3toheadmelo wrote:Bob8 wrote:3toheadmelo wrote:Melo was pretty much the whole offense on those Nuggets teams. So yeah the comparison seems pretty good to me.
We both know damn well no one expected Boston to be in the finals after being 18-21. That's why it's so impressive what he has just accomplished. Getting past KD/Kyrie, Giannis, Butler is not an easy task at all. You can point at the team mates Luka has, but they were still able to win playoff games WITHOUT him which speaks volumes about how good they were. So you're overexaggerating how bad they were if they were still able to win games without Luka in the playoffs.
And yeah even if Tatum loses to a loaded Warriors team he will still be viewed as the superior player to me. He's had a historic playoff run. Luka will need to do something similar in my eyes to top him.
Nets were a mess all year long and that can't be undone in playoffs. Bucks and Heat had big problems with injuries. But I agree Celtics had great playoffs.
I'm not exaggerating anything. Can you honestly say that Tatum hasn't better roster?
It's ok for Tatum to lose against loaded Warriors but not for Luka? Why?
Historic playoffs run normally ends with a title.
Nets still had KD and Kyrie who were an injury away from beating Milwaukee last year. Boston had a bit of injuries as well including Tatum so not really a good excuse there.
Tatum took down HOFers in this playoff run to get to the finals. That's why it's historic.
If Boston wins the chip, do you still think Luka is better?
I didn't know that Tatum did it by himself. I believe you said D was crucial and Boston has multiple good defenders, including DPOY. Nothing historic, if they lose in Finals.
I believe Luka is better player, but if Boston wins, Tatum will be more successful player. Luka is 1 year younger, so he will have time to catch him.















