are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?!

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285

cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,085
And1: 14,457
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#881 » by cgf » Fri Apr 4, 2025 1:59 am

JujitsuFlip wrote:
cgf wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:Hard to say, since he's off the steroids now lol

Idk if the Heat even really play Burks so you all can probably acquire him again at this deadline.


lol that probably doesn't help.

We could do worse, but with Deuce, Payne, Shamet, & Kolek, guard creation isn't as big of a need for our bench as another wing defender who can hit some shots...which is why I keep brining up Okeke, unless someone better gets bought out.

https://www.fearthesword.com/2025/4/3/24400807/cleveland-cavaliers-sign-chuma-okeke-to-finalize-roster

Sorry cgf... Cavs signed your guy!


After that first half last night, makes sense that y'all would be feeling a little nervous about our depth starting to come together :wink:

Good for Chuma, he seems to have had a strong year in the GL and could help your wing depth by giving you another capable defender if Wade pulls a Mitch. But you know Thibs, with kids like McCullar, Watson and Beauchamp on the team, there just wasn't any PT for an old guy like Okeke.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 14,781
And1: 9,153
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#882 » by JujitsuFlip » Fri Apr 4, 2025 2:10 am

cgf wrote:
JujitsuFlip wrote:
cgf wrote:
lol that probably doesn't help.

We could do worse, but with Deuce, Payne, Shamet, & Kolek, guard creation isn't as big of a need for our bench as another wing defender who can hit some shots...which is why I keep brining up Okeke, unless someone better gets bought out.

https://www.fearthesword.com/2025/4/3/24400807/cleveland-cavaliers-sign-chuma-okeke-to-finalize-roster

Sorry cgf... Cavs signed your guy!


After that first half last night, makes sense that y'all would be feeling a little nervous about our depth starting to come together :wink:

Good for Chuma, he seems to have had a strong year in the GL and could help your wing depth by giving you another capable defender if Wade pulls a Mitch. But you know Thibs, with kids like McCullar, Watson and Beauchamp on the team, there just wasn't any PT for an old guy like Okeke.
I think it was the dinosaur PJ Tucker that pushed him out lol

I am sure neither Knicks or Cavs will have anything to play for by that 4th regular season matchup so he should get plenty of burn down the stretch.
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,085
And1: 14,457
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#883 » by cgf » Fri Apr 4, 2025 2:15 am

JujitsuFlip wrote:
cgf wrote:


After that first half last night, makes sense that y'all would be feeling a little nervous about our depth starting to come together :wink:

Good for Chuma, he seems to have had a strong year in the GL and could help your wing depth by giving you another capable defender if Wade pulls a Mitch. But you know Thibs, with kids like McCullar, Watson and Beauchamp on the team, there just wasn't any PT for an old guy like Okeke.
I think it was the dinosaur PJ Tucker that pushed him out lol

I am sure neither Knicks or Cavs will have anything to play for by that 4th regular season matchup so he should get plenty of burn down the stretch.


PJ has 2 minutes for us total lol. He's a coach that's allowed to scrap with opponents if we get the Pistons and they start any stupid s***
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
GreatWhiteStiff
RealGM
Posts: 15,262
And1: 12,684
Joined: Oct 17, 2011
Location: Overusing finna
 

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#884 » by GreatWhiteStiff » Fri Apr 4, 2025 2:19 am

Pharmcat wrote:
Celts17Pride wrote:Knicks are 0-2 against the Cavs and have loss by an average of 22 ppg

Knicks are 0-2 against the Celtics and have loss by an average of 25 ppg

Don’t know how anyone can take the Knicks as serious contenders at this point in the season.


they are pretenders, frauds.


Bookmarked for potential Schadenpharm.
Image

Let's playin for 9th!

"OG puts the clamps on point guards like Trae Young." -DelAbbot
User avatar
RoyceDa59
RealGM
Posts: 24,265
And1: 9,175
Joined: Aug 25, 2002
         

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#885 » by RoyceDa59 » Fri Apr 4, 2025 2:56 am

I put them in the second category. Still contenders but not elite contenders. Everything would need to go perfectly.
Go Raps!!
knicksfan974
Lead Assistant
Posts: 4,849
And1: 1,553
Joined: Mar 02, 2002
 

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#886 » by knicksfan974 » Wed Apr 9, 2025 7:07 am

Celtics-game gives me hope that if everything clicks at the right moment, the Knicks might even go all the way. In any case, they won't be a push-over in a 7-game series against anyone.
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,085
And1: 14,457
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#887 » by cgf » Wed Apr 9, 2025 8:00 pm

donkki wrote:Celtics-game gives me hope that if everything clicks at the right moment, the Knicks might even go all the way. In any case, they won't be a push-over in a 7-game series against anyone.


If our top 7 can stay healthy, we're a threat to anyone. With the D clamping down, Karl returning to his early season form, plus OG & Mikal stepping up in Brunson's absence, this group could be very tough.

Would like to see Brunson out there with Towns & Robinson at some point, but letting our two 7fters build chemistry against second units makes sense.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
LakersSoul
Head Coach
Posts: 7,100
And1: 4,968
Joined: Jul 03, 2016

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#888 » by LakersSoul » Wed Apr 9, 2025 8:08 pm

1993Playoffs wrote:They seem to be building a really really good collection of Talent



Cannot see them beating the Celtics and even the Cavs.

Not Yo Ham Lakers!

The Don and The King!
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,085
And1: 14,457
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#889 » by cgf » Thu Apr 10, 2025 1:28 pm

LakersSoul wrote:
1993Playoffs wrote:They seem to be building a really really good collection of Talent



Cannot see them beating the Celtics and even the Cavs.


We obviously wouldn’t be favorites, but after that last game I feel vindicated in saying that if our top 7 are healthy we’d have a very real shot at pulling the upset. Especially if Jalen finds his rhythm by round two.

And not facing the Cavs on the second night of a back-to-back will definitely help our chances of not gassing against them…
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
celtxman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,847
And1: 1,982
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#890 » by celtxman » Thu Apr 10, 2025 5:35 pm

cgf wrote:
LakersSoul wrote:
1993Playoffs wrote:They seem to be building a really really good collection of Talent



Cannot see them beating the Celtics and even the Cavs.


We obviously wouldn’t be favorites, but after that last game I feel vindicated in saying that if our top 7 are healthy we’d have a very real shot at pulling the upset. Especially if Jalen finds his rhythm by round two.

And not facing the Cavs on the second night of a back-to-back will definitely help our chances of not gassing against them…

After the very first game of the season when the Celtics handily beat the Knicks I wrote in this thread "nothing changed last night. The Knicks are legitimate contenders. I do agree that the off season moves have a higher ceiling but a lower floor."
Last year the Celtics beat the Knicks in 4 out of 5 games. By the time the 5th game rolled around, the Celtics had clinched the best record in the NBA. Zero to play for. But we had to endure that because the Celtics played their starters, and the Knicks now have OG, we can erase the first 4 losses and what a 64 win team did and the Knicks can "play with them."
So we come to this year. 4 games between them. The Celtics coast in the first 3. The 4th game again meaningless to the Celtics - their playoff position set in stone. Now the Celtics win - but it was in OT. So that's now like a win for the Knicks?
Sure the Knicks would feel good if their top 7 are healthy. Jaylen Brown missed the 2nd half and OT of that game and Horford missed the game entirely. Is that worth mentioning? Towns had 34 points. In his career Towns averages 7points a game lower when he faces Horford. So are we talking the Knicks healthy and the Celtics not, or both teams healthy? I think there is a tiny bit of evidence of what a healthy Jaylen Brown can do under the bright lights.
The Knicks are clearly in the group below the Cavs, OKC and the Celtics. In my definition the Knicks are capable of winning a championship. I would never take them lightly in a series. But their record against the best teams does not inspire confidence.
Brad Stevens on fans who want the Celtics to tank: "I don’t think they’ll like me all that much then."
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,085
And1: 14,457
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#891 » by cgf » Thu Apr 10, 2025 5:51 pm

celtxman wrote:
cgf wrote:
LakersSoul wrote:

Cannot see them beating the Celtics and even the Cavs.


We obviously wouldn’t be favorites, but after that last game I feel vindicated in saying that if our top 7 are healthy we’d have a very real shot at pulling the upset. Especially if Jalen finds his rhythm by round two.

And not facing the Cavs on the second night of a back-to-back will definitely help our chances of not gassing against them…

After the very first game of the season when the Celtics handily beat the Knicks I wrote in this thread "nothing changed last night. The Knicks are legitimate contenders. I do agree that the off season moves have a higher ceiling but a lower floor."
Last year the Celtics beat the Knicks in 4 out of 5 games. By the time the 5th game rolled around, the Celtics had clinched the best record in the NBA. Zero to play for. But we had to endure that because the Celtics played their starters, and the Knicks now have OG, we can erase the first 4 losses and what a 64 win team did and the Knicks can "play with them."
So we come to this year. 4 games between them. The Celtics coast in the first 3. The 4th game again meaningless to the Celtics - their playoff position set in stone. Now the Celtics win - but it was in OT. So that's now like a win for the Knicks?
Sure the Knicks would feel good if their top 7 are healthy. Jaylen Brown missed the 2nd half and OT of that game and Horford missed the game entirely. Is that worth mentioning? Towns had 34 points. In his career Towns averages 7points a game lower when he faces Horford. So are we talking the Knicks healthy and the Celtics not, or both teams healthy? I think there is a tiny bit of evidence of what a healthy Jaylen Brown can do under the bright lights.
The Knicks are clearly in the group below the Cavs, OKC and the Celtics. In my definition the Knicks are capable of winning a championship. I would never take them lightly in a series. But their record against the best teams does not inspire confidence.


People taking too much from a single game is silly no matter which side does it...we could also talk about how that game was our 3rd in 4 nights, it was Brunson's 2nd after his injury, or how Robinson's still getting his conditioning back, so neither team was at 100%. If you go through my posting history you won't see me over-reacting to last season's game either. But the "already clinched" argument rings hollow to me, both teams cared about that game...that's why you have folks in the GDT talking about the game having a playoff atmosphere.

Of course we still lost, but neither team wanted to tip their hand before a potential 2nd round matchup...thus OG not getting the tatum assignment from the start and our simplistic offensive sets...and I don't think it's unreasonable to think that barring new injuries in round 1, we should be even stronger by round two; once Brunson has had time to find his rhythm, Robinson is closer to 100%, and Thibs has had more time to experiment with Towns-Robinson lineups.

Now Horford and Brown getting fit would certainly make you stronger as well, which is why you would be deservedly favored...but if we don't get any new injuries to our top 7, I don't think it would be the forgone conclusion so many expect.

Our record against the top 3 has been a disaster, but two of our games against you were our 3rd game in 4 nights...which won't happen in the playoffs...and this was the first one Robinson played in. Similarly, 3 of our games with cleveland have been on the 2nd night of a back to back, which wouldn't be a problem if we faced them in the playoffs and hurts a team that lacks depth, like us, more...and we didn't have our defensive anchor for the first 3 games with them either.

So we may well finish the season 0-8 against you and cleveland, but if we can escape the Pistons with no new injuries, we should pose a lot more of a challenge in a potential playoff matchup with either of you...even if we'll still be underdogs.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
doogie_hauser
Head Coach
Posts: 6,053
And1: 7,209
Joined: Feb 04, 2024
         

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#892 » by doogie_hauser » Fri Apr 11, 2025 1:40 am

Now the Pistons own them

We have seen enough sample size that the Knicks just can't compete against the top teams in the league.

First round exit coming up
celtxman
Assistant Coach
Posts: 3,847
And1: 1,982
Joined: Aug 21, 2004
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#893 » by celtxman » Fri Apr 11, 2025 1:49 am

cgf wrote:
celtxman wrote:
cgf wrote:
We obviously wouldn’t be favorites, but after that last game I feel vindicated in saying that if our top 7 are healthy we’d have a very real shot at pulling the upset. Especially if Jalen finds his rhythm by round two.

And not facing the Cavs on the second night of a back-to-back will definitely help our chances of not gassing against them…

After the very first game of the season when the Celtics handily beat the Knicks I wrote in this thread "nothing changed last night. The Knicks are legitimate contenders. I do agree that the off season moves have a higher ceiling but a lower floor."
Last year the Celtics beat the Knicks in 4 out of 5 games. By the time the 5th game rolled around, the Celtics had clinched the best record in the NBA. Zero to play for. But we had to endure that because the Celtics played their starters, and the Knicks now have OG, we can erase the first 4 losses and what a 64 win team did and the Knicks can "play with them."
So we come to this year. 4 games between them. The Celtics coast in the first 3. The 4th game again meaningless to the Celtics - their playoff position set in stone. Now the Celtics win - but it was in OT. So that's now like a win for the Knicks?
Sure the Knicks would feel good if their top 7 are healthy. Jaylen Brown missed the 2nd half and OT of that game and Horford missed the game entirely. Is that worth mentioning? Towns had 34 points. In his career Towns averages 7points a game lower when he faces Horford. So are we talking the Knicks healthy and the Celtics not, or both teams healthy? I think there is a tiny bit of evidence of what a healthy Jaylen Brown can do under the bright lights.
The Knicks are clearly in the group below the Cavs, OKC and the Celtics. In my definition the Knicks are capable of winning a championship. I would never take them lightly in a series. But their record against the best teams does not inspire confidence.


People taking too much from a single game is silly no matter which side does it...we could also talk about how that game was our 3rd in 4 nights, it was Brunson's 2nd after his injury, or how Robinson's still getting his conditioning back, so neither team was at 100%. If you go through my posting history you won't see me over-reacting to last season's game either. But the "already clinched" argument rings hollow to me, both teams cared about that game...that's why you have folks in the GDT talking about the game having a playoff atmosphere.

Of course we still lost, but neither team wanted to tip their hand before a potential 2nd round matchup...thus OG not getting the tatum assignment from the start and our simplistic offensive sets...and I don't think it's unreasonable to think that barring new injuries in round 1, we should be even stronger by round two; once Brunson has had time to find his rhythm, Robinson is closer to 100%, and Thibs has had more time to experiment with Towns-Robinson lineups.

Now Horford and Brown getting fit would certainly make you stronger as well, which is why you would be deservedly favored...but if we don't get any new injuries to our top 7, I don't think it would be the forgone conclusion so many expect.

Our record against the top 3 has been a disaster, but two of our games against you were our 3rd game in 4 nights...which won't happen in the playoffs...and this was the first one Robinson played in. Similarly, 3 of our games with cleveland have been on the 2nd night of a back to back, which wouldn't be a problem if we faced them in the playoffs and hurts a team that lacks depth, like us, more...and we didn't have our defensive anchor for the first 3 games with them either.

So we may well finish the season 0-8 against you and cleveland, but if we can escape the Pistons with no new injuries, we should pose a lot more of a challenge in a potential playoff matchup with either of you...even if we'll still be underdogs.
You are a very loyal fan!
Brad Stevens on fans who want the Celtics to tank: "I don’t think they’ll like me all that much then."
JujitsuFlip
RealGM
Posts: 14,781
And1: 9,153
Joined: Sep 10, 2021

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#894 » by JujitsuFlip » Fri Apr 11, 2025 2:50 am

doogie_hauser wrote:Now the Pistons own them

We have seen enough sample size that the Knicks just can't compete against the top teams in the league.

First round exit coming up
They were without OG, Hart, and Robinson, to be fair.
User avatar
Galou
Pro Prospect
Posts: 974
And1: 747
Joined: Dec 16, 2017
Location: Brooklyn
 

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#895 » by Galou » Fri Apr 11, 2025 3:02 am

celtxman wrote:
cgf wrote:
LakersSoul wrote:

Cannot see them beating the Celtics and even the Cavs.
But their record against the best teams does not inspire confidence.

Regular season dont mean $hit
F$+*k the Nets.
ArksNetsSince99
General Manager
Posts: 7,713
And1: 6,920
Joined: Apr 10, 2021
 

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#896 » by ArksNetsSince99 » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:03 am

Galou wrote:
celtxman wrote:
cgf wrote:But their record against the best teams does not inspire confidence.

Regular season dont mean $hit


Knicks might win one game against the Pistons in the first round
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,085
And1: 14,457
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#897 » by cgf » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:54 am

ArksNetsSince99 wrote:
Galou wrote:
celtxman wrote:

Regular season dont mean $hit


Knicks might win one game against the Pistons in the first round


Wanna bet on it? If the Knicks win, I pick a sig/avi for you, and if the Pistons win you pick one for me.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,085
And1: 14,457
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#898 » by cgf » Fri Apr 11, 2025 4:57 am

celtxman wrote:
cgf wrote:
celtxman wrote:After the very first game of the season when the Celtics handily beat the Knicks I wrote in this thread "nothing changed last night. The Knicks are legitimate contenders. I do agree that the off season moves have a higher ceiling but a lower floor."
Last year the Celtics beat the Knicks in 4 out of 5 games. By the time the 5th game rolled around, the Celtics had clinched the best record in the NBA. Zero to play for. But we had to endure that because the Celtics played their starters, and the Knicks now have OG, we can erase the first 4 losses and what a 64 win team did and the Knicks can "play with them."
So we come to this year. 4 games between them. The Celtics coast in the first 3. The 4th game again meaningless to the Celtics - their playoff position set in stone. Now the Celtics win - but it was in OT. So that's now like a win for the Knicks?
Sure the Knicks would feel good if their top 7 are healthy. Jaylen Brown missed the 2nd half and OT of that game and Horford missed the game entirely. Is that worth mentioning? Towns had 34 points. In his career Towns averages 7points a game lower when he faces Horford. So are we talking the Knicks healthy and the Celtics not, or both teams healthy? I think there is a tiny bit of evidence of what a healthy Jaylen Brown can do under the bright lights.
The Knicks are clearly in the group below the Cavs, OKC and the Celtics. In my definition the Knicks are capable of winning a championship. I would never take them lightly in a series. But their record against the best teams does not inspire confidence.


People taking too much from a single game is silly no matter which side does it...we could also talk about how that game was our 3rd in 4 nights, it was Brunson's 2nd after his injury, or how Robinson's still getting his conditioning back, so neither team was at 100%. If you go through my posting history you won't see me over-reacting to last season's game either. But the "already clinched" argument rings hollow to me, both teams cared about that game...that's why you have folks in the GDT talking about the game having a playoff atmosphere.

Of course we still lost, but neither team wanted to tip their hand before a potential 2nd round matchup...thus OG not getting the tatum assignment from the start and our simplistic offensive sets...and I don't think it's unreasonable to think that barring new injuries in round 1, we should be even stronger by round two; once Brunson has had time to find his rhythm, Robinson is closer to 100%, and Thibs has had more time to experiment with Towns-Robinson lineups.

Now Horford and Brown getting fit would certainly make you stronger as well, which is why you would be deservedly favored...but if we don't get any new injuries to our top 7, I don't think it would be the forgone conclusion so many expect.

Our record against the top 3 has been a disaster, but two of our games against you were our 3rd game in 4 nights...which won't happen in the playoffs...and this was the first one Robinson played in. Similarly, 3 of our games with cleveland have been on the 2nd night of a back to back, which wouldn't be a problem if we faced them in the playoffs and hurts a team that lacks depth, like us, more...and we didn't have our defensive anchor for the first 3 games with them either.

So we may well finish the season 0-8 against you and cleveland, but if we can escape the Pistons with no new injuries, we should pose a lot more of a challenge in a potential playoff matchup with either of you...even if we'll still be underdogs.
You are a very loyal fan!


:dontknow: it’s been a fun year so far and there’s no pressure to win it all this year, tough not be enjoying life as a Knicks fan right now. This team has run through 26 of 29 teams when healthy this year and there’s cause for optimism against the 3 who have smacked us around.

Probably won’t be our year; as we need more depth and chemistry…but we’re getting healthy at the right time with a top 7 that can do work when fit & rested, and with Robinson back, we should match up a lot better with the Cavs; if you drop the ball / we sneak past you.
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
cgf
RealGM
Posts: 35,085
And1: 14,457
Joined: Jul 01, 2008
   

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#899 » by cgf » Fri Apr 11, 2025 5:01 am

doogie_hauser wrote:Now the Pistons own them

We have seen enough sample size that the Knicks just can't compete against the top teams in the league.

First round exit coming up


Same offer I made to the nets fan is available to you as well, if you really are so confident that the pistons own us ;-)
Capn'O wrote:We're the recovering meth addict older brother. And we've been clean for a few years now, thank you very much. Very uncouth to bring it up.

Brunson: So what are you paid to do?
Hart: Run around like an idiot during the game and f*** s*** up!
User avatar
Galou
Pro Prospect
Posts: 974
And1: 747
Joined: Dec 16, 2017
Location: Brooklyn
 

Re: are the Knicks LEGIT contenders?! 

Post#900 » by Galou » Fri Apr 11, 2025 8:00 pm

Spoiler:
ArksNetsSince99 wrote:
Galou wrote:
celtxman wrote:

Regular season dont mean $hit


Knicks might win one game against the Pistons in the first round

You's an unobjecrive h0€ to even believe that

And you a Nets fan.

F_ck off fool


Strike issued for personal attack. Disagree with the post but don't insult the poster. This is way over the top, obviously. -b
F$+*k the Nets.

Return to The General Board