every single Knicks fan knows that the package Nets are trying to put together blows any offer the Knicks can make out of the water. And Denver knows this too.

Trust me, if Melo ends up in New York, that is simply because he says that is his only option, not because the Nuggets would rather have what the Knicks are offering.

the issue here is that by all accounts, stan kroenke won't let his teamS get pissed on by some agent and his player that are under contract. rose and melo could definitely try to hold the nuggets hostage and say 'new york or we'll walk'....but i really doubt kroenke would cave, especially when he knows melo has financial incentive to get that extension. if it came to that, he'd probably say "up yours CAA.....the nuggets, avalanche, rapids, rams and arsenal won't be looking to sign any of your clients in the future...since we know we're gonna get ****ed on by you." how's that gonna look on their resume for luring athlete clients?

Blackmun wrote:That being said, let's just wait and see. I was watching NBA TV last night, and this fat dude from New Jersey (NBA.com writer) sitting in his bedroom talked about how "the deal is taking a long time because it is so complicated". The deal is so un-complicated that even 15 year old RealGM posters managed to figure out how to do it in 10 minutes using ESPN's trade checker. Trying to say this is taking a lot of time because it's difficult to figure out salaries is f'ing (Please Use More Appropriate Word), unless NBA teams have never heard of Microsoft Excel.

i doubt its just a numbers issue. there's probably sticking points over what draft picks are involved, can the nets take on more salary, can denver find someone to take harrington, who's giving/receiving how much cash. and once the respective gms figure out if the others will/won't budge...then it'll get done or be reported as having fell apart. doesn't look like we've reached that point.
pass first
Head Coach
Posts: 7,346
And1: 765
Joined: Jan 08, 2010
Location: Kingdom of Heaven
 

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#847 » by pass first » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:52 pm

Blackmun wrote:But you gotta keep in mind, when media keeps talking about how someone will "make $20million less!!!!111oneone!" they are actually calculating the "extra" year in an extension and comparing it to a $0 year if he doesn't extend. The idea that a player will not get a new extension at a later point and make up that money seems to not occur to anyone.

No, every mention I've seen is of a 3 year extension, not 6.
User avatar
corona
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,940
And1: 234
Joined: Apr 29, 2006

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#848 » by corona » Tue Jan 11, 2011 3:57 pm

bruddahmanmatt wrote:The previous four-team trade was already debunked as a pure smokescreen when Denver backed out "because they didn't want to take on Kirilenko's contract"...AFTER THEY WERE THE ONES WHO PROPOSED TAKING ON KIRILENKO IN THE FIRST PLACE. Come on man. The Nuggets FO has been doing and saying some seriously suspect things, sliding in last minute demands, changing up the terms, making threats.

by all accounts, the nuggets FO was willing to make that deal. but when they took it to the owner....he said 'screw that, i'm not adding salary this season and paying a massive luxury tax bill to make our team worse'....so taking kirilenko and his 18 million was no longer an option, so they had to reconstruct the deal to try to get more savings. which is why you see billups and more players involved. since raising the cumulative moving salaries allows the nets to take on significantly more salary, which allows the nuggets to lose significantly more, which allows them the chance to get good players/picks while also getting under the luxury tax this season.

Why even drag the Knicks into the conversation when from all outward appearances it looks like New York has taken on an "it's on you Denver" approach? Doesn't make sense. New York is Melo's preferred destination anyway. If Denver was serious about doing a deal with the Knicks it would have been done already.

its some of the leverage they have against the nets (along with the fact that the nuggets have the guy the nets covet and are willing to give up half their roster for). and its great leverage, since the nets know melo would choose the knicks over them. so the nuggets, right or wrong, used it to try to shut all the leaks up.

They'd be compensated for a guy who's obviously on his way out and that would be that. Instead they're intent on dragging this whole thing out for whatever reason. The closer they get to the deadline, the more they risk potential suitors saying "F it" and shutting down talks leaving the Nuggets with nothing but a fat trade exception for Anthony come next summer.

we've been through this before in a number of threads.
nets aren't gonna pack their bags and leave the table because negotiations are too hard. how long do you think prokhorov would employ someone who gave up when the going got a little too tough? seriously. 'mr. prokhorov....we can't get these diamonds out of your mine since we have to dig through 4 feet of quartz to get to them. we're just gonna give up and let the diamonds stay where they are' that nets offer is on the table until the trade deadline, and the nuggets know it.

It simply does not add up. Trades are either happening, not happening or progressing towards one of the above. This much back-and-forth just stinks of BS posturing, and given that Denver hasn't been shy about conjuring up a BS trade in the past, why should we at all be surprised at them attempting to do the same again?

this is progressing towards happening. nuggets are just trying to squeeze $ savings into the deal, which has been one of their goals all along.

As far as Rose is concerned, for him it's all about his bottom line. He stands to lose a lot of money if Melo elects to roll the dice on free agency next summer. He wants Melo to take up an extension under the current CBA so he can get his cut. Why else would he be pushing for of all people, Richard Hamilton whom he also represents? Leon Rose probably no longer sees Melo in New York as a guaranteed thing anymore and so he's attempting to push Carmelo to take "the next best thing" in New Jersey (soon to be Brooklyn) with the promise that he'll get another one of the players he represents in CP3 there come Summer 2012.

agreed. which is why the nets are a great option for denver and most likely at some point in the next week or 6 weeks we'll see a trade come to fruition.

Never have I seen talks between two teams go through so many different variations (straight up deal, Utah and Charlotte, now Detroit) with absolutely nothing to show for it.

well...its very possible and probable that they happen like this all the time. the difference is that for most of the nba's history there wasn't the internet, twitter, 1000's of sportswriters & bloggers looking to get the scoop, incarcerated bob making stuff up and being right 5% of the time but people still believing every word, and a bunch of agents/fo employees with big mouths and blackberries. so all the posturing and threats and making last minute changes weren't seen by the public. the trade was what it was in the paper the morning after it was agreed upon, and it looked like it was put together in 2 hours the night before.

and fwiw, i thought the whole kobe thing was just as ridiculous as this. he was going to chicago, but wanted to play with deng, but the lakers didn't want so and so, and kobe was on youtube talking crap about bynum, and there was a whole sidetrack about him getting together to play with kg, and kobe wanted to play in msg, but he wanted talent there with him, and half the front office wanted to trade him and the other half didn't, and the bulls were thinking about just trading deng for pau gasol and trying to compete that way instead. it was a circus. and there wasn't even stein/broussard/woj giving twitter updates every 18 minutes back then.
User avatar
cb1115
Lead Assistant
Posts: 5,014
And1: 405
Joined: Mar 04, 2010
 

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#849 » by cb1115 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:04 pm

Sure has gotten quiet today. I bet a deal could happen any minute now.
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#850 » by Jordan45822 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:06 pm

cb1115 wrote:Sure has gotten quiet today. I bet a deal could happen any minute now.


Still early in the morning
User avatar
Invictus
Starter
Posts: 2,263
And1: 45
Joined: Jun 24, 2005
Location: NYC
   

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#851 » by Invictus » Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:40 pm

corona wrote:the issue here is that by all accounts, stan kroenke won't let his teamS get pissed on by some agent and his player that are under contract. rose and melo could definitely try to hold the nuggets hostage and say 'new york or we'll walk'....but i really doubt kroenke would cave, especially when he knows melo has financial incentive to get that extension. if it came to that, he'd probably say "up yours CAA.....the nuggets, avalanche, rapids, rams and arsenal won't be looking to sign any of your clients in the future...since we know we're gonna get ****ed on by you." how's that gonna look on their resume for luring athlete clients?


I really don't see that having any factor whatsoever. Kroenke can close his teams from entertaining CAA clients, but now you've expanded the sample to not only the other 29 NBA teams, but also the 29 other NHL teams, the 31 other NFL teams, the rest of the pro soccer league, etc. etc. etc. No shortage of business partners whatsoever. And I seriously doubt that any reps of CAA care at all about what one sports owner thinks of them, considering CAA's clientele list speaks for itself (NBA alone LeBron James, Chris Paul, Melo) in their sports business. Expand that to the actual core of CAA, which is the showbiz and entertainment industry, where they represent clients like Oprah and Steven Spielberg, and all those Colorado teams telling CAA "no, we're not signing your clients" is hardly a drop in the bucket of water. Plenty of other suitors, and plenty of other business being generated from other sources.

I mean, if at the end of the month carmelo ends up on the lakers, I'm sure no one in CAA would care that they've engendered animosity from the nuggets. Agencies are loyal to their clients, not the teams their client plays for.
User avatar
klemen4
Head Coach
Posts: 7,327
And1: 1,927
Joined: Feb 27, 2005

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#852 » by klemen4 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:42 pm

This is the only NY trade i was able to make to be at least competitive to NJN deal:

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachi ... Id=5rpmet6

in a deal also:
- 2 picks go to DEN, one UTA pick via MIN
- 3 mil go from NY to MIN

SAVINGS:
-14, 2 mil in trade, 14, 2 in luxury tax, around 5 mil on Curry(50% payed) and Azubuike(80% insurance covered). That is 32+ mil compared to 24 mil in NJN3 team trade.
PLAYERS:
-Gallinari, Fields, Walker Vs. Favors, Harris, Morrow
PICKS:
-UTA 2011, NY 2013 Vs. NJN 2011 lottery?, GSW 2012 lottery

It is close, but still NJN package better.
“The only important statistic is the final score.” — Bill Russell
ArmantiEdwards
Banned User
Posts: 24
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 09, 2011

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#853 » by ArmantiEdwards » Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:45 pm

the media should be ashamed of themselves. this twitter thing is ruining journalism.
User avatar
Jordan45822
RealGM
Posts: 13,564
And1: 1,891
Joined: Jun 18, 2007

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#854 » by Jordan45822 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:49 pm

ArmantiEdwards wrote:the media should be ashamed of themselves. this twitter thing is ruining journalism.


press are allowed to do whatever they want
ArmantiEdwards
Banned User
Posts: 24
And1: 0
Joined: Jan 09, 2011

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#855 » by ArmantiEdwards » Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:51 pm

Jordan45822 wrote:
ArmantiEdwards wrote:the media should be ashamed of themselves. this twitter thing is ruining journalism.


press are allowed to do whatever they want


anyone can do whatever they want. doesnt mean it isnt pathetic
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#856 » by Jetset » Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:54 pm

klemen4 wrote:This is the only NY trade i was able to make to be at least competitive to NJN deal:

http://games.espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachi ... Id=5rpmet6

in a deal also:
- 2 picks go to DEN, one UTA pick via MIN
- 3 mil go from NY to MIN

SAVINGS:
-14, 2 mil in trade, 14, 2 in luxury tax, around 5 mil on Curry(50% payed) and Azubuike(80% insurance covered). That is 32+ mil compared to 24 mil in NJN3 team trade.
PLAYERS:
-Gallinari, Fields, Walker Vs. Favors, Harris, Morrow
PICKS:
-UTA 2011, NY 2013 Vs. NJN 2011 lottery?, GSW 2012 lottery

It is close, but still NJN package better.

If any deal to NY is to be done Wilson Chandler has to be in it. And I think what Denver is trying to do is get a trading chip that can land them a future star like a Nicolas Batum. Can't really see Fields or Gallinari getting them that.
User avatar
klemen4
Head Coach
Posts: 7,327
And1: 1,927
Joined: Feb 27, 2005

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#857 » by klemen4 » Tue Jan 11, 2011 4:58 pm

Favors, Morrow, Harris(can net another young player), 2 picks is GREAT trade for Denver. Plus lets not forget 12 mil savings in salaries and 12 mil savings in luxury tax.

If they will be able to also nget rid of Harrington this will be a robbery :roll:
“The only important statistic is the final score.” — Bill Russell
User avatar
corona
Retired Mod
Retired Mod
Posts: 15,940
And1: 234
Joined: Apr 29, 2006

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#858 » by corona » Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:01 pm

Invictus wrote:I really don't see that having any factor whatsoever. ...
Agencies are loyal to their clients, not the teams their client plays for.

i understand they're a big agency with a lot of power, but it doesn't do them a lot of good to strongarm a billionaire that controls 5 major teams, particularly when they'd stand to lose millions of dollars for their agency and their client if he called their bluff. plus, not all 30 teams from each league have cap space every summer to sign CAA clients, and not every CAA client is lebron/cp3 with the opportunity to go anywhere for any price when they're a FA.
Jetset
RealGM
Posts: 18,273
And1: 162
Joined: Dec 23, 2010

Re: Nets Trying To Get Billups And RIP Along With Anthony 

Post#860 » by Jetset » Tue Jan 11, 2011 5:06 pm

klemen4 wrote:Favors, Morrow, Harris(can net another young player), 2 picks is GREAT trade for Denver. Plus lets not forget 12 mil savings in salaries and 12 mil savings in luxury tax.

If they will be able to also nget rid of Harrington this will be a robbery :roll:

Which is why I agree the NJN deal is the best. Denver would try and flip Harris for Batum idk if that'll work but I guess they know what they're doing. Denver is starting to ask for too much now, I'm sure the talks are getting tiresome for Nets FO, with them knowing that Denver is trying to rape them for cap relief and picks. Denver should count their losses and just agree to the deal.

Return to The General Board