Dubnation wrote:Tor_Raps wrote:jkvonny wrote:Maybe 2004 Pistons?
1994 Rockets?
Did you just say 1994 Rockets? Hahaha
well-done, sir!

Moderators: Clav, Domejandro, ken6199, bisme37, Dirk, KingDavid, cupcakesnake, bwgood77, zimpy27, infinite11285
Dubnation wrote:Tor_Raps wrote:jkvonny wrote:Maybe 2004 Pistons?
1994 Rockets?
Did you just say 1994 Rockets? Hahaha
Jadoogar wrote:Both teams are extremely deep. Maybe teams will start focusing on depth againdurden_tyler wrote:Lots of heroes for the Pacers in this G3 win. This is how you build a comepetitive/title contending team in the modern NBA. No elite superstar but 8-10 man deep.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my SM-S921W using RealGM mobile app
Dubnation wrote:Tor_Raps wrote:jkvonny wrote:Maybe 2004 Pistons?
1994 Rockets?
Did you just say 1994 Rockets? Hahaha
picc wrote:jehosafats wrote:Halliburton insists on jump passing like it's adult rec league ball
It has to screw them at some point.
It just has to.
jkvonny wrote:Safe to say Indy has the better coach (Carlisle).
PhilBlackson wrote:OKC seems like frontrunners if I'm being honest, they don't look good in crunch time.
Other than SGA, no one seems like they can create any offence.
picc wrote:jehosafats wrote:Halliburton insists on jump passing like it's adult rec league ball
It has to screw them at some point.
It just has to.
akula1488 wrote:this one goes to 7 games. Everyone loves a Cinderella story?