MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] - voting reopened

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

Who is your pick for the 2019-20 MVP?

Antetokounmpo
253
51%
James
53
11%
Walker
4
1%
Doncic
117
24%
Harden
27
5%
Siakam
12
2%
Jokic
4
1%
Leonard
5
1%
Davis
17
3%
Towns
5
1%
 
Total votes: 497

User avatar
yoyoboy
RealGM
Posts: 15,866
And1: 19,077
Joined: Jan 29, 2015
     

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#861 » by yoyoboy » Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:15 pm

HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
Colbinii wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
What the hell have clippers done without Kawhi besides beat Hawks?

Lets see the games without Kawhi since you brought it up

- allowed 119 points to the 26th ranked offense grizzles and were losing under 5 mins left in the 4th quarter

- won by 2 points vs a -0.76 thunder team

- allowed 132 points and found a way to lose to a -2.02 SRS and 28th ranked defensive team

- lost to Utah

- lost to bucks

Geez what a juggernaut without Leonard. I guess you watched that hawks game over and over and that's what you are forming your opinion on? Cut the crap, I wasn't born yesterday pal. 5x better what a joke. AD is the best big man in the league right now. Clippers are better because Kawhi is better than LeBron, remember I told you that come playoff time.

The Clippers last year were a 1.5 SRS team and then added Paul George. The Lakers were a 25-30 win team without James, added Davis while losing Ingram/Ball/Hart.

Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM mobile app


LeBron coasted last year and is playing better this year plus added a player better than he is.

Clippers have underwhelmed while Kawhi is out but still look at the SRS increase he has still given them from last season.

Cool, Toronto is playing even better than last year with Kawhi gone. And that’s despite Lowry and Ibaka missing half the season. Looks like his cast was pretty damn good last year after all.
User avatar
Dupp
RealGM
Posts: 112,394
And1: 67,144
Joined: Aug 16, 2009
Location: Lifelong Nuggets Fan
 

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#862 » by Dupp » Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:23 pm

Yeah everything pointing to kawhi being carried and lebron being by far the best player on his team. Short lived time on the throne for sore thigh kawhi.
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,015
And1: 31,126
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#863 » by mademan » Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:29 pm

yoyoboy wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
Colbinii wrote:The Clippers last year were a 1.5 SRS team and then added Paul George. The Lakers were a 25-30 win team without James, added Davis while losing Ingram/Ball/Hart.

Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM mobile app


LeBron coasted last year and is playing better this year plus added a player better than he is.

Clippers have underwhelmed while Kawhi is out but still look at the SRS increase he has still given them from last season.

Cool, Toronto is playing even better than last year with Kawhi gone. And that’s despite Lowry and Ibaka missing half the season. Looks like his cast was pretty damn good last year after all.


Clippers havent underwhelmed without Kawhi. Theyve underwhelmed without Kawhi and PG, but im not sure how you call a teams play without their 2 best players underwhelming.
HBK_Kliq_33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,562
And1: 1,845
Joined: Jul 05, 2018

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#864 » by HBK_Kliq_33 » Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:46 pm

clyde21 wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
lol, kinda hard to win against Utah and Milly with 65% of your cap is not playing

Paul Geroge right now has a better BPM, TS%, PER and WS/48 than Leonard this year...he's been the clippers' best player, not Kawhi.


Kawhi has been overall more impactful player on both ends, that's why he beats teams like Lakers and raptors. While George loses to pelicans and barely beats Grizzles.

The way the team plays with just Leonard and no George > The way the team plays with just George and no Leonard

Come up with better arguments or i'm a just look at you like how M Harrell looks at the refs after he thinks he's going to get fouled and say "come on now" hahahha. That's all i have to say on the subject, you got me banned from PC board so I don't want to get into it with ya lol


come up with a better argument than George being better than Leonard across the board in impact stats? ok lol


Manu was also better than Duncan at TS, BPM, VORP in 2005. Its a long season man.
HBK_Kliq_33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,562
And1: 1,845
Joined: Jul 05, 2018

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#865 » by HBK_Kliq_33 » Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:48 pm

yoyoboy wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
Colbinii wrote:The Clippers last year were a 1.5 SRS team and then added Paul George. The Lakers were a 25-30 win team without James, added Davis while losing Ingram/Ball/Hart.

Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM mobile app


LeBron coasted last year and is playing better this year plus added a player better than he is.

Clippers have underwhelmed while Kawhi is out but still look at the SRS increase he has still given them from last season.

Cool, Toronto is playing even better than last year with Kawhi gone. And that’s despite Lowry and Ibaka missing half the season. Looks like his cast was pretty damn good last year after all.


Well Siakam has improved. I know one thing, in the 2019 playoff Siakam was scared **** in game 7 2nd round and the bucks series. Now that he has improved from last year, raptors have also improved. Regular season team only but in playoffs they are well known established chokers.
HBK_Kliq_33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,562
And1: 1,845
Joined: Jul 05, 2018

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#866 » by HBK_Kliq_33 » Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:49 pm

mademan wrote:
yoyoboy wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
LeBron coasted last year and is playing better this year plus added a player better than he is.

Clippers have underwhelmed while Kawhi is out but still look at the SRS increase he has still given them from last season.

Cool, Toronto is playing even better than last year with Kawhi gone. And that’s despite Lowry and Ibaka missing half the season. Looks like his cast was pretty damn good last year after all.


Clippers havent underwhelmed without Kawhi. Theyve underwhelmed without Kawhi and PG, but im not sure how you call a teams play without their 2 best players underwhelming.


Don't go around saying they are 5x better than everybody else than, like Colb did.
User avatar
yoyoboy
RealGM
Posts: 15,866
And1: 19,077
Joined: Jan 29, 2015
     

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#867 » by yoyoboy » Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:50 pm

HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
yoyoboy wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
LeBron coasted last year and is playing better this year plus added a player better than he is.

Clippers have underwhelmed while Kawhi is out but still look at the SRS increase he has still given them from last season.

Cool, Toronto is playing even better than last year with Kawhi gone. And that’s despite Lowry and Ibaka missing half the season. Looks like his cast was pretty damn good last year after all.


Well Siakam has improved. I know one thing, in the 2019 playoff Siakam was scared **** in game 7 2nd round and the bucks series. Now that he has improved from last year, raptors have also improved. Regular season team only but in playoffs they are well known established chokers.

Kawhi must have been holding him back. Makes sense given his ISO tendencies.
mademan
RealGM
Posts: 32,015
And1: 31,126
Joined: Feb 18, 2010

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#868 » by mademan » Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:53 pm

HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
mademan wrote:
yoyoboy wrote:Cool, Toronto is playing even better than last year with Kawhi gone. And that’s despite Lowry and Ibaka missing half the season. Looks like his cast was pretty damn good last year after all.


Clippers havent underwhelmed without Kawhi. Theyve underwhelmed without Kawhi and PG, but im not sure how you call a teams play without their 2 best players underwhelming.


Don't go around saying they are 5x better than everybody else than, like Colb did.


Theyve got borderline all-stars coming in off the bench. Their not 5X better than everyone else but they have by far the most talent in the league after their best player
User avatar
LeoBrooklyn
Sophomore
Posts: 138
And1: 206
Joined: Jul 20, 2016
     

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#869 » by LeoBrooklyn » Thu Nov 28, 2019 9:57 pm

Playing in the east can only be used to diminish LeBron I guess. And for people using the curry/durant cancel each other out narrative mind you that team had 2 other all star caliber players.
User avatar
clyde21
RealGM
Posts: 64,085
And1: 70,251
Joined: Aug 20, 2014
     

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#870 » by clyde21 » Thu Nov 28, 2019 10:43 pm

HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
Kawhi has been overall more impactful player on both ends, that's why he beats teams like Lakers and raptors. While George loses to pelicans and barely beats Grizzles.

The way the team plays with just Leonard and no George > The way the team plays with just George and no Leonard

Come up with better arguments or i'm a just look at you like how M Harrell looks at the refs after he thinks he's going to get fouled and say "come on now" hahahha. That's all i have to say on the subject, you got me banned from PC board so I don't want to get into it with ya lol


come up with a better argument than George being better than Leonard across the board in impact stats? ok lol


Manu was also better than Duncan at TS, BPM, VORP in 2005. Its a long season man.


good thing that has nothing to do with the MVP discussion today
جُنْد فِلَسْطِيْن
Vsauce12
Junior
Posts: 271
And1: 432
Joined: Oct 26, 2019

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#871 » by Vsauce12 » Thu Nov 28, 2019 11:37 pm

LeoBrooklyn wrote:Playing in the east can only be used to diminish LeBron I guess. And for people using the curry/durant cancel each other out narrative mind you that team had 2 other all star caliber players.

If we want to diminish lebrons MVP conversation, we’ll mention the fact 14 of the lakers opponents literally have records below .500

Lebron isn’t winning MVP. Can’t take the lebron carrying the lakers narrative seriously when he was crashing and burning last season, now all of sudden he gets AD and they’re winning again. Can’t give lebron the credit
HBK_Kliq_33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,562
And1: 1,845
Joined: Jul 05, 2018

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#872 » by HBK_Kliq_33 » Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:33 am

yoyoboy wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
yoyoboy wrote:Cool, Toronto is playing even better than last year with Kawhi gone. And that’s despite Lowry and Ibaka missing half the season. Looks like his cast was pretty damn good last year after all.


Well Siakam has improved. I know one thing, in the 2019 playoff Siakam was scared **** in game 7 2nd round and the bucks series. Now that he has improved from last year, raptors have also improved. Regular season team only but in playoffs they are well known established chokers.

Kawhi must have been holding him back. Makes sense given his ISO tendencies.


If holding him back is giving him a championship than it is what it it is.
HBK_Kliq_33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,562
And1: 1,845
Joined: Jul 05, 2018

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#873 » by HBK_Kliq_33 » Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:38 am

mademan wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
mademan wrote:
Clippers havent underwhelmed without Kawhi. Theyve underwhelmed without Kawhi and PG, but im not sure how you call a teams play without their 2 best players underwhelming.


Don't go around saying they are 5x better than everybody else than, like Colb did.


Theyve got borderline all-stars coming in off the bench. Their not 5X better than everyone else but they have by far the most talent in the league after their best player


No one should confuse Lou Williams with an allstar, he's probably a top 50\60 player today at best. He has a 0.7 BPM and doesn't really play much defense.
HBK_Kliq_33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,562
And1: 1,845
Joined: Jul 05, 2018

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#874 » by HBK_Kliq_33 » Fri Nov 29, 2019 12:39 am

clyde21 wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
come up with a better argument than George being better than Leonard across the board in impact stats? ok lol


Manu was also better than Duncan at TS, BPM, VORP in 2005. Its a long season man.


good thing that has nothing to do with the MVP discussion today


Lebron is also 2nd in PER, TS, Win share 48 on his team but is still 2nd in votes on this poll.
User avatar
Steelo Green
RealGM
Posts: 14,612
And1: 24,859
Joined: Feb 06, 2013

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#875 » by Steelo Green » Fri Nov 29, 2019 1:14 am

HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
Manu was also better than Duncan at TS, BPM, VORP in 2005. Its a long season man.


good thing that has nothing to do with the MVP discussion today


Lebron is also 2nd in PER, TS, Win share 48 on his team but is still 2nd in votes on this poll.

Not that I am picking sides but WS/48 and PER are based on raw stats and not great indicators of on the court impact on winning.

Demar for example scores 25, but he is a perennial loser because of what he does while on the court.
User avatar
LeoBrooklyn
Sophomore
Posts: 138
And1: 206
Joined: Jul 20, 2016
     

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#876 » by LeoBrooklyn » Fri Nov 29, 2019 1:30 am

Vsauce12 wrote:
LeoBrooklyn wrote:Playing in the east can only be used to diminish LeBron I guess. And for people using the curry/durant cancel each other out narrative mind you that team had 2 other all star caliber players.

If we want to diminish lebrons MVP conversation, we’ll mention the fact 14 of the lakers opponents literally have records below .500

Lebron isn’t winning MVP. Can’t take the lebron carrying the lakers narrative seriously when he was crashing and burning last season, now all of sudden he gets AD and they’re winning again. Can’t give lebron the credit


LeBron has a serious injury once in his career and misses the playoffs with a team filled young players who were also injured while a year prior he carried a lottery team to the finals and now all of a sudden the idea he cant carry a team is implausible?

I am not saying LeBron is the MVP right now I will give it to Giannis but this Idea that he is leaps ahead is wrong. I agree that the Lakers schedule has been light but they have taken care of business nonetheless. If the Lakers get the best record in the league/west and LeBron keeps up this production he should be MVP.
HBK_Kliq_33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,562
And1: 1,845
Joined: Jul 05, 2018

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#877 » by HBK_Kliq_33 » Fri Nov 29, 2019 1:33 am

Steelo Green wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
clyde21 wrote:
good thing that has nothing to do with the MVP discussion today


Lebron is also 2nd in PER, TS, Win share 48 on his team but is still 2nd in votes on this poll.

Not that I am picking sides but WS/48 and PER are based on raw stats and not great indicators of on the court impact on winning.

Demar for example scores 25, but he is a perennial loser because of what he does while on the court.


I agree, that seems more like a team stat.
User avatar
Steelo Green
RealGM
Posts: 14,612
And1: 24,859
Joined: Feb 06, 2013

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#878 » by Steelo Green » Fri Nov 29, 2019 2:01 am

HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
Steelo Green wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
Lebron is also 2nd in PER, TS, Win share 48 on his team but is still 2nd in votes on this poll.

Not that I am picking sides but WS/48 and PER are based on raw stats and not great indicators of on the court impact on winning.

Demar for example scores 25, but he is a perennial loser because of what he does while on the court.


I agree, that seems more like a team stat.

Yeah... I am saying points is what PER and WS/48 is based on, points, rebounds, asststs, steals, that is not necessarilty an indication of on the court impact to winning. Net rating on NBA's website is a lot better for that, impact stats, PIE. Not one but an amalgamation of them all should be used to create a picture. The highest adjusted for minutes and usage is Giannis, followed by Pascal, PG, Lebron, Embiid, Jimmy, Kawhi, Jokic, Doncic.
HBK_Kliq_33
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,562
And1: 1,845
Joined: Jul 05, 2018

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#879 » by HBK_Kliq_33 » Fri Nov 29, 2019 2:11 am

Steelo Green wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
Steelo Green wrote:Not that I am picking sides but WS/48 and PER are based on raw stats and not great indicators of on the court impact on winning.

Demar for example scores 25, but he is a perennial loser because of what he does while on the court.


I agree, that seems more like a team stat.

Yeah... I am saying points is what PER and WS/48 is based on, points, rebounds, asststs, steals, that is not necessarilty an indication of on the court impact to winning. Net rating on NBA's website is a lot better for that, impact stats, PIE. Not one but an amalgamation of them all should be used to create a picture. The highest adjusted for minutes and usage is Giannis, followed by Pascal, PG, Lebron, Embiid, Jimmy, Kawhi, Jokic, Doncic.


PIE seems like an underrated stat.

Top 5: Giannis, Luka, Embiid, Kawhi, Lebron.

That's probably the 5 best players in the NBA right now too.
Colbinii
RealGM
Posts: 34,243
And1: 21,858
Joined: Feb 13, 2013

Re: MVP Discussion [19/20] [part I] 

Post#880 » by Colbinii » Fri Nov 29, 2019 4:17 am

HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
Steelo Green wrote:
HBK_Kliq_33 wrote:
I agree, that seems more like a team stat.

Yeah... I am saying points is what PER and WS/48 is based on, points, rebounds, asststs, steals, that is not necessarilty an indication of on the court impact to winning. Net rating on NBA's website is a lot better for that, impact stats, PIE. Not one but an amalgamation of them all should be used to create a picture. The highest adjusted for minutes and usage is Giannis, followed by Pascal, PG, Lebron, Embiid, Jimmy, Kawhi, Jokic, Doncic.


PIE seems like an underrated stat.

Top 5: Giannis, Luka, Embiid, Kawhi, Lebron.

That's probably the 5 best players in the NBA right now too.

Brah 2 weeks ago you were raging about BPM being the best statistic because Kawhi was towards the top in it. You were also raging about his PER when it was 35.

Now that those numbers have come down you jump to another statistic. It's sad. But I do truly hope that you coming on these forums is benefiting your life because the lengths you go through to prop up Kawhi is what I can only assume an escape mechanic for something troubling in life.

I hope you find what you are looking for on these forums because basketball obviously isn't it.

Sent from my SM-G960U using RealGM mobile app

Return to The General Board